ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024
It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.
The fourth FIDE Grand Prix Series Tournament is being held in Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkaria, Russia, during 14th -29th April 2009 at the Intour Hotel "Sindica". The games start at 3 p.m. local time = 15:00h CEST. After five rounds there is a free day (on Monday, April 20) and another after round nine (on Saturday, April 25).
Round 12: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 |
||
Kamsky Gata |
½-½ |
Aronian Levon |
Leko Peter |
1-0 |
Kasimdzhanov Rustam |
Mamedyarov Shakhriyar |
½-½ |
Eljanov Pavel |
Akopian Vladimir |
½-½ |
Gelfand Boris |
Karjakin Sergey |
1-0 |
Svidler Peter |
Grischuk Alexander |
1-0 |
Bacrot Etienne |
Alekseev Evgeny |
½-½ |
Ivanchuk Vassily |
The following game notes were provided by FIDE and are translated (by Misha Savinov) from the comments of Sergey Shipov. We are grateful for permission to reproduce his commentary here. All photos by courtesy of FIDE.
There are now two leaders in Nalchik. Leko confidently defeated Kasimdzhanov and caught up with Aronian, who barely survived against the inspired Kamsky. Everything will be decided tomorrow in the individual game between the leaders. Aronian plays White.
Gata Kamsky-Levon Aronian
A classic example of the equally strong sword and shield. Kamsky attacked brilliantly,
but Aronian defended with incredible accuracy. I think Black’s opening
was far from perfect. For instance, the knight maneuver to b6 is unconvincing.
White quickly completed his development and created a strong attack in the center
by 12.f5! Levon accepted the challenge, taking everything his opponent dared
to sacrifice – a pawn first, then an exchange. Basically, after 14…Bxf5
and until the end of the game Levon was constantly parrying various threats,
making many only moves in process. White’s exchange sacrifice 16.Rxf5!
is excellent! Kamsky could create very annoying pressure by the tricky 18.d4!,
restricting Black’s knight and passing the right to move to the opponent.
In my extensive analysis I didn’t find how to equalize for Black. White
could get excellent winning chances. Levon’s smart knight maneuver allowed
him to exchange White’s powerful bishop. Later Levon made a very timely
piece sacrifice (21…0-0-0!) and managed to survive without much trouble.
In the subsequent game Black’s rook and pawns successfully held against
two minor pieces.
Peter Leko-Rustam Kasimdzhanov
Rustam was unable to hold against a better prepared and motivated opponent.
In the Petroff Defense White maintained some pressure on a half-empty board,
as he controlled a central file. Leko used his kingside pawns as a weapon, and
it seems Kasimdzhanov accelerated this by 19…Nf6. Instead of it, he could
play 19…c5 or even safer 19…c6 with the idea to meet 20.h6 by 20…b5!,
fixing the pawn structure completely. Rustam’s decision to bring the knight
to g8 (20…Kh8?!) turned fatal (once against better was 20…c6, intending
b7-b5). Peter’s powerful 22.c4! created tension in the center, and Black
was unable to bear it. Rustam eventually got rid of the h6-pawn, but paid dearly
for it. The last mistake (27…f5?) reduced Black’s pain.
Rustam Kasimdzhanov and Peter Leko in the press conference after the game
Effortless: Peter Leko joins Lev Aronian in the lead
Down in the dumps: Rustam Kasimdzhanov joins Ivanchuk at the tail end
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov-Pavel Eljanov
Black played very creatively in the opening (substituting the usual 6…0-0
by 6…dxc4), but failed to equalize. White got the space advantage, while
Black had a very weak pawn on c6. Shakhriyar brilliantly sacrificed a pawn by
14.e6! and created strong pressure. Pavel sacrificed his pawn in response –
17…c5. I think White should have taken it in a different way: 18.Rfe1!?
c4 19.Bg3! Re8 20.Qxd5 – in this case he keeps many pieces on the board
and maintains a significant advantage in the center. In the resulting ending
Black quickly brought the king towards the center (22…Kg8!) and secured
certain compensation for his material loss. Both grandmasters played really
well in the subsequent complications. The assessment “White is slightly
better” remained unchanged until the draw was agreed.
Sergey Karjakin-Peter Svidler
Every defeat comes unexpected. This game started well for Peter; White’s
pressure in the Zaitsev wasn’t particularly dangerous. The players relentlessly
simplified the position, but Black took too long before making the freeing d6-d5
break. He should have played it on the 27th move, and then the game would most
likely be drawn, while after 27…Rde7?! 28.Qb2! White created dangerous
pressure on the a1-h8 diagonal. In order to defend it Black had to fianchetto
his knight, which gave White a few tempi to develop the initiative and advance
his passed pawn. In the time trouble Svidler committed a couple of errors (instead
of 35…Qc7 more accurate is 35…Qc5, and instead of 39…Rc8 much
better is 39…Re7!), and Karjakin managed to trade the b7-bishop, which
was the only obstacle for his passed pawn. Black’s position got worse,
and his defeat did not surprise anybody.
Peter Svidler analyses after the lost game
Sergey Karjakin simply enjoys sweet victory
Vladimir Akopian-Boris Gelfand
This masterpiece was tailored with the best tactical fibers, and can be added
to the Petroff textbooks intact. White made an interesting new move in an old
but still popular line –12.Qa4+!?, but it seems it was anticipated by
Boris. If I am wrong, I beg the pardon and express my utmost admiration to both
players. Every move they played was perfect, and it resulted in an almost equal
position, in which Black’s strong knight on d5 compensated for White’s
long-range bishop.
Alexander Grischuk-Etienne Bacrot
Sasha reminds me a fearless boxer with strong neck – his opponents hit
him a lot, but he always hits back, and never falls. As far as I see, the most
difficult thing in this game for Grischuk was avoiding the move repetition in
the time trouble. This time he succeeded, repeating all possible positions just
twice. Bacrot was up to the task for a long time, but made a mistake in the
ending. The automatic 45…Rxb4? was losing, while 45…c3! would make
a draw, as in this case White could not take the d6-pawn and keep his e4-pawn
at the same time. After White traded an exchange for two pawns (by 48.Kxd3!),
Black was unable to defend against the connected passed pawns, and was one or
two tempi short for creating adequate counterplay.
The player with the toughest neck: Alexander Grischuk
Mistake in the ending: French GM Etienne Bacrot
Evgeny Alekseev-Vassily Ivanchuk
This game was quite interesting (the Sicilian Defense led to a sharp fight in
the center), but the crowd in the internet gone wild in the queen ending. Why
on earth Alekseev did not transpose to a winning pawn ending by 33.Qd3+? It
turned out that the former Russian champion knows pawn endgames better than
computer-armed internet experts. This ‘won’ pawn ending led to a
drawn queen ending... Here are some exemplary lines: 33.Qd3+ Qxd3 34.cxd3 Kg6
35.Kc2 Kf6 36.Kb3 Ke6 37.Ka4 (37.Kc4 Kd6!) 37…Kd5 38.Kxa5 Kd4 39.a4 Kxd3
40.Kb5 f5 41.a5 (41.gxf5 g4!) 41...e4 42.fxe4 fxe4 43.a6 e3 44.a7 e2 45.a8Q
e1Q (Black makes it right on time!) 46.Qd5+ Ke2 47.Qxg5 Qb1+ 48.Kc5 Kf3 49.Qxg7
Qc2+ 50.Kd5 Qe4+ 51.Kd6 Qxg4 52.Qxg4+ Kxg4 – and this pawn ending is drawn.
Therefore the result of the game is logical and fair.
FIDE Grand Prix Nalchik 2009 – Schedule and results
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
LinksThe games are bing being broadcast live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download the free PGN reader ChessBase Light, which gives you immediate access. You can also use the program to read, replay and analyse the PGN games. |