Sun
Network: Anand to lead India in OlympiadNewkerela:
Vishwanathan Anand eyes a unified chess title
International grandmaster and world's second best chess player
Vishwanathan Anand aims at winning a unified chess title. He said that if the
international body for chess introduces a unified world title, then winning
that would be the biggest challenge for him.
Newindpress:
Olympiad will be great fun: Anand
Viswanathan Anand on Friday said that the need of the hour is to have an Unified
World Chess Championship, which will pit the best players against each other.
"We now have different world chess events and the sport is getting hurt
with the top players not taking on each other in a Unified World Chess Championship,''
Anand said here. "The need of the hour is a Unified World Chess Championship,''
he said. "I am excited and looking forward to the Chess Olympiad. We have
a very good team and I get along well with the other members of the team and
it will be great fun,'' said Anand. "It is a very long tournament spanning
14 rounds and I won't make a guess as to where we (the men) will finish with
the Russians around. But the women's team led by Arjuna award winner Grandmaster
Koneru Humpy will put in a good performance with powerhouses like China and
Georgia coming down,'' he said. Anand added that he hoped to touch the magical
Elo rating of 2800 points in his next few tournaments. "I went as close
as 2797 in 1998 and now I'm 18 points away from the mark. I hope to touch it
in the next three or four tournaments.''
In
the last two years chess wizard Viswanathan Anand has won almost everything
that has come his way, including his third
Chess Oscar, which he had earlier won in 1997 and 1998. In doing so, he
became only the second non-Russian after Bobby Fischer of the United States
(in 1970, 1971 and 1972) to win the coveted award. This year he already has
three major crowns resting on his head – the Corus Super Grandmaster's
title, the Dortmund Super Grandmaster's title and the Mainz Classic –
and beaten all the leading players in the process. Now he is aiming for the
2800 mark. Here are excerpts from an interview with the Indian news service Rediff.
You won the Chess Oscar for the third time this year; you also won three titles this year. What have you added to your game recently?
Anand: I think I have been stable. If you see my performances since 2002, I have avoided big disappointments. You may not win a tournament, but at least you play well and feel that you are on the right track. I think since Prague 2002, I have been able to do that. Also, where misfortunes have struck, like with Krishnan Sasikiran [in the 2002 World Cup] in Hyderabad or Anatoly Karpov in Corsica [2002] or so on, I have always managed to strike back the next day and recover. So these two factors, my tenacity and stability have helped.
How much time do you spend analysing positions and practicing chess? Do you practice every day?
I try to, but sometimes I go a couple of weeks without any serious work. I might not look at chess at all or I might look at it for 5 or 10 minutes. Without serious work I could go for a couple of weeks, but before a tournament I try to get into that rhythm again.
You are one of the best in Rapid chess. What special attributes are required to succeed in the Rapid version, where the time is restricted to as little as less than half an hour for a game?
I think my performance has been good in general. I have also won two Classical tournaments, in Corus and Mainz. It looks like I am specialising in Rapid chess, but in fact a majority of the tournaments nowadays are Rapid. I mean, I am not saying that I might have won every single Classical event, but in general I have raised my game not only in Rapid chess. So I think I have just become an overall good player and I am quite consistent.
World number one Gary Kasparov has not done anything much recently. You have won so many tournaments in the same time. Don't you think you deserve the number one ranking? Should there be an official championship game every year?
We can already determine the world's best player every year by simply taking the tournament results. I think the Elo list needs to be brought into the modern era, because it was designed back in the sixties. It was meant for a different era. I am not criticising the thing, but I feel it is outdated. I think its time to change some things. I am aiming for 2800 Elo points. I feel it's a good goal and when I break that barrier that will be really significant.
When will chess fans see the two best players – Anand and Kasparov – taking on each other?
Potentially, it's possible next January or maybe later.
