Unmissable: Caruana on Sindarov, Nakamura and the Candidates

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
4/22/2026 – Fabiano Caruana reflects on his showing at the Candidates Tournament while explaining why he believes Javokhir Sindarov produced one of the strongest performances in the event's history. Caruana discusses Sindarov's opening preparation, his own missed chances, Hikaru Nakamura's costly opening preparation mistake and the likely balance of the forthcoming world title match against Gukesh Dommaraju. | Photo: ChessBase / Nils Rohde

Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally.
FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before. 

An honest debrief

The Candidates Tournament ended with an emphatic victory for Javokhir Sindarov, who secured the right to challenge Gukesh Dommaraju for the world title. In the latest instalment of his C-Squared Podcast - hosted by Cristian Chirila - Fabiano Caruana reflects on a tournament that slipped away from him midway through, while also offering an assessment of Sindarov's remarkable performance.

Caruana describes Sindarov's run as one of the strongest Candidates performances he has ever seen. He compares it to the dominant victory achieved by Veselin Topalov at the 2005 FIDE World Championship in San Luis, Argentina.

Though much has been said about Sindarov's record-breaking 10/14 performance (the highest score achieved in this era of the Candidates), Topalov achieved the same plus-six score in the San Luis event, played with the same format. Back then, two parallel World Championship cycles were taking, with Topalov's victory allowing him to face Vladimir Kramnik in the 2006 reunification match.

FIDE World Chess Championship 2005

Veselin Topalov

Veselin Topalov scored 10/14 for a 2890 TPR against formidable opposition!

A major theme of the podcast discussion is Sindarov's opening preparation. Caruana repeatedly points out how well prepared the Uzbek grandmaster was in a wide variety of positions, including sidelines and somewhat rare continuations. According to him, Sindarov seemed ready for almost every important variation, often emerging from the opening with a comfortable position and a significant advantage on the clock.

The video also provides an honest assessment of Caruana's own event. He explains that, despite a strong start, he often felt uncomfortable in the opening phase and was frequently placed under pressure early in games. He identifies his loss to Sindarov and his failure to press harder in certain positions as important moments in the tournament, especially once Sindarov continued to collect victories and widen the gap.

There is also discussion of other major storylines from the event. Caruana comments on Hikaru Nakamura's loss to Sindarov after an opening mistake.

Nakamura blamed his seconds for not including 12.0-0 in his files. However, Caruana suggests that responsibility lay more with Nakamura himself than with his seconds, as it is the player's duty to go over the lines, checking their validity instead of just clicking through them mindlessly.

The conversation then turns to the likely dynamics of the forthcoming world Championship match. Caruana gives Sindarov a slight edge against Gukesh, though he expects the match to be close. While he acknowledges that Sindarov currently appears to be in better form, he notes that Gukesh, who is still 19 years old, has already shown in the past that he can recover quickly and perform at the highest level when it matters most.


Full video


Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.
Discussion and Feedback Submit your feedback to the editors