5/4/2020 – The first Magnus Carlsen Invitational was won by none other than world champion Magnus Carlsen. The Norwegian defeated Hikaru Nakamura 2½:1½ in a closely disputed final match. The confrontation was highly technical, as all the games went relatively deep into the endgame. Nakamura almost tied the score in the fourth game, but failed to make the most of his advantage. Round-up show by GM Yannick Pelletier. | Photo: Amruta Mokal
new: Fritz 20
Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally. FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before.
Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally. FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before.
Become a master of chess strategy – get Robert Ris’s complete bundle now at a special price!
€99.90
Grinding it out
Magnus Carlsen made a name for himself by outplaying elite opponents in apparently lifeless positions. After reaching the pinnacle of the game — and especially after his World Championship match against Fabiano Caruana — he turned to a different strategy, strengthening his openings and entering tactical struggles: he also succeeded while doing so. Against Nakamura, he showed he can still grind out victories from dry setups, although he also had trouble defending these very positions. The Norwegian commented:
Apparently I just can't defend anymore, so there's that.
The Invitational kicked off a little over two weeks ago, and Carlsen was paired up against Nakamura on opening day. Four wins for White meant the score was tied in regulation, and Carlsen went on to win the Armageddon tiebreaker. The tournament came full circle in a way, as the same two players reached the final. Coincidentally, the first three games of the deciding match also saw wins for White. Carlsen finally held a draw with Black in game four, breaking the streak and getting tournament victory.
It is a big deal. It would've been a disappointment if I hadn't [won] — I'm not gonna lie. I'm really, really happy both to beat Hikaru today, but especially to have gotten through against Ding. I never felt like I got in full gear in this tournament.
Carlsen obtained the US$70,000 first prize, while Nakamura received US$45,000.
Scarcely any world champion has managed to captivate chess lovers to the extent Carlsen has. The enormously talented Norwegian hasn't been systematically trained within the structures of a major chess-playing nation such as Russia, the Ukraine or China.
White wins
Carlsen had the more comfortable position once the queens left the board in game one. With two rooks and six pawns per side, White's knight had better prospects than Black's dark-squared bishop. Getting something tangible was no easy task, though. A long manoeuvring battle ensued, but White eventually managed to break through:
This DVD offers a complete repertoire for handling this solid opening, often featuring a dynamic approach to pose the opponent more practical problems. Both of the main continuations 3...Nf6 and 3...Be7 are covered in two separate parts.
Black was already in deep trouble, and Nakamura's 72...Kf5 allowed the world champion to enter a forcing winning line — 73.h7 Kg6 74.Rg8+ Kxh7 75.Nf6+ Kh6 76.Rh8+, gaining the exchange. Carlsen had no trouble getting the win from that point on.
Nakamura, who showed his prowess in rapid throughout the event, bounced back immediately, gaining space in the opening and proving he can also outplay even the best in the world when given the chance. The American entered a superior knight endgame and tied the score with a 57-move win.
Carlsen 1-1 Nakamura after game 2 of the final. Hikaru winning game two. So far they've played 6 rapid games in the event - 4 in the preliminaries - and now 2 in the final so far - white has won them all.
Would the streak of wins for White continue? In fact, it did. In what turned out to be the most imbalanced game of the day, Carlsen slowly ground out a win with rook, bishop and pawn against a bishop and a pair of knights. The world champion correctly exchanged down into a winning opposite-coloured bishop endgame after Nakamura could not hold things together anymore:
There followed 41.Rf5+ Kg8 42.Rxf4+ Nxf4 43.Kxf4, and Black cannot defend this position despite the presence of bishops of opposite colours.
Nakamura was in a must-win situation, but he had the white pieces — not a small edge given the preceding results. Carlsen managed to neutralize White's position out of the opening, however, breaking on c5 at the right moment to simplify his task. The commentators thought there were many ways to hold the balance with Black, but one should never get over-confident against a player as resourceful as Nakamura.
And suddenly, it seemed like White's passed a-pawn would be enough to get the all-important win in a rook and knight v rook and bishop endgame. 'Naka' did not find the cleanest way to convert his advantage though:
If you want to become a strong player you have to study the endgame. That's just the way it is. Andrew Martin's DVD 'First Steps in Endgames' offers a superb introduction for players rated below 1600.
There were mixed opinions among the commentators regarding White's 41.Ne5 here, exchanging the minor pieces and entering a pure rook endgame. At this point — or at a later opportunity — White could have gone for 41.h4, preventing what was later seen in the game: Black advancing his pawns on the kingside, creating enough counterplay to hold the draw.
Nakamura gave up trying on move 57, expressing with his gestures on the webcam that he knew he had missed a big opportunity. Carlsen concluded:
Obviously the last game was a mess. I allowed this Rd7 stuff for no reason, when I should have been just pretty comfortably drawing. It was tough, but yeah, I'm happy to have pulled through.
As reported by Tarjei J. Svensen, Carlsen mentioned to the Norwegian press that similar events might be organized in later dates:
I can't disclose much yet, but I can say that there will be more tournaments like this. For everyone who wants to watch, this is not the end, but rather the beginning of something that will be a lot of fun in the future.
Select an entry from the list to switch between games
This DVD gives you the key to start out with the French Defence. GM Yannick Pelletier is a specialist of this opening, and believes that the most efficient way to understand its ideas, plans, and typical structures is to study classical lines.
GM Yannick Pelletier analysed the action of the day
GM Daniel King looked deeper into game three of the final
Carlos Alberto ColodroCarlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.
Philip Feeley - Wikipedia article 'Magnus Carlsen Invitational' has all results/pairings I believe.
Philip Feeley 5/5/2020 03:36
Does anyone know where one can see the whole pairing tree? I can't find the full list - only parts of it.
Leavenfish 5/4/2020 05:44
It's still a mano y mano game in in the end - each player stripped of helpers; naked and alone at the board with just their grey matter to get them to the end. That's why we watch it; we as fellow chess players can relate.
willyrobinson 5/4/2020 10:49
The report would be much better if there was a reaction from the losing finalist (same for the semi-final). We should hear something from Ding and Nakamura, not just Carlsen. Great event though, really enjoyed it, thanks for covering it.
karavamudan 5/4/2020 05:19
Can't someone defeat Carlsen and give him the jitters? What is the phalanx of super GMs doing with tools like AI at their disposal? Guess it may be psychological in the shorter version and lack of stamina in the longer version, possible reasons for these GMs losing with monotonic regularity to Carlsen tournament after tournament, one way or the other
Frustrating and even boring to see the monopoly of Carlsen
In this course, you will learn the foundations and key ideas of the Vienna Game and discover a variety of systems that make you extremely difficult to prepare for.
Tata Steel 2026 with analyses by Bluebaum, Giri, L'Ami, Woodward and many more. Opening videos by Kasimdzhanov, Marin and Zwirs. 10 exciting opening articles with new repertoire ideas and much more.
In this course, Dutch Grandmaster Jan Werle presents a modern and practical repertoire in the French Advance Variation, focusing on the critical line 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3.
One of the major battlegrounds of the Queen’s Gambit Declined is the Catalan, and against it Zwirs chose an ambitious strategy: accept the pawn and hold onto it with …c6 and …b5, aiming for an unbalanced fight from the very start.
In almost every chess game there comes a moment when you just can’t go on without tactics. You must strike to not giving away the advantage you have worked for the whole game.
€39.90
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.
Pop-up for detailed settings
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Technically required cookies
Technically required cookies: so that you can navigate and use the basic functions and store preferences.
Analysis Cookies
To help us determine how visitors interact with our website to improve the user experience.
Marketing-Cookies
To help us offer and evaluate relevant content and interesting and appropriate advertisement.