Candidates R6: Vital wins for Pragg and Vidit

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
4/11/2024 – Praggnanandhaa R (pictured) and Vidit Gujrathi scored full points in round 6 of the Candidates Tournament. Pragg inflicted a second consecutive defeat on Nijat Abasov, while Vidit got the better of an overly daring Alireza Firouzja. The remaining two games ended drawn, which leaves Gukesh D and Ian Nepomniachtchi still tied for first place in the standings. Pragg now stands a half point back, with as many points as Fabiano Caruana. | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Firouzja and Abasov crumble

Both Praggnanandhaa R and Vidit Gujrathi played white in back-to-back rounds on Tuesday and Wednesday. Coincidentally, the two compatriots missed winning chances in round 5 and went on to grab full points in round 6. Throughout the event, they have also been two of the most courageous players in the opening, either showing novel ideas in well-known systems or bravely entering sidelines that lead to double-edged struggles.

While Pragg has so far collected 2 wins and 1 loss for a +1 score, Vidit has collected 2 wins and 2 losses for a fifty-percent score. In their round-3 direct confrontation, Pragg played an early ...f7-f5 in the Ruy Lopez to surprise his opponent and eventually get a remarkable win.

On Wednesday, the Indian duo defeated the two players who were sharing last place in the standings, Alireza Firouzja and Nijat Abasov. The losses suffered by Firouzja and Abasov have now left them a full two points behind co-leaders Ian Nepomniachtchi and Gukesh D. Most pundits had predicted that Abasov, the clear rating underdog in the event, was going to have a tough time in Toronto, but Firouzja was considered by some to be a contender for the title.

In round 6, Firouzja lost after playing an over-confident line with black, but given his combative spirit, it is likely that he will continue to take risks in the coming rounds, as he is not one to go down without a fight.

In Thursday’s seventh round, the last one before the second rest day, co-leaders Gukesh and Nepomniachtchi will both play with the black pieces — against the ever-dangerous Firouzja and Hikaru Nakamura, respectively.

Results - Round 6

Dommaraju Gukesh, Hikaru Nakamura

Co-leader Gukesh D and Hikaru Nakamura signed a 40-move draw in round 6 | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza

Vidit 1 - 0 Firouzja

Firouzja was visibly looking to get a fighting position right from the start, as he played a rarely seen manoeuvre out of a Sicilian as early as on move 8.

Vidit v. Firouzja

Clearly the most natural move here is 8...Ne5, while 8...Qd8, as played by Firouzja, moves the queen for a second time in the game, inviting White to quickly employ the usual plan in the Sicilian — i.e. Qd1-d2 and 0-0-0, not only getting ready to expand on the kingside but also attacking the d6-pawn.

Three moves later, Firouzja again played an imprudent move in 10...Bb7, already leaving White in the driver’s seat.

Things went from bad to worse for Black when 13...Qxf2 appeared on the board.

In his excellent game recap (find it below), GM Daniel King noted that Firouzja’s play in the opening demonstrates that he was clearly on tilt — i.e. a state of mental or emotional confusion or frustration in which a player adopts a suboptimal strategy, usually resulting in the player becoming overly aggressive.

Black’s king is unsafe on e8, as White counts with ideas connected to Bxb5, opening up lines for a potential attack. Vidit rightfully felt that he had good chances of getting a full point here, and spent 17 minutes before playing 14.e5, the strongest move in the position!

There followed 14...Nd7 (14...Nxe5 fails to 15.Bxb5+, grabbing the queen on f2) 15.exd6 Qb6 16.Be3 Qd8

Note that the black queen has gone to b6, back to d8, back to b6, captured on f2, back to b6, back to d8 — 6 out of the 16 moves played so far in the game, only to return to its initial square. In the meantime, the black king remained in the centre and the dark-squared bishop cannot be developed due to the extremely troublesome pawn on d6.

Firouzja had prevented his opponent from ending the game quickly, but could not avoid entering a strategically lost position. Vidit began playing positionally sound manoeuvres, and eventually emerged with an extra exchange and two extra pawns.

Understandably, Black here went for 25...Nxg5, since trying to save the rook on a8 at this point seems very artificial — nevertheless, after 26.Nxa8 Qxa8 27.Qe2, White had unpinned his bishop on a7, fully consolidating his big advantage.

Vidit took advantage of his opponent’s risky, mistaken opening play and was at this point completely winning. Firouzja continued playing until move 40, when he resigned a game that had gone for too long on a steady downward course.

Vidit Gujrathi

Vidit Gujrathi | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza


Expert analysis by GM Daniel King


Praggnanandhaa 1 - 0 Abasov

Pragg’s victory was not as straightforward as his compatriot’s, though he did get to keep the initiative on his side throughout the opening and the early middlegame. Only on move 30 did Abasov make a mistake that prompted the commentators to assess the position as clearly favourable for White.

Praggnanandhaa v. Abasov

30...Bf4 looks quite natural, as the bishop might need to defend the kingside later on and White does not count with an immediate tactical refutation. Abasov went for 30...Bb8, though, perhaps playing ‘on principle’ instead of taking the time to calculate the ensuing lines carefully (at that point, he had 36 minutes on his clock).

Pragg noticed that Black’s pieces were rather uncoordinated and played the strong 31.f6 after thinking for a bit over 4 minutes. Notably, Abasov replied by 31...Bf4, realizing that he had wasted a tempo with his previous manoeuvre.

A strong technical player, Pragg chose to simplify the position into a slightly favourable endgame, as he avoided entering deep time trouble before reaching move 40.

Abasov’s 38...Rxf6 turned out to be a decisive mistake.

Much like in the aforementioned ...Bh2-b8, the Azerbaijani GM was hasty in grabbing the white pawn with 38...Rxf6. Better would have been 38...Rd6 39.Rxa6 Rd2, creating counterplay as quickly as possible.

After 39.Rxa6 Rf5, Pragg found the elegant 40.Nd7

By covering the f6-square, White prepares to play Ra6-a5, all but forcing a trade of rooks — which will result in White getting a winning minor-piece endgame with his outside passers on the queenside.

And, indeed, the rooks left the board three moves later.

43.Rxf5 Kxf5 was followed by the straightforward 44.a5 gxf2 45.a6, and Black resigned.

45...Be3 loses to 46.Nc5. Game over.

Nijat Abasov

Nijat Abasov | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza

Standings after round 6

Loading Table...

All games

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 4 c5 10 2.Nf3 5       d6 4 3.d4 14 cxd4 6 4.Nxd4 3 Nf6 6 5.Nc3 4 e5 5 6.Bb5+ 3:44       Nbd7 30 7.Nf5 4:07 a6 43 8.Ba4 9:20 8.Nxd6+? Bxd6 9.Qxd6 axb5-+ 8...b5 14 9.Bb3 3 Nc5 5 10.Bg5 1:40 aiming for Bd5. Bxf5 6 White is slightly better. 11.exf5 1:54 Be7 5       12.Bxf6 5:30 Bxf6 1:43 13.0-0 10:14 e4 2:43 14.Nxe4 9:35 Nxe4 1:16 15.Re1 20 15.Qd5!? 0-0 15...Ng5? 16.Rae1+ Kf8 17.h4± 16.Qxe4 15...0-0! 8 16.Rxe4 3       Black needs to defend precisely. Bxb2 14 Black is weak on the light squares 17.Rb1 2 Bf6 3:52 18.Qd5 2:38 Rc8 6:37       19.Qb7 12:29 Rc5 34:27 20.Qxa6 1:21 Rxf5 4:27 21.Rd1 4:45 White is more active. d5 2:49 22.Rb4 20:56       22.Qxb5? dxe4 23.Bxf7+ Rxf7-+ 22...Bc3 20:10 23.Rxb5 23 Rxf2 7 24.Rbxd5 10:18 Of course not 24.Kxf2?! Qh4+ 25.Kg1 Bd4+ 26.Kh1 Be5= 24...Qh4 31 25.Qd3 2:31 Rf6 2:45 26.g3 2:30 26.Qxc3? is a self mate. Qf2+ 27.Kh1 Qf1+ 28.Rxf1 Rxf1# 26...Qb4 3:18 27.Kg2 2:48 Bb2 0 28.Rf5 2:58 g6 9:41 29.Rxf6 3 Bxf6 4 30.Qf3 17 Qe7 4 31.a4 56 Kg7 1:28 32.a5 16 White should play 32.Bd5 32...Ra8= 2:55 33.Rd5 1:03 33.Qxa8!? Qe2+ 34.Kh3= 33...Ra7 5 34.Rb5 1:38 Qd8 1:25 35.Rd5 54 Qc7 1:35 But not 35...Qa8?! 36.a6 36.h4 52 Rxa5 6:15 37.Rxa5 4 Qxa5 3 38.Qb7 3 Qd8 22 39.Qxf7+ 6 Kh6 1 40.Kh3 0 Qe7 0 41.Qc4 2:23 Qe3 52 Weighted Error Value: White=0.08 (flawless) /Black=0.08 (flawless) . Mistake: White=1 --- Inaccurate: White=2 Black=5 OK: White=13 Black=15 Best: White=1 Black=1 Strong: --- Black=1 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Caruana,F2803Nakamura,H2789½–½2024B56FIDE Candidates 20241.1
Abasov,N2632Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024D53FIDE Candidates 20241.2
Firouzja,A2760Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C83FIDE Candidates 20241.3
Gukesh D2743Vidit,S2727½–½2024D40FIDE Candidates 20241.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Gukesh D27430–12024E20FIDE Candidates 20242.1
Nakamura,H2789Vidit,S27270–12024C65FIDE Candidates 20242.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Firouzja,A27601–02024C65FIDE Candidates 20242.3
Caruana,F2803Abasov,N26321–02024B30FIDE Candidates 20242.4
Gukesh D2743Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024E01FIDE Candidates 20243.1
Abasov,N2632Nakamura,H2789½–½2024D13FIDE Candidates 20243.2
Firouzja,A2760Caruana,F2803½–½2024B30FIDE Candidates 20243.3
Vidit,S2727Praggnanandhaa R27470–12024C70FIDE Candidates 20243.4
Nakamura,H2789Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C78FIDE Candidates 20244.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Vidit,S27271–02024C67FIDE Candidates 20244.2
Caruana,F2803Gukesh D2743½–½2024C54FIDE Candidates 20244.3
Abasov,N2632Firouzja,A2760½–½2024E32FIDE Candidates 20244.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024C42FIDE Candidates 20245.1
Firouzja,A2760Nakamura,H27890–12024C54FIDE Candidates 20245.2
Gukesh D2743Abasov,N26321–02024C43FIDE Candidates 20245.3
Vidit,S2727Caruana,F2803½–½2024B30FIDE Candidates 20245.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Caruana,F2803½–½2024C47FIDE Candidates 20246.1
Gukesh D2743Nakamura,H2789½–½2024B27FIDE Candidates 20246.2
Vidit,S2727Firouzja,A27601–02024B57FIDE Candidates 20246.3
Praggnanandhaa R2747Abasov,N26321–02024D40FIDE Candidates 20246.4
Firouzja,A2760Gukesh D27431–02024D02FIDE Candidates 20247.1
Nakamura,H2789Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024C42FIDE Candidates 20247.2
Caruana,F2803Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C02FIDE Candidates 20247.3
Abasov,N2632Vidit,S2727½–½2024C65FIDE Candidates 20247.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Firouzja,A2760½–½2024B47FIDE Candidates 20248.1
Vidit,S2727Gukesh D27430–12024C55FIDE Candidates 20248.2
Nakamura,H2789Caruana,F28031–02024C78FIDE Candidates 20248.3
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Abasov,N2632½–½2024C01FIDE Candidates 20248.4
Vidit,S2727Nakamura,H27891–02024C55FIDE Candidates 20249.1
Gukesh D2743Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C77FIDE Candidates 20249.2
Firouzja,A2760Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024A07FIDE Candidates 20249.3
Abasov,N2632Caruana,F2803½–½2024E40FIDE Candidates 20249.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Vidit,S2727½–½2024C65FIDE Candidates 202410.1
Nakamura,H2789Abasov,N26321–02024B22FIDE Candidates 202410.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Gukesh D2743½–½2024C70FIDE Candidates 202410.3
Caruana,F2803Firouzja,A27601–02024B90FIDE Candidates 202410.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Nakamura,H27890–12024D06FIDE Candidates 202411.1
Vidit,S2727Nepomniachtchi,I27580–12024C42FIDE Candidates 202411.2
Gukesh D2743Caruana,F2803½–½2024D35FIDE Candidates 202411.3
Firouzja,A2760Abasov,N26321–02024D04FIDE Candidates 202411.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C01FIDE Candidates 202412.1
Nakamura,H2789Firouzja,A27601–02024C01FIDE Candidates 202412.2
Abasov,N2632Gukesh D27430–12024E32FIDE Candidates 202412.3
Caruana,F2803Vidit,S27271–02024C54FIDE Candidates 202412.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Nakamura,H2789½–½2024C64FIDE Candidates 202413.1
Praggnanandhaa R2747Caruana,F28030–12024B30FIDE Candidates 202413.2
Vidit,S2727Abasov,N2632½–½2024C42FIDE Candidates 202413.3
Gukesh D2743Firouzja,A27601–02024C65FIDE Candidates 202413.4
Nakamura,H2789Gukesh D2743½–½2024E51FIDE Candidates 202414.1
Caruana,F2803Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024D35FIDE Candidates 202414.2
Firouzja,A2760Vidit,S2727½–½2024C67FIDE Candidates 202414.3
Abasov,N2632Praggnanandhaa R27470–12024E69FIDE Candidates 202414.4

The Vidit Gujrathi vlog on beating Alireza Firouzja

An absolutely stunning finish

Watch tons of high-quality content on ChessBase India’s YouTube channel!


Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.