
Magnus Carlsen plays Vishy Anand for the World Chess title
By GM Lubomir Kavalek
– Read
part one here –
After round twelve Kramnik and Carlsen were physically and emotionally
spent, one from winning, the other from a loss. In the penultimate round,
Kramnik was close to victory. His opponent, Boris Gelfand, was short of
time, but managed to find a counterplay, saving a draw.
Carlsen paces himself like a long distance runner. He takes what his opponent
gives him and Radjabov makes his first concession only on move 64. Carlsen's
manager Espen Agdestein is a bundle of nerves, running in and out of the
commentary room. He knows Magnus needs more mistakes and Radjabov delivers.
The marathon is over after 89 moves and Carlsen wins. He is back in the
race.
Carlsen was in a better position as white to calibrate his play in the
last round against Svidler. He played a solid line in the Spanish, but at
one point strayed into unclear attacking prospects. The tension resonates
in the silence. "Anything can happen when you are tired, when pressure
is high," said Carlsen later. "My sense of danger dropped a bit."
He lost control of the clock and the position, and Svidler was winning.
But what would Kramnik do against the unpredictable Ivanchuk? He chose
the complicated Pirc defence. Like in the King's Indian, you may get one
or two chances to escape from a cramped position. Not a great prospect,
but what else to do?
The defense goes way back, perhaps to India in the 1850s. We know for sure
that Louis Paulsen, the grandpa of many modern opening ideas, played it
in major tournaments in the 1880s. Vasja Pirc needed only 25 pages to cover
the defense in his theoretical work "The Newest Theory of Chess Openings"
in 1959. Today's works are 15 times longer.
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.d4 d6 2.e4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 0-0 6.0-0 a6 7.h3 7.Bf4 b5 8.e5 Nfd7 9.a4 bxa4 10.Re1 Nb6 11.Nxa4 Nxa4 12.Rxa4 Nd7 13.Qc1 Nb6 14.Ra3 a5 15.Bh6 7.Re1 Nc6 8.d5 Ne5 9.Nxe5 dxe5 10.Be3 Qd6 11.Qd3 Rd8 12.Na4 7...Nc6 8.Bg5 b5 9.a3 h6 10.Be3 e5 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Qc1 Kh7 13.Bc5 Re8 14.Rd1 Bd7 15.b4 Qc8 16.Qe3 Nd8 17.a4! bxa4 18.Nxa4 Ne6 19.Bc4 Nh5 20.Nc3 Nhf4 21.Nd5 Bb5 22.Bb3 Bc6?! 23.Ra5? 23.Ne7! Rxe7 23...Qb7 24.Nxc6 Qxc6 25.Bd5 Qb5 26.c4 Qb8 27.Bc6+- 24.Bxe7 Nxg2 25.Kxg2 Nf4+ 26.Kg1 Qxh3 27.Ng5+! 27.Ne1 Qg4+ 28.Kf1 Re8 29.Bc5 Qh4 30.Qg3 30.f3 30.Qf3 f5-+ 30...Qh1+ 31.Qg1 Qh3+ 32.Ng2 Bxe4-+ 27.Nh4 Qg4+ 28.Kh2 Re8 29.Qg3 Qh5 30.Bc5 Bf6 31.f3 Bxh4 32.Qg4 Qxg4 33.fxg4 Bxe4 34.Bxf7± 27...hxg5 28.Qxh3+ Nxh3+ 29.Kf1 Bxe4 30.Rd8 23...Qb7 24.g3 24.h4 Red8 25.c4 Nxc5 26.bxc5 Rab8 24...Nxh3+ 24...Nxc5 25.Rxc5 Ne6 26.Ra5 Nd4 25.Kg2 Nhg5 26.Rh1 Kg8 26...Nxe4 27.Qxe4 f5 28.Qc4 28.Qh4 Bxd5 29.Bxd5 Qxd5 30.Be3 c5 31.Bxh6 Kg8 32.Bxg7 Kxg7 33.Qh7+ Kf6 28...Rad8 29.Be3 Bb5 30.Qh4! 30.Rxh6+!? Bxh6 30...Kg8? 31.Qxc7! Nxc7 32.Ne7+ Kf8 33.Nxg6# 31.Qh4 f4 32.Ra1! Rxd5 33.Rh1 Kg7 34.Qxh6+ Kf7 35.Qh7+ Kf6 36.Rh6 Nf8 37.Qg8 fxe3 38.Bxd5 c6 39.Be4 exf2 40.c4 Qg7 41.Rxg6+ Nxg6 42.Qxe8 f1Q+ 43.Kxf1 Bxc4+ 44.Kf2 Ne7 45.Qd7 Qf7 46.Qg4 30...Rxd5 31.Bxh6 Rd6 27.Nxg5 Nxg5 28.f3 Bxd5 29.Bxd5 c6 30.Bc4 Qc8 30...Ne6 31.Qb3 31.c3 Ne6 32.Bd6 Ng5 33.Qe2 31...h5 32.Be3 Ne6 33.Rha1 h4! 34.gxh4 Qd8 35.Rxa6? 35.Bxe6 Rxe6 36.Rxa6 Rxa6 37.Rxa6 Qxh4 38.Ra8+ Kh7 39.Ra1 Qd8 40.c4 35...Rc8? 35...Rxa6 36.Rxa6 Nf4+! 37.Bxf4 37.Kg3 Qd1 38.Bxf7+ Kh8 39.Bxe8 Qe1+ 40.Bf2 40.Kg4 Bf6 40...Qh1 37...exf4 38.Bxf7+ Kh8! 39.Qd3!? 39.Bxe8? Qd2+ 40.Kh1 40.Kh3 Qf2 40.Kf1 Bd4 40...Qe1+ 41.Kg2 Bd4 39...Qxh4! 40.Bxe8 Qg3+ 41.Kf1 Qh3+ 36.Rh1 Rc7 37.Bxe6 Rxe6 38.b5! Rb7 38...cxb5 39.Rxe6 fxe6 40.Qxe6+ Kf8 40...Rf7 41.Qxg6 Qc8 41...Rf6 42.Qg4 Rc6 43.Kg3 Rxc2 44.h5+- 42.Kg3 Qxc2 43.Rc1 Qe2 44.Rc8+ Rf8 45.Qe6+ Kh7 46.Rxf8 Bxf8 47.Qf5+ Kg8 48.Qg5+ Kh7 49.h5 40...Kh7 41.h5 41.Ra1 41.h5 Rxc2+ 42.Kg3 Qe7 43.Qd5 Qf7 44.h6+- 41...Rf7 42.c4 bxc4 43.Rd1 Qxd1 44.Qc8+ Ke7 45.Bc5+ Kf6 46.Qa6+ 39.b6 c5 40.Rb1 Bf8 41.Qd5! Qb8 42.Rba1! Rd6 43.Ra8 Rxd5 44.Rxb8 Rxb8 45.exd5 Bd6 45...Rxb6 46.Ra8 Kg7 47.Rxf8! Kxf8 48.Bxc5+ 46.Ra6 Rb7 47.Kf1 1–0
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Ivanchuk,V | 2757 | Kramnik,V | 2810 | 1–0 | 2013 | B08 | FIDE Candidates, London | 14 |
Please, wait...
In the end Carlsen and Kramnik lose, but share first place. I don't know
if something like this ever happened in such a major event. Winning by losing
is a hard concept to explain. In the first Candidates tournament in Budapest
in 1950 Isaac Boleslavsky and David Bronstein shared first place, but had
to play a playoff match. Boleslavsky was generous: he not only lost to Bronstein,
but he let him marry his daughter. Carlsen won outright with a better tiebreak:
one more win made the difference.

Kramnik is disappointed. He was so close to winning, but he might not be
the most disappointed player in the history of the Candidates tournaments.
The legendary Estonian grandmaster, Paul Keres, finished second in three
Candidates tournaments in 1953 (tied), 1956 and 1959. Somebody always played
a bit better.
One of the most dramatic Candidates tournament in history ended on a day
the Washington Nationals started the baseball season. What has baseball
to do with chess?
In 1978 I discussed with Bobby Fischer the idea of playing the world championship
match to ten wins without counting draws. "It could take months, "
I said. "So what?" countered Bobby. "The baseball season
takes more than six months and people follow it." At that time you
could still have adjourned games after five hours. Carlsen plays seven-hour
marathon sessions without a rest. He may also spend two, three hours preparing
for the game. He believes that the 24-game world championship match could
turn into a exhausting contest with only one man standing in the end. Remember
how Anand and Gelfand were tired after 12 classical games in the world championship
match last year in Moscow? It makes you wonder: how could the old-timers
have managed to play Candidates tournaments of 28 rounds in 1959 and 1962?
Age could be a factor in the match of two generations. At 43, Anand is
one of the oldest world chess champions to defend the title. Is he too old
for a title match? At 50, Mikhail Botvinnik beat the brilliant 25-year-old
Mikhail Tal in Moscow in 1961. William Steinitz lost his title against Emanuel
Lasker in 1894 at the age of 58. Four years later Steinitz finished fourth
in a major 20-player double-round tournament in Vienna. "The old Bohemian
lion can still bite," the Austrian press wrote about him.
Anand – the Tiger of Madras – is not toothless. He paints himself
as an underdog. On paper, Carlsen should win, he thinks. The Norwegian blasted
his way to the top spot in the world's ratings at the age of 19. He excels
in tournament play and has more energy to succeed in marathon sessions.
But Anand has a tremendous match experience and knows how to prepare. His
match against Carlsen should be a treat for all of us.
Original
column here – Copyright
Huffington Post

The Huffington Post is an American news website and aggregated blog founded
by Arianna Huffington and others, featuring various news sources and columnists.
The site was launched on May 9, 2005, as a commentary outlet and liberal/progressive
alternative to conservative news websites. It offers coverage of politics,
media, business, entertainment, living, style, the green movement, world
news, and comedy. It is a top destination for news, blogs, and original
content. The Huffington Post has an active community, with over one million
comments made on the site each month. According to Nielsen NetRatings, the
site has around 13 million unique visitors per month (number for March 2010);
according to Google Analytics the number is 22 million uniques per month.