Huffington: Immortal Blitz Game

5/6/2016 – The spectacular game Wesley So played at the Ultimate Blitz Challenge against legendary World Champion Garry Kasparov – with echos of Anderssen and Morphy – will go down in history. But there were other highlights in a month filled with exciting chess. Huffington Post columnist Lubomir Kavalek treats us to seven examples taken from the events in Norway and St Louis. It's a column to enjoy.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

Immortal Chess Blitz Game

By GM Lubomir Kavalek

Wesley So won a spectacular blitz game at the Ultimate Blitz Challenge in the Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis last Friday. It was power chess with hard to see threats and surprising sacrifices. He was immediately compared to two of the nineteen century chess legends: the American Paul Morphy and the brilliant German attacker Adolf Anderssen. The game was showered with superlatives all around the globe.

The loser of the game was the former world champion Garry Kasparov, attempting another blitz chess comeback. He took the defeat in stride, praised his opponent and even donated his winnings to the U.S. Chess Olympiad team. But I would not be surprised if Kasparov will now be called the Kieseritzky of Blitz chess. Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritzky was known not only for his long name, but for his loss of the original Immortal Game as well. It was won by Anderssen in London in 1851. This friendly encounter later became the subject of many books.

So’s victory, analyzed below, might have overshadowed other impressive performances in April and there were plenty. The world champion Magnus Carlsen won the Altibox Norway Chess tournament, the strongest event of this year.

Topalov vs Carlsen – photo from Altibox Norway Chess by Joachim Steinbru

The finish was bumpy for Carlsen. Levon Aronian defeated him and caught him, but the Norwegian grandmaster was able to pull away with a last round victory. Two first places in two tough tournaments this year is not a bad start for the world champion.

At the U.S. championships in Saint Louis, the top-rated Fabiano Caruana became the U.S. champion on his first try and Nazi Pakidze was best in the women’s section.

Caruana gained enough points to climb to the second place behind Magnus Carlsen on the May FIDE rating list. Caruana’s style of play resembles the young Anatoly Karpov. He can turn into a boa constrictor at times, patiently squeezing his opponents.

[Event "US Championship "] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Black "Shankland, Samuel L"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2795"] [BlackElo "2656"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2r1q1k1/1Q3bp1/R1nBp1p1/3pP1Pp/2pP3P/2P2PKN/8/8 w - - 0 43"] [PlyCount "23"] [EventDate "2016.04.14"] {Black is tied in knots and can hardly move. Caruana takes his time to tighten the screws.} 43. Nf4 Kh7 44. Ng2 Bg8 45. Ne3 Bf7 46. Nc2 Bg8 47. Na3 Bf7 48. Kf2 Bg8 49. Ke3 Bf7 50. Kd2 Bg8 51. Kc2 Bf7 52. Kc1 Kg8 53. Nb5 {Finally creating a winning threat 54.Nc7 that cannot be parried.} Ne7 54. Na7 $1 { A final leap, winning a piece. The alternatives are less convincing.} (54. Qxe7 Qxb5) (54. Bxe7 Rb8) 1-0

Caruana can also pounce on an unsuspecting opponent, winning tactically when the opportunity presents itself.

[Event "US Championship "] [Site "Saint Louis "] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Black "Onischuk, Alexander"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2795"] [BlackElo "2664"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "6k1/2p2ppp/p1Pb4/R7/4rP2/2P1B3/1r3P1P/3R2K1 w - - 0 25"] [PlyCount "7"] [EventDate "2016.??.??"] {Caruana takes advantage of the weak last rank with a pretty interference:} 25. Re5 $1 Rxe3 (25... Rxe5 26. fxe5 Be7 27. Rd7 Kf8 28. Ba7 $1 {preventing the black rook returning to the eigth rank. White wins and promotes the c-pawn, for example:} Ke8 29. Rxc7 Rd2 30. Bd4 Kd8 31. Rb7 Ba3 32. Bb6+ Kc8 33. Ra7 $18 ) 26. fxe3 Rb8 27. Ra5 Kf8 28. c4 1-0

The defending champion Hikaru Nakamura lost to Caruana early and was unable to catch him. In the end, he shared the second place with Wesley So.

At the beginning of the championship, So played the most entertaining chess. He confessed he studied all games of Magnus Carlsen. Against Akopian he played like a 14-year-old Magnus.

[Event "ch-USA 2016"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2016.04.18"] [Round "5"] [White "So, Wesley"] [Black "Akobian, Varuzhian"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C10"] [WhiteElo "2773"] [BlackElo "2615"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r2r2k1/pp2bpp1/1qb1pn1p/4N3/2P5/2BB4/PP2QP1P/1K1R2R1 w - - 0 20"] [PlyCount "9"] [EventDate "2016.04.13"] {So finds two consecutive winning sacrifices.} 20. Nxf7 $1 Kxf7 (20... Rxd3 21. Nxh6+) 21. Rxg7+ $1 Kxg7 22. Qxe6 Qxf2 $2 {Speeds up the defeat.} ({The computers provide the best defense with a bitter twist:} 22... Re8 23. Rg1+ ( 23. c5 Qxc5 24. Rg1+ Kf8 25. Bxf6) 23... Kf8 24. Bxf6 Bg2 $1 {and Black survives.}) ({But they also recommend two ways to get the advantage after} 22... Re8 23. Qf5 (23. c5 $1 {deflects the Queen from the sixth rank:} Qd8 ( 23... Qxc5 24. Rg1+ Kf8 25. Bxf6 $18) 24. Bc2 Qxd1+ 25. Bxd1 Bd8 26. Qg4+ Kf8 27. Qf4 Kg7 28. Bc2 $18) 23... Kf8 24. Rg1 (24. Bxf6 Bd7 $1 25. Bxe7+ Kxe7 26. Qh7+ Kf8 ({The tripple-pin wins after} 26... Kd8 27. Bf5 $18) 27. Bg6 Qf6 28. Rxd7 Re1+ 29. Kc2 Qxf2+ 30. Rd2 Qf6 $16) 24... Bd5 (24... Qd8 25. Ka1 $18) 25. cxd5 Rec8 26. Bd2 $18) 23. Qxe7+ Kg8 24. Bh7+ (24. Bxf6 {was quicker. It mates soon.}) (24. Bh7+ Kh8 (24... Nxh7 25. Qg7#) 25. Bxf6+ $18 {wins material.}) 1-0

Meantime, Carlsen started in Norway. On his best day he would have finished off the Indian grandmaster Harikrishna with precision.

[Event "4th Norway Chess "] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Black "Harikrishna, Pentala"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2851"] [BlackElo "2763"] [Annotator "lk"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r3rk1n/5ppB/3q3p/3pN2P/p7/6P1/2Q1R1K1/4R3 w - - 0 38"] [PlyCount "7"] [EventDate "2016.??.??"] 38. Qf5 ({Carlsen would surely prefer the winning deflection} 38. Nd7+ $1 Qxd7 39. Qc5+ Re7 40. Rxe7 {and White mates.}) 38... Re7 39. Bg6 Kg8 40. Nxf7 Rxf7 41. Bxf7+ 1-0

So is always well prepared in the opening and against the young Jeffrey Xiong, 16, he took it to the extreme. Wesley spent mere seconds on each move until move 30, when he thought for nearly two minutes. The players soon agreed to a draw. Give computers the credit. It is also sad to see actual play start that late in the game. It is part of today’s chess.

There was some resemblance between So and Carlsen. Both placed their knights on the same squares (g3, h4) to jump decisively to the square f5. So did it against Gata Kamsky in a more spectacular way, generating a strong attack.

[Event "US Championship"] [Site "Saint Louis "] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "So, Wesley"] [Black "Kamsky, Gata"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2773"] [BlackElo "2678"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3qr1k1/1b1n1pb1/2pp1npp/1p2p3/3PP2N/2P3NP/1PBB1PP1/2Q1R1K1 b - - 0 21"] [PlyCount "14"] [EventDate "2016.04.13"] 21... Kh7 {Allowing a dangerous knight sacrifice.} ({In a similar position, Spassky and Portisch liked the following manuever:} 21... Nh7 22. Nf3 {A move So was going to play.} (22. Nhf5 $5 {the sacrifice does not bring much after} gxf5 23. Nxf5 Re6) 22... h5 {with a playable game.}) 22. Nhf5 $1 gxf5 23. Nxf5 Re6 (23... Ng8 24. Nxd6 Bc8 25. Nxf7 Qe7 26. Nxe5 Nxe5 27. dxe5 Bxe5 28. f4 { favors White.}) 24. Bxh6 Ne8 25. Bg5 $1 Bf6 $2 {Exchanging the dark bishops gives White a powerful attack, but White has a strong upper hand, for example:} (25... Qb6 26. d5 Rg6 27. dxc6 Bxc6 28. Bb3 $16) (25... f6 26. Bh6 Kg8 27. Re3 Bxh6 28. Nxh6+ Kh7 29. Rg3 $18) 26. Bxf6 $1 Qxf6 {Kamsky admitted he overlooked 28.g4, but his position was hardly defensible.} (26... Ndxf6 27. Qh6+ Kg8 28. Qg5+ Kf8 29. Re3 {with a decisive attack, for example:} Nc7 30. Rf3 Bc8 31. Qh6+ Ke8 32. Ng7+ $18) (26... Rxf6 27. Qg5 Qc7 28. Re3 $18) 27. d5 Re7 (27... cxd5 28. exd5 Bxd5 29. Ne7+ $18) 28. g4 $1 {Clinching the win.} (28. g4 cxd5 29. g5 {drops the rook.}) 1-0

Carlsen used the square f5 to hinder Vladimir Kramnik’s play. The result was a positional masterpiece against the former world champion, now ranked third in the world.

[Event "4th Norway Chess "] [Site "Stavanger "] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Black "Kramnik, Vladimir"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2851"] [BlackElo "2801"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r3k2r/pp3p1p/2p2pb1/3p4/nb1P3N/4P1N1/PP3PPP/R2K1B1R w kq - 0 15"] [PlyCount "71"] [EventDate "2016.04.19"] {The knights of Carlsen and So seem to live in an identical world.} 15. Ngf5 $1 {Carlsen employs the famous Nimzowitsch blockade of the isolated pawn, correctly judging that Black cannot take the b-pawn. Little tactics going hand in hand with a positional aim. Carlsen has time to develop his bishop efficiently on d3.} Kd7 (15... Nxb2+ 16. Kc2 Nc4 17. Bxc4 dxc4 18. Rhb1 c5 19. a3 Ba5 20. Rxb7 $16) 16. Rb1 Ke6 17. Bd3 {Just in time.} Rhc8 18. Ke2 {White has a clear advantage.} Bf8 19. g4 {Paving the way for the knight on the edge to enter the game.} c5 {Kramnik hopes that he can create some counterplay on the queenside.} ({He should have regrouped:} 19... Nb6 20. Ng2 Bd6 21. h4 Rh8 22. h5 Bxf5 23. Bxf5+ {although White has the game firmly in his grasp.}) 20. Ng2 cxd4 21. exd4 {Opening the e-file is in White's favor.} Bd6 22. h4 h5 { Loses a pawn and de facto the game.} ({After the passive} 22... Rh8 23. h5 Bxf5 24. Bxf5+ Ke7 25. Ne3 Nb6 26. Kf3 {Black can hardly move.}) 23. Ng7+ $18 Ke7 24. gxh5 {The outcome is not in doubt. Kramnik resisted till move 50.} Bxd3+ 25. Kxd3 Kd7 26. Ne3 Nb6 27. Ng4 Rh8 28. Rhe1 Be7 29. Nf5 Bd8 30. h6 Rc8 31. b3 Rc6 32. Nge3 Bc7 33. Rbc1 Rxc1 34. Rxc1 Bf4 35. Rc5 Ke6 36. Ng7+ Kd6 37. Ng4 Nd7 38. Rc2 f5 39. Nxf5+ Ke6 40. Ng7+ Kd6 41. Re2 Kc6 42. Re8 Rxe8 43. Nxe8 Nf8 44. Ne5+ Bxe5 45. dxe5 Kd7 46. Nf6+ Ke6 47. h5 Kxe5 48. Nd7+ Nxd7 49. h7 Nc5+ 50. Ke2 1-0

Garry Kasparov turned 53 on April 13 and was the main draw of the Ultimate Blitz Challenge despite the fact that Caruana, Nakamura and So are now rated among the world’s Top Ten.

Kasparov blundered three knights the first day. It could have been four, but against Nakamura he took his move back against the rules and sent his knight to a safer square. The fans exploded on social media, immediately bringing back Kasparov’s game against Judit Polgar from Linares in 1994 when Garry used the same trick. “The main question that comes to mind is: why did I not say anything?” Polgar wrote later. Nakamura also let it go. But why is Kasparov tarnishing his own legacy?

Eventually everything settled down. Nakamura showed again why he is the blitzing maestro. He faced the only challenge from Wesley So. So had the best results against Kasparov, Caruana was too slow.

Kasparov got going at the end, defeating Nakamura and Caruana. But he will be remembered for the game against So, the ultimate blitz showpiece. I personally consider the Game 9 between Vasyl Ivanchuk and Artur Jusupov from the 1991 Candidates match in Brussels the most exciting non-classical game.

[Event "Ultimate Blitz Challenge"] [Site "Saint Louis"] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "So, Wesley"] [Black "Kasparov, Garry"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [PlyCount "49"] [EventDate "2016.04.28"] [EventType "blitz"] 1. Nf3 g6 2. e4 Bg7 3. d4 d6 4. c4 Bg4 5. Be2 Nc6 6. Nbd2 {A clever way to protect the central d-pawn.} e5 7. d5 Nce7 8. h3 Bd7 9. c5 $1 {A promising pawn sacrifice. So is looking for a breakthrough, freeing the square c4 for the knight. Kasparov accepts the challenge.} dxc5 $6 (9... Nf6) 10. Nc4 f6 11. d6 (11. Be3 b6 12. d6 {was a more precise move order.}) 11... Nc8 12. Be3 b6 ({ Kasparov could have chased the knight away with} 12... b5 $1) 13. O-O Bc6 ( 13... Nxd6 $1 14. Nxd6+ cxd6 15. Qxd6 Qe7 {was a good way to equalize.}) 14. dxc7 Qxc7 ({After} 14... Qxd1 $2 15. Rfxd1 Nce7 16. Nd6+ Kf8 17. Bc4 {White wins.}) 15. b4 $1 {[#]Wesley sees possible gains on the open c-file.} cxb4 ({ After} 15... Bxe4 16. bxc5 bxc5 {the computers suggest} 17. Ncxe5 $1 fxe5 18. Ng5 {with a powerful attack.}) (15... b5 16. Na5 c4 17. a4 a6 $14) 16. Rc1 { The pin on the c-file looms big. Black is already lost.} Nge7 17. Qb3 $1 $18 h6 ({Garry is alert and sees the threat of the knight sacrifice on e5 immediately. For example after} 17... a5 18. Ncxe5 $1 fxe5 19. Ng5 $18 {White wins:} Ng8 ( 19... Rf8 20. Ne6 $18) 20. Rxc6 Qxc6 21. Qf7+ Kd8 22. Ne6+ $18) 18. Rfd1 b5 { Kasparov forces White to play sharp.} (18... a5 19. Nxb6 $1 Nxb6 20. Bb5 Rc8 21. Qe6 $18) {[#]} 19. Ncxe5 $1 fxe5 20. Bxb5 $1 {A normal human move is the strongest.} ({The computers maintain that White also wins with the quiet} 20. Qe6 $5 Bd7 (20... a6 21. Bxh6 Bxh6 (21... Rh7 22. Bxg7 Rxg7 23. Nxe5 Na7 24. Rd6 $18) (21... Rxh6 22. Ng5 $18) 22. Nxe5) 21. Bxb5 $18) 20... Rb8 (20... Qb7 21. Ba4 $1 Bxa4 22. Qxa4+ Kf7 23. Rd7 Qxe4 24. Qb3+ Ke8 25. Qe6 $18) 21. Ba4 $1 {A wonderful quiet continuation in a blitz game. Wesley maintains the pin and keeps the black pieces tied up.} ({The computer brains work on a different level:} 21. Bxh6 $5 Bxh6 (21... Rxb5 22. Bxg7 Rh7 23. Ng5 Rxg7 24. Ne6 $18) 22. Rxc6 Nxc6 23. Qe6+ Kf8 24. Qf6+ Kg8 25. Bxc6 $18) 21... Qb7 $2 (21... Rf8 22. Qe6 Rf6 23. Rxc6 $1 $18) 22. Rxc6 $1 Nxc6 23. Qe6+ N8e7 (23... Qe7 24. Bxc6+ Kf8 25. Bc5 {White mates soon.}) 24. Bc5 $1 {[#]The wonderful world of pins! Another quiet move seals the victory. Garry has no defense.} Rc8 (24... Rh7 25. Bxc6+ Kf8 26. Bd5 $1 $18) (24... Bf6 25. Nxe5 $1 (25. Qxf6 Rh7 26. Nxe5 $18) 25... Bxe5 26. Bxc6+ Kf8 27. Bxb7 $18) (24... Kf8 25. Bb3 Nd8 26. Rxd8+ Rxd8 27. Qf7#) (24... Rd8 25. Bxc6+ Qxc6 26. Qxe7#) 25. Bxe7 (25. Bxe7 Bf8 26. Bxc6+ Qxc6 27. Rd8+ $1 Rxd8 28. Bd6+ Be7 29. Qxe7#) 1-0

Images from Saint Louis by Lennart Ootes

Original column hereCopyright Huffington Post


The Huffington Post is an American news website and aggregated blog founded by Arianna Huffington and others, featuring various news sources and columnists. The site was launched on May 9, 2005, as a commentary outlet and liberal/progressive alternative to conservative news websites. It offers coverage of politics, media, business, entertainment, living, style, the green movement, world news, and comedy. It is a top destination for news, blogs, and original content. The Huffington Post has an active community, with over over a quarter of a billion visits per month (according to Quantcast), making it the number 73 ranked web site in the world (Alexa, January 2014).


Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

GregEs GregEs 5/11/2016 05:00
Kavalek was the second (also called coach) of GM Short during the Short-Kasparov world championship match.
hserusk hserusk 5/9/2016 09:59
Wonder what this guy has against poor Weinstein :)
A7fecd1676b88 A7fecd1676b88 5/9/2016 05:08
"Immortal Blitz" is an oxymoron...But one does not expect anything of quality from Huffpos, hence we have the spectacle of Kavalek writing there, and his "Immortal Blitz". LOL.
Offramp Offramp 5/7/2016 08:00
I don't think it's a good game at all.
kbala kbala 5/7/2016 02:39
[White "Lubomir Kavalek"]
[Black "Garry Kasparov"]
[Site "Bugojno i"]
[Date "1982.??.??"]
1.c4 g6 2.Nc3 Bg7 3.d4 Nf6 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.h3 e5 7.d5 Na6
8.Be3 Nh5 9.Nh2 Qe8 10.Be2 Nf4 11.Bf3 f5 12.h4 Qe7 13.g3 Nb4
14.Qb3 Nfd3+ 15.Ke2 f4 16.Bd2 fxg3 17.fxg3 Rxf3 18.Nxf3 Bg4
19.Raf1 Rf8 20.Nd1 Qf7 21.Be3 Bxf3+ 22.Kd2 Qd7 23.Rhg1 Qh3
24.a3 Bxe4 25.Rxf8+ Bxf8 26.axb4 Qh2+ 27.Kc3 Nc1 0-1
Denix Denix 5/7/2016 10:14
Very nice recap. GM L Kavalek's column is always very entertaining and highlights moments that could have been missed during the live coverage.
Kingpawnkid Kingpawnkid 5/7/2016 08:53
Another point of view of Kasparov donation is tax deduction he'll receive from his earnings in the US.
Lachesis Lachesis 5/7/2016 05:05
I remember reading an article in new in chess magazine by Nigel Short concerning the character weaknesses of Kavalek. Apparently after many years he is still plagued by them after reading this column.
cptmajormajor cptmajormajor 5/7/2016 04:25
'He didn't receive some sort of appearance fee?'

Well, the American CHampionship to be on at the same time as the norway tournament which is recently pulled from the grand chess tour ... adn then the Kasparov blitz tournament on while the norway tournament still on ....
That small revenge is enough payment for Kasparob and the grand chess tour organisers.
Must say I enjoyed watching the blitz tourney more than norway ... great fun .
Catastrophe Catastrophe 5/7/2016 03:07
That computer line in the So - Akobian game ending with Bg2 is just insane. Computers and their unbelievable defensive skills!
Steven E DuCharm Steven E DuCharm 5/7/2016 02:26
Kasparov chess variant = you must touch your knight before moving any piece - you must knights twice-you must touch knights even if you lose all of them
Rational Rational 5/6/2016 10:03
Perhaps Kavalek should cast his mind back to Bugojno in 1982 when a 19 year old Kasparov demolished him on the black side of one of the great Kings Indian Defences instead of hyping up this relatively routine blitz game.
joachimus joachimus 5/6/2016 09:05
Kavalek is not objective, when it comes to Kasparov. Apparently he doesn't have any respect towards one of greatest players in chess history. I would love to see top GMs after 50 vs top 10 in blitz. It was amazing especially 1 round and first games. Kasparov lacked stamina and he was rusty, neverthless he playes great chess.
Aighearach Aighearach 5/6/2016 06:21
Nope. It was just blitz.
Heavygeardiver Heavygeardiver 5/6/2016 05:29
Great analysis by GM.Kavalek. I only read the Huffington because I enjoy his column so much. It is always nice to see his contributions here.
fightingchess fightingchess 5/6/2016 03:44
this was just an unrated blitz exhibition tournament. if kasparov took back his move and naka said nothing, others better shut up and stop judging kasparov.
Papatactics Papatactics 5/6/2016 03:19
Agreed with Fabulous.. Kavalek trying to plant the seed for the Kieseritzky nickname lol
FabulousNight FabulousNight 5/6/2016 03:02
The report is zealously negative towards Kasparov. Someone needs to inform Kavalek that the cold war is over.
koko48 koko48 5/6/2016 02:58
Speaking of Kasparov donating his winnings to the US Olympiad team....It's a nice publicity move, but I still find it difficult to believe that Kasparov played in this event for free

He didn't receive some sort of appearance fee?
Mr TambourineMan Mr TambourineMan 5/6/2016 11:14
Put up som millions you know what im thinking about.
1