Ancient chess problems to solve

by Frederic Friedel
11/13/2024 – Chess was invented in India, and brought to Europe in the 9th Century by the Arabs – who also introduced the first “mansuba” – middle or endgame puzzles with well-defined tasks, with stories and legends surrounding them. Today we give you three of the oldest mansuba to solve – in your head or against our live chess diagrams.

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

I usually say that chess was invented in one week in the autumn of 570 A.D. somewhere in the north-eastern part of India, by a single person. I do this mainly to provoke chess historians who search for ancient predecessors of the game, in China and in Egypt. The only real precursor, I believe, was the 64-square chequered board.

Chess moved from India to Arabia, and when the Arabs stormed Europe in the 9th century they brought the game with them. And introduced the first “mansuba”, which consisted of composed middle or endgame positions with well-defined tasks, e.g. white to play and win. Which is the subject of today's challenge.

Here's an ancient mansuba that was composed more than a thousand years ago by a certain al-Adli. Originally it was Black to move and win, but we have switched it to the more modern form by reflecting the position. And here is your first challenge:

You can see that this is a fairly hopeless position, with Black threatening immediate mate by Ra1 or Reb2. White must not just defend, but actually win the game. Give yourself two minutes just looking at the diagram, and then execute the mate on the board. The diagram will defend.

In the Fireside Book by F. Reinfeld and I. Chernev write: Do you believe in reincarnation of chess ideas? The diagram shows a position which occurred in a game played in 1945 between Jorgensen and Sorensen. This identical position is described by al-Adli in an Arabian manuscript dating back to the ninth century!" Full details of this remarkable claim are to be found in chess historian Edward Winter's article Chess Reincarnation.

Once again, take a couple of minutes to just study the above position before moving the pieces and overcoming the diagram's defence. The story attached to the problem was that a chess-addicted prince, Murwardi, had wagered and lost his entire fortune in an intense chess session. In his desperation he offered his beautiful wife Dilaram as stake, and was losing the game they were playing for her. In the above position, his wife called out to him: "Oh Prince, sacrifice your rooks and not your wife."

Incidentally, the original problem had an "Alfil" on h3 – a bishop which at the time could only move two squares diagonally and jump over pieces (e.g. the knight on g4). We replaced it with a knight, which allow for the same solution.

And here is a Lucena that showed a unique mate for the first time:

I urge you to solve these historical puzzles – assuming you do not know them already – yourself. The solutions are given below.

al-Adli: 1.Nh5+ Rxh5 2.Rxg6+ Kxg6 3.Re6#

as-Suli: 1.Rh8+ Kxh8 2.Ng5+ Kg8 3.Rh8+ Kxh8 4.g7+ Kg8 5.Nh6#

Lucena: 1.Qe6+ Kh8 2.Nf7+ Kg8 3.Nh6+ (3.Nd8+ Kh8 4.Qe8+ Qf8 5.Qxf8#) 3...Kh8 4.Qg8+ Rxg8 5.Nf7# *

Highlight the lines above to view the solution. Did you find them all?


Editor-in-Chief emeritus of the ChessBase News page. Studied Philosophy and Linguistics at the University of Hamburg and Oxford, graduating with a thesis on speech act theory and moral language. He started a university career but switched to science journalism, producing documentaries for German TV. In 1986 he co-founded ChessBase.
Discussion and Feedback Submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

arzi arzi 11/18/2024 08:00
Probably, FF, probably. I just said "probably moved differently". Was it a wrong word or sentence? I do recall that all the chess rules today were not the same as 1000 years ago. The move of Q was not the same as today if I `m not totally mistaken, again. Probably, presumably, surely, very likely, maybe, in chance...in fact the fact is...what ever...

Although we could have this whole conversation in e.g. Finnish ... in which case I would have to constantly correct what you said, even if you had AI to help you. "Stikkaa kundi plääkät koska mun omat on jemmassa." Try to translate this. This is easier: "Mulle meinas tulla ykät liiveille, niin kusisesti mä skulasin tätä geimii" ;)
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 11/15/2024 10:48
Arzi,
I don't quite understand your reply to Mamacki, but you seem to have information that doesn't completely coincide with established chess history. (I won't suggest you are unaware of it.) Could you please inform us?
arzi arzi 11/15/2024 06:37
Mamacki:"arzi, there's no "probably" about it"

Surely there are different possibilities, very likely, I would say even probably if not by the look of it you could not believe it, presumably thinking by Mamacki, probably.
Mamack1 Mamack1 11/14/2024 04:51
arzi, there's no "probably" about it.

Though the moves of the R/N/K were the same.
arzi arzi 11/14/2024 06:28
Easy, also the last one if you know your Lucena. It took me 3 min. with all three. Sorry. Chess pieces probably moved differently 1000 years ago than they do today. It's great, in any case, that modern chess can be recognized in the old chess positions.
1