Chess Explorations (69)
By Edward Winter
C.N. 7263 quoted a remark by Mikhail Botvinnik on page 248 of International
Championship Chess by B. Kažić (London, 1974):
‘Alekhine’s was a complex character. As soon as he felt any signs
of hostility, he would shoot out his quills like a porcupine. When people
were kind he felt bound to behave in the same way.’
That complexity makes it especially useful to retrieve from forgotten publications
all possible information that can be gleaned from the interviews given by Alekhine. A number
of such items have been presented in C.N. over the years, and examples are offered in the present article.
C.N. 6613 reproduced an interview with Alekhine which was published on page
1 of the Tribune de Genève, 27-28 September 1925:

Larger
version
Another interview with Alekhine, by Lucien Zacharoff, was printed on page 7
of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 19 May 1929. A copy was presented by John
Blackstone (Las Vegas, NV, USA) in C.N. 7260:

Larger
version
From Alekhine’s observations the following particular comments may be
noted:
-
‘Yes, chess is an art, beautiful and esthetic ... I derive tremendous
spiritual satisfaction from delving into its intricacies. Liking for it
must be intuitive. It’s like music.’
-
(Asked why so many masters are ‘known to have gone crazy’ from
indulgence in chess.) ‘Ah, but this is another fallacy. True enough,
they were insane, some are today, but not from chess. You see, many people
don’t know that to enjoy chess thoroughly a general wide cultural
background is required. Some players are so engrossed in the game that they
neglect other phases of their mental development, and this undue concentration
on one thing results in dementia precox. Then, again, some have hereditary
disposition toward insanity and it would have asserted itself in some other
occupation anyhow.’
-
‘I do not engage in politics nowadays at all ... In my views I am
thoroughly democratic but not quite as much inclined to the left as the
present Russian rulers, but I am most heartily in accord with the efforts
of the Soviet Government to encourage chess activity in the Union.’
-
‘What are my hobbies? I like music, horseback riding, painting. That
is not enough? Well, add tennis. Do I play it well? That’s a different
story.’
Wayne D. Komer (Toronto, Canada) and Stephen Wright (Vancouver, Canada) submitted
in C.N. 7016 an interview with Alekhine by Archibald Lampman which was published
in the Toronto Daily Star, 14 November 1932, page 3:

The C.N. item gave a full transcript. Below are some extracts:
‘“Are you good at figures, doctor?”, we asked. “I
mean are you one of those chaps who can juggle a hatful and know all the answers?”
“No good at mathematics at all”, he says surprisingly. “No
good at any of the exact sciences.” “Well, don’t you call
chess an exact science?” “No, it’s an art. I’m pretty
good at philosophy and all the abstract sciences.”
“Tell us, doctor – how do you train for these big bouts?”
“Train? I don’t train – I knew all about it long ago –
I haven’t even got a chess board.” Anybody lend the doctor a chess
board?
“You mean to say you won’t slip upstairs and have a couple of
rounds of shadow boxing with the chess board before you encounter the boys
tonight?” He laughed. “I don’t know how I’ll put in
the time – maybe play a little bridge.” “Good at bridge?”
“Just a fairly good player.” ...
“Women good at chess?” “No – they’re not”,
he says smiling. And, by the way, if all the Moscow lads smile like that,
the home town can’t be so bad after all. “And that’s funny
too – because they’re good at bridge and other things –
but not chess.” “Just another mystery.” “About women?”
“Yes, just one more.”
He has a library of 1,600 books on chess. “Read them all?”, we
asked. “No”, he says off-hand, “I know what’s in them.”
He has written eight books on chess himself.
“Anybody around the world now that can beat you, do you think?”
“No, I don’t think so. I have beaten them all”, he says,
although I only beat Capablanca by a small margin. I just want to hold my
own against my own generation. If one of the younger generation came along
and beat me – well – .” He shrugged a shoulder. “I
don’t care.”
“No hard feelings, eh, toward the youngsters?” “No; none
at all.” ...
We switched to the man himself. By the way, he smoked one cigarette after
another as he talked to us – if that’s any help to you chess aspirants.
And so did we, if that’s any interest. “You come from a noble
family?”, we opened tentatively, as you can’t tell how people
are going to look on this kind of thing.
“Yes – my father was marshal of Voronesh”, he says, “Russia
under the czar was divided into states – my father was head of one of
those states.”
“Did your family suffer a lot in the revolution?” No –
not so much. I was sentenced to death”, he says, something like “The
traffic cop hands me a ticket, see.” “Sentenced to death! –
well, how did you get out of that?” We had to arouse some interest in
the man about his own death sentence. He just shrugged his shoulder. “Blew
over, eh? – this shooting business?” He laughed his sunny laugh
again. “Yes – just blew over.”
He was an officer in the German [sic; Russian] army. He’s 40
now, so he couldn’t have been any veteran then. He’s also a reserve
officer in the French army as well as being a lawyer. So that’s why
he doesn’t care whether he wins or not. Twelve years ago he left Moscow
for the last time.
“I’m practically an exile now”, he says, as though exiling
was a great sport. “Why’s that?”, we asked. “Just
because they don’t like you?” “No, they don’t like
me – and I’m anti-Communist.”
He says in the old days there’d be about a million grade A chessplayers
in Russia. Moscow was a great centre. “Didn’t the Soviets do something
about the chess boards – kings and queens and everything?” “No,
they didn’t worry about them. They still play chess.”
Dr Alekhine started to play chess at the age of seven. The family made him
quit. “I was always good”, he said, as naturally as you’d
say, “I’m punk at bridge”. He began again at 12. They let
him go to it. He joined the local club at 15. And at 16 was a master of chess.
Tie that.
“Was your dad good at chess?” “He played, but he wasn’t
much good”, he said. By the way, there have only been seven or eight
chess champions in the last 250 years. It’s not one of those things
you rush into.
“When are you going to quit?” “Oh, I don’t know –
perhaps I’ll practise law later on.” He’s going to the Far
East to clean up on Gandhi’s crowd and then the Aussi playboys.
“Sure you’re not worrying about tonight?” He grins –
jaunty, we call it. “Not much”, he says, and grabs our hand.’

Alexander Alekhine
C.N. 5631 supplied excerpts from an interview with Alekhine by Isaac Kashdan
on pages 9-10 of the September 1933 Chess Review:
‘Particularly in Asia I was interested in the number of different peoples
that play chess, and also in the varieties of the game itself. It is there
that chess probably originated. I found several simple forms, and others even
more complicated than the game we know. It may be, in time, that we can combine
the best features of the Oriental game with our chess. This would be a more
natural evolution than adding new pieces and squares, or some of the other
changes that have been proposed. I do not believe that chess needs any change
at present, as it still holds new wonders, and will continue to do so for
years to come.’
‘I do not believe it is the function of the world’s champion
to go on constant barnstorming tours. I wanted to make the world trip to become
personally familiar with the conditions of chessplaying everywhere, and also
to meet so many individuals whom I had known through magazine pages or correspondence.
But I believe I can do more for chess in other ways, notably by writing. With
more leisure, I could work out methods of instruction, and perhaps eventually
be at the head of a vast system of schools and coaches, as has happened in
contract bridge under Ely Culbertson. This would mean many new converts of
chess, and cause a great awakening of public interest, as more and more people
were initiated into the mysteries of our glorious game.’
A particularly significant pair of interviews in Spanish publications was submitted in 1987 by the late Pablo Morán (Gijón, Spain). Our translations
into English are available on-line in Two
Alekhine Interviews (1941). The importance of the articles relates, above all, to the much discussed
question Was
Alekhine a Nazi?

C.N. 5804 gave, courtesy of Juan Carlos Sanz Menéndez (Alcorcón, Spain), an
interview with Alekhine by ‘Austral’ in the weekly news magazine
Semana, 26 October 1943:

Larger
version
Mr Sanz Menéndez provided a transcript which was given in full in C.N. 5804.
To highlight some of the main points made by the world champion: the loss of
his first game of chess, when he was aged about seven, reduced him to tears;
with a few exceptions, women did not play chess well; to his knowledge, the
only strong chessplayer among heads of state was Bonar Law, whom he had played
(‘a very strong player’); the Chinese were much better at mah-jong
than at chess. Alekhine also made some interesting observations on chess and
bridge, but we are particularly intrigued by the many references to his being
a criminalista (criminologist or criminal lawyer). He is even quoted
as claiming to have written more than 18 books ‘some on chess, but the
others on a wide range of subjects, including criminology, because that is my
speciality’.
Submit information
or suggestions on chess explorations
All ChessBase articles
by Edward Winter
Edward Winter is the editor of Chess
Notes, which was founded in January 1982 as "a forum for aficionados
to discuss all matters relating to the Royal Pastime". Since then, over 7,280
items have been published, and the series has resulted in four books by Winter:
Chess
Explorations (1996), Kings,
Commoners and Knaves (1999), A
Chess Omnibus (2003) and Chess
Facts and Fables (2006). He is also the author of a monograph on Capablanca
(1989). In 2011 a paperback
edition was issued.
Chess Notes is well known for its historical research, and anyone browsing
in its archives
will find a wealth of unknown games, accounts of historical mysteries, quotes
and quips, and other material of every kind imaginable. Correspondents from
around the world contribute items, and they include not only "ordinary readers"
but also some eminent historians – and, indeed, some eminent masters. Chess
Notes is located at the Chess
History Center. Signed copies of Edward Winter's publications are
currently available.