Nagesh Havanur on ChessBase Magazine #164

by ChessBase
3/4/2015 – The electronic magazine that appears on DVD or per download every two months, is a vital weapon in the arsenal of tournament players. The latest issue includes 1479 top international games, 115 with expert annotations, and twelve opening surveys ranging from Vienna Game to Reti Opening. Professor Nagesh Havanur at ChessWorld recommends it warmly.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

ChessBase Magazine #164

Review by Prof Nagesh Havanur

It’s with a sense of déjà vu that one looks at Carlsen on the cover of this magazine. He did it again, winning the world championship match and retaining the title. A precious part of this issue is devoted to the games of The Match. After studying it all it’s important to carry forward the analysis and find sign posts for your own play.

From this point of view I found the analysis of game ten by Michal Krasenkow interesting. There is one point that he would not have known. During the game it was not clear why Anand did not play the critical sequence 12.Rd1 Bf5 13.d6. The answer to that question was to come from Anand himself early this year.

It's an intriguing game in which truth proved elusive for both players and commentators. In retrospect I am rather sceptical about the future of Prins Variation (7…Na6). The knight remains offside for a long time. Perhaps it should be brought into play sooner with…Nb4.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Qb3 dxc4 6.Qxc4 0-0 7.e4 Na6 The Prins Variation 8.Be2 c5 9.d5 e6 10.0-0 exd5 11.exd5 Re8 11...Bf5 is the main line. 11...Nb4!? 12.Rd1 b6 preparing...Ba6 has also been tried by GMs Sutovsky and Svidler. 12.Bg5!? This move was first played by Wojtaszek, Anand's second in this Match. It forces a weakening of Black's kingside and its purpose is revealed on the 16th move. Anand avoided 12.Rd1 Bf5 13.d6! on account of h6 Not 13...Ne4? 14.d7 Re7 15.Nxe4 Rxe4 16.Bg5!± 14.Be3 14.Bf4 Nd7 and the pawn on d6 is firmly blockaded. 14...Ng4 .Months later he found some dynamite that would blow up Black's position. 15.Bf4! Bxc3 16.bxc3 Re4 17.Qb5 Rxf4 18.Qxb7 Ra4 19.d7 Be4 20.Qb3 Bc6 21.Rd6 Bxd7 22.Rad1 Qb8 23.Rxd7 Qxb3 24.axb3 Ra2 25.Bc4 Rf8 26.R7d6 Kg7 27.Rxa6 Rxf2 28.Re1 1-0, Anand, V.-Aronian, L., Zurich Chess Classic 2015 12...h6 13.Be3 Bf5 14.Rad1 Ne4 Carlsen is the first to deviate. Stronger is 14...Qb6 15.Qb5 Rad8∞ according to Glenn Flear 15.Nxe4 Bxe4 This move runs into problems. Garcia suggests 15...Rxe4 16.Qc1 Nb4 17.d6 and now 17.Qxc5? fails to b6 18.Qc1 Rc8 19.Qd2 Rc2-+ or 17.a3? Nc2! 17...Rc8∞ deserves attention-NSH 16.Qc1 The point of the 12th move and part of his preparation.Sadly, its effect is neutralised by Black's counterpressure on b2. The best move is 16.d6! recommended by Krasenkow in this issue. Pavel Maletin offers a line of defence with Bc6 If 16...Bxb2? 17.Bxh6 with a powerful attack 17.d7 Re4 18.Qc2 Nb8 19.Rd6 Nxd7 20.Rxc6 Rxe3 21.Rxg6 fxg6 22.fxe3 Kh7 23.Bd3 Qe8 Now White can dispense with his e-pawn and attack with 24.Rd1 followed by h4-NSH 16...Qf6! 16...Kh7? is too passive. After 17.d6 Black is pushed on the defensive. 17.Bxh6 Qxb2 This is an error. He should get rid of the d-pawn first. Krasenkow rightly commends Golubev's move 17...Bxd5 18.Rxd5 Rxe2 19.Bxg7 Kxg7 20.Rd7 Re7= 18.Qxb2 Bxb2 19.Ng5 This abandons control of d4 and Carlsen immediately seizes the chance to bring back his bishiop into play. In his ChessBase report on the Match Ramirez rightly recommends 19.d6! Nb4 20.d7 Red8 21.Bg5 f6 22.Bc4+ Kg7 23.Be3± 19...Bd4! Not 19...Bxd5?? 20.Bxa6+- If 19...Bf5? 20.Bb5 Red8 21.d6 Bd4 22.Bc4 Rd7 23.Rfe1 with the threat of 24.Re7 is decisive as pointed out by Jacob Aagaard. 20.Nxe4?! This move was widely criticised. But during the game Anand must have thought he was going to prevail with two bishops as Black knight is still offside. Quite a few experts suggested 20.Bb5! that would have won the exchange. Bxd5 It's no use trying to save the rook with 20...Re5? White wins after 21.Rfe1 Bc2 22.Rxe5 Bxe5 23.Re1 Bd6 24.Be8 f6 25.Re6 Be5 26.Re7+- as shown by Aagaard again. 21.Bxe8 Rxe8 22.Rfe1 Rc8! (Svidler) Black preserves the rook both to guard the back rank and also to push the queenside pawns. Now perhaps the quiet move 23.a3 denying entry to the knight deserves attention-NSH 20...Rxe4 21.Bf3 Re7 22.d6 Rd7 23.Bf4 Nb4 24.Rd2?! A reflex action that unwittingly gives Black counterchances. White missed 24.Rfe1! After Rad8 Krasenkow recommends in this issue 24...Nxa2? 25.Re7 Rxe7 26.dxe7 Re8 27.Re1 Nb4 28.Bxb7 f6 29.Bd6 Kf7 30.h4! preparing Bf3 and h5 wins. 25.a3 After 25.Re7 Kf8 also Black is under pressure, but no immediate win for White. 25...Nc6 26.h4± and Black runs out of moves. 24...Re8! 25.Rc1 Re6 26.h4 Be5 27.Bxe5 Rxe5 28.Bxb7 Anand was roundly criticised for forcing simplification with this move. But there isn't much left. If 28.a3 Nc6 29.Bxc6 bxc6= 28...Rxb7 29.d7 Nc6 30.d8Q+ Nxd8 31.Rxd8+ Kg7 32.Rd2 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Anand,V2792Carlsen,M2863½–½2014D97WCh 2014

In the above game Carlsen chose 11… Re8 rather than 11… Bf5, the main line in this variation. But after Anand’s TN in the game with Aronian at Zürich Chess Classic 2015 its state has become rather critical.

Here is the game with fine commentary by Lubomir Kavalek

Apart from the World Championship this issue also carries brief reports on London Classic, Qatar Open and Petrosian Memorial Tournaments. All the games from these events are included and a number of them are annotated. There are also games from other events like the Bundesliga.

I was particularly interested in the following encounter from Qatar Open. IM Sagar Shah, who annotates the game in this issue, makes a valid point. Black stood worse after the opening and it was only later errors that led to White’s loss. The challenge for the practical player is to investigate how White could have played better.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 Thus we have Queen's Gambit by transposition. 4.Nc3 Nbd7 A non-standard move. 4...Be7 followed by 0-0 leads to more well-known lines. 5.Bg5 5.Bf4 could be met by c6 6.e3 Nh5 as pointed out by Sagar Shah. 5...h6 off the beaten track, keeping the opponent in suspense. 5...Be7 followed by 0-0 is more obvious. 6.Bh4 6.Bxf6 Nxf6 would ease Black's position. That was the point of 4...Nbd7. 6...Be7 7.e3 0-0 7...b6? preparing...Bb7 is bad as it opens up a4-e8 diagonal for white bishop. 8.Bxf6 Nxf6 9.cxd5 exd5 10.Bb5+ Bd7 11.Bxd7+ Qxd7 12.Ne5 Qe6 13.Qa4+ Kf8 14.Nb5± 8.Rc1 c5 8...b6 9.cxd5 exd5 10.Bd3 Bb7 11.0-0 c5 as played by Mihail Marin is a better way of playing for equality than the line chosen by Kramnik. 9.cxd5 Nxd5 After 9...exd5 10.Bd3 White has a slight edge according to Sagar Shah. Perhaps that's the lesser evil-NSH 10.Bxe7 Nxe7 Forced. White is now better developed than Black-NSH 10...Qxe7? loses a pawn after 11.Nxd5 exd5 12.dxc5 Nxc5 13.Qxd5± 11.Be2 b6 12.0-0 Bb7 13.dxc5 13.Qa4 is met by cxd4 and the queen would be targeted by the knights as shown by the game Davidson-Tartakower, Semmering 1926. Instead 13.Qc2 preparing 14.Rfd1 could be considered. It maintains tension without giving away useful squares to the knight on d7-NSH 13...Nxc5 14.Nd4 14.b4 Ne4 15.Nxe4 Bxe4 16.Qa4 preparing b5 advance as well as Rfd1 deserves attention-NSH 14...Nf5 15.Nxf5 15.Bf3 neutralising the power of the bishop on b7 may be preferable. If Bxf3 or 15...Nxd4 16.Bxb7 Nxb7 17.exd4 Rc8 16.Nxf3 Qxd1 17.Rfxd1= 15...exf5 16.Bf3 He should have played this move before. Now it allows Black to inflict damage on White's kingside pawns. 16.Qxd8 Rfxd8 17.Rfd1= is a simple way to draw. 16...Qxd1! 16...Be4 17.Bxe4 17.Nxe4 fxe4 18.Be2= 17...fxe4 is also possible. But white would contest Black's control of e4 and it would not be easy to secure a knight outpost on d3-NSH 17.Rfxd1 Bxf3 The point of the queen exchange. 18.gxf3 White's f-pawns are doubled and the h-pawn is isolated and vulnerable. This would not be fatal if White can exchange the h-pawn or exert pressure on the queenside-NSH Rfd8 19.Kf1 g6 20.Ke2 Kg7 21.Nb5 Kf6 22.Rxd8 Rxd8 23.b4 Sagar Shah suggests 23.Nxa7!? Ra8 24.Nc8 Rxa2 or 24...Rxc8 25.b4 Ra8 26.bxc5 Rxa2+ 27.Kf1 bxc5 28.Rxc5= 25.Rc2 Ra6 26.Nxb6 Rxb6 27.Rxc5= 23...Ne6 24.Rc6 probably intending Nc7. But the immediate 24.Nc7 was good enough. Rd7 25.Nxe6 fxe6= 24...Ke7 25.a3 Rd7 26.Rc8 a6 27.Nc3 b5 28.Ra8 Rd6 29.Rh8?! This turns out to be a mirage. Instead White has to exert pressure on the queenside. Max Illingworth shows the way with 29.a4! bxa4 30.Nxa4= 29.f4 g5 30.fxg5 still allows Black some mischief with Nxg5 29.h4!? also deserves attention. If Rc6 30.Kd3 and Black cannot make headway-NSH 29...g5 30.Ra8 It's only now that he realizes, 30.Rxh6 would be a blunder on account of Nf4+-+ 30...Kf6 31.Ra7 Kg6 32.Na2 preparing Nc1 followed by Nb3 or even better Nd3 Not 32.e4?? Nd4+ 33.Ke3 f4+ 34.Kd2 Nxf3+-+ 32.Kf1? Rd3-+ The loss of the a-pawn would be the beginning of the end. Again 32.a4! bxa4 33.Nxa4 Rc6 34.Kd3 is the easier way to draw as mentioned by Max Illingworth. 32...Nd8! The knight guards the f7 pawn before the king marches on to pick the White pawn on h2. 33.Ke1? Weak and indecisive. He should have played 33.Nc1 as planned before and followed up with Nd3. 33...Kh5 34.Nc1 Kh4 35.Nb3? Now it's too late. Elsewhere Max Illingworth gives an incredible variation to draw with 35.Ne2! Kh3 36.Ng3 Kxh2 37.Nxf5 Rf6 38.e4 Kg2 39.Ke2 h5 40.f4 Ne6 or 40...gxf4 41.Ra8 41.Ne3+ Kg1 42.f5 Nd4+ 43.Ke1= White rook would come to the first rank via d-file and together with the knight harass the Black king. 35...Kh3 36.Nd4 36.Nc5 fails to Kxh2 37.Rxa6 Rxa6 38.Nxa6 Kg2-+ as pointed out by Sagar Shah. 36...f4 37.Ra8 Kxh2 38.Nf5 Rf6 39.e4 The plausible move 39.Nxh6? loses to Rxh6 40.Rxd8 Kg2 41.Rg8 41.Ke2 g4! 42.fxg4 f3+ 43.Kd3 Kxf2 44.g5 Rg6 45.Rd7 Ke1-+ White will have to give up the rook to stop the pawn from queening. 41...Kxf3 42.Rxg5 fxe3 43.Rf5+ Ke4 44.Rxf7 exf2+ 45.Kxf2 Kd3!-+ a move found by Max Illingworth stronger than 45...Rh3 46.Ke2 Rxa3 47.Kd2 given by Sagar Shah 39...Nc6 40.Rxa6 Rg6! 41.Kf1 Ne5 42.Ra5 Nxf3 43.Rxb5 g4 44.Rd5 h5 45.Ng3! A touch of bravado in a lost position. h4 Of course Kramnik would not fall for 45...fxg3?? 46.Rxh5+ Nh4 47.Rxh4# 46.Ne2 g3 47.fxg3 fxg3 48.b5 Rf6 49.Rf5 Rxf5 50.exf5 g2+ 51.Kf2 Nd4 52.Ng1 Nxb5 53.a4 Nc3 54.Nf3+ Kh1 55.a5 h3 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Salem,A2586Kramnik,V27600–12014D63Qatar Masters Open 2014

This brings me to other contents of the current issue. There are as many as twelve opening surveys ranging from Vienna Game to Reti Opening. Among them Alexey Kuzmin’s analysis of Sicilian Paulsen deserves special mention. As is known, the line 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.c4 Nf6 6.Nc3 Bb4 arose in the sixth game of the World Championship 2014. Here Carlsen played 7.Qd3 and Anand got into a difficult position. Quite a few experts like Rustam Kasimdzhanov thought, 7…d5 would have solved Black’s problems. Alexey Kuzmin does not agree.

He proposes an improvement a move earlier with 6…Qc7.
This makes sense and it is more in the spirit of Paulsen.

This issue also carries trademark sections with middle game strategy, tactics and endgame technique. For reasons of space I have not dealt with them here. In all there are 1479 games of which 115 are annotated. This time I did not see the trade mark feature, the Telechess section with correspondence games. Hopefully commentators Robert Alvarez and Juan Morgado would be back in the next issue.

Recommended – Order ChessBase Magazine here
Price €19.95 (€16.76 without VAT for Customers outside the EU; $20.37 without VAT)


All Opening Surveys in CBM #164

Illingworth: Reti Opening A11
1.c4 Nf6 2.g3 c6 3.Bg2 d5 4.Nf3 g6 5.b3 Bg6 6.Bb2 0-0 7.0-0

In the second part of his article on the double fianchetto Max Illingworth looks into the most frequently played moves 7...a5 and 7...Bg4. As he does so, the author demonstrates above all what happens in the early middlegame – what White can make out of his positions which are generally slightly in his favour.

Moskalenko: Pirc Defence B09
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Bd3 Nc6

In the diagram 7.0-0 is the move played most often, but as Viktor Moskalenko explains Black has absolutely no need to fear the tactical complications after 7...e5 8.fxe5 dxe5 9.d5 Nd4. And in the main variation 7.e5 dxe5 8.fxe5 Black even has two good moves: 8...Nh5 and 8...Ng4.

Kuzmin: Sicilian Defence B41
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.c4 Nf6 6.Nc3 Bb4 7.Qd3

The queen move was a strong surprise weapon for Carlsen against Anand, but as Alexey Kuzmin shows in his article, it is more than that. It is difficult for Black to equalise at all and it can be supposed that in the future players will deviate.

Postny: Sicilian Defence B48
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Qc7 6.Be3 a6 7.Qf3

Instead of 7.Qd2 and 7.Bd3, moves played thousands of time, and other continuations, this time it is 7.Qf3 which is up for debate – a move which only the 11th most frequent. But as Evgeny Postny shows, the move has potential, its main idea consisting of Qg3, because after the exchange of queens White gets a very pleasant endgame.

Havasi: French Defence C06
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 b6

The early exchange of bishops is a tried and trusted manoeuvre in the French. As Gergö Havasi demonstrates, with aggressive play White can build up some pressure, but the closed positions offer Black good chances of getting away with his plan.

Marin: French Defence C09
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Ngf3 Nc6 6.Bb5 (cxd4/Qe7+)

If you play 6...cxd4 or 6...Qe7+ (instead of the main move 6...Bd6), you have to be prepared to exchange queens at an early stage. In his extensive article Mihail Marin refers to many Korchnoi games, but also shows the modern treatment by Vadim Zvjaginsev.

Müller: Vienna Game C26
1.e4 e5 2.Nc3

Karsten Müller’s new article is linked to his articles on the King’s Gambit: after 2...Nc6 the transposition is made with 3.f4. However, this time it is principally about 2...Bc5 (3.Nf3) and even more important - 2...Nf6 (3.g3). This way speculative sacrifices are avoided.

Ris: Queen’s Gambit Accepted D20
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e4 b5 4.a4 c6 5.axb5 cxb5 6.Nc3 a6 7.Nxb5 axb5 8.Rxa8 Bb7

The 3...b5 variation is supposed to be made playable with a surprising exchange sacrifice. In his analyses Robert Ris comes to the conclusion that White can obtain a slight advantage, but in practice these positions are far from easy to play.

Gormally: Queen’s Gambit Accepted D24
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 a6 5.e4 b5 6.e5 Nd5 7.a4

In Part 2 Daniel Gormally turns to the sharp lines in which Black tries to defend his extra pawn. But all these attempts are dubious. Even when the positions which are reached are okay according to the engines, in practice Black is facing grave problems.

Krasenkow: Bogo-Indian E11
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 4.Nbd2

Michal Krasenkow presents his own repertoire against the Bogo-Indian. In the first part he shows above all what he has up his sleeve against the present main variation 4...0-0 5.a3 Be7, namely: 6.b4, which has not been played often so far but which is very venomous.

Breutigam: King’s Indian E60
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.e3

As long as White has not played Nc3, Black cannot transpose to the Grünfeld Defence. But Martin Breutigam sees more in the setup he is presenting: after transpositions to the Benoni or the King’s Indian the pawn on e3 (instead of e4) also has an advantage: there is no need to defend it.

Szabo: King’s Indian E73
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 0-0 6.Bg5 Na6 7.f4 c6

In the Averbakh Variation too, ...Na6 is a common move. White then strengthens his centre with 7.f4. But as Krisztian Szabo shows in his article, Black will then attack it rapidly with ...d5. In the sharp lines a good knowledge of the theory ids advisable.

Order ChessBase Magazine 164 here


Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.