FIDE World Cup: On to round two

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
9/13/2019 – A number of upsets were in store at the FIDE World Cup in Khanty-Mansiysk, as round one concluded after twenty-three matches were decided on tiebreaks. Most play-off encounters finished after the first pair of rapid games, while only two of them reached the third stage of tiebreaks. From the top quarter of the tournament bracket, besides Radek Wojtaszek and David Navara — who were knocked out in the classical phase — Bu Xiangzhi and Sam Shankland were eliminated before round two. | Photo: FIDE

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Down to sixty-four

The first round of the World Cup is over, which means the biggest cut-off of the tournament has already taken place. Sixty-four players were nominal favourites as they faced lower-rated opposition (sixty-three, in fact, as Sergei Movsesian and Grigoriy Oparin had the same rating) and fifteen of them were left out of contention in round one. More notably, out of the thirty-two highest rated, i.e. the top quarter of the bracket, four players were upset in the first round: Radoslaw Wojtaszek, David Navara, Bu Xiangzhi and Sam Shankland.

Some more stats from round one:

  • 23 out of 64 matches went to tiebreaks
  • 14 out of 23 tiebreak match-ups lasted two games
  • 7 out of 23 finished after the second pair of rapid games (10'+10")
  • 2 out of 23 were decided on the third set of tiebreak mini-matches (5'+3")
  • No match reached the Armageddon stage

The youngest player to reach round two is Nihal Sarin, as Nodirbek Abdusattorov was knocked out by Maxim Matlakov, while the oldest contender is Boris Gelfand, who eliminated 24-year-old Lu Shanglei from China.


Post-game interview with Boris Gelfand


The rapid play-offs (25'+10")

Being ready to face rapid tiebreakers surely is part of the players' preparation before travelling to the World Cup, and perhaps the 25-minute games stage is the last instance in which handling your nerves is not the main decider of the match-ups. Players like Hikaru Nakamura, Sanan Sjugirov and Dmitry Andreikin, amongst others, got clear victories in this stage.

Tamir Nabaty, who came from losing game two with the white pieces against Sethuraman, was facing a tough psychological situation as we pointed out in our previous report. Nabaty won the first rapid game — with Black again — and nicely finished off his opponent in the next encounter:

 
Nabaty vs. Sethuraman
Position after 33...Kg6

34.g4 was a natural way to continue with the attack, but Nabaty's 34.xe6 is more lethal. Black captured the knight with 34...xh5 and the Israeli grandmaster gave up yet another piece in order to give mate: 35.g7+ xg7 36.g4+ fxg4 37.h2#.

 
Position after 37.Qh2#

A nice way to get a ticket to round two.

Sethuraman, Tamir Nabaty

Sethuraman could not bounce back again against Tamir Nabaty | Photo: FIDE

Meanwhile, the youngest player in the field, 14-year-old Nodirbek Abdusattorov, also fell prey to a king hunt in his second rapid game against Maxim Matlakov:

 
Matlakov vs. Abdusattorov
Position after 36...Ke7

Black is doomed. Instead of immediately capturing the bishop, Matlakov spent a minute and a half calculating a winning sequence (one of many) and duly showed it on the board (you can follow the moves and try your own variations on the board above): 37.d6+ xd6 38.f8+ c7 39.xg7+ b6 40.f6+ a5 41.d8+ b4 42.f8+ c4 43.c8+ and Black resigned.

Nodirbek Abdusattorov

More than a promising talent — Nodirbek Abdusattorov | Photo: FIDE

All the games from matches decided on this stage

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 g6 4.g3 Bg7 5.Bg2 d6 6.0-0 e6 7.e3 Nge7 8.d4 0-0 9.Re1 A37: Symmetrical English vs ...g6: 4 Bg2 Bg7 5 Nf3 Rb8 10.b3 cxd4 10...e5 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Ba3 Qa5 13.Qc1 e4 14.Nxe4 f5 15.Bb2 fxe4 16.Ng5 Ne5 17.Bxe4 0-1 (27) Yu,Y (2739)-Jones,G (2702) Hengshui 2019 11.exd4 White is slightly better. Nf5 12.Bg5N Predecessor: 12.Bb2 Ncxd4 13.Nxd4 Nxd4 14.Ne4 Qb6 15.Ba3 Bd7 16.Bxd6 Bc6 1-0 (36) Malikentzos,S (2431)-Halkias,S (2568) Anogia 2018 12...Qa5 13.Ne4 h6 14.Bd2 Qd8 15.d5 exd5 16.cxd5 Ne5! 17.Bc3 Re8 18.Rc1 Bd7 19.Ba1 Qb6 20.Nfd2 Bb5 21.Nc4 Bxc4 22.bxc4 Rbc8 23.Qa4 23.Bh3± 23...Re7 23...Nd3= 24.Nf6+ Bxf6 25.Rxe8+ Kg7 26.Rxc8 Qxf2+ 27.Kh1 Ne1 24.Red1 Nd7 25.Bxg7 Kxg7 26.Rb1       White is in control. Qc7 27.Qxa7 Nc5 28.Nxc5 Qxc5 29.Qxc5 Rxc5 30.Bf1 Ra5 31.Rd2 Rc7 32.Rb6 Ra6 33.Rdb2 Nd4 33...Ra3± might work better. 34.Kg2 34.Rxb7 Rxb7 35.Rxb7 Rxa2± 34...Kf6 34.Rxa6+- bxa6 35.Rb6      
Double Attack 35...Nf3+ 36.Kg2 Nd2 36...Ne1+ 37.Kh3 Rd7 37.Rxd6 Nxf1 38.Rc6 Accuracy: White = 77%, Black = 49%. Weaker is 38.Kxf1 Rxc4 39.Rxa6 Rd4±
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Andreikin,D2741Mekhitarian,K25581–02019A37FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Mekhitarian,K2558Andreikin,D2741½–½2019A40FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Le,Q2708Aleksandrov,A25771–02019A13FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Aleksandrov,A2577Le,Q2708½–½2019D20FIDE World Cup 20191.4
McShane,L2682Delgado Ramirez,N26151–02019E19FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Kovalenko,I2674Lupulescu,C26431–02019A18FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Lupulescu,C2643Kovalenko,I2674½–½2019B40FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Sjugirov,S2662Mareco,S26331–02019E15FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Mareco,S2633Sjugirov,S2662½–½2019C88FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Sarana,A2651Predke,A26570–12019D38FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Predke,A2657Sarana,A2651½–½2019A50FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Tabatabaei,M2642Amin,B26991–02019E94FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Amin,B2699Tabatabaei,M2642½–½2019A06FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Bok,B2640Saric,I26671–02019D43FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Saric,I2667Bok,B2640½–½2019C65FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Parligras,M2629Nisipeanu,L2656½–½2019C11FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Nisipeanu,L2656Parligras,M26291–02019D02FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Sethuraman,S2624Nabaty,T26580–12019D20FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Nabaty,T2658Sethuraman,S26241–02019A46FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Narayanan.S.L2611Anton Guijarro,D2674½–½2019C65FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Anton Guijarro,D2674Narayanan.S.L26111–02019A15FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Abdusattorov,N2608Matlakov,M2716½–½2019C78FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Matlakov,M2716Abdusattorov,N26081–02019B91FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Petrov,N2586Tomashevsky,E2718½–½2019A45FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Tomashevsky,E2718Petrov,N25861–02019E17FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Bellahcene,B2540Nakamura,H27450–12019C67FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Nakamura,H2745Bellahcene,B25401–02019A33FIDE World Cup 20191.4

The 'quick-rapid' play-offs (10'+10")

Seven match-ups were decided on this phase. Vladimir Fedoseev defeated Ganguly, Wang Hao eliminated Aleksei Pridorozhni, Yu Yangyi finally got the better of Ehsan Ghaem Maghami (the latter surprisingly tied the score in game two of the classical stage), Boris Gelfand beat Lu Shanglei and Anton Korobov took advantage of an inaccuracy by Abhijeet Gupta to take him out of contention — Gupta took it in stride.

Yes, we are missing two match-ups in the list above. First, let us take a look at a Chinese duel, in which Xu Xiangyu eliminated his higher-rated compatriot Bu Xiangzhi — as pointed out by user "thesavage4" in the comments section of this article, trying to say the names of these two five times in a row can be a real challenge. Bu was actually better in the first 10'+10" encounter, but his opponent ended up on top after a complex tactical skirmish:

 
Bu Xiangzhi vs. Xu Xiangyu
Position after 29...Nh4

Bu Xiangzhi made the last mistake with 30.b5 — instead of 30.gxh4 — as after 30...g6 capturing the knight is not advisable any more. The game continued 31.e5 f3+ 32.xf3 and Xu Xiangyu went on to convert his material edge into a memorable win.

Bu Xiangzhi

Bu Xiangzhi eliminated Magnus Carlsen in the previous World Cup | Photo: FIDE

The strangest occurrence of the day was seen in Sam Shankland vs Eltaj Safarli. After four draws in classical and rapid, Safarli had won their fifth encounter. Only needing a draw with Black, he missed an easy tactic though:

 
Shankland vs. Safarli
Position after 27.a4

The Azeri played 27...a6 and eventually got a 62-move draw to go through, but in the diagrammed position he could have gone for the simple 27...♜xd6, using the deadly pin on the long diagonal. Even top players miss simple tactical tricks!


Post-game interview with Vladimir Fedoseev


All the games from matches decided on this stage

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.e3 dxc4 6.Bxc4 0-0 7.Nf3 Nbd7 D93: Grünfeld: 4 Nf3 Bg7 5 Bf4 0-0 6 e3 8.0-0 Nh5 9.Bg5 h6 White is slightly better. 10.Bh4 g5 11.Nd2 Ndf6 12.Bg3 Nxg3 13.hxg3
Don't play 13.fxg3 Ng4= 13...Rb8N Predecessor: 13...Bf5 14.Qb3 Rb8 15.a4 0-1 (37) Xu,M (2374)-Yu,Y (2751) China 2019 14.Rc1 Bf5 15.Re1 e6 16.Nf3 c6 17.a3 Nd5 18.Nxd5 exd5 19.Bd3 Bg4 20.Qc2 Qd6 21.Bf5 Bxf5 22.Qxf5 Qe6 23.Qd3 Qg6 23...a6 keeps more tension. 24.b4 Rfd8 25.Qd1 Bf8 26.Ne5 Bd6 24.Qxg6 24.Qd2 is interesting. Bf6 25.b4 a6 26.a4 g4 27.Ne5 24...fxg6 25.b4 g4 26.Nd2 Rf6 27.Nb3 Bf8 28.Re2 h5 29.Rec2 Kf7 30.Rb1 Ke8 31.Nc1 Accuracy: White = 41%, Black = 45%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ghaem Maghami,E2544Yu,Y2763½–½2019D82FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Yu,Y2763Ghaem Maghami,E2544½–½2019C42FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Ghaem Maghami,E2544Yu,Y2763½–½2019D82FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Yu,Y2763Ghaem Maghami,E25441–02019C42FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Pridorozhni,A2599Wang,H2726½–½2019B11FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Wang,H2726Pridorozhni,A2599½–½2019D35FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Pridorozhni,A2599Wang,H2726½–½2019B23FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Wang,H2726Pridorozhni,A25991–02019A13FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Shankland,S2705Safarli,E2593½–½2019D10FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Safarli,E2593Shankland,S2705½–½2019C55FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Safarli,E2593Shankland,S27051–02019C55FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Shankland,S2705Safarli,E2593½–½2019D10FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Fedoseev,V2664Ganguly,S2658½–½2019B92FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Ganguly,S2658Fedoseev,V2664½–½2019D46FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Ganguly,S2658Fedoseev,V26640–12019A11FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Fedoseev,V2664Ganguly,S26581–02019E91FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Korobov,A2679Gupta,A26090–12019A48FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Gupta,A2609Korobov,A26790–12019B06FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Korobov,A2679Gupta,A26091–02019D71FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Gupta,A2609Korobov,A26790–12019D36FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Gelfand,B2686Lu,S2602½–½2019E04FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Lu,S2602Gelfand,B2686½–½2019C43FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Gelfand,B2686Lu,S26021–02019E04FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Lu,S2602Gelfand,B26860–12019C24FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Bu,X2721Xu,X2576½–½2019A22FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Xu,X2576Bu,X2721½–½2019C42FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Bu,X2721Xu,X25760–12019D23FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Xu,X2576Bu,X2721½–½2019B23FIDE World Cup 20191.6

The blitz play-offs (5'+3")

Kacper Piorun (Poland, 2660) and Nijat Abasov (Azerbaijan, 2632) drew their two classical encounters and exchanged blows in both rapid phases of the tiebreaks. After splitting the point in the first blitz game, Abasov eliminated his Polish rival in a fine strategic effort with the black pieces.

The storyline in Michael Adams (England, 2694) vs Aravindh (India, 2609) was rather different, as the players drew their first seven encounters and seemed en route to an Armageddon...until Adams miscalculated in an endgame:

 
Aravindh vs. Adams
Position after 45.Nf3

45...e6 gives way to 46.g5+ xg5 47.xg5 and White can later force a rook trade in order to get a superior pawn ending.

 
Position after 54.bxa4

The white king will inevitably penetrate Black's camp. The game continued 54.c5 55.d2 e6 56.e3 d5 57.d3 c4+ 58.e3 c5 59.e2 c6 60.f3 c5 61.e3 d5 62.e6 etcetera, and the young Indian got his pass to the next round. 

Aravindh Chithambaram

Aravindh Chithambaram got the better of none other than Mickey Adams | Photo: FIDE

All the games from matches decided on this stage

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.Be3 Be7 10.c3 0-0 11.Nbd2 Bg4 12.Nxe4 dxe4 13.Qd5 C83: Open Ruy Lopez: 9 c3 Be7 Qxd5 14.Bxd5 exf3 15.Bxc6 fxg2 16.Rfe1 Rad8 17.a4 b4
18.a5N Predecessor: 18.cxb4 Bxb4 19.Rec1 Bd2 20.Bxd2 Rxd2 1/2-1/2 (45) Caruana,F (2804)-Giri,A (2782) Paris 2016 18...f6 19.Bb7 Bc8 19...bxc3 looks sharper. 20.bxc3 Bc8 21.Bxc8 Rxc8 22.Bf4 fxe5 23.Bxe5 Bh4 20.Bxc8 Rxc8 21.exf6! gxf6 22.Bd2 bxc3 23.Bxc3 Kf7 24.Ra4 Bd6 25.Rh4 Kg6 26.Kxg2 Rb8 The position is equal. 27.Kf3 Rb5 28.Ree4 Rfb8 29.h3 h5 30.Rc4 Rf5+ 31.Ke2 Be5 32.b4 Bxc3 33.Rxc3=       Endgame KRR-KRR Re8+ 34.Kf1 Rd8! 35.Ke2 Re8+ 36.Kf1 Rd8! 37.Re4 Rd2 38.Re2 Rd1+ 39.Kg2 Accuracy: White = 76%, Black = 87%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Adams,M2694Aravindh,C2609½–½2019C80FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Aravindh,C2609Adams,M2694½–½2019D35FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Aravindh,C2609Adams,M2694½–½2019D35FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Adams,M2694Aravindh,C2609½–½2019C77FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Adams,M2694Aravindh,C2609½–½2019C77FIDE World Cup 20191.7
Aravindh,C2609Adams,M26941–02019C50FIDE World Cup 20191.8
Abasov,N2632Piorun,K26601–02019E08FIDE World Cup 20191.3
Piorun,K2660Abasov,N26321–02019B31FIDE World Cup 20191.4
Piorun,K2660Abasov,N26320–12019B30FIDE World Cup 20191.5
Abasov,N2632Piorun,K26600–12019A81FIDE World Cup 20191.6
Abasov,N2632Piorun,K2660½–½2019A81FIDE World Cup 20191.7
Piorun,K2660Abasov,N26320–12019B31FIDE World Cup 20191.8

Commentary webcast

Commentary by GMs Evgeny Miroshnichenko and Alex Yermolinsky


All results

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
TBPerf.
1
GM

7
GM
2811
½

7
GM
2811
½

7
GM
2811
1

7
GM
2811
½

7
GM
2811
½

7
GM
2811
1

7
GM
2811
½

7
GM
2811
1

Ø 2811
5.5/8
2758
5.5
8
5.5
19.25
2952
2
GM
GM
2811

1
FM
1954
1

7
GM
2758
½

7
GM
2758
½

7
GM
2758
0

7
GM
2758
½

7
GM
2758
½

7
GM
2758
0

7
GM
2758
½

7
GM
2758
0

Ø 2669
3.5/9
2811
3.5
9
2.5
13.75
2589
3
GM

7
GM
2763
1

7
GM
2763
1

7
GM
2763
½

7
GM
2763
½

Ø 2763
3/4
2774
3.0
4
3.00
2956
4
GM
2763
1.0
4
3.00
2581
5
FM
FM
1954

1
GM
2811
0

Ø 2811
0/1
1954
0.0
1
0.00
2011
TBs: Sonneborn-Berger

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.