ChessBase 13: In search of a treasure trove

by Nagesh Havanur
5/2/2016 – In spite of the release of ChessBase 13, the newest version of our flagship program, many players continue to use the older versions. There is nothing wrong with this, but it does mean missing out on the latest features and functions. Here is a review precisely by someone who was using the older program until he found the new power house.

ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024 ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024

It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.


ChessBase 13: In search of a treasure trove

Review by Prof. Nagesh Havanur

I made my first acquaintance with ChessBase a few years ago when I offered some of my writing to this site. “Do you use our program?” asked Mr. Frederic Friedel, the venerable paterfamilias.

Frederic Friedel

Now the only ChessBase program I knew of was CB Light, a nice freeware for viewing games. In those days it didn’t have a big database and an engine to speak of. So I merely shrugged my shoulders. Mr. Friedel, however, had no use for half measures and sent the program immediately.

He must have come to regret that decision later! Over years whenever I have wanted to find fault with the analysis here, I have merely used the program and pointed out with glee, “Your own little fellow says so!”

That first version I used had four board designs and my favourite was pink.

I still have a soft spot for this beauty and ChessBase 10 has remained with me for good. In the current version there are other colours to choose from. I am afraid I don’t fancy them so much. So I have settled for maple, its standard anyway.

The current program became available in November, 2014.  I wasn’t eager for change and resisted it for quite some time. But then ChessBase 12, the program I was using so far began to show signs of exhaustion. So now I have this new program. If you are a newcomer and check with ChessBase you find it has four versions. You begin to wonder what to choose. So here is a simple comparison. The Download version is the most basic. It comes with access to Online Database with now more than 7 million games. No more. The Starter Package is better, with Big Database 2016 (6.4 million games from 1475 to 2015) and update till the end of the current year.

The games in Big Database have neither analysis nor commentary. For this reason it’s often seen as a poor cousin of MegaBase that has as many as 68,000 annotated games. I for one do not share this perception. The Big Database allows you to follow a game independently. After each move you ask yourself, “why” or “why not?” You enter your own variations and try to understand how the game was won, lost or drawn. Those lines that you see by yourself are your precious contribution to the game. But are they sound? So you ask wise old “Fritz” what he thinks. The old boy knows a thing or two.

On occasion you are not happy with his answer. Some times his way of thinking is too impersonal, not the way we ordinary mortals think. Then you ask the players what they think. If they tell you, well and good, otherwise the commentators will fill in the gaps.

Those are the annotated games in MegaBase. Currently annotations have become a collaborative endeavour with Let’s Check and ChessBase Cloud facilities. That’s nice. But no matter who says what, do use your own grey cells in the end for judging a position.

Now that you have the database before you where do you begin? One way is to search for miniatures, say, games with 20 moves. When I started I was looking for the shortest of them all. Out of curiosity I set the parameters to 0 moves and was astonished to find 67,500 entries. They mention the names of players, the event and the result, but no moves! If you are a practical player you start cursing these entries for being of no use to you, but if you are an historian or archivist they are of interest as they offer valuable clues on how or where the game can be found. They also provide an important function: they fill in gaps of a tournament's information, allowing a complete crosstable to be produced. Anyway these entries with zero moves form only 1% of the database. So they should not be a cause for concern to the practical player.

This brings me to the next point. Most databases contain tournament and match games played under standard time control. Recently, rapid and blitz games have also gained recognition with the participation of elite players. I was particularly delighted to find here games from Herzeg Novi Blitz Tournament 1970 that Bobby Fischer won ahead of Korchnoi, Petrosian and Tal (44 games in all!)

Fischer facing Petrosian during the 1970 blitz event in Herzeg Novi.

This database also includes a memorable blitz match of 24 games played between Kasparov and Kramnik way back in 1998.

Kramnik, Vladimir-Kasparov, Garry, (Blitz Match, Moscow 1998)

[Event "Kosmos m 5'"] [Site "Moscow"] [Date "1998.11.27"] [Round "4"] [White "Kramnik, Vladimir"] [Black "Kasparov, Garry"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E37"] [WhiteElo "2780"] [BlackElo "2815"] [PlyCount "82"] [EventDate "1998.11.27"] [EventType "match (blitz)"] [EventRounds "24"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceDate "1999.01.01"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 d5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Qxc3 Ne4 7. Qc2 e5 8. cxd5 Qxd5 9. f3 Nf6 10. e4 Qxd4 11. Qxc7 Nc6 12. Ne2 Qc5 13. b4 Nxb4 14. Qxc5 Nd3+ 15. Kd2 Nxc5 16. Rb1 O-O 17. Ke3 Be6 18. Bb2 Rfd8 19. Bxe5 Rd3+ 20. Kf2 Ncxe4+ 21. Kg1 Nd2 22. Ra1 Nxf1 23. Nf4 Rd2 24. Rxf1 Bc4 25. Rc1 Nd7 26. Bc3 Ra2 27. h4 b5 28. Rh3 f6 29. Rd1 Ne5 30. Rg3 Bf7 31. Rd6 Rxa3 32. Bd4 Ra4 33. h5 h6 34. Bxe5 fxe5 35. Nd3 Rd4 36. Rxd4 exd4 37. Rg4 a5 38. Rxd4 a4 39. Rb4 a3 40. Nc1 Bc4 41. Rb1 a2 0-1

A terrific performance by Garry! It speaks for the courage confidence of his young rival that even after this loss he finished with an even score, 12:12 (+ 6,-6, =12)! Two years later he made history, vanquishing Garry himself to claim the world crown.

A chess database is never finished. It’s constantly evolving. Old games are forever found and new games are added every day. This calls for a closer collaboration between chess historians, players and database specialists. It’s also necessary to widen the parameters so that non-standard items like training or offhand games are included. A case in point is the following miniature that was played in the house of Alois Nagler, President, Zürich Chess Club. With just 5 seconds a move, Keres and Bronstein created a masterpiece.

Keres, Paul-Bronstein, David (offhand game, Zürich 1965)

[Event "Zürich "] [Site "?"] [Date "1965.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Keres, Paul"] [Black "Bronstein, David"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C33"] [PlyCount "44"] [EventDate "1965.??.??"] 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nc3 Qh4+ 4. Ke2 d5 5. Nxd5 Nf6 6. Nxf6+ gxf6 7. Nf3 Bg4 8. d3 Bh6 9. Qe1 Qh5 10. Qb4 Nc6 11. Qxb7 Bxf3+ 12. gxf3 Nd4+ 13. Kd2 Nxf3+ 14. Kc3 Qc5+ 15. Kb3 Nd4+ 16. Ka4 O-O 17. c3 Qb6 18. Qxb6 axb6+ 19. Kb4 Ra4+ 20. Kxa4 Ra8+ 21. Kb4 Bf8+ 22. Kc4 b5+ 0-1

A game that Anderssen and Morphy would have approved!

If you are a newcomer to this program, a few names present a problem. Don’t worry, you are not alone. Do you know why Ian Nepomniachtchi is such a successful blitz player?

Most of his opponents spend precious time just getting his name right on the score sheet and run out of clock (I am just kidding!). In this database he appears as Nepomniaschchy. Now that’s phonetically right, but you would hardly find it elsewhere.

Similarly you won’t find Viktor Korchnoi on this database. After some effort you see him under another name, Kortschnoj, Viktor, but the results are worth the trouble. There are more than 5000 games to his credit including the encounter you see in this picture. It took 40 moves for the warlord (“Kortchnoi” as shown here) to subdue the wunderkind who was to become the world champion.

When you see a database of 6.5 million games you are overwhelmed. It is not for nothing that we have the proverb: Chess is a sea in which a gnat may drink and an elephant may bathe.

There are nuggets everywhere if you know how to find them. Here are three remarkable positions from the database. You are invited to give each a reasonable try before you click for the solution.

1) The following position was reached in a simultaneous display by Dr. Emanuel Lasker. Black, a gifted amateur, is several pawns up. However, White has a shot that turns the tables on Black. Thereafter he still needs a precise move order to win. Lasker missed it and lost! Can you do better?

White to play

[Event "USA Simultaneous Display "] [Site "?"] [Date "1903.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Lasker, Emanuel"] [Black "Loman, Rudolf"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "6k1/1p4pp/p5P1/1p1p4/5R2/8/2r3PP/6K1 w - - 0 34"] [PlyCount "14"] [EventDate "1903.??.??"] {Lasker played} 34. Rf8+ $1 Kxf8 35. gxh7 Rc1+ 36. Kf2 Rc2+ 37. Kg3 $2 { He must have thought he could escape from checks with this move.But it's wrong. } (37. Ke3 $1 $18 {would have won on the spot.}) 37... Rc3+ 38. Kg4 $4 { overstepping the line of safety} ({He could still have reached the same winning position with} 38. Kf2 $1 Rc2+ 39. Ke3 $18) 38... Rc4+ 39. Kg5 Rh4 $1 40. Kxh4 g5+ {and Lasker resigned.} *

2) This position was reached between a veteran grandmaster and a modest IM. The young man had boldly sacrificed the exchange and valiantly advanced his forces deep into White territory, but now he saw the White rooks invading the third rank and  felt intimidated. Sheepishly, he offered a draw. To his chagrin the grandmaster would have none of it and announced, he had already sealed Re6+ winning. Thinking there was nothing left, the young master resigned without resuming play. What would you have done?

Black to play

[Event "Lord John Cup "] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Kotov, Alexander"] [Black "Lambert, Glenn"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "4r3/4k3/p3R1R1/6P1/P3p1p1/2P1bp2/1P6/5K2 b - - 0 42"] [PlyCount "6"] {Kotov demonstrated} 42... Kd7 43. Rxe8 Kxe8 $4 ({Both players missed} 43... g3 $1 $19) 44. Re6+ Kf7 45. Rxe4 $18 {as winning and trusting it, his opponent resigned.} *

3) Here Black’s advantage is obvious. He can win a pawn, exert pressure or go for more drastic measures. Which course of action do you prefer?

Black to play

[Event "Trud ch. Berdyansk "] [Site "?"] [Date "1985.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Samarin, Igor"] [Black "Antoshin, Vladimir"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2r4k/p2b3p/1p6/2p1P1r1/1P2Pp2/P4P1q/2RN3P/2R2Q1K b - - 0 35"] [PlyCount "6"] [EventDate "1985.??.??"] 35... Qxh2+ $4 (35... Qh5 $1 $17 {threatening 36...Bh3 retains pressure.}) ( 35... Rxe5 $6 36. Qxh3 Bxh3 37. Nb3 {allows counterplay for White.}) 36. Kxh2 Rcg8 {and White resigned! in view of 37...Rh5+. He had missed} 37. e6 $1 Bxe6 38. Rxc5 $18 {"The ultimate blunder" as Tim Krabbé called it.} *

Now that was fun! It was Tim Krabbé whose writing led me to these curiosities, but I found the complete game scores only here in this database. You would find more such curiosities if you know where to look.

Tim Krabbé

We live in an age of ratings and numbers. But Elo is not everything if you are looking for inspiration. You would find plenty of it in a genius like Nezhmetdinov. When you see his games your imagination would take wings and soar to heights.

Here is the final phase of a combination by the old maestro and the gallant loser was all admiration for it. No prize for guessing his name though.

White to play

[Event "USSR Championship "] [Site "?"] [Date "1961.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Nezhmetdinov, Rashid"] [Black "Tal, Mikhail"] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r2qk2r/1b5p/p4ppN/1p1Nb3/5pP1/P7/1PP2QBP/4R1K1 w kq - 0 23"] [PlyCount "13"] [EventDate "1961.??.??"] 23. Nxf6+ $1 Qxf6 24. Qd4 Kf8 25. Rxe5 Qd8 26. Rf5+ $1 gxf5 27. Qxh8+ Ke7 28. Qg7+ Ke6 29. gxf5+ 1-0

That was elegant, wasn’t it?

To return to the database I have not said a word about the galaxy of chess stars who have lit up its horizons … from Labourdonnais and McDonnell to Carlsen and Karjakin. If you look across centuries you will see how they have all worshipped at the same altar of Caissa. Find their thoughts, feel their agony and share their ecstasy. This database comes to life. Amen.


ChessBase 13 can be purchased in the ChessBase Shop

Prof. Nagesh Havanur (otherwise known as "chessbibliophile") is a senior academic and research scholar. He taught English in Mumbai for three decades and has now settled in Bangalore, India. His interests include chess history, biography and opening theory. He has been writing on the Royal Game for more than three decades. His articles and reviews have appeared on several web sites and magazines.


Rules for reader comments


Not registered yet? Register