An interview with Merijn van Delft

by André Schulz
7/6/2020 – Merijn van Delft has been giving chess training for many years, and has a regular show at ChessBase. He now published an interesting book on "Positional Sacrifice". In an interview he talks about the book, his work and his passion for positional sacrifices.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Can one say that you are a professional chess player?

Yeah, definitely. I live from chess, but not as a player, but as a trainer, coach, author, organizer, and as a presenter. At ChessBase, for example, I have a weekly show.

As a coach, you're carrying on your father's tradition...

When I was a small kid, my father and I were new to the chess world but then my father became interested in psychology and didactics. He raised the local chess culture to a higher level here in Apeldoorn and was always keen to find out how one could develop further. Not only as a chess player, but also as a human being. When I was about 14 years old, I gave chess lessons for the first time and when I moved to Amsterdam to study at the age of 18, teaching became more important than my own chess career. My father and I described our experiences from these early times of learning, playing and teaching chess in our book Developing Chess Talent.

You just published a new book: "Mastering Positional Sacrifices". Why did you not write an opening book? Opening books sell a lot better, don't they?

I also like to deal with opening theory, because I am very interested in strategy in general. But I am especially interested in positional sacrifices, a fascinating and increasingly important topic in modern chess. For me it is all connected. Of course, I would be happy when the book sells well, but that was not my main motivation for writing it. I wanted to record systematically what I know about the subject.

Merijn van Delft

How long did you work on the book?

I have been collecting beautiful games and examples for decades and last summer I finally worked out the structure of the book in detail. When I had the structure, it took only a few months to write it. Much quicker than writing my final thesis at university!

Very briefly, the difference between positional and tactical sacrifice is...?

Tactical sacrifices usually aim for quick success, mostly to mate the king. Positional sacrifices are long-term. You give material but you get other advantages in return, e.g. good pieces, a good pawn structure or control of important squares.

When did you have the idea to turn your interest in the topic into a book?

I asked New in Chess if they could imagine to publish such a book. Allard Hoogland was immediately interested and said, sure, come by and we'll discuss it. Peter Boel became my editor, and since he is an old friend from Apeldoorn, working with New in Chess was very pleasant. From time to time Allard and Peter came up with an idea but otherwise I just did my thing – an ideal arrangement.

How is the book structured?

The book is 300 pages long and in the first nine chapters I present 115 model games. Chapter 10 contains 48 tasks related to the topic. When I planned the book, I wanted to to create a clear structure that would enable the reader to grasp and understand the subject. The first four chapters are practically a basic course about positional sacrifices. Then things get more challenging and I deal with various sacrifices that have become standard, for example the exchange sacrifices in the Benko Gambit and in the Sicilian. These are covered in Part Two, in chapters five and six. The third part is particularly exciting. In chapters seven to nine I have examined how far one can go with positional sacrifices.  I also showed how the strong modern engines treat positional sacrifices.

In practical games the motifs usually do not appear in their pure form. Often there are other motifs which obscure the clear view of the main theme. How did you go about that?

The main motif must be clearly visible in the model games. When I was in doubt, I omitted such unclear games. Of course, practice is always more complicated, but the first thing to do is to learn what topics there are, ideally in a clear form.

How did you find the model games?

For years I have collected model games with positional sacrifices because I was fascinated by this topic. My teammates and chess friends know my passion and if they see a nice game with a positional sacrifice, they often send it to me. The games in the book are from this collection.

Did you pick a lot of classical games?

There are of course some classics that you just can't ignore. But I wanted to select less well-known illustrative games, including some older ones. Some classics, for example the famous game Reshevsky-Petrosian, Zurich 1953, have been published so often that I preferred to turn it into an exercise.

Here is an example of a game that I found very instructive.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
We will now look at one more game with the King's Gambit, before we put it aside as a museum piece. While the opening is objectively not very good, it did play a major role in the history of chess, in exploring the limits of what is possible and what is not. 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 Black has many ways of playing, but this has always been regarded as the main line. 4.h4 g4 5.Ng5 5.Ne5 is the alternative. 5...h6 6.Nxf7!? A daring piece sacrifice, which is still tricky to meet over the board, if you are not well prepared. Kxf7 This position was already known in the 18th century, and maybe even earlier. 7.Nc3 This positional interpretation of the position is rather modern though, and was first played by Glazkov in 1975, as far as I can see. 7.Bc4+ is also met by the typical pawn sacrifice d5 which serves to ease Black's development. 7...d5 8.d4 f3 After 8...Nf6 it is doubtful that White has enough compensation for the piece. 9.Nxd5 Nf6 10.Nxf6 f2+? This is a serious mistake, after which White gets very nice play for the piece. Correct is 10...Qxf6 and Black has the upper hand. 11.Kxf2 Qxf6+
12.Kg3! The king is remarkably comfortable here and his development will be very fast now. Nc6 12...Be6 may have been the best try. 13.Bc4+ The immediate 13.e5 is strong. 13...Ke8 14.e5 Qd8? This fails tactically, and gives White a winning position. Black could have more or less kept the balance with 14...Qg6 15.Qd3! The key move, getting full control over the position. Qe7 15...Nxd4 16.Qg6+ Kd7 17.e6+ is a disaster for Black. 15...Qxd4 16.Qg6+ Kd8 17.Rd1! wins the queen because of Qxd1 18.Bg5+ 16.Qg6+ The immediate 16.Rf1 was most accurate. 16...Kd8 17.Rf1 Qg7 Black's last chance to fight back was 17...Bd7 18.Qe4 Keeping full control over the position. Ne7
19.h5! This is how it works: consistently taking away squares from your opponent. Ke8 20.Be3 White is not yet interested in winning the queen with 20.Rf7 but rather enjoys dominating the position. 20...Qh7 21.Bf7+ Kd8 22.Bg6 Nicely using the outpost on g6. Qg8 23.d5 Taking away further squares from Black. Bd7 24.e6 Nxg6 25.hxg6 Be8
26.Rf7! This move flows naturally from what happened before. White turns the piece sacrifice into a rook sacrifice. Bxf7 27.exf7 Bd6+ 28.Kxg4 Qf8 Black can hardly breath. 29.Bd4 c5 30.Bf6+ Kc7 31.Qe6 31.Kh5 would nicely fit in the picture as well. 31...h5+ 32.Kh3 Qh6 33.Rf1 Rhc8 34.g7 Qh7 35.Be5 White calmly finishes the game. Bxe5 36.Qxe5+ Kb6 37.f8Q
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Manuel Bosboom-Erik O M C Teichmann-1–01984Ramsgate op

What technical aids did you use?

The book is completely written with the ChessBase program. I have examined and tested all games very intensively with the cloud versions of Leela and Stockfish. So all positional assessments and variations are computer-checked. Here, the ChessBase Engine Cloud is a fantastic tool. Using the engines of other chess enthusiasts and their super machines costs a few ducats, but you get reliable results very quickly.

ChessBase is a personal, stand-alone chess database that has become the standard throughout the world. Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.

The most popular chess program offers you everything you will need as a dedicated chess enthusiast, with innovative training methods for amateurs and professionals alike.

Why two engines?

The architectures of the two engines are very different. Leela - you could also take FatFritz, which is basically the same - very quickly offers a coherent basic assessment. The program is very stable in its judgment. But there are sometimes blind spots in regard to tactics. Here Stockfish helps with the blunder check. But: Most of these lines I did not put into the book. Instead, I have explained the sacrificial patterns and when they work. I wanted to understand these sacrifices and I wanted to pass this knowledge on to the reader in an accessible way. I tell the chess story of the respective games.

You are a bit of a wanderer between the worlds, at home in Apeldoorn/Amsterdam and in Hamburg...

Yes, I like it in both worlds. For me German and Dutch cultures are very similar. Well, in football we have a long-standing rivalry but the cultural differences are actually not that big. Chess also connects.

In Apeldoorn we have a Denksportcentrum, a center for mind sports, which can be found in all major Dutch cities. In 2018 we had GM tournament there and we are also planning another one. But always with supporting events, especially for children and young people, to promote chess. I am also the tournament organizer of the Batavia tournament in Amsterdam. There, too, the social character of the event is in the foreground. Chess can be very integrating. I also think that chess players do a lot in this field.

Thank you very much for the interview and good luck with your book.

Thank you very much.

Questions: André Schulz, Translation from German: Johannes Fischer

Links

 

 


André Schulz started working for ChessBase in 1991 and is an editor of ChessBase News.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.