Isle of Man: Adams joins the ever-growing lead

by Antonio Pereira
10/27/2018 – With only two rounds to go, seven players share first place at the Chess.com Isle of Man International Tournament. The six co-leaders drew each other — in fact, the six first boards finished tied, while the only player that used this opportunity to join them at the top was Michael Adams, who inflicted Gupta's second straight loss. Twelve players are trailing by half a point, including round seven winners Anish Giri, Levon Aronian and Alexander Grischuk. | Photos: John Saunders / Official site

Chess News


Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Anybody's game

It is hard to think of a more uncertain scenario in a tournament — it is not impossible for one of the leaders to win his last two games and take first place outright and, at the same time, it is feasible to imagine four or more players ending up shared first. Therefore nerves will play a big role in the final rounds, when a single mistake might take any player out of contention. It is anybody's game, as it would be naïve to talk about favourites at this point.

This is a good time to take a look at the regulations regarding tiebreaks in case of a tie for first. The policy in the Isle of Man is to have a single deciding match between two players. Before going into the format of this match, let us see what would happen if three or more players are tied — the following criteria will be followed:

  • The results between the players involved in the tie
  • Sum of progressive score
  • Sum of opponent's scores (Buchholz)
  • Sonneborn-Berger
  • Number of won games

In the deciding match, two 5'+2" blitz games will be played. In case of a tie, an Armageddon game will take place, with 5 minutes for White and 4 for Black, plus an increment of 2 seconds per move from move 61 — Black has draw odds.

Going back to the action of round seven, despite the fact that the first six boards finished in draws, most of them were hard-fought. On first board, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave needed six minutes to play his seventeenth move in a complex middlegame that resulted from a Ruy Lopez:

 
Vachier-Lagrave vs. Naiditsch
Position after 16...Nxe4

The time spent by Maxime to play 17.c4 was mentioned above because his rival, Arkadij Naiditsch, spent no less than 42 minutes to respond! And we cannot blame him, especially if we look at the ensuing variation seen in the game (and the many possible sidelines that needed to be calculated). The co-leaders continued with 17.Nxe5 18.cxd5 Nxf2 19.Kxf2 Ng4+ 20.Rxe1+:

 
Position after 20.Rxe1+

MVL took with the queen and accepted a repetition a few moves later, as his king was unprotected and his queenside undeveloped.

Will Vachier-Lagrave or Naiditsch manage to pull ahead in the end? | Photo: John Saunders

The all-Russian game between Vladislav Artemiev and Vladimir Kramnik was a strategical struggle in which the older Vlad obtained the upper hand with the black pieces. Kramnik handled the position in remarkable fashion but did not take his chance to force matters in his favour when he could have done so:

 
Artemiev vs. Kramnik
Position after 30.Nh5

The former World Champion invited a queen exchange with 30...Qg6 when he could have gone for the energetic 30...f5. White would have been forced to exchange queens after 31.Qd1 and Black's a-pawn would have started moving forward, making it hard for White to keep it at bay while maintaining material balance. In the game, the contenders continued fighting in a nuanced endgame until move 64, when the draw was signed. It was a case of what could have been for the veteran.

Kramnik looked disappointed after letting go of his advantage | Photo: John Saunders

The big winner of the day was Mickey Adams, sometimes nicknamed Spiderman, who incidentally defeated the player that wore a Superman cap throughout the event — Abhijeet Gupta. An Exchange French-type position benefited the Englishman's ability to find subtle positional resources in seemingly quiet setups. According to the computer evaluation, Gupta erred on move 24:

 
Adams vs. Gupta
Position after 24.Qf3

The Indian went for 24...Ng6, when he should have kept the option of taking the knight to e6 in the future, without losing a tempo due to a pawn attacking the piece from h5 (as was later seen in the game). Massive simplifications followed and Black was left with an inferior structure. It took Adams some thirty more moves to grind down the victory, a common sort of win for England's highest-rated player.

Spiderman won the super-hero battle | Photo: John Saunders

On a lower board, Alexei Shirov won the kind of game that brought him to fame in the past, against Le Quang Liem. It is a struggle worth replaying in full, but here is a small example of the sharp play that was seen right from the opening:

 
Shirov vs. Le Quang Liem
Position after 43...Qh5

White (Shirov) is a piece up, but his king's position invited Le Quang Liem to continue looking for a perpetual check until move 56. In the position shown above, Alexei played 44.Nb7 — Black cannot take due to mate on c8. Shirov now belongs to the huge group of chasers on 5/7.

Alexei Shirov showed his class | Photo: John Saunders

With the end of the tournament getting closer, the favourites have climbed up the standings — amongst the co-leaders the only slightly surprising name is that of Jeffery Xiong's. Aronian, Giri, Kramnik, Anand, Grischuk and Karjakin are in the chasing pack, while the only top-10 clearly underperforming is Wesley So.

Jeffery Xiong and Hikaru Nakamura | Photo: John Saunders

It is impossible to highlight one or two particular games from round eight's top boards — they are all alluring!

Round 8 pairings (top 20 boards)

Name Pts. Result Pts. Name
Vachier-Lagrave Maxime   Wang Hao
Naiditsch Arkadij   Nakamura Hikaru
Wojtaszek Radoslaw   Adams Michael
Kramnik Vladimir 5   Xiong Jeffery
Jones Gawain C B 5   5 Aronian Levon
Giri Anish 5   5 Rapport Richard
Anand Viswanathan 5   5 Artemiev Vladislav
Parligras Mircea-Emilian 5   5 Grischuk Alexander
Karjakin Sergey 5   5 Sethuraman S.P.
So Wesley   5 Shirov Alexei
Svane Rasmus   Vidit Santosh Gujrathi
Eljanov Pavel   Antipov Mikhail Al.
Leko Peter   Hess Robert
Gupta Abhijeet   Howell David W L
Adhiban B.   Christiansen Johan-Sebastian
Tregubov Pavel V.   Kovalev Vladislav
Melkumyan Hrant   Lomasov Semen
Sevian Samuel   Praggnanandhaa R
Wagner Dennis   Sutovsky Emil
Williams Simon K   Ganguly Surya Shekhar

Games from Round 7

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 d6 3.Nf3 f5 4.g3 Be7 5.Bg2 Nf6 6.d3 0-0 7.0-0 Kh8 8.b4 A21: Englische Eröffnung Qe8 LiveBook: 4 Partien 9.Bg5 Nbd7 10.Rc1N Weiß hat minimalen Vorteil. Vorgänger: 10.Nh4 h6 11.Bd2 Nh7 12.Nd5 ½-½ (12) Izeta Txabarri,F (2470)-De la Villa Garcia,J (2525) San Roque 1996 10...h6 11.Bd2 c6 12.e3 g5 13.Ne2 e4 14.Ne1 Ne5 15.Bc3 g4 16.dxe4 fxe4 17.Nf4 Nf3+ 18.Bxf3 gxf3 19.Qc2 Kg8 20.Rd1 a5 21.b5 a4 22.Bxf6 Bxf6 23.Rxd6 Be5 23...Bg7 24.Rxh6+- Bf5
25.g4! Bh7 25...Bxg4 26.Rg6+ 26.Rxh7 Kxh7 27.Qxe4+ Kg7 27...Kg8 ist eine bessere Verteidigung. 28.Qxf3 Bxf4 29.exf4 Rd8 30.Ng2 Rd4 31.Qc3 Qd7 32.bxc6 bxc6 33.Qa5 Kg8 34.h3 Rxc4 35.Re1 Qd5 36.Qc7
Und Te5 würde nun gewinnen. 36...Re4 37.Rc1 Rf7 37...Rc4 ist wohl besser. 38.Re1 Qd8 38.Qb6 Viel schwächer ist 38.Qxc6?! Qxc6 39.Rxc6 Rb7± 38...Rc4 39.Re1 Und weiter mit Te8+ wäre nett. Re4 40.Ne3 Qd6 40...Qd4 kämpft weiter. 41.Qxd4 41.Qxc6 Rexf4 42.Rd1 Qf6± 41...Rxd4 41.f5       Rb4 42.Qa6 Re7 43.Rd1 Qc7 Weiss muss nun ...Txe3! beachten. 44.Qd3 Droht stark f6. Rbe4 beabsichtigt ...Txe3. 45.f6 Weiß steht klar auf Gewinn. R7e5 46.Nf5 Re1+ 47.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 48.Kg2 Weiss droht Sh6+ und Matt. Kf7 49.Nd6+ Precision: Weiß = 77%, Schwarz = 28%. 49.g5
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Aronian,L2780Short,N26521–02018A21IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Vachier-Lagrave,M2780Naiditsch,A2721½–½2018C90IOM chesscom Masters 20187
So,W2776Sevian,S2634½–½2018A28IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Grischuk,A2769Jumabayev,R26051–02018C11IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Nakamura,H2763Xiong,J2656½–½2018A34IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Rapport,R2725Jones,G2677½–½2018D78IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Wang,H2722Wojtaszek,R2727½–½2018B70IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Adams,M2712Gupta,A25881–02018C01IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Vidit,S2711Krishna C R G24451–02018A07IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Artemiev,V2706Kramnik,V2779½–½2018A14IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Almasi,Z2702Williams,S2457½–½2018C40IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Gelfand,B2701Paehtz,E2513½–½2018E11IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Howell,D2689Olafsson,H25101–02018B22IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Sethuraman,S2673Anand,V2771½–½2018A30IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Kovalev,V2664Wagner,D2572½–½2018C81IOM chesscom Masters 20187
L'Ami,E2639Keymer,V2491½–½2018D35IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Shirov,A2636Le,Q27151–02018B68IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Sutovsky,E2633Batsiashvili,N24821–02018B12IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Ganguly,S2622Harsha Bharathakoti24921–02018D78IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Fridman,D2600Darini,P24751–02018E62IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Svane,R2595Leko,P2690½–½2018E05IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Antipov,M2593Giri,A27800–12018B51IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Hess,R2574Adhiban,B2668½–½2018E90IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Christiansen,J2541Tarjan,J24041–02018C95IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Lomasov,S2540Seul,G24021–02018A45IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Schneider,I2507Meier,G2639½–½2018C01IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Swapnil,S2493Eljanov,P27030–12018D45IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Henderson de La Fuente,L2484Donchenko,A2610½–½2018B12IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Gukesh D2456Melkumyan,H2660½–½2018A07IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Kashlinskaya,A2447Deac,B2594½–½2018D85IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Sundararajan,K2445Kaidanov,G25441–02018E65IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Eggleston,D2406Tregubov,P25880–12018C76IOM chesscom Masters 20187
Praggnanandhaa,R2519Ravi,T23571–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.33
Vaibhav,S2597Vaishali,R2313½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.34
Nabaty,T2692Kolosowski,M24481–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.35
Ladron De Guevara Pinto,P2427Tari,A26180–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.36
Arjun,K2408Huschenbeth,N25890–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.37
Zhukova,N2403Kosteniuk,A25510–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.38
Debashis,D2548Lubbe,N2447½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.39
Tania,S2400Puranik,A2547½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.40
Mekhitarian,K2546Gaponenko,I24091–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.41
Jackson,J2371Dragnev,V25081–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.42
Strunski,A2306Kobo,O25051–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.43
Shyam,S2505Raja,H2420½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.44
Anurag,M2495Erenberg,A2407½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.45
Khmelniker,I2492Trent,L23911–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.46
Zumsande,M2492Karavade,E2374½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.47
Gormally,D2482Serarols Mabras,B2367½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.48
Cornette,D2462Guramishvili,S2378½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.49
Lubbe,M2359Vishnu,P25040–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.50
Cramling,P2465Gavilan Diaz,M23341–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.51
Prithu,G2458Dubinski,M23271–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.52
Sadhwani,R2438Kolbus,D23131–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.53
Kulkarni,R2297Soumya,S24231–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.54
Munguntuul,B2422Pranav,A22691–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.55
Fenil,S2411Ragnarsson,D22511–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.56
Janzelj,L2244Houska,J24020–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.57
Grant,J2203Rahul,S23950–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.58
Hemant,S2393Piasetski,L22521–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.59
Hoefelsauer,T2380Byron,A21361–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.60
House,G2180Merry,A24350–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.61
Wallace,J2377Wall,T22531–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.62
Mortazavi,A2353Agrest,I2283½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.63
Rapport,J2350Paramzina,A22431–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.64
Leutwyler,M2142Arakhamia-Grant,K2345½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.65
Dahl,B2113Wu,L2335½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.66
Bellin,R2326Laustsen,L22361–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.67
Sahl,B2322Allen,K2216½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.68
Paterek,M2311Lorscheid,G22051–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.69
Mannion,S2289Demeter,D20641–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.70
Bianco,V2008Stefansson,V2291½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.71
Enkhtuul,A2295Burrows,M21211–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.72
Stanetzek,C2192Dushyant,S22891–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.73
Chennaoui,Y2050Unuk,L22720–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.74
Moksh,A2224Vidic,T21161–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.75
Jonsson,G2073Bopp,T21600–12018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.76
Schroer,M2064Shaw,P2096½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.77
Mai,A2063Sipos,S20501–02018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.78
Nihal,S2572Bellaiche,A2453½–½2018A00IOM chesscom Masters 20187.79

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.