Rapport tempts fortune, wins Belgrade Grand Prix

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
3/14/2022 – A win with white in Sunday’s second game of the final gave Richard Rapport tournament victory at the second leg of the FIDE Grand Prix in Belgrade. Rapport beat Dmitry Andreikin after rejecting a draw by triple repetition in a double-edged position. This victory, combined with his reaching the semifinals in the first leg of the series, places him as a clear favourite to get a spot in the Candidates Tournament. | Photos: Mark Livshitz

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

With a foot in the door

FIDE Grand Prix Belgrade 2022There is only a 3.3% chance of Richard Rapport not qualifying to the Candidates Tournament after having won the second leg of the FIDE Grand Prix in Belgrade, as Chess by the Numbers has shared on Twitter. The Hungarian grandmaster is up to number 7 in the live ratings list and can almost be counted as the seventh player to get a spot in the Candidates.

As we noted in a previous report, by Rapport’s own admission, luck has played a role in his getting the best result so far in the series. Besides getting victories in close matchups both in Berlin and Belgrade after taking considerable risks, Rapport has now been favoured by the drawing of lots for the third leg that kicks off next week. The three players, other than him, to have reached the final either in Berlin or Belgrade have all been seeded in the same pool, which means (in the worst-case scenario for him) only one among his three closest pursuers could reach the semifinals in that event — i.e. Hikaru Nakamura, Levon Aronian or Dmitry Andreikin.

Moreover, even if one of these three players reaches the final, it would be necessary for either Anish Giri, Leinier Dominguez or Maxime Vachier-Lagrave to win the tournament for Rapport to be disqualified — and only if one of these players outscores him on tiebreak criteria.

Rapport’s almost-certain qualification to the Candidates cannot be fully ascribed to luck by any stretch of the imagination, though. The Hungarian star did not shy away from employing his usual creative playing style in the first two legs of the series, and has demonstrated that he is particularly well-versed in dealing with imbalanced, sharp positions.

Richard Rapport

Richard Rapport

In the second game of the final match in Belgrade, Rapport had the white pieces and managed to get his opponent spending considerable amounts of time from as early as move 5. A tense struggle in the opening and early middlegame gave fighting chances to both players as the time control was approaching. On move 26, the contenders began to repeat moves, signalling an implicit draw offer. After the same position appeared twice on the board, though, Rapport decided to take his chances by deviating into a double-edged struggle — despite only having two minutes on the clock with over 10 moves to go to reach the time control.

The brave decision paid off. Andreikin soon faltered, and Rapport made the most of his chances in an excellent display of calculation and technical abilities to take home tournament victory, €24,000 in prize money and a near-certain qualification to the Candidates.

Richard Rapport, Dmitry Andreikin

The final game of yet another remarkable tournament

Rapport’s 5.a3 out of a Queen’s Gambit Declined — with an exchange on d5 — was a tricky way to avoid long theoretical lines. Andreikin’s principled 7...c5 had the Hungarian thinking long and hard, though, as he spent over 15 minutes before deciding on 8.Be5.

 
Rapport vs. Andreikin

It was clear that we were in for an entertaining struggle between two in-form players. The tense strategic battle that followed left both players with chances to fight for more if they so decided. By move 25, White was targeting a weakness on e6, while Black had strong central pawns and a chance to infiltrate along the c-file.

 

Black can place either the rook or the knight on e4. Andreikin opted for 25...Ne4, and saw his opponent immediately challenging the centralized piece with 26.f3.

There followed 26...Rc3 27.Qd4 Rc4 28.Qe3 Rc3 29.Qd4 Rc4, with Andreikin offering Rapport to draw the game by a threefold repetition.

 

But Rapport did not want to take the match to rapid tiebreakers just yet. With two minutes on the clock, the Hungarian played 30.Qe5, not fearing to enter a position with both kings vulnerable to attacks.

Andreikin, not one to shy away from tactical complications, continued with 30...Nd2, allowing Rapport to break things open via 31.f5

 

White at the very least is giving up an exchange — 31...Nxf1 32.fxe6 followed. As so often happens in double-edged positions, an innocuous-looking imprecision turned out to be the decisive mistake, as Andreikin’s 32...Ke8 gave White the edge going forward, when 32...Ke7 would have kept the balance.

Had Black placed his king on e7, 33.Qxg7 would have been a check, but the black monarch would have found shelter on the queenside, escaping via d6 and c7. In the game, on the other hand, there followed 33...Qb6+ 34.Kxf1 Rc1+ 35.Ke2, and Andreikin saw it necessary to give up his rook to try to save the game with a perpetual check.

 

After 35...Re1+ 36.Kxe1 Qe3+, it turns out that White can escape the checks by transferring his king to the queenside and eventually blocking a check with his queen on b2. 

Andreikin probably knew that he was lost once the time control was reached, but he continued playing until move 45, when he ‘resigned the game’ in a friendly, joking manner.

 

45...Qf1+ allowed 46.Bxf1, and Andreikin hurried to congratulate his opponent for the fine victory. A great way to finish a remarkable game, and a remarkable tournament.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nxd4 Bb4 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.Bd3 d5 8.Bd2 0-0 9.0-0 Bxc3 C47: Scotch Four Knights and Four Knights with 4 g3. 10.Bxc3 dxe4! is now more promising than 10...Nxe4. 11.Bxf6 Qxf6 12.Bxe4 Qxb2 13.Bxc6 Rb8 14.Rb1 Qxb1 15.Qxb1 Rxb1 16.Rxb1= Endgame KRB-KRB Rd8 17.Bf3 Bf5 18.Rb7 Bxc2
19.Rxc7N Predecessor: 19.h3 f5 20.Rxc7 Be4 21.Bxe4 fxe4 22.Kf1 Rd2 23.Rxa7 h6 24.a4 Kh7 25.a5 ½-½ (87) Heimann,A (2617) -McShane,L (2680) Karlsruhe 2020 19...Be4 20.Be2 g5 21.h3 a5 Weaker is 21...Rd2 22.Bc4± 22.Ra7 Ra8 The position is equal. Don't play 22...Rd2 23.Bc4± 23.Re7 Bd5 24.Bf3 Bxf3 25.gxf3 KR-KR f6 26.Kg2 Rc8 27.Ra7 Rc5 28.f4 gxf4 29.Kf3 Rc3+ 30.Kg4 Ra3 31.Kf5 Rxh3 32.a4 f3 33.Kxf6
33...Rh6+ 34.Kg5 Rh2 35.Kf6 Rh6+ 36.Kg5! Rh2 37.Kf6 Weighted Error Value: White=0.03 (flawless) /Black=0.03 (flawless)
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Andreikin,D2724Rapport,R2763½–½2022FIDE Grand Prix-II KO 20222.1
Rapport,R2763Andreikin,D27241–02022FIDE Grand Prix-II KO 20222.2

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.