Belgrade GP: Andreikin stuns Grischuk

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
3/2/2022 – Half the games ended decisively on opening day at the second leg of the FIDE Grand Prix in Belgrade. Dmitry Andreikin and Vidit Gujrathi are leading their pools after beating Alexander Grischuk and Alexei Shirov respectively. Meanwhile, both games finished decisively in pool C, with Anish Giri and Nikita Vitiugov scoring full points in the first round. Two draws were seen in pool D. | Photos: Mark Livshitz

ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024 ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024

It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.

More...

The second leg has begun

A horrific war is taking place in Ukraine, and the whole world is closely following the appalling events prompted by Vladimir Putin’s decision to invade the second-largest country in Europe.

There is no argument that this time around, in the era of social media, a massive rejection of Putin’s behaviour online will make a difference, as the general public can both influence leaders’ decisions and offer their help directly — the chess world can support via Hikaru Nakamura’s charity stream, via Mikhail Golubev (who often writes articles for ChessBase) or via long-time chess journalist Anastasiya Karlovich.

At the start of the commentary webcast for chess24, 8-time Russian chess champion Peter Svidler quickly clarified:

Let’s at least get some things stated live on air. I do not agree with the war my country is waging in Ukraine. I do not believe Ukraine, or Ukrainian people, are my enemies, or anybody’s enemies

Notwithstanding, there is a limit to the impact we can have by following the news. In fact, sharing bad information can be harmful both for the victims and for our mental health. At some point, as stated by Abby Ohlheiser, we should consider logging off:

Sometimes when an important and horrible thing is happening in the world, looking away or taking a break feels like apathy. It’s not. Stop doomscrolling.

Alexander GrischukFive out of sixteen participants at the Grand Prix in Belgrade are Russian. In the direct duel between compatriots, Dmitry Andreikin beat Alexander Grischuk.

In the post-game press conference, Andreikin mentioned that he played a sharp game because “maybe it’s [our] last tournament, who knows”, while Grischuk gave a more lengthy response condemning his country’s actions. Grischuk reflected:

I will not use the word ‘war’ because it’s prohibited in our media, and I want them to be able to quote me. [...] If we know that the truth is on our side, if we feel that we are with the truth, with justice, [we resurrect as a country] — and now, at least me, I’m losing this feeling every day, with what is going on, with every victim, with every bombing of the civil [population], and it’s extremely painful.

Pool A: Andreikin strikes with the Sicilian

For a second tournament in a row, Etienne Bacrot is playing in pool A. After scoring 1½/6 in Berlin, the Frenchman started the second leg with a 46-move draw against Sam Shankland.

Meanwhile, Alexander Grischuk and Dmitry Andreikin were battling in a sharp Sicilian. The compatriots only left theory on move 14, but by then they had both spent copious amounts of time dealing with the opening complications. By move 20, White was a pawn up, but had to deal with a rather annoying pin.

 

Already in zeitnot, Grischuk found the appropriate idea but not the correct move order. To keep fighting, White needs to start with 21.b4 here, and after 21...Qa4 22.Bh6 Black cannot gain a piece with 22...Bxd6 23.Qxd6+ (see diagram below) Rxd6 because of 24.Rf8#

 

However, instead of 21.b4, Grischuk opted for the direct 21.Bh6, which can be responded by 21...Qxe1 22.Rxe1 (the rook is no longer on the f-file, so there will be no mate threat on f8) Bxe6 23.Qe3

 

Black was left with a rook and a knight for the queen. More importantly, though, he can immediately play the strong 23...Ng4, with a clear initiative. 

Andreikin was in the driver’s seat, and went on to convert his advantage into a 35-move win despite also being low on time. It was an excellent win to boost his confidence in his debut at the series.

 
 

Pool B: Giri and Vitiugov score

Both round-1 games in this pool saw a player getting the upper hand very early in the game. Anish Giri played a powerful novelty as early as on move 10, giving up a pawn and prompting Amin Tabatabaei to spend 38 minutes on his response. The Dutchman showed his class to convert the advantage into a remarkable victory.

In the other encounter, instead of a novelty that created long-term opportunities, it was a blunder by Pentala Harikrishna which decided the game in Nikita Vitiugov’s favour.

 

This very position was seen last year at the New in Chess Classic, when Aryan Tari played 13.0-0 and drew Vidit Gujrathi in a long encounter. Harikrishna’s 13.Nxd5, on the other hand, immediately fails to 13...Ne4, which attacks both the queen and the f2-pawn. 

 

There is no way to save this position against a player of Vitiugov’s calibre. Resignation came on move 24.

 
 

Anish Giri

Anish Giri

Pool C: Vidit beats Shirov

Richard Rapport and Vladimir Fedoseev are once again playing in the same pool, as they also faced each other twice in the prelims of the Berlin leg. In that event, Rapport won both encounters, clinching group victory by beating his Russian opponent in the sixth round. This time around, the Hungarian was once again in the driver’s seat, but could not make the most of his advantage and ended up collecting only a half point.

In an extremely messy encounter, Vidit Gujrathi out-calculated Alexei Shirov while marshalling the white pieces.

 

As the players noted in the press conference, it was all but impossible to correctly evaluate such a complex position over the board. Here, Shirov’s 23...Qe8 was a crucial mistake though, as it allows White to consolidate his position with 24.Bxd6+ Rxd6 25.Bxb3 Rg8 26.Nc4

 

Of course, playing black was markedly difficult with such a vulnerable king on b8. In the first diagrammed position, nonetheless, the engines give 23...e3 as best, a tough move to play but one that an in-form Shirov is surely capable of finding. 

In the game, the Spaniard threw in the towel on move 30.

 
 

Vidit Gujrathi

Vidit Gujrathi

Pool D: Two draws

Seasoned grandmasters Yu Yangyi and Shakhriyar Mamedyarov entered a theoretical Scoth Opening and signed a 36-move draw.

Another experienced member of the elite, meanwhile, played a much longer game, as Maxime Vachier-Lagrave struggled in his encounter with white against Alexandr Predke. 

 

MVL gave up the c-pawn with 32.Rd1, but quickly placed his rook on the seventh rank to get enough compensation for the lost material. The game lasted around four and a half hours, which, as the Frenchman emphasized, helped him to get back in rhythm after not having played a single classical game in a bit over three months.

 
 

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Jacob woge Jacob woge 3/8/2022 12:42
“a world championship is fought between two individuals. Those individuals represent their nations and their nations are behind them.”

We just have to disagree on that. Looking at chess history, I don’t see it to be true. Not at WC level, not at lower levels.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/8/2022 12:56
@Jacob Woge

a world championship is fought between two individuals. Those individuals represent their nations and their nations are behind them.

Top chess players are individuals and representatives of their nations at the same time.

The fact that Karjakin and Shipov support the current invasion casts a shadow on their names. I believe that any and all biographies of these players will mention that and this is shameful, even if they do not realize it now.
Jacob woge Jacob woge 3/7/2022 06:45
“Why have flags at all?”

I may have been too brief; did not mean in general, but in this context: alongside player’s name in chess tourneys. You might as well skip it, for instance in chessbase reports. Definitely at top level. We know who these guys are, anyway.

I still side with Dubov, and definitely not the Karjakin/Shipov duo who was out to criticize him on his role as second. Totally unfounded, and quite startling already then, in my (honest) opinion. They should have kept their big mouths shut - but went ahead and opened even wider.

A WC chess match is a match between two individuals. Not two nations.

You may have allies to support, but although this work group may have a national bias (language skills matter), it tends to be very diverse and based on personal relations.

Should one player have to default, be it in match or tournament play, a replacement may be sought. Based on qualifications/availability. Not on nationality.

Norway’s #2 does not get a shot at it, should Carlsen injure himself badly e.g. by taking a fall from a high horse. Karjakin being barred from the Candidates (and this whole issue may end up in a big fight) does not hand his spot to another russian. The slot was his, not Russia’s.

We regard chess players as persons. Not as representatives of whatever nation. The widespread shopping around, seeking the federation that furthens your career the best, shows that top players have the same regard, or necessity.
arzi arzi 3/7/2022 03:04
to lajosarpad:" I call a spade a spade."

Yes, but with truth it is not that simple thing. We have talked before about this, dishonesty, and the opinion of the one writer does not make the other writer dishonest, just because he thinks differently. I think the honest way of communicating is to say straight what you think, even though you may be wrong. Karjakin was at least honest when he said aloud he supports Putin. Was he right is the different matter.

I`m not going to start again Dubov incident or covid. By the way, where has covid gone? Did the war in Ukraine kill it?
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/7/2022 01:04
@arzi I call a spade a spade. I would not say that I am always right. Not by far. But when I see logical fallacies, dishonest measures to "win" a debate, I tend to not shy away from exposing it. It could be the case that Jacob Woge is right and I am wrong. (In my opinion it is the other way around, but let's assume that he is right for a moment). Even if he is right, he is not making a good case for his position. Mixing up the position that Russia has an interest and Dubov has violated it via helping Carlsen to prevent a Russian from becoming a world champion with warmongering is a dishonest way of presenting a position. Using the anti-Russian sentiment that is trending now to advance an internationalist agenda is a sad example of dishonest discourse. So, independently of who is right and who is wrong, we should expose fallacies and dishonest discourse. We should all try to present our position in a discourse in an honest way, with arguments. I exclude the possibility that Jacob would be unaware that chess fans criticizing Dubov are not ab ovo warmongers. There is nothing personal with Jacob, but, if he wants to present an internationalist position, he should do so without such fallacies.
arzi arzi 3/7/2022 07:44
To lajosarpad:"To be frank, it is quite dishonest to attempt to equate the normal and understandable expectation according to which other members of your nation should not violate national inerests with the support of attacking another nation"

Do try NOT to use the word - dishonest -" too often. It gives a mistaken impression that the truth comes only from you. There are anti-Russian sentiment in everywhere but also anti-world-other-than-Russian sentiment. No one is total innocent or all to blamed. People should learn to know when the nationalism is good thing to act or just too bad for all.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/6/2022 11:52
Being loyal to your nation and expect other members of the same nation to be loyal as well is one thing. Attacking another nation or hating another nation is another thing. You try to mix up the two. And, when I point out why (I think) you are wrong with arguments, you say ex-cathedra that it is "utter crap". No arguments on that whatsoever. However, it's quite obvious that groups of people have interests. In the Carlsen-Nepo match the Norwegian interest was that Carlsen would win and the world champion would be a Norwegian. The Russian interest was that Nepo would win and he would become world champion, so the world champion would be Russian. If Nepo would have been the world champion, Russian fans would have been happy. Tournaments would have been more likely to be organized in Russia, Russian children would have been more likely to become chess players. The prestige of the Russian country and nation would have been higher. Shortly: in that match it is obvious that the Russian interest was that their contender would win. Yet, Dubov did everything he could to prevent that. So, he served Norwegian interests against Russian interests.

To be frank, it is quite dishonest to attempt to equate the normal and understandable expectation according to which other members of your nation should not violate national inerests with the support of attacking another nation.

Also, there is a trending anti-Russian sentiment. Using this in order to try and move forward your globalist views is an immoral position in this discussion.
Jacob woge Jacob woge 3/5/2022 05:22
“When Dubov was training Carlsen in order to protect his crown (and preventing his compatriot, Nepo from achieving it), Dubov actively served foreign interests against the interests of Russians.”

This prompts me to cite a famous Tony Miles chess book review in full length: “Utter crap.”. Even if a former WC finalist is of that opinion.

“It is normal that Russians don't like that.”

Even worse.

Dubov served the interests of Carlsen (and his own) against the interests of Nepomniatchi. It takes the mindset of aforesaid finalist to take it further than that, and I am not surprised the same person(s) have come forward as Putin and invasion supporters. It is about time that mindset got retired. That is my agenda, if there is any.

When it comes to excluding russians in general, I am close to being on the fence. I do not much fancy the holier-than-thou attitude that quickly spreads. It runs counter to the FIDE slogan, and may take the chess community to a place beyond repair.

The question is, can it be avoided.

My hope is chess players are less prone to group thinking than average Joe. After all, the heart of the game is to think for yourself, and top players have to be internationally oriented in order to make a living.

But there is more to life than chess, and hardball ostracism may be needed in order to avoid assaults on lesser states becoming the new order.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/5/2022 02:39
@Jacob Woge first let's clarify that if someone was right previously, he/she might be wrong later. And if someone was wrong previously, he/she might be right later. It is perfectly normal and reasonable from a community (Russians in this case) to expect its members to be loyal to them and to at least not harm their interests. When Dubov was training Carlsen in order to protect his crown (and preventing his compatriot, Nepo from achieving it), Dubov actively served foreign interests against the interests of Russians. It is normal that Russians don't like that. On the other hand, attacking a country, killing civilians, risking WWIII, threatening with nuclear weapons should be too much, even for Russians. Supporting that war is an extremist view. Yet, you try to mix up the fact that Dubov served foreign interests against Russians with the fact that Russia has started a reprehensible war. You also try to use the anti-Russian sentiment that is trending now for your agenda. The logical fallacy you use is called "Poisoning the well". Yet, I see that there is a real danger that Russian individuals in the west will be discriminated against and some atrocities will happen. We should instead try to convince people that the Russian person living next door is not a war criminal for being a Russian. Many entities, including the ECU are starting to discriminate Russians so severely that it starts to look somewhat similar to the discrimination Jews had to face in the Third Reich.
Jacob woge Jacob woge 3/5/2022 01:08
This discussion about chess and nationality being interlinked or not relates to the criticism Dubov received from notorious parties, when being a Carlsen second during the recent WC match:

“Karjakin criticised Daniil Dubov for serving as a second for Magnus Carlsen in the World Chess Championship 2021 against Ian Nepomniachtchi. This was also criticised by Sergei Shipov who along with Karjakin, said that Dubov should not have helped a non-Russian in a match against a fellow Russian. Dubov responded that he considered it to be a match between two individuals, and counter-argued that working with Carlsen would improve his chess and hence help the Russian team.”

I side with Dubov in his first point in this exchange, rather than his compatriots. It seems others have a different view.
arzi arzi 3/4/2022 12:46
To lajosarpad: I'm afraid that Putin doesn´t care about what ordinary Russians think and say, unless there are also many very high ranking military people, FSB,...
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/4/2022 12:22
@Jacob Woge the idea of abolishing the nations and flags is promoted by communism. They still have a flag, which is red. That flag is waved by the invading Russian soldiers.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/4/2022 12:21
@arzi if Russia punishes Grischuk for his opinion, then all Russian chess players will be outraged. I doubt Putin would be crazy-enough to risk that. But I doubted he would be crazy to attack Ukraine and I was wrong. Hofi Géza was a Hungarian humorist who openly criticized and ridiculed the terrible communist dictatorship. Yet the government did not touch him, because that would have led to a second anti-communist Hungarian revolution, which would have directly challenged Kádár and his regime. In 1956 Rákosi needed the Soviet army to suppress the Hungarian revolution. The West did not help then. Ukraine is learning this reality right now. But after that, the Hungarian communist regime would not dare to imprison or kill high-profiled popular people. So they had the option to speak out against insanity, while not famous people would have been brutally punished for that.
arzi arzi 3/4/2022 07:18
Jacob woge:"Why have flags at all?"

For same reasons there are the nations. The nations have citizens. Citizens are competing with each other. And the fame is for both. Also money talks.
Jacob woge Jacob woge 3/3/2022 06:25
Chess is a mental combat between two individuals. When and why exactly did flags become part of that relation? Why have flags at all?
Quanber Quanber 3/3/2022 04:39
I am unable to understand that tournaments are being held while millions have been sent on the run from a slaughterhouse in the middle of Europe. But one should at least exclude those who play under the Russian flag, because then they automatically help to legitimize the attack on Ukraine. No one dies from being boycotted, and the exclusion has signal value.

Of the 141 countries in the UN that voted to condemn the invasion of Ukraine, many are close to Russia, and are provoked by Russia on a daily basis, such as overflights and threats of nuclear weapons use. They ask themselves two related questions:

01) Putin assured that the major military forces would never be used to attack Ukraine. After which he invaded the country with the sole purpose of expanding Russia. So can we trust that he will not continue to our country?

02) If the answer to the first question is a resounding no, then what is needed to most effectively stop this risk?

One does not need a doctorate in logic to figure out that there is no other answer to this catastrophe than to take Putin out of the equation. All forms of negotiation are completely out of the question. So in these hours and minutes, great resources are being spent on this very solution, and my guess is that within a month Putin will be visited by a cute little drone with greetings from the Ukrainian people. Peace will be restored after.
arzi arzi 3/3/2022 03:02
To lajosarpad: Still, Grischuk can not say anything he just wants. He can not use certain words, like for example, a war. He have to protect his safety. Some day he have to go back home to face the possible punishment. Who will help him then? FIDE?
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/3/2022 02:50
@arzi Russian individuals, like Grischuk can play even if FIDE decides that their flag will not be shown. The idea I propose is to avoid discriminating Russian individuals even if we do not allow them to represent their country in view that Russia violated international law. So Grischuk should be allowed to play and FIDE can decide whether it allows Grischuk to represent the Russian flag under the current circumstances.
arzi arzi 3/3/2022 12:40
Lajosarpad:"We need to distinguish between Russia's politics and Russian individuals."

That is an impossible formula to follow. Someone represents their country but cannot represent their country, politically. Individuals have to make choices before they start represent their country. For example, if a country is in favor of a racist policy, the representative of the country must think in advance whether he/she wants to make him/herself a representative of the racist country. You cannot do both at the same time. You cannot say you are not a racist but at same time you represent a racist country. Unfortunately, the choice has to be made.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 3/3/2022 11:25
We need to distinguish between Russia's politics and Russian individuals. Russian politics is problematic, especially because of its imperialism that led to this war. This is why the Russian flag cannot be used at international sports competitions. However, Russian chess players are individuals. As long as they cannot represent the Russian flag, they are individuals like you and me. Don't apply collective guilt, please.
arzi arzi 3/3/2022 06:41
To Minnesota Fats "Or i am exagerating now?"

No, it is the most natural thing to say. The Russians have never lived in a democratic society. They have lived always in a land of Tsars. Tsar Peter the Great, Red Star Tsar Lenin the Great, Red Star Tsar Stalin the Second Greatest and Tsar Putin the Greatest (sorry Muhammad Ali). How could the Russians have been learnt anything about democracy, freedom of speech, liberty? From books, War and Peace? Russia is not any more Russia but Putinia. Old Tsar has died, long live new Tsar. Good bye Russia, welcome Putinia!
arzi arzi 3/2/2022 01:27
To johnzzballard. Consider this. If both the Ukrainian and the Russian players agree with this war and say it in a joint declaration, would it have a propaganda value?
Stupido Stupido 3/2/2022 01:19
@johnzzballard - I honestly don't know. I have seen some news that Ukrainian athletes like Svitolina are ok to play Russian opponents if they show up under neutral flag.
arzi arzi 3/2/2022 01:00
To johnzzballard: "..they are being shot in the head !"

Are the shooters playing here? Even though they may oppose the war?
johnzzballard johnzzballard 3/2/2022 12:26
@stupido. Hard to criticize this unless you are an Ukrainian. As some one else said shoot yourself in the foot, they are being shot in the head !
Stupido Stupido 3/2/2022 12:23
@johnzzballard - This is an individual competition. All sports federations allow Russian athletes to compete under a neutral flag. Chess players personally involved in war propaganda are under disciplinary investigation. So it seems hard to criticize FIDE on this.
Pionki Pionki 3/2/2022 11:04
Should we ban also those Russian players who are against the war in Ukraine? - Well, the Ukrainians did not arrive, for one reason or another. Why should the Russians have the luxury of leaving the hotel in the morning, coming to the playing hall and play chess, sipping coffee between the moves? Just sitting there and thinking about the beautiful positions on the board. I admire their power of concentration.
arzi arzi 3/2/2022 10:38
Should we ban also those Russian players who are against the war in Ukraine? Really? Why don't we just shoot on our own foot, for fun.
johnzzballard johnzzballard 3/2/2022 09:37
How come Russians are being allowed to compete !!!
flachspieler flachspieler 3/2/2022 07:29
Thanks, in particular for the first part of the report.
And thanks to the Russian players who found clear words.
Keep on playing chess.
1