Wesley So wins Clutch Chess Champions Showdown

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
5/30/2020 – The first edition of the Clutch Chess Champions Showdown, organized by the Saint Louis Chess Club, concluded on Friday. Wesley So became the winner on tiebreaks after he and Fabiano Caruana scored nine points each throughout the twelve games. The first criterion to break the tie was the number of wins in "clutch games", with So getting two wins to Caruana's one. | Photo: Lennart Ootes

Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally.
FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before. 

Chess players do not read contracts

A curious incident was seen at the end of the first online Clutch Chess event. After ten games, each of the finalists had collected six points, which meant the last two encounters, each worth three points, would decide the winner. By then, the commentators noted, though, that drawing both games would favour Wesley So, who had won a "clutch game" on day one — the number of wins in "clutch games" was the first tiebreaker. 

So went on to win the eleventh game, securing tournament victory right there and then as, even if Fabiano Caruana won the last encounter, he had the best tiebreak score. Curiously, however, the main talking point of the commentators was whether the players were aware of this fact or not. Since Caruana obtained a clear victory in game twelve, it seemed like So knew he had won the event and relaxed in the last encounter. But this was not the case.

The fact that Jennifer Shahade, Yasser Seirawan and Maurice Ashley suspected that the players did not know the tournament winner had already been decided was not based on a simple hunch — they knew that elite chess players seldom read the tournament regulations in detail. For example, back in 2015, Magnus Carlsen lost his first-round game at the Norway Chess Tournament on time because he assumed 15 minutes would be added to the clocks after move 60, when the rules stipulated otherwise!

During the post-game interviews, Ashley posed the question: did they know the tournament winner was decided in game eleven? Surprisingly, not even So was aware of the fact that he had secured first place before the last game. In fact, Caruana was a little disappointed that there would not be blitz tiebreakers. They were solely focused on their moves and their openings, not on technical details!

Clutch Chess 2020

Caruana started the day a point down and quickly turned the tables, winning the first two games on Friday. First, he took down So's Berlin Defence, and then he survived a losing position before taking advantage of his opponent's oversight on move 42:

 

White's 42.Qd3 was a blunder, as it allowed 42...Nf2+, when capturing the knight with 43.Rxf2 ran into 43...Re3 and White has nothing better than to give up the queen with 44.Qxe3 — after, for example, 44.Qf5 Black gives mate starting with 44...Qxh4+ 45.Kg1 Qg3+. So continued trying to defend, but eventually had to concede defeat.

A draw followed, so Caruana had a one-point lead with three games to go. So levelled the score in game ten and went on to secure tournament victory in the first "clutch game" of the day. The Filipino-born grandmaster outplayed Caruana positionally and got to place both his rooks on the second rank. He finished the game in style:

 

40...Rxf2 41.Rxf2 and Caruana resigned due to 41...Ra1+ 42.Rf1 Rxf1 43.Kxf1 b2. 

Thinking that he could still win the tournament on a hypothetical blitz tiebreaker, Caruana scored a convincing win in game twelve, only to find out later that his opponent had already secured tournament victory. Nevertheless, he received $3,000 extra for his "clutch win" — not a bad consolation prize!

  Total G1 G2 G3 G4 G5* G6* G7 G8 G9 G10 G11** G12**
Fabiano Caruana 9 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 1 ½ 0 0 1
Wesley So (*) 9 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 0 0 ½ 1 1 0
*Games 5 and 6 are worth two points each
** Games 11 and 12 are worth three points each
(*) Wins the tournament on tiebreaks — more points in clutch games
 

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

ulyssesganesh ulyssesganesh 6/6/2020 07:13
In the world cup T20 cricket final, the score between england and newzeland remained tied ; England was declated winner for scoring more boundaries....
TheBowtieClub TheBowtieClub 5/31/2020 09:35
D) Blindfold simul bughouse?
E) Pistols at twenty paces?
Former Prodigy Former Prodigy 5/31/2020 08:13
Given that one can get two or three points for a win, my previous comment is not universally valid, but its point still holds.
Former Prodigy Former Prodigy 5/31/2020 07:49
I am afraid that the tie-breaker "more points in clutch games" in case of an equal score mean "less points according to classical scoring".
Shakey Shakey 5/31/2020 03:08
An odd idea. Some games worth much more than others. Which means others worth much less.
Players not even aware.

And the next gimmick is (choose one option only):

A) Players dress up as coloured knights and ride into games on coloured black and white steeds.
B) Chess-table tennis-Kerplunk triathlon
C) Match losers are fed to pigs (per Bricktop)
Leavenfish Leavenfish 5/30/2020 08:31
Gimmicks often lead to oddities. Heck, Armageddon as a tie break is essentially a gimmick - One game with 'draw odds' for Black (and an extra min) when a correctly played game at the highest level often leads to a draw, is a gimmick to force a result in one game. That's an edge for Black.

Simply play a best of an odd # of games where any WIN by black decides...a win by White would still give the loser of that game a chance to continue. This while you shorten the time limit as you go along...more errors will result and errors are what decides a chess game. Dion't change the nature of the game by giving one side 'draw odds'!
dmumba dmumba 5/30/2020 05:20
I think just like in boxing, the Arbirter is supposed to announce these rules to the players.

Even for things like software, how many of us really read the terms and conditions. We just click on AGREE.
PatrickP PatrickP 5/30/2020 12:39
Weird rule. So Caruana won more games, but less of the "important" ones...
1