Hamburg GP: Grischuk and Vachier-Lagrave to meet in semis

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
11/10/2019 – Only one match-up will be decided in tiebreaks at the second round of the FIDE Grand Prix in Hamburg, as Russians Peter Svidler and Daniil Dubov drew for a second day in a row and will be playing rapid and blitz on Sunday. Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Alexander Grischuk and Jan-Krzysztof Duda secured their spots in the semi-finals in the classical phase, thus getting one extra point at the overall GP standings. | Photo: Nadja Wittmann

ChessBase 15 - Mega package ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2020 with 8 million games and more than 80,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!

More...

A crucial match-up


The third leg of the FIDE Grand Prix is being played in Hamburg, Germany. The 16-player knockout has a €130,000 prize fund, with the series as a whole having an additional prize fund of €280,000 plus two qualifying spots for the 2020 Candidates Tournament. The tournament takes place in the Kehrwieder Haus from November 5th to 17th. You can find more info here.


Saturday's round in Hamburg had ChessBase co-founder Frederic Friedel as the special guest. The Editor-in-Chief emeritus of our news page made the ceremonial first move in the only match-up that will go to tiebreaks in the quarter-finals, Peter Svidler versus Daniil Dubov. Following Svidler's quip from Friday, when he mentioned that he did not know whether his home preparation was older than Dubov, we can certainly say that ChessBase is actually ten years older than the young Russian — the company was born in 1986 and Dubov in 1996.

Peter Svidler, Frederic Friedel, Daniil Dubov

Frederic Friedel played pawn to king four | Photo: Nadja Wittmann

It was an exciting day of chess at the Theater Kehrwieder, as Alexander Grischuk and Jan-Krzysztof Duda obtained fine victories to get their passes to the semi-finals. Grischuk will be facing Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, who drew Veselin Topalov from a position of strength after having won their first encounter a day earlier.

For either 'MVL' or Grischuk, winning the face-off will go a long way in getting one of the two Candidates spots at stake. For example, if the Russian wins that match in tiebreaks, even if he loses in the final he will get a six-point advantage over current co-leader Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, who would need to at least reach the final in Jerusalem to tie Grischuk's score (depending on how many rounds he goes through without needing tiebreaks). The standings table on Wikipedia gets frequently updated even with partial results.    


Match results

Click or tap any result to open the game via Live.ChessBase.com

 

Vachier-Lagrave 1½:½ Topalov

In a must-win situation, Topalov surprised his opponent with the French Defence, to which Vachier-Lagrave responded by going for a line that was "less theoretical and less direct". The strategy worked wonders for the Frenchman, who was in control all along, until signing the draw after 26 moves:

 

White is clearly better, as he has more space, a safer king and the better minor piece — Topalov mentioned afterwards that he needs many tempi to activate his knight, awkwardly sitting on e7 at the moment. Vachier-Lagrave decided to call it a day and secured his second consecutive match win without tiebreaks. Smiling, he declared:

In the end I can play, but why would I? 

Perhaps he should have done it on the outside chance of getting Anish Giri to eat his hat. Martin Bennedik shared that Vachier-Lagrave needed to gain 36 rating points to surpass Giri in the race to get the Candidates spot for the player with the highest average rating of the year. The Dutchman wittily responded:

Of course, 'MVL' agrees with Giri that gaining so many rating points is totally unrealistic. Luckily for us spectators, however, seeing members of the elite joking around on Twitter is an added bonus fans of some other sports do not have.

 

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave is in the semis | Photo: Nadja Wittmann

Grischuk 1½:½ Navara

Out of a Ragozin Defence, the contenders followed fifteen moves of a game Navara himself had played against Kacper Piorun in last year's Bundesliga. The Czech star had won that encounter, but this time around he had to deal with a novelty that changed the nature of the struggle to a certain extent:

 

Later on, Grischuk mentioned that 15...g6 is a rather logical move that leads to a struggle in which White needs to play carefully. Navara spent a little over four minutes on the correct 16.e4 — perhaps he knew the move, as he actually was doing fine out of the opening.

With the kings castled on opposite flanks, the players went for parallel expansions against the opposite monarchs. It turned out that Black's attack was stronger though, with Grischuk later mentioning that he was proud of his 27...b4:

 

There followed 28.axb4 b5 29.b3 a5, further opening lines against the white king. Navara tried his chances against the king, but Grischuk managed to transfer it to safety on c8. At that point, with mate-in-nine on the board, Navara resigned.

 

David Navara, Alexander Grischuk

David Navara versus Alexander Grischuk | Photo: Nadja Wittmann

Duda 1½:½ Yu Yangyi

In this encounter, Yu Yangyi was the first one to deviate from theory, going for a move that the masters of the (distant) past perhaps would not have even considered:

 

Advancing the c-pawn for a second time in less than ten moves with 9...c5 is a suggestion of the engines. Duda was ready to face this and did not take long before continuing with 10.dxc5. The queens left the board four moves later, but despite their absence a sharp struggle ensued. Duda had the initiative, and Yu Yangyi kept finding the right moves to keep a tense dynamic balance. On move 32, however, the Chinese faltered:

 

Yu Yangyi's 32...h3 gave way to the lethal 33.xg4+. When Grischuk strolled around the playing hall and saw this move, he sort of shrugged, noticing what had just happened — Black cannot capture the bishop with 33...hxg4 due to 34.♖h8#, while capturing with the bishop would leave Black in a losing position an exchange and two pawns down.

The Chinese went for 33...♚h4, but he most likely knew that there was no way out. Resignation came after 34.♖xc8 ♜a1+ 35.♔g2 hxg4 36.♖e8.

 

Jan-Krzysztof Duda

Poland's number one Jan-Krzysztof Duda | Photo: Nadja Wittmann

Svidler 1:1 Dubov

Once again the all-Russian encounter was the shortest of the day. Out of a Sicilian Rossolimo, Dubov blitzed out all his moves until the draw was agreed on move 21. Svidler spent more than ten minutes more than once, demonstrating that he was not as well-prepared as his younger opponent. The veteran later declared:

I knew this was probably not the greatest idea in the world, but on the other hand every now and again you feel like playing a central line and actually asking the question, but Daniil is probably not the person to be asking that question to. [...] Daniil is one of the leading experts on this line, and against him probably 1.a3 is arguably a better choice.

Svidler and Dubov will play the only tiebreaker on Sunday, and the winner will be facing Duda in the semi-finals.

 

Peter Svidler, Daniil Dubov, Frederic Friedel

Svidler, Friedel and Dubov in good spirits | Photo: Nadja Wittmann


Commentary webcast

Commentary by GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko


Schedule

Nov. 5–7 Round 1 + Tie-breaks
Nov. 8–10 Round 2 + Tie-breaks
Nov. 11-13 Semi-final + Tie-breaks
Nov. 14 Rest day
Nov. 15-17 Final + Tie-breaks

Links




Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Lilloso Lilloso 11/10/2019 06:25
@Serse
I agree. MVL played horribly against M. Carlsen too. And A. Grischuk is a great player.
Serse Serse 11/10/2019 01:08
@Lilloso Hope so. But MVL has his bad days sometimes (see the horrible game against Radjabov). Anyway Max and Sasha are two of the most exciting players nowadays. Would be nice to have both in the candidates tournament.
Lilloso Lilloso 11/10/2019 12:13
" if the Russian wins that match in tiebreaks, even if he loses in the final he will get a six-point advantage over current co-leader Shakhriyar ".
Sure ! But MVL seems constantly underestimated by commentators. I do think that he plays better than Alexander Grischuk and will win easily his next match and most probably FIDE Grand Prix.
1