CBM 193: Learning from losing

by Nagesh Havanur
2/12/2020 – ChessBase offers a window to the world of professional chess. Our thoughtful columnist NAGESH HAVANUR reviews issue #193 which offers a bird’s eye view of three major events, the FIDE Grand Swiss / chess.com IOM Open, European Team championship and World Chess Grand Prix in Hamburg. 1618 games, 11 opening surveys, demo lectures and exercises for training. Games annotated by Fabiano Caruana, Wang Hao and Peter Heine Nielsen, to mention a few. | Photo: Nadja Wittmann

Analyses by Caruana, Giri, Duda, Wang Hao, So, Vidit, Vitiugov, McShane and many more. Plus videos by Williams, King and Shirov. 11 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and training sessions in strategy, tactics and endgame!

Find the right questions

In chess as in life it’s more important to ask deep and searching questions than to find pat answers. A young player wants to know how a game is won. An old player wants to know why how it is lost. The second bit is not easy to come by as the loser does not tell you what went wrong, especially in the opening. He would rather wait for another chance with the same opponent.

When you see a good game, applaud the winner by all means, but do try to see what lay behind the defeat. The results can be rewarding. This is what I discovered while I was checking out the current issue of ChessBase Magazine. Among other things it offers games from three major events, Hamburg FIDE Grand Prix, Isle of Man Open and European Team Championship.

MVL explains

First, we start with the Hamburg Grand Prix as it’s a qualifying event for the Candidates’.

When I looked at the Grischuk-MVL mini-match from the Semi-finals, I was baffled. In the first game MVL was White and only drew in 27 moves. There was no attempt at initiative, let alone attack. In the second game with Black he was outplayed.

But what prevented him from going for more in the first game? Finally, I found the answer in a post on his blog:

With white, I was surprised by his choice of the Arkhangelsk Spanish. As a result, I hesitated between 13.♗c2 and the resulting ton of theory, and 13.e3, which is less risky. I chose the latter and got a very small plus, but I started making small miscalculations…

 
Vachier-Lagrave vs Grischuk, Semi-final Game 1
Position after 22...♝c5

Especially when here I played 23.a4?! and instantly noticed that I was allowing 23…♞d5!. What Sasha and I both missed is that after 24.♘c6, black doesn’t only have 24…♛h4 25.g3, but also 24…♛f6! 25.♕xd5 ♛xf4, and the position turns in his favor. So, while Sasha was thinking, I had decided, in case of 23…♞d5, to go for 24.♕f3 with a slight advantage for black. Maybe if I had focused a little more on the position, I would have chosen 23.♗a2 with the idea, ♕d2-♖ad1, and a microplus for white. The rest of the game was a quick path towards the draw (1/2, 27 moves).”

Here is the game and I have inserted a little commentary for readers unfamiliar with opening theory.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 b5 The Archangel Variation with which Black aims for sharp piece play. 6.Bb3 Bc5 6...Bb7 is the older line in this variation 6...Be7 leads to the Main Line of the Spanish. 7.c3 7.Nxe5 Nxe5 8.d4 Bxd4 9.Qxd4 d6 is known to be harmless. 7...d6 Black still retains the option of developing the other bishop to b7 or g4. 8.a4 From now on the pawn on b5 is under pressure. 8.d4 Bb6 9.a4 Rb8 transposes to the line in the game. 8...Rb8 9.d4 Bb6 10.axb5 axb5 11.Na3 0-0 12.Nxb5 This is the critical position and it has been debated for more than 20 years. White wins a pawn on the queenside. However, his own centre pawns are under threat. Bg4 12...exd4 13.cxd4 Bg4 14.Ba4 guards the knight and also targets the rook if it comes to e8. Not 12...Nxe4?? 13.Bd5+- 13.Be3 MVL writes, he opted for this safer line instead of 13.Bc2 with tons of theory. 13...exd4 14.cxd4 Nxe4 15.h3 15.Bd5 Qe8 16.h3 16.Nc3 16...Bf5 15...Bf5 15...Bd7 16.Nc3 h6 17.Bd5 Nxc3 18.bxc3 Ne7 19.Bb3 c5 20.Re1 20.dxc5 Bxc5 20...cxd4 21.Nxd4 Bg6 22.Bf4 Bc5 23.Ba4?! Subsequently MVL thought, he should have played 23.Ba2 with a slight plus. 23...Rb2 "Instantly I noticed that I was allowing 23...Nd5! and decided to go for 24.Qf3 with a slight advantage for Black" -MVL Sasha saw only 24.Nc6 Qh4 missing 24...Qf6! 25.Qxd5 25.Nxb8 Qxf4 26.Rf1 Nxc3 27.Qb3 Ne2+ 28.Kh1 d5 29.Nc6 Bd6 30.g3 Be4+ 25...Qxf4 25.g3 24.Qf3 Now the game peters out to a draw. Bxd4 25.cxd4 Nf5 26.Be3 Nxe3 27.Qxe3 MVL's comments are from his blog. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier-Lagrave,M2777Grischuk,A2764½–½2019C78Hamburg FIDE Grand Prix

Semi-final Game 1 | World Chess on YouTube

Where MVL and Krasenkow concur and differ

The second game is comprehensively annotated by Michal Krasenkow in this issue. I compared it with MVL’s own analysis. Krasenkow is thorough and, in places, more objective than MVL. But if you want to see what went on in MVL’s mind, you need to check out his words. Here I have done both and offered my own commentary:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,170,31954%2421---
1.d4949,86755%2434---
1.Nf3282,62856%2440---
1.c4182,73156%2442---
1.g319,74556%2427---
1.b314,34754%2427---
1.f45,91748%2377---
1.Nc33,81651%2384---
1.b41,75948%2379---
1.a31,22254%2404---
1.e31,07349%2409---
1.d395550%2378---
1.g466646%2361---
1.h444953%2374---
1.c343551%2426---
1.h328356%2419---
1.a411460%2465---
1.f39346%2435---
1.Nh39066%2505---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 c5 The English Opening. 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e3 e6 MVL had quite a few unhappy experiences with 5...Nxc3 losing to Radjabov and Wesley So months before this game. He decided not to play it any more. 6.Bc4 6.d4 Nc6 leads to the Semi-Tarrasch Defence. 6...Be7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Qe2 Nc6 9.Rd1 b6 10.d4 Thus we have reached the Semi-Tarrasch by transposition. Nxc3 11.bxc3 Qc7 12.e4 Rd8 As the subsequent course of the game shows, this move does not turn out very well and may be the cause of his misfortunes. During the game MVL considered 12...Bb7 13.d5 exd5 14.Bxd5 Rad8 15.c4 and did not like the position. Instead he could have tried 12...Na5 13.Bd3 Bb7= 13.Be3 After 13.d5 he had prepared Na5 14.Bd3 c4 15.Bc2 e5!? 13...Na5 14.Bd3 Bb7 15.h4! It is only now that MVL realized his position had become unpleasant. So he initiated active counter play with b5!? 15...a6 preparing 16...b5 appears too slow on account of 16.h5 16.Bxb5 Bxe4 After this move MVL was concerned about 17. Ng5. 17.dxc5 This move took him by surprise and he reacted badly with the inopportune As MVL learnt later, Grischuk did not play 17.Ng5 on account of cxd4 18.cxd4 a6 Indeed, after 19.Rac1 Qb7 20.Bd3 Bxd3 21.Qxd3 g6 the Black knight is ready to return to c6 and the pressure on the d-pawn is a cause of concern for White. 17...Bxf3? He did think about 17...Bxc5 18.Rxd8+ Rxd8 19.Bg5 Rb8 20.Qxe4 Rxb5 21.Rd1 and the position looked suspicious to him. 18.Qxf3 Bxc5 19.Bf4 "We both missed 19.Bg5! Be7 20.Rd7 The refutation. Rxd7 21.Bxd7 Rb8 22.Bxe7 Qxd7 23.Qg3 In the DVD here Krasenkow gives 23.Bf6 without further analysis. There may follow Qd6 24.Rd1 Qf8 25.Qg3 Nc6 26.Rd7± 23...Nc6 24.Bf6 g6 25.Qf4 with great danger on black squares" -MVL 19...Qb7 20.Qe2 Qe7 21.h5 Bd6 22.Bxd6 Rxd6 23.Rxd6 Qxd6 24.Rd1 Qc5 25.Rd7 The rook dominates the d-file and occupies the 7th rank. The queen and the bishop contol light squares. In contrast the Black knight remains out of play and there is little co-ordination between his pieces. Qxc3 26.Qd1? A routine move, doubling up heavy pieces on an open file. Krasenkow gives 26.Qe4! Qc1+ 26...Rf8 27.h6 Qc1+ 28.Bf1 Qxh6 29.Rxa7 Qh5 30.Qa4+- 27.Bf1 Grischuk had only calculated 27.Kh2? Rf8 28.Rxa7 Qc5! attacking as many as four pieces. 27...Qc6 28.Qd4 h6 29.Rd8+ Kh7 30.Bd3+ f5 31.Rd7 Rg8 32.Rxa7+- 26...h6 27.g3 Rf8? This defensive move reduces Black to a passive position. Krasenkow makes a fine suggestion. 27...Rb8!? 28.a4 Nb7! If 29.Qg4 Nc5 30.Rxa7 Qa1+ 31.Bf1 Not 31.Kg2? Rxb5! 32.Qf4! Rb7 33.Rxb7 Nxb7 34.Qb8+ Kh7 35.Qxb7 Qxa4 36.Qxf7 Qc4= 31...Rb1= 28.Rxa7 Nc6 29.Rd7 Ne5 30.Rd8 Qc7 MVL did not want 30...Rxd8 31.Qxd8+ Kh7 as it left the king in the corner without any participation in play. 31.Rxf8+ Kxf8 32.a4 Ke7 33.Be2 Qc3 34.Qb1 Nc6 35.Qb7+ Kf6 36.Bf1 Na5 37.Qd7 g5 38.hxg6 Kxg6 39.Kg2 Kg7 40.Bb5 Qe5 41.Qd3 Qc5 42.Qf3 Qd4 Not 42...Qe7? 43.Qc3++- If 42...Qb4 43.Be8 Qb7 43...Qe7? 44.Bxf7 Qxf7 45.Qc3++- 44.Qxb7 Nxb7 45.Bc6± 43.Be8 Qd5? MVL thought the pressure on f7 was too much and decided to opt for the exchange of queens. Krasenkow also concurs with this decision. In my view, however, the exchange of queens simplifies White's task. He could have offered more resistance with 43...f5 44.Qh5 Qf6 After 45.Qe2± White has an advantage. However, he has yet to find a way of dislodging the Black knight and advance his a-pawn. 44.Qxd5 exd5 This pawn is Black's new asset and he hopes to make something of his prospects with the knight. However, in the ensuing struggle the bishop proves superior to the knight. 45.Kf3 Kf6 46.Kg4 Ke7 47.Bb5 Kf6 MVL writes in his blog that 47...Ke6 could have saved the game. However, it is refuted by the calm 48.Be2! according to Krasenkow. If Nc4 Or 48...Kd6 49.Kf5+- 49.Kh5+- 48.Kh5 Kg7 49.Bf1 The bishop is going to run rings round the d-pawn. Nb3 50.Bg2 "White forces...d5-d4, and Black's d-pawn becomes even more vulnerable."-Krasenkow d4 51.Bf1 Nd2 52.Bd3 Nb3 53.Bf1 Nd2 54.Bd3 Nb3 55.Bb5 f6 56.Bf1 Na5 57.Ba6 Nb3 58.Bb5 Na5 59.Kg4 Nb7 60.Kf4 Nc5 61.a5 d3 62.Ke3 d2 63.Be2! 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Grischuk,A2764Vachier-Lagrave,M27771–02019A17Hamburg FIDE Grand Prix

Semi-final Game 2 | World Chess on YouTube

The Grand Prix had both talent and experience jostling for space, with Dubov, Duda and Yu Yangyi slugging it out with Svidler, Radjabov and Nakamura. Is time is running out for older players? Ask Sasha Grischuk. Now that he has qualified for the Candidates; he has every reason to be happy.

Caruana stops Carlsen

The games from the Isle of Man Tournament form the second segment in this DVD. This was a Swiss event with as many as 154 players, and the field included Aronian, Nakamura and Grischuk among others. The contest was won by Wang Hao slightly ahead of Caruana on tie-break, with a score of 8/11. Carlsen was among others sharing the third spot with 7½/11. The world champion was bogged down by draws and I still wanted to see how he was pipped at the post. I was surprised by the following game throughout, expecting Magnus to win any time.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.e4!? The Nimzovich Variation that takes control of d5 and leaves d4 weak. 4.g3 followed by 5.Bg2 is the Main Line. 4...Bc5 Black responds in kind and takes control of d4. Once upon a time it was regarded as bad on account of White's next move. 4...Bb4 is the other line. 5.Nxe5 Nxe5 6.d4 Bb4 7.dxe5 Nxe4 8.Qf3 8.Qd4 is more common. 8...Nxc3 9.bxc3 Ba5 10.Bf4 The bishop and the e-pawn exert pressure on d6, rendering the d-pawn immobile for now. If 10.Qg3 Qe7! Not 10...0-0 11.Bh6 Bxc3+ 12.Qxc3 gxh6 13.Be2 11.Be2 0-0 12.0-0 d6 13.Ba3 13.Bh6? is premature on account of f6 13...Re8 and White's pawn centre is under pressure. 10.Ba3 d6 11.exd6 0-0 12.0-0-0 deserves attention. It is similar to the position in the game here. 12.dxc7?? Qd4!-+ 10...0-0 11.0-0-0 The first new move in this position. White intesifies pressure on d-file with queenside castling.The flip side is that the king runs into danger. Only 11.Be2 has been seen here so far. 11.Rd1 followed by 12.Be2 and 13.0-0 deserves attention. 11...Qe7 12.Kb2 Rb8 13.Bd3 b5 Caruana responds with sharp counterplay. 14.cxb5 Bb7 15.Qh3 g6 16.Qe3 Rfe8 17.Rhe1 He can live dangerously with 17.Qxa7 Bb6 At ChessPublishing.com David Cummings gives 17...Bxc3+! 18.Kxc3 Ra8 19.Qxb7 Qc5+ 20.Bc4 Ra3+ 21.Kb2 Qxc4 22.Kxa3 Qc3+= Draw by perpetual check. 18.Qa3 Qe6 19.f3 Bd5 20.Ra1 However, his position is too full of holes and his king in a precarious state to claim any plus although he is two pawns up. 17...Bc6 18.a4 a6 19.Bg5 Bxc3+! 20.Kxc3 Qa3+ 21.Kd2 Qb4+ 22.Ke2 Qg4+ 23.Kd2 Not 23.f3? Qxg2+ 24.Qf2 Bxf3+-+ 23...Qb4+ 24.Ke2 Qg4+ 25.Kd2 Qb4+ Draw! Note that the Black bishop has been en prise for the last six moves. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2876Caruana,F2812½–½2019A28FIDE Chess.com Grand Swiss

A fighting draw! Caruana is one of the few players who can take on the world champion in any contest. Let's not forget, he recently won the Tata Steel Masters in Wijk aan Zee tournament with a round to spare, ahead of Carlsen.

It’s a pity that I cannot do justice to Wang Hao here for reasons of space. In this issue he annotates his win over Luke Mcshane.

How team captains play

Finally, let us take a look at the games from the European Team Championship in this DVD. In recent years former Soviet republics, Russia, Ukraine and Armenia have dominated the event. This time it was again Russia that won the title on tie-break. It was followed by Ukraine and surprise of surprises, England. The Ukraine Team did well under the leadership of Ivanchuk and only his defeat in the hands of Dmitry Andreikin was a bit of setback.

Michael Adams of England and Dmitry Andreikin of Russia withstood enormous pressure on the first board and their perseverance enabled other team members to fight on round after round. As is known, collapse of the leader on the first board can be demoralizing for the players on other boards and they tend to lose heart.  Adams and Andreikin kept up the morale of their teams till the end. For this reason I was keen to see their encounter in the penultimate round in this issue.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e6 Andreikin had prepared the French Defence for this tournament. Usually, he plays 1...e5 leading to the Spanish or the Italian Game. 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Adams on the other hand has a long experience with the Tarrasch Variation. c5 3...Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 is the other line. However, Andrekin prefers a relatively more open position. 4.exd5 4.Ngf3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Nc6 6.Bb5 Bd7 7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.Bd3 Bd6 9.Qe2 Qc7 10.Nf3 dxe4 11.Qxe4 Nf6 12.Qh4 h6 13.0-0 led to a tense draw in Ragger-Andreikin in the second round of the same tournament (=, 31 moves) 4...Qxd5 Once upon a time this move was frowned upon as it exposed the queen to attacks and left the light- squared bishop behind. In the course of the game these drawbacks make their presence felt. The other line is too well-analysed. 4...exd5 5.Ngf3 Nc6 6.Bb5 Bd6 7.dxc5 Bxc5 8.0-0 Nge7 9.Nb3 Bd6 Black has active pices to compensate for its IQP. 5.Ngf3 The sacrifice of the pawn is temporary. cxd4 6.Bc4 Qd6 7.0-0 Nf6 7...Nc6 8.Nb3 Nf6 transposes. 8.Nb3 Nc6 9.Nbxd4 Nxd4 10.Nxd4 Be7? This move is less played and has a poor reputation as leading to a passive position. Apparently Andreikin did not want to walk into his opponent's preparation. The well-known move 10...a6 prevents Nb5 and prepares...Qc7 and...Bd6. It also paves the way for...b7-b5 and...Bb7. It would also have suited Andreikin's style. 11.b3 0-0 12.Bb2 Qf4 Left to himself, Black would want to initiate an attack with moves like...Bd6 and... Ng4. However, White is better developed and he moves in first. 13.Qf3 The ensuing exchange of queens suits Adams rather than Andreikin. 13.Bd3 deserves attention of players who prefer to queens on the board. 13...Qxf3 14.Nxf3 b6 15.a4 Bb7 16.a5! The first new move in this position. White's pawn majority on the queenside is going to be more effective than Black's on the kingside. Only 16.Ne5 has been seen here so far. 16...Be4 17.Rfc1 Patient preparation. The immediate 17. Ne1 defending c2 would have have shut in the rook. Rad8 It was necessary to activate the other bishop with 17...Bc5 without fearing 18.Bxf6 gxf6 18.Ne1 Bg6 18...Bc5 was still playable. 19.Bd3 Ne4 20.Kf1 Rd7 21.f3 Bf6 22.Bxf6 Nxf6 23.Bxg6 hxg6 24.axb6 axb6 25.Rd1 Rc7 26.Rd6 White begins the siege of the b-pawn. The absence of the dark-squared bishop is now sorely felt by Black. Rb8 26...Nd5? allows 27.c4 winning the b-pawn. 27.Ra6 b5 28.Rab6 Rcc8 29.Rdc6 Rd8 30.Rxb8 Rxb8 31.Nd3 Nd5 32.h4 Ra8 33.Ke2 Ra1? This could have waited. It was necessary to activate the king first with 33...Kf8! 34.g4 Ke7 though White enjoys a slight plus. 34.Rc8+ The point.Now the Black king is shut out in a far off corner without any play. Kh7 35.Ne5 f6 36.Nd7 Ne7? A blunder towards time control. 36...Kh6?? 37.Rh8# would be a tragicomic end to the game. 36...e5? 37.Nf8+ Kh6 38.Ne6 Kh7 39.Rc5 Nb4 40.Kd2 Ra2 41.Nc7 wins the b-pawn. 36...Nf4+! offered stronger resistance. 37.Kf2 e5 38.Nf8+ Kh6 39.g3 Nd5 40.Ne6 Kh7 41.Rc5 Nb4 42.Ke3± and white still has to make headway. 37.Nxf6+! gxf6 38.Rc7 Kh6 39.Rxe7 e5 40.g4 Rc1 41.Kd3 Rf1 42.Ke2 Rc1 43.Rc7 Rh1 44.Rf7 Rxh4 45.Rxf6 Kg5 46.Rb6 Kf4 If 46...Rh2+ 47.Ke3 Rxc2 48.Rxb5+- 47.Rf6+ 47.Rxg6 allows Rh2+ 48.Kd3 Kxf3 47...Kg5 48.Rb6 Kf4 49.Rf6+ Kg5 50.Rf8 Rh2+ 51.Kd3 b4 52.c3 bxc3 53.Kxc3 Rf2 54.Kd3 Rb2 55.Kc4 e4? Anxious for counterplay, Andreikin gives up this pawn to create a passed pawn for himself on the g-file. Unfortunately, White's pawn is faster. Black ccould still fight on with 55...Rf2! though after 56.Kd5 Rb2 57.Rb8 Rf2 58.Ke4 Re2+ 59.Kd3 Rf2 60.Ke3 Rf1 61.b4 the outcome is not in doubt. 56.fxe4 Kxg4 57.e5 Rc2+ 58.Kd5 Rd2+ 59.Kc6 Re2 60.Kd6 Rd2+ 61.Ke7 Rb2 62.Rb8 g5 63.e6 Kh5 64.Ke8 g4 65.e7 g3 66.Kd7 Rd2+ 67.Kc6 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Adams,M2694Andreikin,D27411–02019C07EU-chT 22nd

Adams

Photo: ruchess.ru / Mark Livshits

A smooth performance by the English veteran. What went wrong with Andreikin? He had played the French against Markus Ragger in the second round and secured a draw after a tense game. Now in the 8th round he expected his experienced opponent to be ready for him in the same opening. So he opted for a lesser line and came to grief. Fortunately, his teammate, Nikita Vitiugov won against Luke McShane (the game is annotated in this issue). With two draws on the remaining boards the score was 2:2. In the last round Ukraine and Russia were with level points. Russia scored 2½-1½ over Poland and Ukraine missed the bus with “only” 2:2 against Croatia. So Russia won Gold, Ukraine, Silver and England, Bronze medal.

Among the young stars the hero was Daniil Dubov and his games with Bjerre and Svane were indeed a spectacular performance. They are highlighted in this DVD.

I missed the games from European Team Championship for Women. Hopefully, they would appear in the next issue.

This brings me to the rest of the DVD. Apart from standard features on middlegame tactics, endgame play and training this issue has as many as 11 opening surveys ranging from the Berlin to the King’s Indian. Among them I would single out the articles on the Traxler Counterattack in the Two Knights’ Defence and the unusual line 3.h4!? against the King’s Indian.

Tal is Tal!

The Traxler Counterattack has a chequered history and much of its theory was developed in correspondence chess and I would have liked to see some of those games. The only exception here is a telephone game that Tal played with readers of Pionerskaya Pravda This was a newspaper for young readers (not to be confused with the regular newspaper, Pravda). Apparently the game started in 1968 and finished in 1969.

Misha revelled in offbeat games and loved meeting the young.

Tal at a simul

Photo: https://chess-boom.online/

In this game he “faces” invisible opponents whose zest for chess matches his own.

He enjoys himself and so do the young players thrilled at the prospect of beating a legend. Here is what happened (I am giving it here without major notes so that readers can analyse it on their own and compare it with the annotations in the DVD)L

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
This was a consultation game and readers were invited to send suggestions to the newspaper and the Editors selected the "best" move and passed it oto Tal by telephone. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 4.d3 leads to the slow Italian Game, currently in vogue. 4...Bc5!? The Traxler Counterattack named after Karel Traxler, Czech chess master (1866-1936). 4...d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2 h6 9.Nh3 is the old Main Line of Two Knights' Defence on which great battles were fought between Steinitz and Chigorin during 1890 and 1892. 5.Nxf7 The "sober" 5.Bxf7+ is the main alternative to this "greedy" move. 5...Bxf2+ Here the "fun" begins and I shall pass the rest of this game without comment. Detailed annotations are found in the current issue,CBM 193. 6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 9.hxg3 Qxg3+ 10.Kf1 Rf8 11.Qh5 d5 12.Bxd5 Nd4 13.Qh2 Qg4 14.Qxe5+ Be6 15.Bxe6 Qf3+ 16.Kg1 Ne2+ 17.Kh2 Qf2+ 18.Kh3 Qf3+ 19.Kh4 Qf2+ 20.Kh5 Rxf7 21.Bxf7+ Kxf7 22.Rh2 Qf3+ 23.Kh4 g5+ 24.Qxg5 Rg8 25.Qh5+ Qxh5+ 26.Kxh5 Ng3+ 27.Kh6 Nf5+ 28.Kxh7 Rg7+ ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Readers,P-Mikhail Tal-½–½1968C57Telephone Match

“Pionerskaya Pravda” versus Mikhail Tal, Telechess 1968-1969

How to intimidate King’s Indian players

The second line, 3.h4!? against the King’s Indian was analysed by Simon Williams way back in 2011 (SOS No.13, New in Chess). An update is only appropriate. Currently, the ball is in Black’s court.

The main database of the issue has 1618 recent games of which 33 are deeply annotated.

Apart from the GMs I have already mentioned, the commentators include Fabiano Caruana, David Navara, Yu Yangyi, Lars Schandorff  and Igor Stohl. It may be noted that there are more annotated games in the sections on opening theory and training.

Recommended.


Analyses by Caruana, Giri, Duda, Wang Hao, So, Vidit, Vitiugov, McShane and many more. Plus videos by Williams, King and Shirov. 11 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and training sessions in strategy, tactics and endgame!

Videos by Mihail Marin, Adrian Mikhalchishin and Georgios Souleidis. "Lucky bag" with analyses by Alireza Frouzja, Peter Heine Nielsen and many more. Plus over 35,000 new games for your database!


Links


Prof. Nagesh Havanur (otherwise known as "chessbibliophile") is a senior academic and research scholar. He taught English in Mumbai for three decades and has now settled in Bangalore, India. His interests include chess history, biography and opening theory. He has been writing on the Royal Game for more than three decades. His articles and reviews have appeared on several web sites and magazines.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.