Best of 2015: Best Endgame

In the Suba–Laiz Ibanez endgame I think you should metion that 43.Kc6 or 43.g4 holds. In the first endgame it was nice to see that even the best of the world dont play perfectly. My favorite is the engine endgame. It's like a study :-).
An interesting endgame from 2015 is Rublevsky-Adams ECC, I think.

carlsen naka for sure

Where is the endgame of Carlsen Nakamura London chess classic? that was pure art

I vote for So-Vachier Lagrave

I'll vote for Carlsen-Nakamura LCC 2015 bishops vs. knights game

So-MVL is best

Carlsen - Naka is the best endgame from London Chess Classic

For me, the So-MVL endgame is tops. Up until the end (and really many moves after that even), I was not 100% sure Black could win. Heck, with the starting position, it wasn't even immediately clear that Black can hold! There were also many drawn pitfalls MVL had to navigate. A great game.

The Wojtaszek-Liren endgame is in my opinion the most challenging one, and therefore the hardest to convert, because the material is really almost even, and Wojtaszek got little wrong, while Liren played really flawlessly so I choose this one. This statement needs a little explanation. Karjiakin has already a clear material advantage over Svidler, and white's king has also ot in enemy territory; that's enough for me not to consider that game. Also in So-Lagrave endgame, Lagrave has already a clear avdantage, although little, about half a point (2.5 points for the knight against 2 points for the two pawns that So is up of).The Jonny-Komodo endgame is perhaps the most balanced in material of them all, and yet in such a close position with all those pawns on the board, every chess textbook teaches you that having a knight against a bishop is a clear advantage; make no mistake though, I could have never played like that, but both the opponents were strong engines, wich is like to have me against a same level human opponent: on the long run I'd have good chances to win. The Anand-Carlsen position is essentially a missed chance by Anand, although in a situation that personally I can hardly think of as an endgame yet; I'd really call it still a middlegame, where Anand missed a chance, and missing a chance in a middlegame is pretty different than missing it in an endgame: in the former case it can be thought of as a strategic mistake, even in the Anand case, although hardly, I admit, while in the latter as a tecnical mistake, whereas endgame is really all about (brilliant) tecnique, which, at the end of the day, is what we are asked to assess here. Finally the Suba-Ibanez endgame is a plain an simple underestimation of a drawn position by Suba, a big mistake: too easy for Ibanez to win.

I think the best endgame of the year 2015 is the one which took place in Qatar 2015; Carlsen vs Nakamura.

The computer ending looks the most impressive, but it doesn't seem fair to include computer games here. From the remaining games I like Wojtaszek-Ding. Not sure why Anand-Carlsen is here, as it was neither a particularly beautiful endgame nor an accurately played one.

Kxf6!?!?! CALRSEN NAKA ANYONE?

The Aronian draw against Carlsen should be here...the computer ending not.

To me this endgame:
http://en.chessbase.com/post/danzhou-wang-yue-wins-with-2887-performance

I would change my vote if this endgame was part of it.