Most attractive chess players

by Frederic Friedel
2/9/2026 – Who is your favourite chess player – of all time, from the history of chess? Whose games do you enjoy the most? Is it one of the greats from the 19th century, the world champion legends of the twentieth? Or is it a player who is still active? Tell us your choices – and we will compare them with what a chess AI chooses, after evaluating millions of games.

Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally.
FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before. 

Who are the most intersting chess players in history, focusing on style, rather than just strength? Who do you count as your favourites? Candidates are surely:

  • Paul Morphy (1837–1884) – who was the icon of romantic attacking chess, far ahead of his contemporaries in the 1850s, demolishing Europe’s best and leaving behind so many dazzling games.
  • Wilhelm Steinitz (1836–1900) – the first official world champion and father of positional chess, who pioneered the principles of structured buildup and small advantages.

  • Emanuel Lasker (1868–1941) – the world champion for 27 years, famous for practical, “psychological” play and choosing lines that were unpleasant for specific opponents.

  • José Raúl Capablanca (1888–1942) – the “Human Chess Machine,” feared for his effortless endgame technique and crystal-clear positional style.

  • Alexander Alekhine (1892–1946) – the brilliantly aggressive world champion whose games are packed with deep combinations and attacking ideas.

  • Mikhail Botvinnik (1911–1995) – the father of the Soviet chess school, who combined scientific preparation, and disciplined training, mentoring stars like Karpov and Kasparov.

  • Mikhail Tal (1936–1992) – the "Magician from Riga,” beloved for wild, speculative sacrifices that often looked unsound but posed impossible practical problems.

  • Bobby Fischer (1943–2008) – the lone American superstar who crushed Soviet dominance, who won the 1972 “Match of the Century” vs. Spassky.

  • Anatoly Karpov (b. 1951) – the positional boa-constrictor who dominated 1970s–80s chess, embodying the pragmatic side of the Soviet school.

  • Garry Kasparov (b. 1963) – the charismatic, fiercely combative world champion whose opening preparation and use of computers transformed elite chess.

  • Vladimir Kramnik (b. 1975) – the player who ended Kasparov’s reign in 2000 with superb preparation and defensive technique that shaped modern opening theory.

  • Viswanathan Anand (b. 1969) – the “Lightning Kid” who played very quickly while maintaining high accuracy, with clear positional play plus explosive tactical shots.

  • Magnus Carlsen (b. 1990) – the “Mozart of chess,” who has dominated the game with a universal style, grinding small edges and winning equal endgames.

And how about contemporary players like Hikaru Nakamura, Fabiano Caruana, Gukesh Dommaraju, R Praggnanandhaa, Arjun Erigaisi, Alireza Firouzja? Or any others?

What does chess AI think?

Ed Schröder, Dutch software developer and author of the programs REBEL and ​Chess System Tal, came out of temperory retirement to develop a tool that evaluates games from general databases – specifically the best games played by humans and computers, from ChessBase Mega Database. The tool is called Best of Chess, and we described it in a previous report. It extracts the most spectacular games from a PGN database, with each game evaluated on three features:

  • King Attack
  • Material Sacrifice
  • Length of the game (the smaller the number of moves in a game the higher the bonus).

Ed ran his algorithms on the many million of high-quality games contained in Mega Database, and it identified the 50 players it considered most attractive. We will not (yet) tell you the order of the players, but list them here alphabetically:

Adams, Michael
Alekhine, Alexander
Anand, Viswanathan
Anderssen, Adolf
Aronian, Levon
Botvinnik, Mikhail
Bronstein, David 
Capablanca, Jose Raul
Carlsen, Magnus
Caruana, Fabiano
Chigorin, Mikhail 
Ding, Liren
Erigaisi, Arjun Kumar
Euwe, Max
Firouzja, Alireza
Fischer, Robert James
Gelfand, Boris
Geller, Efim P
Giri, Anish
Gukesh, Dommaraju
Karpov, Anatoly
Kasparov, Garry
Keres, Paul
Keymer, Vincent
Kortschnoj, Viktor 
Kramnik, Vladimir
Lasker, Emanuel
Leko, Peter
Morphy, Paul
Nakamura, Hikaru
Niemann, Hans Moke
Nimzowitsch, Aron
Petrosian, Tigran V
Polgar, Judit
Praggnanandhaa, R
Reshevsky, Samuel
Reti, Richard
Rubinstein, Akiba
Shirov, Alexei
Smyslov, Vassily
So, Wesley
Spassky, Boris
Steinitz, William
Svidler, Peter
Tal, Mihail
Tarrasch, Siegbert
Topalov, Veselin
Van Foreest, Jorden
Wei, Yi
Zukertort, Johannes
 

Please tell us which ten players you consider most attractive.

We will compare your choices with those of the the chess AI.


Editor-in-Chief emeritus of the ChessBase News page. Studied Philosophy and Linguistics at the University of Hamburg and Oxford, graduating with a thesis on speech act theory and moral language. He started a university career but switched to science journalism, producing documentaries for German TV. In 1986 he co-founded ChessBase.
Discussion and Feedback Submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

NMcrazyim5 NMcrazyim5 2/13/2026 06:20
My top 10 most attractive chess players purely based on their original style (20th century or later):
Akiba Rubinstein
Alexander Alekhine
Bent Larsen
Boris Spassky
David Bronstein
Judit Polgar
Lev Polugaevsky
Mikhail Tal
Tigran Petrosian
Vasily Ivanchuk
Masquer Masquer 2/12/2026 07:35
The list to choose from is bush-league, given how many genuine attackers are missing from it!
Raymond Labelle Raymond Labelle 2/10/2026 09:11
With these criteria:
King Attack
Material Sacrifice
Length of the game (the smaller the number of moves in a game the higher the bonus).

I would try Morphy for the first place - he was so much more advanced than his contemporary players that he could try with success sacrifices and quickly go to the King attack. I will not guess for the other players but I am certain that, even among the best ones, the gap with their contemporaries as a whole was not as big as in the case of Morphy.
Steven E DuCharm Steven E DuCharm 2/10/2026 07:51
Super Nezh ftw!
Mamack1 Mamack1 2/10/2026 05:52
Genuinely no disrespect to Adams - after all our best player for a few decades now - but I so wonder how he got on this list when some of the previous named didn't (plus, of course, Nigel Short!)

Especially since one doesn't really associate him with short brilliancies......
arzi arzi 2/10/2026 07:09
If this methodology favors short games it just means that either the opponent was extremely bad or had a big hangover.
arzi arzi 2/10/2026 06:33
Amazing ... Gukesh, Niemann, Van Foreest on this list but missing Ivanchuk, MVL, Korchnoi to name a few? Gukesh has only had one good year ... when he won the world championship, because of one big mistake by the opponent at the end of the last world championship game. You will get a list exactly as the parameters have been made for making the list. However, it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with reality, it's a matter of taste.
gwrtheyrn gwrtheyrn 2/10/2026 06:00
Carlsen, Anand, Kramnik, Kasparov, Karpov, Fischer, Spassky, Stein, Petrosian, Botvinnik.

Alas, that leaves off Alekhine, Capablanca and Lasker, not to mention Korchnoi, Keres, Fine and Ivanchuk.

Ten is just too short a list.
cyl1968 cyl1968 2/10/2026 02:00
This methodology favors short games, so Carlsen will be penalized for his long grinding endgames. It will reveal great attacking games, certainly not favoring positional players who are no less brilliant in their own way
Grandmaster Grandmaster 2/9/2026 11:23
Why not make it 60 players
Karjakin is also missing
Mamedyarov, Radjabov, Nepo, Grischuk
jmrlucio jmrlucio 2/9/2026 09:39
Bent Larsen is missing
Ivanchuk and Morozevich should also make the short list
Davidx1 Davidx1 2/9/2026 07:19
Karpor and Anderssen have lost.
Carlsen's score is too close to Kasparov's, despite being the successor and holding Stockfish.
Three remain... Maybe Fischer.
KingZor KingZor 2/9/2026 06:31
Shouldn't the title be "least unattractive"?
Mamack1 Mamack1 2/9/2026 05:58
Leonid Stein loses out again, then.

As unlucky in death as in life.
WillScarlett WillScarlett 2/9/2026 04:49
I appreciate the concept of this poll and accept the work of Chessbase and, in particular, Ed Schröder in contributing the rationale and process for both selecting the candidates and for the opportunity to participate. It was gratifying to see many of my favorite players, past and present, on the list of 50 greats.
It was, however, a rather severe disappointment to note the absence of one of my most revered and admired players of the Golden Age of Chess - Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa . I will, regardless, submit my ten choices, but I reserve the right to consider the omission of von der Lasa an unhappy flaw in your project.
sebtak sebtak 2/9/2026 04:36
How is this list missing Ivanchuk, Morozevich, MVL?
I can easily think of 3 names to remove from the list to include these 3.
Werewolf Werewolf 2/9/2026 04:30
My guess would be Morphy would be near the top of the list, mainly because of weaker opposition.
1