Nankai wins in Nankai!

by Qiyu Zhou
12/7/2019 – The Winner of the World Prestigious University Chess Invitational Went to Nankai University Team 1! Headed by Wang Yue (2710), the team performed amazingly against many strong universities. University tournaments are no joke, with many GMs and IMs competing in Nankai over a four day period. | Photo: Yi Liu

The ChessBase Mega Database 2020 is the premiere chess database with over eight million games from 1560 to 2019 in high quality. Packing more than 85,000 annotated games, Mega 2020 contains the world‘s largest collection of high-class analysed games. Train like a pro! Prepare for your opponents with ChessBase and the Mega Database 2020. Let grandmasters explain how to best handle your favorite variations, improve your repertoire and much more.

World Prestigious University Invitational

What does it mean to be a prestigious university? For some, it means excelling at chess. For others, it means placing high on international university rankings. This tournament invited some of the very best chess universities in the world. For example, University of Missouri fielded a team with Grigory Oparin (2660) and Dmitry Gordievskiy (2590). However, the tournament also invited some of the best academic universities in the world (by Times Higher Education rankings) such as University of Oxford (rank 1), Harvard University (rank 6), Princeton University (rank 7), University College London (rank 14), University of Toronto (rank 21). Perhaps of interest is that Japan did not send a specific university’s team, but rather played under the Japanese flag.

Day 1

Continuing from the previous report, the opening ceremony was kicked off by Yang Kexin (Deputy Secretary of CPC Committee of Nankai University), Ye Jiangchuan (Chairman of Chinese Chess Association), and Wang Hong (Deputy Secretary of CPC committee of Tianjin Sports Bureau placing their hands on this giant red ball. If you think it’s random, funny and cool all at the same time, we’re in this together. 😊

Powerball

Dubbed the “Power Ball”. Perhaps a giant Pokeball? From left to right: Yang Kexin, Ye Jiangchuan, Wang Hong | Photo: Changrong Yu

Jiaqi Zhou

Before the tournament starts in the morning, Jiaqi Zhou teaches chess to his students from Nankai University, where it is an optional course | Photo: Changrong Yu

Day 2

Since this invitational was played under a 25 min + 10 sec/move format, each day had 3 rounds (apart from the last day). There is a lot of talk about chess becoming faster. This is one of the only rapid tournaments I have played, but I can say with 90% certainty I like this movement. As a current university student operating on a student budget, the usual one-week half to two-week tournaments for most open tournaments and youth/junior championships is far too long (and quite expensive). Even while I was still in high-school, it was very challenging to balance the International Baccalaureate program while playing tournaments.

Of course, it is different for everybody’s case, and some universities obviously put more emphasis on studies, but from talking to a lot of different students from universities like Harvard, Princeton, and my own, most players at this tournament play chess very occasionally.

Chess taught me valuable lessons about time management, and I’m very happy they’re applicable in real life too! Though I had to study for my classes in Nankai, I still very much enjoyed the trip. Nothing could make me reject the temptation to visit China and get the chance to spend some very valuable time with my grandparents who visited me (I personally haven’t had the chance to visit China for a few years, and of course they missed me 😊).

Round 1 started Beijing time at 14:00 sharp. The organizers did an amazing job on making sure each game started exactly at the posted time.

Nankai University Team 1 (the eventual winners) suffered an early loss to St. Louis University, with Nikolas Theodorou drawing against Yue Wang, and boards 2 and 3 on St. Louis winning their games.

Wang Yue

All eyes on Wang Yue. Yes, the 2710 Wang Yue | Photo: Changrong Yu

playing hall

Tournament is underway | Photo: Liu Yi

In Round 2 brings you a crazy game and drama between GM Yue Wang from Nankai University and Harvard University Michael Isakov. See the game below and thoughts by Michael, who managed to pull himself back from a sure loss.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 0 d5 0 2.g3 0 Nf6 0 3.Bg2 0 e6 0 4.c4 21 Be7 0 5.d4 0 0-0 0 6.Nc3 0 b6?! 0 Likely too passive, better was 6… dxc4 7. Ne5 Nc6!? 8. Nxc6 bxc6 9. 0-0 Rb8 with dynamic equality 7.0-0 0 Bb7 0 8.cxd5 0 exd5 0 9.Ne5 0 Nbd7? 0 I simply missed 10. Qa4! After this, my position is significantly worse, and the loss of a pawn is more or less inevitable 10.Qa4! 0 a6 0 11.Nxd7 0 Nxd7 0 12.Nxd5 0 Bd6 0 13.Rd1 0 Re8 0 14.Qc2 0 Rb8 0 15.Nc3 0 Bxg2 0 16.Kxg2 0 b5 0 17.e4 0 Nb6 0 18.f3 0 Qc8 0 19.Be3?! 0 This simple developing move gives me hope of counterplay (see text). Safer and perhaps better was 19. b3, forcing me to try 19… c5 which is likely insufficient for any real chances Nc4 0 20.Bf2 0 Re6! 0 The only hope at counterplay, forcing a series of complications which are ideal for a game against a human opponent 21.b3 0 Rh6 0 22.h4 0 Bxg3!? 0 This is objectively lost, but is practically better than playing a strategically lost position a pawn down against a super-GM. I decide to go for fireworks in a last-ditch attempt to exploit the lack of white pieces on the kingside 23.Kxg3!? 0 23.bxc4 looks scary at first but is possible: Bxh4 24.Rh1 Rg6+ 25.Kf1 Bxf2 26.Kxf2 bxc4 27.Rab1+- 23...Rbb6 22 24.bxc4 0 Rxh4!? 59 The only natural follow-up to sacrificing two pieces is to sacrifice more! In rapid, this had enough of a psychological effect to rattle my opponent to finally commit a mistake 25.Kxh4?? 0 The first and decisive blunder, as well as the main point of my bluff. Paradoxically, “losing” a tempo with 25. Rh1! wins, despite the perhaps initially scary looking 25… Rg6+ 26. Kxh4 Qd8+ 27. Kh3 Qg5 28. Bh4! Rh6 29. Qf2 +-. Though at first sight leading to a winning endgame (see below), this allows for a long, forced and aesthetically pleasing draw Rh6+ 42 26.Kg3 0 Qh3+ 39 27.Kf4 0 Rf6+ 0 28.Ke3 0 Rxf3+ 18 29.Kd2 0 Qh6+‼ 1 The only move, dragging the king out into the opening and allowing a perpetual. Hunting after the queen at this point is futile - I am down too much material 30.Ke2 0 Rxf2+ 0 31.Kxf2 0 Qh2+ 2 32.Kf3 0 Qh3+! 18 Funnily, taking the queen probably loses 32...Qxc2? 33.Rac1 Qb2 34.cxb5 axb5 35.Nd5 33.Ke2 10 Qh2+ 0 34.Kd3 6 Qh3+ 6 35.Kd2 53 Qh6+ 2 The key to this last sacrifice is that Kd2 is always met with Qh6+, making possible a long-distance perpetual despite being two rooks and a knight (!) down in the final position. Overall this was a profoundly flawed but pretty game, incorporating the all-important psychological factor of chess. It was also my first draw against a super-GM, which was especially satisfying with the black pieces!) 36.Ke2 1:19 Qh2+ 0 37.Kf3 1:01 Qh3+ 8 38.Kf4 23 Qh4+ 8 39.Ke3 12 Qh3+ 6 40.Ke2 7 Qh2+ 9 41.Kd3 5 Qh3+ 0 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Yue,W2710Michael,I2279½–½2019E18Nankai Prestigious Universities2.7

Wang Yue

Wang Yue thinks… | Photo: Changrong Yu

Isakov

While Isakov tries to save his game | Photo: Changrong Yu

Also, Michael Green from UCL shares his thoughts on an interesting game he played:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 3 Nf6 4 2.c4 1 c5 4 3.Nc3 2 Nc6 15 4.d4 3 cxd4 2 5.Nxd4 2 g6 1 6.e4 3 Bg7 2 7.Be3 2 Ng4 0 8.Qxg4 26 Nxd4 3 9.0-0-0 12 9. Qd1 is by far the most popular move, but leads to a much slower game. Having analysed Weichao's playing style, I wanted to take him away from his beloved slower, positional chess! Nc6 1:05 10.Nd5 1:24 0-0 1:50 11.Qh4 44 Qa5 20 12.Kb1 0 e6? 1:18 I'm sure Weichao understood the positional weaknesses of this move, but seeing a chance to simplify was too tempting for the strategical player. 13.Nf6+ 53 Bxf6 15 14.Qxf6 3 Qe5 18 15.Qxe5 56 Nxe5 2 16.Be2 1:09 f6 22 17.f4 0 Nc6 47 18.h4 16 h6 3:26 Here I have a clear space advantage plus the bishop pair. The engine prefers to play on the queenside and lockdown with c5, or just improve the position with b3. However, seeing black's lack of development, I felt it was an appropriate time to strike. 19.f5?! 2:58 exf5 1:18 20.Bxh6 0 Re8 4 21.Rd6 1:22 Kh7 2:58 22.h5?! 3:25 Engine really dislikes this move, but finding the strongest defence is not easy. Kxh6 3:01 23.hxg6+ 3 Kg7 3 24.exf5 1:02 A second piece sacrifice!? Rxe2 3:05 25.Rh7+ 5 Kg8 2 26.Rxf6 5:57 26.Rd1 A nice idea to swing the rooks over to the h file to mate, but unfortunately the manouvere is too slow. Re7 27.Rh5 Rg7 28.Rdh1 Kf8 29.Rh8+ Rg8 30.R1h7 Ne5 black defends! 26...Re7 2:03 27.Rf8+ 1:55 Kxf8 21 28.f6 1 black has one move to save the game. Can you find it? Rg7! 1:14 Black's king survives and white's best hope is to play into a lost endgame 28...Rxh7 29.gxh7 Kf7 30.h8Q 28...Kg8 29.Rxe7 Nxe7 30.fxe7 29.Rxg7 0 d6 18 29...Ne5! would have maintained the advantage for black 30.Rh7 16 30.Rf7+! Kg8 31.Rg7+ Kf8 32.Rf7+ Ke8 33.Rh7 threatening to queen Bf5+ 34.Kc1 Bxg6 35.Rh8+ Kd7 36.Rxa8 Good drawing chances for white. 30...Be6 1:37 31.Rh8+ 0 Bg8 2 32.f7 7 Kg7 3 33.fxg8Q+ 22 Rxg8 3 34.Rh7+ 2 Kxg6 1:32 35.Rxb7 1 Rg7?! 1 trading rooks gives white stronger drawing chances. 36.Rxg7+ 30 Kxg7 1 37.Kc2 2 Kf6 4 38.Kc3 4 Ke5 1:17 39.b4 3 Nd8 8 40.a4 26 Ne6 3 41.b5 14 Nc5 0 42.a5 3 Ke4 1 43.Kb4 19 Kd4 15 44.b6 5 a6 1 45.g4 0 Ke5 39 46.Kc3 1 Nb7 2 47.Kb4 27 47.g5! the only drawing move! Nxa5 48.g6 Kf6 49.Kd4 Kxg6 50.Kd5 Kf7 51.Kxd6 Nxc4+ 52.Kc7 Na5 53.Kb8 53.b7? Nxb7 53...Ke7 54.Ka7 47...Kf4 42 48.Kc3 5 Ke5 0 49.Kb4 2 Ke4 6 50.g5 3 g5 is now a tempo down with the white king on b4 instead of c3. Kf5 0 51.Kc3 1 Kxg5 12 52.Kd4 1 Kf6 10 53.Kd5 1 Ke7 1 Black has time to defend the d6 pawn. If 47.g5, black has only time to reach 53...Kf7 54.c5 30 dxc5 17 55.Kc6 6 Nxa5+ 9 56.Kxc5 3 Kd7 6 57.b7 0 Nxb7+ 1 58.Kb6 21 a5 1 And with accurate play, black converted the winning endgame. 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Michael,G1914Weichao,C24230–12019B39Tian jin, China2.4
Michael,G1914Weichao,C24230–12019B39Tian jin, China2.4

The aim of these Dvd's is to build a repertoire after 1.c4 and 2.g3 for White. The first DVD includes the systems 1...e5, the Dutch and Indian setups. The second DVD includes the systems with 1...c5, 1...c6 and 1...e6.


Day 3

After the rounds each day, there’s still some time to tour around Tianjin!

Tianjin Eye

View from the Tianjin Eye (perhaps named after its London counterpart)
And a view of the Tianjin eye! | Photos: Qiyu Zhou

Qiyu Zhou

Your author, representing University of Toronto | Photo: Liu Yi

Day 4

In China, do we call food Chinese food or just food? This is a hotly-debated topic, because in Mandarin, “Zhong can (中餐)” can either mean Chinese food or lunch. Usually, it’s just food though.

Chinese food

The breakfast buffet offers a wide variety of Chinese foods… | Photo: Qiyu Zhou

breakfast

But some still prefer their choice of butter and bread, and it’s never too early for cake | Photo: Qiyu Zhou

Day 5

The deciding round of the tournament, round 10 saw University of Missouri lose to Nankai University Team 1 by ½-2 ½. On board 1, we saw Grigory Oparin draw Yue Wang, but both boards 2 and 3 lost. Prior to the round, Missouri had a perfect score. However, after the loss, Nankai and Missouri both had 9/10. Both Nankai and Missouri won their last match, but the damage was done and Nankai clinched first place on tiebreaks.

Oparin

Grigory Oparin plays as his captain Christian Chirila looks on | Photo: Changrong Yu

Take a look at the face off between Grigory and Wang (with comments by your author)!

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 0 d5 0 2.g3 0 Nf6 0 2...c5 3.Bg2 Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 5.0-0 1-0 (64) Ding,L (2816) -Wojtaszek,R (2749) Shenzhen 2018 3.Bg2 0 e6 0 4.0-0 0 c5 0 5.d4 0 Nc6 0 6.c4 0 dxc4 0 7.Qa4 0 Bd7 0 8.Qxc4 0 cxd4 0 9.Nxd4 0 Rc8 0 10.Nc3 0 Nxd4 0 11.Qxd4 0 Bc5 0 12.Qh4 0 h6 0 both 0-0 and Bc6 are common here. 12...0-0 13.Bxb7 Rb8 14.Bf3 Rb4 12...Bc6 13.Rd1 Qb6 13.Bxb7 0 Rb8 0 14.Ne4 0 Be7 0 15.Ba6 0 Bc6 0 15...0-0 was played between Ding and Wojtaszek last year around the same time. 16.Rd1 Nd5 17.Qh5 Bc6 18.Bc4 Qc8 19.b3 f5 20.Nd2 Bf6 21.Ba3 Qe8 22.Qxe8 Rfxe8 23.Bxd5 Bxd5 24.Rac1 a5 25.Nc4 a4 26.bxa4 Rec8 27.Bd6 Rb7 28.Ne3 Rxc1 29.Rxc1 Bxa2 30.a5 Bd4 31.Rc8+ Kh7 32.Nc2 Bd5 33.Nb4 Be4 34.Rc4 Ba7 35.Rc7 Kg6 36.Kf1 Kf6 37.f3 Rxc7 38.Bxc7 Bb7 39.Nd3 Bd4 40.f4 Kf7 41.Bb6 Bf6 42.Kf2 g5 43.Ke3 gxf4+ 44.gxf4 Be7 45.Kd4 Bd6 46.e3 Ke8 47.Bc5 Bc7 48.Bb4 Bb8 49.h4 h5 50.Nf2 Kd7 51.Nh3 Kc6 52.Ng5 Ba7+ 53.Ke5 Bxe3 54.Nxe6 Bc8 55.Ng7 Bf2 56.Nxf5 Kb5 57.Be7 Kxa5 58.Kf6 Kb6 59.Kg6 Kc6 60.Ng7 Kd5 61.f5 Ke5 62.Bg5 Bc5 63.f6 Ba6 64.Nxh5 Kd5 1-0 (64) Ding,L (2816)-Wojtaszek,R (2749) Shenzhen 2018 16.Nxf6+ 0 Bxf6 0 17.Qc4 0 Qd5 0 18.Qxd5 0 Bxd5 0 19.a4 0 Bxb2 0 20.Rb1 0 Be5 0 21.Rxb8+ 0 Bxb8 0 22.Ba3 0 f6 0 after all that, white has a very slight advantage because his pieces are more active. However, will white be able to convert his slight advantage into anything substantial? 23.f3 0 Kf7 0 24.Bc5 0 Bc6 0 25.Rb1 0 Bxa4 0 25...Rd8 perhaps it was better to bring the last piece into play... 26.Bb5 Bxb5 27.Rxb5 a6 28.Rb7+ Kg6 29.Kg2 29.Rb6? Ba7!-+ 29...Bd6 leads to a roughly equal position 26.Rb7+ 0 this gives white a few moves of iniative Kg6 0 27.Bd3+ 0 f5 0 28.Bd4 6 Rg8 0 29.Bc4 15 Bc6 11 30.Re7 8 Bd5 3 31.Bxd5 10 exd5 0 32.Rd7 1:07 h5 3 33.Kg2 1:08 33.Rxd5 first doesn't make much of a difference. Rc8 33...a5 0 34.Rxd5 16 but the most white can do is recapture the pawn.. . for now Re8 35 35.Kf1 1:21 Bc7 7 36.Bc3 1:08 Rd8 1:46 36...a4 37.Rd7 Rc8 38.Rxg7+± 37.Rc5 2 Rd1+ 1 38.Kg2 2 Bd8 1 39.Bxa5 6 and white becomes up a pawn, but unfortunately for Wang this is not enough to win the endgame. Bxa5 0 40.Rxa5 1 Kf6 1 41.Ra6+ 17 Kf7 1 42.h4 9 Rb1 5 43.Kf2 2 Rb3 2 44.Rd6 7 g6 0 45.Rd3 2 Rb4 28 46.Ke3 14 Ke6 18 47.Rd4 6 Rb2 3 48.Ra4 3 Kf6 23 49.Ra6+ 12 Kf7 0 50.Ra7+ 1:02 Kf6 1 51.Ra6+ 1 Kf7 1 52.Rc6 1 Ra2 10 53.Kd3 24 Ra4 22 54.e4 29 fxe4+ 0 55.fxe4 1 Ra1 7 56.Ke3 6 Ra3+ 51 57.Kf4 2 Rb3 1 58.Ra6 11 Rc3 2 59.Ra2 5 Rb3 0 60.Rf2 15 Kf6 7 61.Rf3 9 Rb1 45 62.e5+ 35 Kg7 12 63.Re3 1 Rf1+ 1:21 64.Ke4 2 Ra1 0 65.Rd3 32 Kf7 18 66.Rd7+ 4 Ke6 2 67.Rd6+ 10 Kf7 0 68.Rd7+ 17 Ke6 1 69.Rd6+ 1 Kf7 0 70.Rf6+ 1 Kg7 0 71.Rc6 0 Kf7 11 72.Rb6 22 72.Kf4 Ra3 73.Rb6 Rc3= 72...Ra2 37 73.Kf4 10 Ra4+ 9 74.Kg5 2 Rg4+ 18 75.Kh6 1 Rxg3 1 76.Rf6+ 1 Ke7 6 77.Rxg6 2 Re3 25 78.Rg5 18 Re4 0 79.Rxh5 40 79.Kxh5 Kf7 80.Rf5+ Ke6 81.Rg5 Kf7= 79...Rg4 17 80.Kh7 8 Kf7 3 81.Rf5+ 23 Ke6 2 82.Rg5 7 Rxh4+ 3 83.Kg7 2 Re4 1 84.Kg6 0 Rxe5 1 85.Rxe5+ 1 Kxe5 1 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Grigory,O2660Yue,W2710½–½2019E04Nankai Prestigious Universities10.7

Closing Ceremony

Some universities came to China to win, some came to find out more about China, and some came to make friends with Chinese university students, as well as each other. In the end, Nankai University narrowly took home first place, with University of Missouri coming second on tiebreaks. 

Nankai team

The first prize goes to Nankai University. The middle 3 players are in the middle: Yankai Li, Wang Yue and Yiyi Xiao | Photo: Changrong Yu

Closing thoughts

Though I missed a lot of social events (unfortunately. due to schoolwork), many other teams toured Nankai with volunteers from the local university, experienced Chinese massages, shopping and karaoke (KTV, as it is affectionally called in China).

Dinner out

UCL, Oxford University and the Japan team enjoy a meal out

It has been a great opportunity for the university students to know each other’s universities and cultures. This event hopes to make China even more open to the world, as well as show that chess is not game for professionals, but can also be enjoyed by amateurs like us. I hope that some universities from different countries will be interested in holding a similar event. Here we all give a shout-out to Nankai, wishing its 100th Anniversary to be a prosperous one, with another 100 years of good fortune to come.

Tianjin street

Tianjin has some 15 million people, proving the need for most streets to be as wide as this one! | Photo: Qiyu Zhou

Qiyu bubble tea

Sipping on boba — bubble tea, now a world phenomenon, is very popular in its birthplace | Photo: Changrong Yu


Two-minute interview with IM Nikolas Theodorou at the Nankai World Prestigious University Invitational

It might not be a good time to interview you after your draw against Nankai University Team 2 today in the 9th round. But could you please tell us whether you have enjoyed this tournament?

Nikolas Theodorou: Even though we’re hoping to be the first, we’re 2nd after the 9th round. It’s not that bad, but we really hope to do better. But I really like to play here, like to see different places, like the food and tournament organization. We went sightseeing with my teammates this morning, it was very exciting for me and my teammates. I also enjoy playing chess with students from different universities all over the world. I am also excited to interact with students from all over the world, close to my age.

Have you ever thought of becoming a professional chess player?

NT: Um, I never really wanted to become a professional chess player. I would rather combine chess with my study. This is why chose to go to St. Louis. Um, which is a great opportunity to do what I wanted.

Do you have any plan for your future? Continue to play chess, or continue your academy after you finish your bachelor’s degree?

NT: I haven’t decided yet, but I don’t think I will ever stop playing chess. I will keep going to tournaments, and after getting my degree, I want to get a job in engineering potentially.

What are the benefits that you have gained from playing chess?

NT: It helps me become initiative for sure. It also helps with my studies, organize my time, and helps me with my logical thinking, which has something to do with math.  I really like math and chess. And my favourite subject in school is math (ODE: ordinary differential equations) if I have to choose one.

Nikolas Theodorou

IM Nikolas Theodorou (fide rating 2541), originally from Greece, is a 2nd-year student in Physics Engineering | Photo: Changrong Yu

Final team results of all rounds

Round 1 on 2019/11/26 at 14:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Oxford   University of Toronto 2 : 1
2   University of Missouri   Princeton university 3 : 0
3   University of new south wales   Japan Team 2 : 1
4   Saint Louis university   Nan Kai university : ½
5   Harvard University   University college London 1 : 2
6   Nan Kai university(Team2)   Moscow state university 1 : 2
Round 2 on 2019/11/26 at 15:30
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Toronto   Moscow state university :
2   University college London   Nan Kai university(Team2) 0 : 3
3   Nan Kai university   Harvard University 2 : 1
4   Japan Team   Saint Louis university 0 : 3
5   Princeton university   University of new south wales 1 : 2
6   University of Oxford   University of Missouri 1 : 2
Round 3 on 2019/11/26 at 17:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Missouri   University of Toronto : ½
2   University of new south wales   University of Oxford :
3   Saint Louis university   Princeton university 2 : 1
4   Harvard University   Japan Team 3 : 0
5   Nan Kai university(Team2)   Nan Kai university ½ :
6   Moscow state university   University college London 3 : 0
Round 4 on 2019/11/27 at 14:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Toronto   University college London 3 : 0
2   Nan Kai university   Moscow state university 2 : 1
3   Japan Team   Nan Kai university(Team2) 0 : 3
4   Princeton university   Harvard University :
5   University of Oxford   Saint Louis university 0 : 3
6   University of Missouri   University of new south wales 3 : 0
Round 5 on 2019/11/27 at 15:30
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of new south wales   University of Toronto 1 : 2
2   Saint Louis university   University of Missouri 1 : 2
3   Harvard University   University of Oxford 2 : 1
4   Nan Kai university(Team2)   Princeton university : ½
5   Moscow state university   Japan Team 3 : 0
6   University college London   Nan Kai university 0 : 3
Round 6 on 2019/11/27 at 17:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Toronto   Nan Kai university 0 : 3
2   Japan Team   University college London 2 : 1
3   Princeton university   Moscow state university ½ :
4   University of Oxford   Nan Kai university(Team2) :
5   University of Missouri   Harvard University 2 : 1
6   University of new south wales   Saint Louis university 0 : 3
Round 7 on 2019/11/28 at 14:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   Saint Louis university   University of Toronto : ½
2   Harvard University   University of new south wales : ½
3   Nan Kai university(Team2)   University of Missouri 1 : 2
4   Moscow state university   University of Oxford : ½
5   University college London   Princeton university 1 : 2
6   Nan Kai university   Japan Team 3 : 0
Round 8 on 2019/11/28 at 15:30
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Toronto   Japan Team 1 : 2
2   Princeton university   Nan Kai university 0 : 3
3   University of Oxford   University college London 1 : 2
4   University of Missouri   Moscow state university 2 : 1
5   University of new south wales   Nan Kai university(Team2) 0 : 3
6   Saint Louis university   Harvard University : ½
Round 9 on 2019/11/28 at 17:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   Harvard University   University of Toronto :
2   Nan Kai university(Team2)   Saint Louis university :
3   Moscow state university   University of new south wales 3 : 0
4   University college London   University of Missouri 1 : 2
5   Nan Kai university   University of Oxford 3 : 0
6   Japan Team   Princeton university 0 : 3
Round 10 on 2019/11/29 at 14:00
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   University of Toronto   Princeton university 3 : 0
2   University of Oxford   Japan Team 3 : 0
3   University of Missouri   Nan Kai university ½ :
4   University of new south wales   University college London 1 : 2
5   Saint Louis university   Moscow state university 3 : 0
6   Harvard University   Nan Kai university(Team2) 1 : 2
Round 11 on 2019/11/29 at 15:30
No. Team Team Res. : Res.
1   Nan Kai university(Team2)   University of Toronto : ½
2   Moscow state university   Harvard University :
3   University college London   Saint Louis university 0 : 3
4   Nan Kai university   University of new south wales : ½
5   Japan Team   University of Missouri 0 : 3
6   Princeton university   University of Oxford 3 : 0

Links


WGM Qiyu Zhou [pronounced Chee-you Jo], born in 2000, is a Canadian chess player who has competed for team Canada at the Women's Chess Olympiad since 2014 and who won the Canadian women's championship in 2016.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.