Huffington: Caruana's Spectacular Chess Leap

9/12/2014 – The Sinquefield Cup was arguably the strongest tournament in the history of chess. Fabiano Caruana, an Italian born in Miami, won the first seven games and finished the six-player double-round robin tournament three points ahead of the field. It was one of the best results in chess history. Huffington Post columnist Lubomir Kavalek compares it to other great chess performances.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

Caruana's Spectacular Chess Leap

By GM Lubomir Kavalek

The Sinquefield Cup in Saint Louis was promised to be extraordinary this year: the highest-rated chess tournament ever with many of the world's best players on hand. To the delight of Rex Sinquefield, the main sponsor, it got even better.

Fabiano Caruana, an Italian born in Miami, won the first seven games and finished the six-player double-round robin tournament three points ahead of the world champion Magnus Carlsen. It was one of the best results in chess history and it earned Caruana $100,000 first prize.

Sinquefield Cup, Saint Louis, August 27-September 6, 2014

The string of chess victories took Caruana straight into the record books. The result of the 22-year-old Italian grandmaster was soon being compared to Anatoly Karpov's fabulous run in the 1994 tournament in Linares called the Wimbledon of Chess. After winning the first six games, Karpov finished undefeated with 2.5 point ahead of Garry Kasparov and Alexei Shirov, scoring 11/13. The 14-player field also included Vishy Anand, Vladimir Kramnik, Vassily Ivanchuk, Boris Gelfand, Judit Polgar, Gata Kamsky and other strong players.

Chess dominance is often measured by the margin of victory. The world champion Alexander Alekhine won the double-round robin in Bled, Slovenia, in 1931, scoring 20.5/26 and finishing 5.5 points ahead of Efim Bogoljubov. Bobby Fischer's perfect 11-0 score placed him 3.5 points ahead of his nearest rival, Larry Evans, at the 1963 U.S. championship. In 1970, Bobby won the Palma de Mallorca Interzonal with the margin of 3.5 points.

Fischer's string of 13 victories in the 1971 Candidates matches, defeating both Bent Larsen and Mark Taimanov 6-0 and winning the first game against Tigran Petrosian, is unprecedented in match play.

It is possible that Caruana may never repeat the result he achieved in Saint Louis. Karpov could never match his own result from Linares 20 years ago.

In the rating game, Karpov gained 34 points, Caruana 35 - an incredible feat in tournaments of such strength. With the rating leap to 2836, the Italian is rated second, just 27 points behind the world champion Magnus Carlsen.

Caruana achieved his victory with steady play and excellent opening preparation. He didn't appear to be nervous and he was calm when he spoke. And he is modest. No, he doesn't play like Karpov. Not yet.

Caruana's final result of 8.5 points matched Karpov's performance after 10 games. Veselin Topalov was their common victim and both grandmasters were able to make a decisive sacrifice on the square e6: Caruana offered his bishop, Karpov gave away a whole rook.

[Event "Sinquefield Cup,"] [Site "Saint Louis "] [Date "2014.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Black "Topalov, Veselin"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2801"] [BlackElo "2772"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3r1kr1/1bq1bp2/p1n1p3/2p1P1p1/N1B3Qp/2B1R2P/PP3PP1/4R1K1 w - - 0 24"] [PlyCount "15"] [EventDate "2014.??.??"] {Nothing is more frustrating than to be ambushed after you follow a promising plan to its logical end. Topalov spent a lot of time to bring his knight to the square c6, overlooking the demolition.} 24. Bxe6 $1 {The bishop sacrifice opens lines to the black king.} fxe6 25. Rf3+ Ke8 ({After} 25... Kg7 {white has two ways to crack black's position:} 26. Qh5 (26. Nxc5 Bxc5 (26... Kh6 27. Nxe6 Bc8 28. Nxc7 $18) 27. Rf6 {wins.}) 26... Rdf8 (26... Rgf8) 27. Rf6 $3 {A brilliant entry that Topalov at first did not see. The black pieces resemble a warehouse in which the vulnerable king is boxed in.} Bxf6 (27... Rxf6 28. exf6+ Bxf6 29. Nxc5 Bxc3 30. Nxe6+ Kf6 31. Nxc7 Bxe1 32. Qh6+ Rg6 33. Qh7 $18) 28. Nxc5 Bc8 29. Nxe6+ Bxe6 30. exf6+ Rxf6 31. Rxe6 $18) 26. Qxe6 {Black has problems with his rook on g8.} Rg7 ({After} 26... Nd4 27. Qxg8+ Kd7 28. Qf7 { black can win back the exchange, but his position is lost.}) ({And after} 26... Rf8 27. Nxc5 Rxf3 28. gxf3 Nd4 29. Qg6+ Kf8 30. Bxd4 Bxc5 31. Bxc5+ Qxc5 32. Qf6+ Ke8 33. e6 Qf8 34. Qg6+ Ke7 35. Qh7+ Kf6 36. e7 $18) 27. Qh6 Nd4 28. e6 $1 {Hemming in the black king.} Nxf3+ 29. gxf3 Bf8 (29... Rg8 30. Qh5+ Kf8 31. Qf7#) (29... Qf4 30. Qxg7 Bd6 31. Qxb7 $18) 30. Qh5+ Ke7 31. Bxg7 (31. Bxg7 Bxg7 32. Qf7+ Kd6 33. e7 {wins.}) 1-0

Karpov's sacrifice leads to more king hunts and he crowns his victory with another rook sacrifice. It belongs to some of his best tactical achievements.

[Event "Linares "] [Site "Linares"] [Date "1994.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Karpov, Anatoly"] [Black "Topalov, Veselin"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2740"] [BlackElo "2640"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "rqr3k1/3Qbp2/p1n1p1p1/1pp5/2P2P2/2N3P1/PP3PB1/R3R1K1 w - - 0 20"] [PlyCount "39"] [EventDate "1994.02.??"] [EventType "tourn"] [EventRounds "13"] [EventCountry "ESP"] [EventCategory "18"] 20. Rxe6 $3 {The rook runs amok since the black king is left to his own devices without good defenders.} ({After} 20. Bxc6 Ra7 {black wins the bishop on c6.}) 20... Ra7 ({After} 20... fxe6 21. Qxe6+ $1 Kg7 22. Bxc6 Ra7 (22... Rxc6 23. Qxc6 Qc8 24. Qe4 Bf6 25. Nd5 $18) 23. Be4 Bf6 24. Qg4 g5 25. Qf5 { white wins.}) 21. Rxg6+ $1 fxg6 {White has a mating attack after other moves, for example:} ({A.} 21... Kf8 22. Qh3 fxg6 (22... Bh4 23. Rh6 $1) 23. Qh8+ Kf7 24. Bd5#) ({B.} 21... Kh7 22. Qh3+ $1 Kxg6 23. Be4+ f5 (23... Kg7 24. Qh7+ Kf6 25. Qh6#) 24. Qxf5+ Kg7 25. Qh7+ Kf8 (25... Kf6 26. Qg6#) 26. Qh8+ Kf7 27. Bd5+ Kg6 28. f5+ $1 Kxf5 (28... Kg5 29. Qg7+ Kxf5 30. g4+ Kf4 31. Ne2#) 29. Qh7+ Ke5 30. Qh6 $1 Kf5 31. g4+ Kxg4 32. Be6+ Kf3 33. Qe3#) 22. Qe6+ Kg7 23. Bxc6 { White has enough material for the exchange and dominates the light squares.} Rd8 (23... Bf6 24. Ne4 $1 Bxb2 25. Rd1 Bd4 26. Rxd4 $1 cxd4 27. Qf6+ Kh6 28. f5 $18) 24. cxb5 ({Karpov could have minimized black’s suffering with} 24. Ne4 $1 bxc4 25. Kg2 Qxb2 26. Rh1 Rh8 27. Bd7 $18) 24... Bf6 (24... axb5 25. Nxb5 $18) (24... Qd6 25. Qxd6 Bxd6 (25... Rxd6 26. b6 $18) 26. b6 Re7 27. Rd1 $18) 25. Ne4 Bd4 (25... Bxb2 26. Rb1 Bd4 27. b6 Rf7 28. Ng5 $18) 26. bxa6 (26. Kg2 $1 {is even stronger:} axb5 27. Rh1 Rh8 28. Rxh8 Qxh8 (28... Kxh8 29. Qxg6) 29. f5 gxf5 30. Nd6 $18) 26... Qb6 (26... Qxb2 27. Rd1 $18) 27. Rd1 Qxa6 ({After} 27... Rxa6 28. Rxd4 $1 {white wins, for example:} cxd4 (28... Rxd4 29. Qe7+ Kh6 30. Qf8+ Kh5 (30... Kh7 31. Ng5#) 31. Nf6#) 29. Qe7+ Kh8 (29... Kh6 30. Nf6 Ra7 31. Ng4+ Kh5 32. Qh4#) 30. Qf6+ $18) (27... c4 28. f5 gxf5 29. Nd6 $18) 28. Rxd4 $1 {The double-exchange sacrifice eliminates the defender of dark squares. } Rxd4 29. Qf6+ Kg8 {Other moves do not help either:} (29... Kh6 30. Qf8+ Rg7 31. Nf6 $18) (29... Kh7 30. Ng5+ Kg8 31. Qxg6+ Kf8 32. Qe8+ Kg7 33. Ne6+ Kf6 34. Nxd4 cxd4 35. Qf8+ Rf7 36. Qh8+ Ke7 (36... Rg7 37. Qh6+) 37. Qe8+ Kf6 ( 37... Kd6 38. Bb5 $18) 38. Qe5+ Kg6 39. Be4+ $18) 30. Qxg6+ Kf8 (30... Kh8 31. Nf6 $1 {wins.}) (30... Rg7 31. Nf6+ {followed by 32.Qe8+ wins.}) 31. Qe8+ ({ Karpov misses a faster ending} 31. Qh6+ Kg8 (31... Rg7 32. Qh8+ Ke7 (32... Rg8 33. Qf6#) 33. Qe8#) 32. Nf6+ Kf7 33. Nh5 $1 {and black does not have a good defense.}) 31... Kg7 32. Qe5+ Kg8 (32... Kf8 33. Qh8+ Kf7 (33... Ke7 34. Qf6#) 34. Ng5+ Ke7 35. Qe5+ Kf8 36. Qxc5+ Re7 37. Ne6+ $18) (32... Kf7 33. Ng5+ Kg8 34. Qe8+ Kg7 35. Ne6+ $18) 33. Nf6+ Kf7 34. Be8+ Kf8 (34... Kg7 35. Nd7+ {wins. }) 35. Qxc5+ Qd6 (35... Rd6 36. Ne4 $18) 36. Qxa7 Qxf6 37. Bh5 Rd2 38. b3 Rb2 39. Kg2 1-0

During the Sinquefield Cup, Carlsen had to decide whether he was going to play the world championship match against Vishy Anand in the Russian coastal city of Sochi in November. In the end he signed. The sanction against Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine do not apply to sporting events.

As the legendary Czech master Karel Opocensky used to say: "You can't play chess with a big noise in your head." Chess players, preoccupied by personal problems cannot concentrate properly. Perhaps one reason for Carlsen's less than stellar result.

Images by Lennart Ootes

Original column hereCopyright Huffington Post


The Huffington Post is an American news website and aggregated blog founded by Arianna Huffington and others, featuring various news sources and columnists. The site was launched on May 9, 2005, as a commentary outlet and liberal/progressive alternative to conservative news websites. It offers coverage of politics, media, business, entertainment, living, style, the green movement, world news, and comedy. It is a top destination for news, blogs, and original content. The Huffington Post has an active community, with over over a quarter of a billion visits per month (according to Quantcast), making it the number 73 ranked web site in the world (Alexa, January 2014)..



Topics: Huffington, Kavalek
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

HuyenAnh HuyenAnh 9/21/2014 07:20
Caruana will be Bobby Fischer of 21th centuary.
Omoplata Omoplata 9/13/2014 10:36
The article was written by Kavalek for the Huffington Post, not by Chessbase. The stuff going on with the world championship no doubt didn't help Carlsen, but it's not to take anything away from Caruana's performance. I don't see what everyone is no annoyed about; Caruana was only Carlsen's opponent in two of the games so it doesn't explain Carlsen's slightly below par performance against all the other players.
VVI VVI 9/13/2014 06:53
Are you stupid and clumsy to attribute Carlsen`s poor performance at Sinquefield on Sochi and other irrelavent matters. For sure, Carlsen had a noise in his mind and that was Caruana`s superb performance. He could not believe it and lacked the sportsman spirit to openly appreciate it during the interviews.
What happened to his performance this year at the Norway Chess and the Olympiad ? How about the losses at Shamkir?
It is Carlsen`s moral obligation to defend his title against Anand at Sochi. Having demonstrated his vulnerability, I wouldn`t be surprised if he gets demolished by Anand.
Pentium Infinite Pentium Infinite 9/12/2014 11:24
Carlsen is surely the cute boy of chessbase, but please, try to be professional in your writings and would be good for you to avoid cheap arguments, the kind my unborn child will not believe in.

Lately chessbase articles have these such craps of bringing irrational talk. The man talks about "caruana spetacular leap" and at the and he cries for the reason why his favourite carlsen didnt get 8,5/10. You are hitting a new LOW, chessbase. Please write again this article.
Bostonian Bostonian 9/12/2014 10:06
You cannot use the Ukraine-Russia-Euro issue as an excuse for Carlsen's less 1st rank performance. No one should. All the credit goes to Caruana. He performed significantly better than his rivals. Period.
kandeebanr kandeebanr 9/12/2014 08:25
Carlsen is definitely not a god by himself and you cannot attribute such trivial things as reasons for his not-so-good play. If we go on citing problems for bad games, then each and every player will have tons of excuses. Please don't be biased in your reporting.
Pentium Infinite Pentium Infinite 9/12/2014 07:57
"Perhaps one reason for Carlsen's less than stellar result".

No way Jose, you need to live with the painfull idea that Caruana ass whiped them all.
ulyssesganesh ulyssesganesh 9/12/2014 05:20
sorry lubosh! one can't agree with the reason attributed to carlsen's indifferent play in the tmt., (that is the WCC complications! caruana was simply invincible in this tournament! this is the fact....
dysanfel dysanfel 9/12/2014 02:45
The FIDE has destroyed chess in North America.
1