ChessBase Magazine 161 – 'highly recommended'

8/4/2014 – Sergey Karjakin is the cover star of the latest CBM, due to his extremely impressive victory at the Norway Chess tournament, which receives comprehensive coverage: in addition to most of the games featuring annotations, there is an opening survey based on the tournament from Mihail Marin and a series of video presentations by Danny King. CBM 161 review at Marsh Towers.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

ChessBase Magazine #161

Review by Sean Marsh

Sergey Karjakin is the cover star of the latest ChessBase Magazine, due to his extremely impressive victory at the Norway Chess tournament. He finished half a point ahead of World Champion Magnus Carlsen and even further ahead of a galaxy of stars including Grischuk, Caruana and former World Champions Topalov and Kramnik. The tournament had been very close all the way to the end but Karjakin's winning sprint - with three straight wins – brought him a very notable success.

Needless to say, the Norway Chess event received comprehensive coverage in this issue. Indeed, in addition to most of the games featuring annotations, there is an opening survey based on the tournament from Mihail Marin and a series of video presentations by Danny King, rounding up the highlights from each day's play. These days there is no chance for a top player to hide his mistakes away from the public!

As usual, it is the annotations of the players themselves I look at first. I enjoyed reading Karjakin's notes to his important victory over Kramnik.

Black played 38 ...gxh5 here. Karjakin comments: ''Taking the pawn is tempting, but he should advance his pawns. 38 ...f5! Although here White can also lay claim to a slight superiority, the game in this case would most likely have finished a draw.''

39 d5! ''White uses the time to push forward the d-pawn!''

39 ...e3?! ''Another tempting move, especially when both sides are in time trouble. But Black absolutely had to bring his knight back into the game.''

40 Kc2! ''The last precise move before the time control. White attacks the e3-pawn! As a result of disadvantageous sharpening of the game, Black is now facing unpleasant tasks but my opponent did not manage to change his way of thinking in time. He did not sense the danger...'' Indeed, after 40 ...Ng4? 41 d6 Re6?! 42 Ra7! White gained a serious advantage (1-0, 72).

Other annotations left a strange impression. There's a game from the Capablanca Memorial with notes by Wesley So, in which plays the Winawer against Zoltan Almasi. He says: ''I did some preparation on the Winawer before the event, and I noticed that current theory for White is not very convincing.'' Then after playing 12 ...d4! (see the next diagram): ''I think this is Black's only reasonable move. Here Zoltan started using a lot of time. Obviously taking the pawn on d4 is critical, but without preparation it's a different matter. Anyway, he still found a way to get a good position out of the opening.'' Yet by move 17 he has to admit ''Around here I forgot my analysis already, and my next few moves were probably not the best'' and he ends up standing worse (before turning the game around later on). So how does that leave his preparation? White did nothing unusual between moves 12 and 17 and gained an advantage. A couple of one move suggestions are given for Black during those moves, but in an offhand kind of way. Does that mean that Wesley So now thinks the theory is more convincing for White than he thought before the game, or is he holding back what he really thinks Black should play after 12 ...d4? Either way, the rest of us are left in the dark; the annotations are not helpful in this regard.

Other tournaments covered include the Capablanca Memorial (won by Wesley So, with the mercurial Ivanchuk - frequent winner of the event - left languishing at the foot of the table on this occasion) and the Karpov Tournament (won by Morozevich).

It is good to see a tribute to the late Yugoslav Grandmaster Dragoljub Velimirovic, whose entertaining games grace one of Danny King's ''Move by Move'' columns and a series of four videos from Adrian Mikhalchishin. It's amazing people still played 1 ...c5 to Velimirovic's 1 e4. I would welcome more articles covering fabulous players of the past and, while we are suggesting things, it may be worth a thought to devote some space to a survey of the chess literature that is published between issues of ChessBase magazine, as regular, printed magazines usually do (I am available...).

My favourites from the opening surveys this time focus on the French Defence (Winawer Variation - presented by Stohl) and the Saemisch KID (by Kuzmin). The former analysis something really sharp. 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 e5 c5 5 a3 Bxc3+ 6 bxc3 Ne7 7 Qg4 Qc7 8 Qxg7 Rg8 9 Qxh7 cxd4 10 Ne2 Nbc6 11 f4 dxc3 12 Qd3 d4.

This line is not for the faint-hearted or unprepared. Wesley So used it – as Black – to win a key game at the aforementioned Capablanca Memorial tournament (see above). Maybe the pawn sacrifice will now come into fashion, in which case it would make sense to study Stohl's notes very carefully.

The latter looks at a line designed to annoy White and his temporarily unguarded c-pawn: 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 e4 d6 5 f3 0-0 6 Be3 Nc6 7 Nge2 a6 8 Qd2 Na5!?

The point is Black can meet, for example, 9 Ng3 with the thematic 9 ...b5!, when 10 cxb5 axb5 11 Bxb5?? loses to 11 ...Nb3.

The survey should give players on both sides of the board something fresh to analyse. ''Conclusion: According to the present state of affairs it in no way looks like an advantage for White. That would be a hard blow for fans of the Saemisch System.'' Indeed it would.

Incidentally, it is always worth reading the editorial piece in every issue of ChessBase Magazine. It's easy to overlook amid the wealth of top chess material but it is usually a thought provoking piece. This time André Schulz writes about the problems associated with classifying chess as a sport (in Germany, but the piece will have a familiar ring to in plenty of other countries). His summing up of the situation ends with an ironic twist.

''In Germany 96% of the development cash for sport, at present 140 million euros per year, go to the olympic sporting disciplines – sometimes these are really minority sports with few organised members, but every four years at least they are seen on television with perhaps the German national anthem being sung at the end of their competition. The remaining 4% of the budget is divided amongst the non-olympic sports, including chess which receives 130 000 euros per year. There are of course many non-olympic sports which would gladly have these 130 000 euros for themselves. Elsewhere people take a more pragmatic attitude: the Norwegians chose Magnus Carlsen as sports personality of the year – although there chess is not (yet?) officially recognised as a sport.''

ChessBase Magazine is, as always, highly recommended.
For further please head for the relevant ChessBase product page.

Source: Sean Marsh at Marsh Towers


ChessBase Magazin 161 - Intro

Free opening survey - download a sample!

<img data-cke-saved-src="/Portals/4/files/news/2014/topical/products/cbm161-05.jpg" src="/Portals/4/files/news/2014/topical/products/cbm161-05.jpg" width="265" "="" height="380" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px; width=" 320=""> 
Evgeny Postny: "A lot of blanks" (Nimzo-Indian with 4.f3 c5 5.d5 0-0 6.e4 d6)

If White wants to go for a sharp position against the Nimzo-Indian the move 4.f3 is always shortlisted. In this article IGM Evgeny Postny examines the many positions that may show up on the board after 4.f3 c5 5.d5 0-0 6.e4 d6.

Here 7.Nge2 is preferred by most experts, in particular Sergey Volkov, who is represented in the Mega database with countless 4.f3 games, plays this (till 2003 he still used 7.Bd2). Postny now considers four moves for Black: 7...Nh5, 7.exd5, 7...Re8, and 7...b5.

After the most frequently played move 7...b5 White then moves his knight away from e2. 8.Nf4 is intended to provoke 8...e5, but it is not clear whether that is really necessary and whether it is in White’s favour at all. Thus Rainer Knaak comes to the conclusion:

"There are still a lot of blanks in the theory of this variation. As Evgeny Postny writes, engines sometimes overrate Black’s prospects."


Download for free (CBV-file for ChessBase/Fritz)
Load the article from CBMagazine 161 (PDF)


All opening articles in CBMagazine #161

Langrock: English Defence A40
1.d4 e6 2.c4 b6 3.e4 Bb7 4.Bd3

Hannes Langrock used to be a convinced adherent of the English Defence, but he has now changed sides. In his article he presents a repertoire from the point of view of White. According to Langrock’s analyses Black is faced with a difficult task after 4.Bd3!.
Moskalenko: Budapest Gambit A52
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Bf4 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Qe7

This variation is considered slightly better for White, but Viktor Moskalenko is of a different opinion. White may usually obtain the bishop pair, but Black has a sound position in which the pawns are placed on dark squares and appropriately he possesses the light-squared bishop.
Rotstein: Old Indian Defence A53
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 d6 3.Nc3 Bf5 4.f3 e5

Somewhat surprisingly it is not quite so simple for White to manage a slight advantage for White after 3...Bf5. The most frequently seen move is 4.f3, but, as Arkadij Rotstein shows, Black obtains a satisfactory game after 4...e5.
Karolyi: Alekhine Defence B05
1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.Nf3 Bg4 5.Be2 e6

In the second part of his repertoire against the old main variation (4...Bg4) Tibor Karolyi deals with the sub-variation 5...e6. White obtains a secure advantage in all lines and in our author’s opinion should above all avoid the move h3.
Havasi: Caro-Kann B11
1.e4 c6 2.Nf3 d5 3.Nc3 Bg4 4.h3 Bxf3 5.Qxf3

This was played by Bobby Fischer, but Tibor Havasi is able to squeeze a few new subtleties out of the subject. But above all, the setup presented by the young Hungarian is extremely easy to learn and nonetheless not without its venom.
Antic: Sicilian Defence B40
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.g3

Michael Adams has played this several times with a good measure of success. So Dejan Antic calls it the Adams Variation. White firstly does without d3 and if need be he protects e4 with Qe2. Of course this is no way to force an advantage, but it does immediately set Black a few problems.
Szabo: Sicilian Defence B48
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Qc7 6.Be3 a6 7.Qd2 Nf6 8.f4

White has for a long time been successful with 8.0-0-0, but countermeasures have been found for Black. At present it is still possible to surprise one’s opponent with 8.f4. But according to Krisztian Szabo Black should not have any great problems keeping things on a level keel.
Stohl: French Defence C18
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 d4

Spurred on by the game Almasi-So (Capablanca Memorial 2014) Igor Stohl examines the modern variation with 12...d4. The results are absolutely heartening for Black and for the moment it is rather White who has to be thinking about improvements.
Krasenkow: Queen's Gambit Accepted D28
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.Qe2 a6 7.dxc5 Bxc5 8.0-0 Nc6 9.e4

In the second part of his investigations into 6.Qe2 Michal Krasenkow comes to the critical variation with 8...Nc6. In it Black has good chances for equality but he needs to know his theory well and must also play accurately in the early middlegame.
Sumets: Queen's Indian Defence E15
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ 6.Qxd2 Ba6 7.b3

Andrey Sumets analyses the variations from White’s point of view. From the diagram the first move examined is 7...d5. But then one needs to have a good knowledge of the sharp 8.Nc3 d5 9.e4.
Postny: Nimzoindian E20
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.f3 c5 5.d5 0-0 6.e4 d6

Magnus Carlsen sees himself having to meet the move 4.f3 “all the time”. At the Gashimov Memorial he played 4...c5, resulting in the position in the diagram. Evgeny Postny considers Nakamura’s 7.Bd2 to be simply a side variation with the critical line being 7.Nge2.
Marin: Nimzoindian E52
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 0-0 5.Bd3 d5 6.Nf3 b6 7.0-0 Bb7 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Ne5

This natural setup for Black is still valid. Mihail Marin tries in his extensive article to show that White has at least the more pleasant game. And he manages to do just that.
Kuzmin: King's Indian Defence E83
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Nge2 a6 8.Qd2 Na5

The almost new 8...Na5 attacks a sensitive point in White’s camp – the pawn c4 – and at the same time it prepares ...b5, because if White captured twice the final move would be Na5-b3! So far White has not found a good countermeasure – a hard blow for fans of the Sämisch Variation.

Buy ChessBase Magazine in the ChessBase Shop...



Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register