Chess Explorations (13)
By Edward Winter

Carl Carls in 1914
It is over 25 years since Chess Notes first discussed the celebrated miniature
won by Carl Carls against a player named Schuster. There are many complications,
although the game-score itself is not in doubt: 1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 dxe4 4
Nxe4 Nf6 5 Ng3 h5 6 Bg5 h4 7 Bxf6 hxg3 8 Be5
8...Rxh2 9 Rxh2 Qa5+ 10 c3 Qxe5+ 11 dxe5 gxh2 12 White resigns.
Firstly, there is the question of where and when Carls won. C.N. 293 indicated
that the game was played in a tournament in Oldenburg, 1914, and not 1913 as
stated, for instance, in the source quoted in C.N. 237 (page 297 of The Year-Book
of Chess 1914 by M.W. Stevens). The occasion is, though, often given as
‘Bremen, 1914’ (e.g. by Pal Benko on page 156 of Chess Life &
Review, March 1973 and by Nikolay Minev on page 30 of Inside Chess,
8 March 1993). The moves appeared on pages 167-168 of Deutsches Wochenschach,
10 May 1914. A brief account and the crosstable of the weekend tournament (referred
to as ‘der 3. Kongreß des Oldenburgisch-Ostfriesischen Verbandes’
and held on 7-8 March 1914) were supplied on pages 94-95 of the 15 March 1914
issue of the German magazine.

In C.N. 5231 we commented that there seemed no reason to doubt the statement
in Deutsches Wochenschach that the occasion was the tournament in Oldenburg
in 1914, although Carls also defeated Schuster in the 1913 tournament held there
(for the crosstable, see page 242 of the German magazine, 6 July 1913). Schuster,
though not Carls, participated in the first Oldenburg tournament too (whose
crosstable appeared on page 242 of the 7 July 1912 issue). In none of these,
or other, contemporary references have we yet found the forename of Schuster,
who, according to page 129 of the 6 April 1913 Deutsches Wochenschach,
was from Wilhelmshaven.
Next, there is the Torre matter. C.N. 778 pointed out that on pages 183-184
of 200 Miniature Games of Chess (London, 1941) J. du Mont gave Schuster
v Carls (‘Bremen, 1914’) and wrote:
‘Curiously enough, the identical game was played in an off-hand encounter
won by Torre in Mexico 15 years later.’
As noted on page 268 of Chess Explorations, the following appeared on
page 327 of the August 1929 BCM:

C.N. 5231 asked whether it was known where the game was ascribed to Torre before
publication in the BCM. No such prior appearance has yet been found,
but in C.N. 5258 Christian Sánchez (Rosario, Argentina) offered a further complication
by quoting from page 98 of Emil Gelenczei’s book 200 celadas de apertura
(whose publishing history was discussed in C.N. 4455):
So now the claim, on the basis of two 1953 magazines, is that, 15 years after
Schuster v Carls was played, Torre believed that he had refuted the combination
with 10 Qd2, overlooking 10...gxf2+. The text does not suggest that Torre played
the game himself.
This brings us to the analytical complications. Concerning the final moves,
in C.N. 417 W.H. Cozens (Ilminster, England) wrote in connection with Schuster
v Carls:
‘This famous old combination ... is unsound. White has only to play
10 Qd2! (instead of 10 c3) and the combination is bust, for after 10...Qxe5+
11 dxe5 gxh2 12 O-O-O Nd7 13 Nh3 h1(Q) 14 e6 fxe6 15 Be2 Qxg2 16 Bh5+ Kd8
17 Nf4 White wins quickly. 12...Bd7 also loses. Black would have to play (after
10 Qd2) ... Qxd2+ 11 Kxd2 gxh2 12 Bxh2 Bf5 with equality. This was pointed
out by G. Porreca in L’Italia Scacchistica in 1953.’
However, in a subsequent item (C.N. 619) we reported:
‘The September 1983 issue of Schacknytt has two pages of pickings
from C.N., and the writer, Sixten Johansson, gives a further twist
to the Schuster-Carls combination, which was declared unsound in C.N. 417
on account of 10 Qd2. The simple yet curiously unobvious point is that White
loses his queen after 10...gxf2+. We learn that E. Böök published the “refutation”
of Carls’ combination in his chess column that appeared in a Finnish
railwaymen’s magazine, having taken the refutation from Shakhmaty
v SSSR in 1964. Some weeks later a correspondent from Lieksa pointed out
10 Qd2 gxf2+, previously overlooked by everybody. Böök mentions that Kurt
Richter in Deutsche Schachblätter, 1936 and H.J. van Donk in Schakend
Nederland, 1966, also wrongly claimed that the Carls brilliancy was “bust”.’
The game was given (as N.N. v Torre, Mexico, 1928) on page 175 of the July
1964 Chess Life, and a reader of Larry Evans’ column, Vincent Mooney,
reverted to it on page 40 of Chess Life & Review, January 1970:
‘Several years ago grandmaster Rossolimo showed me that White should
play 10 Q-Q2, and then QxBch 11 PxQ PxR 12 O-O-O! B-Q2 13 P-K6 PxP 14 N-B3
P-R8(Q) 15 B-B4 QxP 16 N-N5!! and it seems White has a won game. Does Black
have a better defense: e.g., 15...QxRch – I have tried about six lines
and in all of them White seems to have a win, even though he is a bishop and
pawn down at the end of move 15, unless 15...QxRch is played?’
Evans replied:
‘Black wins rather easily after 10 Q-Q2 PxPch! followed by 11...QxQch
and 12...PxN(Q).’
The claim that Kurt Richter wrote in the 1936 Deutsche Schachblätter
that the Schuster v Carls combination was unsound resulted in additional details
being provided in C.N. 5258. The full game was given on page 166 of the 1 June
1936 magazine (at the end of an article on Carls by Alfred Brinckmann), and
Alan McGowan (Waterloo, Canada) noted that it was discussed further in an unsigned
feature (readers’ reaction) on page 389 of the 1 November 1936 issue:

Mr McGowan also pointed out that page 403 of the 15 November 1936 Deutsche
Schachblätter reverted to Schuster v Carls, and that this time the possibility
of 10...gxf2+ was included:

And that is how matters currently stand. Some, but not all, of the loose ends
have been tidied up, but the Torre aspects remain particularly puzzling.
Below, in conclusion, is a photograph of Carl Carls watching a game in Mannheim
in 1914 between Ehrhardt Post and Savielly Tartakower. It is taken from Carl
Carls und die “Bremer Partie” by Kurt Richter (Berlin, 1957).

Submit information
or suggestions on chess explorations
All articles by Edward
Winter
Edward
Winter is the editor of Chess
Notes, which was founded in January 1982 as "a forum for aficionados
to discuss all matters relating to the Royal Pastime". Since then over
5,800 items have been published, and the series has resulted in four books by
Winter: Chess
Explorations (1996), Kings,
Commoners and Knaves (1999), A
Chess Omnibus (2003) and Chess
Facts and Fables (2006). He is also the author of a monograph
on Capablanca (1989).
Chess Notes is well known for its historical research, and anyone browsing
in its archives
will find a wealth of unknown games, accounts of historical mysteries, quotes
and quips, and other material of every kind imaginable. Correspondents from
around the world contribute items, and they include not only "ordinary
readers" but also some eminent historians – and, indeed, some eminent
masters. Chess Notes is located at the Chess
History Center. Signed copies of Edward Winter's publications are
currently available.