Hikaru Nakamura wins Grand Chess Tour Paris

by Johannes Fischer
6/12/2016 – Hikaru Nakamura convincingly won the Grand Chess Tour Paris. After a shaky start into the second day of the blitz tournament he started to win game after game. World Champion Magnus Carlsen, however, failed to find his form and lost one game after the other. After 16 of 18 rounds Nakamura was 2.5 points ahead and had won the tournament with two rounds to go.
Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

 

 

Magnus Carlsen...

...and Hikaru Nakamura were dominating day one of the blitz tournament

After the first day of the blitz tournament in Paris Nakamura was half-a-point ahead of Carlsen in the table that combined rapid and blitz results. Their rivals were trailing far behind and it was clear that either Carlsen or Nakamura would win the Grand Chess Tour Paris. But both had a bad start into day two of the blitz tournament and both lost in the eleventh round: Nakamura against Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Carlsen against Fabiano Caruana.

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave played a good tournament and finished third

But Nakamura recovered and started to gather points while Carlsen did not manage to get going. After a draw in round 12 against Vachier-Lagrave he lost again  in round 13 - this time against Levon Aronian.

Levon Aronian

Vladimir Kramnik (left) before his game against Carlsen.
For Kramnik the second part of the blitz tournament
was just horrible: he scored only 1.0/9.

Anish Giri lost against Nakamura but won against Carlsen

Round 16 already proved to be decisive. While Nakamura won against Fressinet Carlsen tried too hard against Veselin Topalov and suffered one more defeat. After 16 rounds Nakamura was 2.5 points ahead of Carlsen and had clinched tournament victory.

But the encounter between Carlsen and Nakamura in the final round of the event was still prestigious and with a win in this game Nakamura would have been the new number one on the live-blitz-rating list. But Carlsen kept his nerves, won the game and ended the tournament on a positive note.

Despite this loss Nakamura was clear winner of the Grand Chess Tour in Paris. He won the rapid tournament and in the blitz tournament he shared first place with Carlsen and he had been dominating both events.

The winner of Paris: Hikaru Nakamura

Table - Blitz Tournament

Here and in the other tables the given ratings refer to classical ratings

Table - Rapid Tournament

Games- Blitz Tournament

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d3 Nf6 4.g3 d5 5.exd5 Nxd5 6.Bg2 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.Re1 Re8 9.Nc3 Nxc3 10.bxc3 Rb8 11.Rb1 h6 12.Nd2 Ne7 13.Nc4 Ng6 14.d4 Be6 15.Na5 exd4 16.Rxb7 Qf6 17.Rxb8 Rxb8 18.Nc6 Rb1 19.cxd4 Nf4 20.gxf4 Bxf4 21.d5 Bd7 22.Qf3 Bxc6 23.dxc6 Rxc1 24.Rxc1 Bxc1 25.Qxf6 gxf6 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2855So,W2770½–½2016C44GCT Blitz Paris 20161
Caruana,F2804Nakamura,H27870–12016C50GCT Blitz Paris 20161
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Fressinet,L26871–02016C65GCT Blitz Paris 20161
Aronian,L2792Topalov,V27611–02016D12GCT Blitz Paris 20161
Kramnik,V2812Giri,A27820–12016A05GCT Blitz Paris 20161
So,W2770Giri,A2782½–½2016A45GCT Blitz Paris 20162
Topalov,V2761Kramnik,V2812½–½2016C24GCT Blitz Paris 20162
Fressinet,L2687Aronian,L2792½–½2016C84GCT Blitz Paris 20162
Nakamura,H2787Vachier Lagrave,M2789½–½2016A29GCT Blitz Paris 20162
Carlsen,M2855Caruana,F2804½–½2016B40GCT Blitz Paris 20162
Caruana,F2804So,W27701–02016A07GCT Blitz Paris 20163
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Carlsen,M2855½–½2016C77GCT Blitz Paris 20163
Aronian,L2792Nakamura,H2787½–½2016E06GCT Blitz Paris 20163
Kramnik,V2812Fressinet,L26871–02016B32GCT Blitz Paris 20163
Giri,A2782Topalov,V27611–02016D78GCT Blitz Paris 20163
So,W2770Topalov,V2761½–½2016D12GCT Blitz Paris 20164
Fressinet,L2687Giri,A27820–12016D38GCT Blitz Paris 20164
Nakamura,H2787Kramnik,V2812½–½2016D35GCT Blitz Paris 20164
Carlsen,M2855Aronian,L27921–02016C65GCT Blitz Paris 20164
Caruana,F2804Vachier Lagrave,M27890–12016A00GCT Blitz Paris 20164
Vachier Lagrave,M2789So,W2770½–½2016C77GCT Blitz Paris 20165
Aronian,L2792Caruana,F28041–02016B08GCT Blitz Paris 20165
Kramnik,V2812Carlsen,M28550–12016C55GCT Blitz Paris 20165
Giri,A2782Nakamura,H27870–12016C65GCT Blitz Paris 20165
Topalov,V2761Fressinet,L26870–12016C24GCT Blitz Paris 20165
So,W2770Fressinet,L2687½–½2016A45GCT Blitz Paris 20166
Nakamura,H2787Topalov,V27611–02016E46GCT Blitz Paris 20166
Carlsen,M2855Giri,A27821–02016B50GCT Blitz Paris 20166
Caruana,F2804Kramnik,V28121–02016C65GCT Blitz Paris 20166
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Aronian,L2792½–½2016C67GCT Blitz Paris 20166
Aronian,L2792So,W2770½–½2016A30GCT Blitz Paris 20167
Kramnik,V2812Vachier Lagrave,M27891–02016A48GCT Blitz Paris 20167
Giri,A2782Caruana,F28040–12016B41GCT Blitz Paris 20167
Topalov,V2761Carlsen,M2855½–½2016C84GCT Blitz Paris 20167
Fressinet,L2687Nakamura,H27870–12016D56GCT Blitz Paris 20167
So,W2770Nakamura,H27870–12016C65GCT Blitz Paris 20168
Carlsen,M2855Fressinet,L26871–02016C11GCT Blitz Paris 20168
Caruana,F2804Topalov,V27611–02016D73GCT Blitz Paris 20168
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Giri,A2782½–½2016D73GCT Blitz Paris 20168
Aronian,L2792Kramnik,V2812½–½2016A14GCT Blitz Paris 20168
Kramnik,V2812So,W27701–02016A07GCT Blitz Paris 20169
Giri,A2782Aronian,L2792½–½2016C65GCT Blitz Paris 20169
Topalov,V2761Vachier Lagrave,M27891–02016A20GCT Blitz Paris 20169
Fressinet,L2687Caruana,F28040–12016B43GCT Blitz Paris 20169
Nakamura,H2787Carlsen,M28550–12016D37GCT Blitz Paris 20169
So,W2770Carlsen,M28550–12016A29GCT Blitz Paris 201610
Nakamura,H2787Caruana,F2804½–½2016D37GCT Blitz Paris 201610
Fressinet,L2687Vachier Lagrave,M2789½–½2016D85GCT Blitz Paris 201610
Topalov,V2761Aronian,L2792½–½2016A20GCT Blitz Paris 201610
Giri,A2782Kramnik,V2812½–½2016A07GCT Blitz Paris 201610
Giri,A2782So,W27700–12016A14GCT Blitz Paris 201611
Kramnik,V2812Topalov,V27610–12016D02GCT Blitz Paris 201611
Aronian,L2792Fressinet,L2687½–½2016A14GCT Blitz Paris 201611
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Nakamura,H27871–02016A05GCT Blitz Paris 201611
Caruana,F2804Carlsen,M28551–02016C50GCT Blitz Paris 201611
So,W2770Caruana,F28041–02016D31GCT Blitz Paris 201612
Carlsen,M2855Vachier Lagrave,M2789½–½2016A48GCT Blitz Paris 201612
Nakamura,H2787Aronian,L2792½–½2016D56GCT Blitz Paris 201612
Fressinet,L2687Kramnik,V28121–02016C65GCT Blitz Paris 201612
Topalov,V2761Giri,A27821–02016A36GCT Blitz Paris 201612
Topalov,V2761So,W2770½–½2016A30GCT Blitz Paris 201613
Giri,A2782Fressinet,L26871–02016C45GCT Blitz Paris 201613
Kramnik,V2812Nakamura,H27870–12016A14GCT Blitz Paris 201613
Aronian,L2792Carlsen,M28551–02016A40GCT Blitz Paris 201613
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Caruana,F28041–02016C00GCT Blitz Paris 201613
So,W2770Vachier Lagrave,M2789½–½2016A04GCT Blitz Paris 201614
Caruana,F2804Aronian,L27920–12016C50GCT Blitz Paris 201614
Carlsen,M2855Kramnik,V28121–02016C65GCT Blitz Paris 201614
Nakamura,H2787Giri,A27821–02016A06GCT Blitz Paris 201614
Fressinet,L2687Topalov,V2761½–½2016A07GCT Blitz Paris 201614
Fressinet,L2687So,W2770½–½2016D78GCT Blitz Paris 201615
Topalov,V2761Nakamura,H2787½–½2016A15GCT Blitz Paris 201615
Giri,A2782Carlsen,M28551–02016B41GCT Blitz Paris 201615
Kramnik,V2812Caruana,F28040–12016A05GCT Blitz Paris 201615
Aronian,L2792Vachier Lagrave,M27890–12016A04GCT Blitz Paris 201615
So,W2770Aronian,L2792½–½2016C67GCT Blitz Paris 201616
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Kramnik,V28121–02016D73GCT Blitz Paris 201616
Caruana,F2804Giri,A27820–12016B90GCT Blitz Paris 201616
Carlsen,M2855Topalov,V27610–12016B51GCT Blitz Paris 201616
Nakamura,H2787Fressinet,L26871–02016D55GCT Blitz Paris 201616
Nakamura,H2787So,W2770½–½2016D12GCT Blitz Paris 201617
Fressinet,L2687Carlsen,M28550–12016A40GCT Blitz Paris 201617
Topalov,V2761Caruana,F28040–12016A13GCT Blitz Paris 201617
Giri,A2782Vachier Lagrave,M2789½–½2016A04GCT Blitz Paris 201617
Kramnik,V2812Aronian,L2792½–½2016A14GCT Blitz Paris 201617
So,W2770Kramnik,V28121–02016C67GCT Blitz Paris 201618
Carlsen,M2855Nakamura,H27871–02016C65GCT Blitz Paris 201618
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Topalov,V2761½–½2016B51GCT Blitz Paris 201618
Caruana,F2804Fressinet,L26871–02016A01GCT Blitz Paris 201618
Aronian,L2792Giri,A2782½–½2016A80GCT Blitz Paris 201618

Games - Rapid Tournament

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.c3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.h3 Ne7 8.Ba4 a6 9.d4 Ba7 10.Bc2 d5 11.Nxe5 Nxe4 12.Nd2 Nd6 13.Ndf3 Bf5 14.Re1 Bxc2 15.Qxc2 Ne4 16.Qb3 Qc8 17.Ng5 Nxg5 18.Bxg5 f6 19.Nd3 Qd7 20.Bf4 c6 21.Re2 Ng6 22.Rae1 Rad8 23.Re6 Kf7 24.Bg3 Rde8 25.Rxe8 Rxe8 26.Rxe8 Kxe8 27.a4 Qe7 28.a5 Kd8 29.Qd1 Qe4 30.Kh2 Ne7 31.Qb3 Kc8 32.Qb4 Qe6 33.Nf4 Qf7 34.Kg1 Bb8 35.Nd3 Bxg3 36.fxg3 Nf5 37.g4 Ng3 38.Nc5 h5 39.gxh5 Qe7 40.Kf2 Nf5 41.g4 Qe3+ 42.Kf1 Qxh3+ 43.Ke1 Qg3+ 44.Kd2 Nd6 45.Nxb7 Qg2+ 46.Kc1 Qf1+ 47.Kc2 Qe2+ 48.Kc1 Qe1+ 49.Kc2 Qe4+ 50.Kb3 Nxb7 51.Qf8+ Kc7 52.Qxg7+ Kb8 53.h6 Qd3 54.Ka3 Qb1 55.h7 Qa1+ 56.Kb3 Qd1+ 57.Kb4 Ka7 58.h8Q Qa1 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2855So,W27700–12016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20161
Fressinet,L2687Vachier Lagrave,M2789½–½2016D85GCT Rapid Paris 20161
Nakamura,H2787Kramnik,V2812½–½2016D35GCT Rapid Paris 20161
Topalov,V2761Caruana,F28040–12016C45GCT Rapid Paris 20161
Giri,A2782Aronian,L2792½–½2016D37GCT Rapid Paris 20161
Kramnik,V2812So,W2770½–½2016D78GCT Rapid Paris 20162
Caruana,F2804Giri,A2782½–½2016C80GCT Rapid Paris 20162
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Carlsen,M28550–12016C78GCT Rapid Paris 20162
Nakamura,H2787Topalov,V27611–02016A29GCT Rapid Paris 20162
Aronian,L2792Fressinet,L26871–02016A20GCT Rapid Paris 20162
So,W2770Vachier Lagrave,M27890–12016D83GCT Rapid Paris 20163
Fressinet,L2687Caruana,F28041–02016D78GCT Rapid Paris 20163
Giri,A2782Nakamura,H2787½–½2016A14GCT Rapid Paris 20163
Carlsen,M2855Aronian,L27921–02016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20163
Topalov,V2761Kramnik,V28120–12016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20163
Caruana,F2804Carlsen,M28550–12016C78GCT Rapid Paris 20164
Kramnik,V2812Vachier Lagrave,M27890–12016A04GCT Rapid Paris 20164
Nakamura,H2787Fressinet,L26871–02016D31GCT Rapid Paris 20164
Aronian,L2792So,W27700–12016D15GCT Rapid Paris 20164
Topalov,V2761Giri,A27821–02016C24GCT Rapid Paris 20164
Carlsen,M2855Nakamura,H2787½–½2016E21GCT Rapid Paris 20165
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Aronian,L2792½–½2016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20165
So,W2770Caruana,F2804½–½2016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20165
Giri,A2782Kramnik,V2812½–½2016A14GCT Rapid Paris 20165
Fressinet,L2687Topalov,V2761½–½2016D58GCT Rapid Paris 20165
Nakamura,H2787So,W2770½–½2016D38GCT Rapid Paris 20166
Topalov,V2761Carlsen,M28550–12016C84GCT Rapid Paris 20166
Caruana,F2804Vachier Lagrave,M27890–12016A48GCT Rapid Paris 20166
Kramnik,V2812Aronian,L2792½–½2016C53GCT Rapid Paris 20166
Giri,A2782Fressinet,L26871–02016C45GCT Rapid Paris 20166
Carlsen,M2855Giri,A2782½–½2016C24GCT Rapid Paris 20167
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Nakamura,H27870–12016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20167
So,W2770Topalov,V2761½–½2016D37GCT Rapid Paris 20167
Aronian,L2792Caruana,F28041–02016A09GCT Rapid Paris 20167
Fressinet,L2687Kramnik,V28120–12016C65GCT Rapid Paris 20167
Nakamura,H2787Aronian,L27921–02016D35GCT Rapid Paris 20168
Fressinet,L2687Carlsen,M2855½–½2016D05GCT Rapid Paris 20168
Giri,A2782So,W2770½–½2016D38GCT Rapid Paris 20168
Kramnik,V2812Caruana,F28041–02016A07GCT Rapid Paris 20168
Topalov,V2761Vachier Lagrave,M27890–12016B51GCT Rapid Paris 20168
Caruana,F2804Nakamura,H27870–12016A14GCT Rapid Paris 20169
Carlsen,M2855Kramnik,V28121–02016D35GCT Rapid Paris 20169
Vachier Lagrave,M2789Giri,A2782½–½2016C77GCT Rapid Paris 20169
So,W2770Fressinet,L26871–02016A30GCT Rapid Paris 20169
Aronian,L2792Topalov,V27611–02016A09GCT Rapid Paris 20169

Final result of the Grand Chess Tour Paris

 

Photos: Grand Chess Tour

Tournament page Grand Chess Tour...

Grand Chess Tour on Twitter...

Tournament page Paris...

Tournament page Bruxelles...

 

Johannes Fischer was born in 1963 in Hamburg and studied English and German literature in Frankfurt. He now lives as a writer and translator in Nürnberg. He is a FIDE-Master and regularly writes for KARL, a German chess magazine focusing on the links between culture and chess. On his own blog he regularly publishes notes on "Film, Literature and Chess".

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

french_fries french_fries 6/21/2016 12:27
Hi. Question: Where can i download complete game of this event? Thanks!!!
Resistance Resistance 6/14/2016 09:46
About Naka and Magnus...
Well, as thlai80 has already mentioned, I think Carlsen's overwhelming record against Naka is due, not only to Carlsen's great talent, but to him, Magnus, being a pretty uncomfortable player for Hikaru. There is something in his style that doesn't fit Naka at all. Naka's play is rather concrete, while Carlsen's is more intuitive, abstract. Hikaru inclines towards sharp, irrational stuff, while Carlsen avoids that type of game. Since sharp, calculating play is more difficult and energy consuming than intuitive play, Hikaru might go wrong more often than Magnus, who relies on his natural, immediate grasp to do what he does at the board. This, in turn, might make feel Magnus more comfortable and secure about his chess, whatever the situation --whatever the position--, while in Naka's case, things might not be that clear at times. Also, Magnus' temperament is calmer than that of Naka's, and so, he might tend to avoid desperate or irrational courses of action when pressed by the circumstances.

I can see Hikaru beating Magnus in a match for the World Championship, but it would take of him much study of Carlsen's way of playing: not only an analysis of Magnus losses or most famous games, but a grand-scale analysis of his games and overall strategies.

.
Resistance Resistance 6/14/2016 07:50
Beautiful pictures! Beautiful place; the illumination... Good report, though I would've loved having a more complete one, with more details about these last four days. Thank you for your coverage, Chessbase.
thlai80 thlai80 6/14/2016 05:34
@chessdrummer, there's no floodgate. Very much like Shirov vs Kasparov. Nakamura style simply doesn't work against Carlsen. Carlsen is superior in every part of the game and simply more talented, the only trump Nakamura has is preparation. He can be better out of opening, and still draw or lose. Even if Nakamura ever get a classical win vs Carlsen, 1 out of many games will not rattle the world champion. Anand, Kramnik, Ivanchuk or Aronian in their day will beat Carlsen as they are superior in certain style and positions of the game vs Carlsen. Not so for Nakamura.
Masquer Masquer 6/14/2016 02:42
Why are the crosstables showing the players' classical ratings when this event was blitz/rapid ??
santie54321 santie54321 6/13/2016 09:01
And Naka's mental block against Carlsen continues....
donwaffel donwaffel 6/13/2016 07:06
Theese jippos are fun but not serious. Only you thing so.
DJones DJones 6/13/2016 01:46
He lost 3/4 games coming down the stretch but beat Nakamura in their direct encounter which close the difference once the tournament was already in hand. Your quoting of points makes no reference to context.
ebit ebit 6/13/2016 01:25
"World Champion Magnus Carlsen, however, failed to find his form and lost one game after the other. "

???

1. Carlsen 11,5/18
2. Nakamura 11,5/18
TMMM TMMM 6/13/2016 12:16
@vladivaclav

Giri did not only finish on 50%: He scores 4.5/9 in the rapid, 4.5/9 on the first day of blitz, and 4.5/9 on the second day of blitz. That's a perfect 50% score!
charlysl charlysl 6/13/2016 09:31
Live Blitz Ratings!!!

28 ↑54 Caruana 2743.8 +78.8
29 ↓23 Kramnik 2739.0 −102.0
DJones DJones 6/13/2016 05:49
Magnus is going to play a bullet match with him this summer. It's coming then no matter what.
chessdrummer chessdrummer 6/13/2016 05:34
Yada yada. Nakamura will never make 2600... will never make 2700... will never beat a top ten player... will never win an elite tournament... will never make top ten... will never make 2800... etc., etc. It's all been said before. He certainly has a mental block against Carlsen, but the Norwegian cannot allow a single loss or the floodgates will open.
jhoravi jhoravi 6/13/2016 04:17
SneakyPete
That kind of position is a win in Long games but is lost in Blitz games.
TallVenusian TallVenusian 6/13/2016 03:22
SneakyPete -- it's in the Round 1 report - "And while Carlsen was pondering whether to defend b2 with Qh2 or a5 with Qd8 he overstepped the time and lost."
Karbuncle Karbuncle 6/13/2016 03:09
@ SneakyPete, Carlsen lost that game on time. He forgot to keep track of it.
beck15 beck15 6/13/2016 02:39
@SneakyPete

Carlsen lost on time.
algorithmy algorithmy 6/13/2016 01:39
@ SneakyPete
Carlsen lost on time!! he was wining indeed
DJones DJones 6/13/2016 01:14
There are more tournaments than the title. Maybe he is this era's Larsen and that's OK with me. Caruana will challenge magnus and maybe giri but I don't enjoy their chess.
VVI VVI 6/13/2016 01:11
Naka is always disappointing against Magnus; even when leading the fray with 2.5 points.
With such weak temperament against Magnus, he has no chance at WCC title.
SneakyPete SneakyPete 6/13/2016 01:00
Carlsen, M.2855–So, W.27700–1
C65GCT Rapid Paris 2016(1)09.06.2016

How can this game be a win for Black ? I have white way ahead on stockfish with the white king escaping via C2 ?? Can anyone fill me in ?
Augusta2022 Augusta2022 6/13/2016 12:07
Naka still lacks everything to become a Wch-challenger. And he still can't play vs Carlsen. I'm sorry to say this but we need some new blood to challenge Carlsen.
wengardz wengardz 6/13/2016 12:05
Coongrats GM Wesley So!
vladivaclav vladivaclav 6/13/2016 12:04
well deserved victory for nakamura. interesting and exciting event overall. and we all know the name of only player who finished with 50% (18/36). congrats to him as well. he he
DJones DJones 6/12/2016 11:36
Actually two did. The fact that he donated points to Carlsen and still won ahead of the world champion and possible greatest of all time says it all really.
Denix Denix 6/12/2016 11:22
One game ended in mate
bbrodinsky bbrodinsky 6/12/2016 11:14
Congrats to Nakamura. Hey, Naka against Fischer in 5-minute, what a match that would be.
1
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.