World Championship Game 7: Black is fine

by Antonio Pereira
11/19/2018 – Another day, another draw. The long-awaited 2018 World Championship has seen the players hold their own with the black pieces, and even get the upper hand — once Caruana and once Carlsen — when having to move second. The seventh game was a Queen's Gambit Declined where Fabiano unleashed the first surprise and ended up getting a rather comfortable half point. DANIEL FERNANDEZ and YANNICK PELLETIER took a closer look at what happened over the board | Photos: Nikolai Dunaevsky / World Chess

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

No breakthrough

Tension keeps rising in London, as the uncertainty that surrounded this match before it began has been extended until more than half its course. Leading up to the event, we saw how Fabiano Caruana got increasingly closer to Magnus Carlsen's previously insurmountable first place in the ratings list. Nonetheless, the Norwegian somehow held on to his post despite, for example, facing lower-rated opposition at the European Club Cup. It seems like Magnus feels the danger looming and is trying to keep things under control. After all, he stated prior to the match:

On paper this is my absolute worst opponent. That's why I think the match will be different than previously.

We could also speculate that some memories from his previous experience in New York might be playing a role in the champion's mind. Lars Bo Hansen recently posted an article where he analysed what went on in the 2016 match, stating that in game eight — the first decisive encounter, which favoured Karjakin — "Carlsen over-reached in his attempts to finally break through". This time around, Magnus might not want to make the same mistake.

These are only two of the many factors that lead us to think that the psychological component might play an increasingly bigger role in this duel. Certainly, getting a win after seven draws will be a bigger deal than if the win would have come in game two, for example.

Magnus with Shreyas Royal, the 9-year-old prodigy that made the opening move on Sunday

From Caruana's side, on the other hand, losing might actually give him a boost of confidence. At least that is what happened in the last Candidates Tournament, where he pointed out that his loss in round twelve — against Karjakin, curiously — was in fact helpful: 

After I lost that game I felt awful for a few hours, but then the next day I felt much better. It was like a weight was lifted from me. My play was so heavy for a few days and it culminated in that loss, and after I lost that game I started to feel much freer in my play and more confident.

Fabiano Caruana had no trouble with Black

Who will crack under pressure? We will find out in the next week and a half.


Game 7 summary

GM Daniel King is in London and encapsulated Sunday's action in a short video:


A quiet killer

When we think of surprises in the opening, we might recall Kasparov's big theoretical breakthroughs in sharp Najdorfs or Kramnik's extensive analysis of the Berlin Defence, but sometimes a quiet move can also have a large effect on the outcome of a game. Caruana showed precisely that in a Queen's Gambit Declined. After repeating nine moves from game two, Carlsen deviated with 10.Nd2, and a well-prepared Caruana quickly responded with a surprise:

 
Carlsen vs. Caruana - Game 7
Position after 10.Nd2

10...Be7 and 10...Bb4 are the most common moves in this position, but the American went for the more conservative 10...Qd8. Carlsen took around 10-15 minutes in each of his next four moves, signalling that this was not what he expected — although, of course, he knew the variation.

Natural developing moves continued and, after 14...Ne5, Carlsen castled, which in his own word is "an admission that the position is equal":

 
Position after 14...Ne5

Magnus could have played 15.Nce4 instead of 15.0-0, getting a sharper position. However, he did not think it was worth the try — Caruana (and computers) also thought Black was fine in the ensuing complications.

Eventually, the game petered into a draw by move 40. On Monday's game, Fabiano will have the white pieces again. Will we see another Rossolimo Sicilian? Anish Giri thinks so: 


Game 7 analysed by GM Daniel Fernandez

English GM Daniel Fernandez closely analysed a game that took place in "...one of the thematic battlegrounds of the world champions".

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5 3.c4 e6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 c5 Straight into one of the thematic battlegrounds of the world champions! This is an opening that seems to be very much beloved by Nakamura, Anand, and more recently Caruana himself. 7.dxc5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Nxd5 Qxd5 holds less venom and was the battleground for an encounter between a Topalov second and a Carlsen second... Edouard,R -Hammer,J Drancy 2016 7...Bxc5 8.Qc2 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.Nxd5 exd5 10.a3 Nc6 11.Bd3 To be honest, I am a little surprised Carlsen didn't choose this. He tends to like playing against the IQP, and while it might appear that Black can play ...d4, this is a mirage: either there will be some trick yielding an edge (like exd4 followed by Be3) or else White will simply push past with e4. The textbook encounter features a commentator from this match: Bb6 12.0-0 Bg4 13.h3 Bh5 14.b4 a6 15.Rc1 d4 16.g4 Bg6 17.e4 Re8 18.Re1 Rc8 19.Bc4! Svidler,P-Harikrishna,P Shenzhen 2017 8...Nc6 9.a3 During Norway Chess 2018, when I last looked at this variation, I commented that I did not believe the present move to be White's most critical, but I am now revising this assessment. Qa5 10.Nd2 On this move, my only earlier comment was that it "might be an interesting try for an advantage, but that it ultimately fails"- giving 10...Bb4. The challenger, however, did not play that move, indicating that neither player reads the details on chessbase.com! 10.0-0-0!? See my detailed notes on this in Karjakin-Anand, Norway Chess 2018. Ne4! 11.Nxe4 11.Nb5 a6 12.Nc7 e5! Originally played by Karjakin, but ultimately used against him by Anand in the above-mentioned encounter. 11...dxe4 12.Qxe4 Bxa3! There follows a forced line. 13.bxa3 Qxa3+ 14.Kd2 Rd8+ 15.Ke2 Qb2+ 16.Rd2 Rxd2+ 17.Nxd2 e5 18.Bg3 Bg4+‼ New and detailed analysis now reveals that White needs to accept first the bishop and then the perpetual check which results after best play. Of course, 10.Rd1 is also possible. It is impossible to annotate the present game without paying attention to what occurred in the 2nd match game, and also more generally one of the defining decisions White faces in such games is the choice between long-castling and playing Rd1. Re8! 10...Be7 is more common, but mistaken. In January 2018 I wrote that White has an edge after 11.Be2 Ne4 12.cxd5 Nxc3 13.bxc3 exd5 14.0-0 and I see no reason to change this verdict. 10...Rd8 was what happened in the 2nd game. I wonder what Fabi has in mind following 11.Nd2 here? 11.Nd2!? 11.Be2 Ne4 12.0-0 Nxc3 13.bxc3 h6 14.a4 Ne7 15.Ne5 Bd6!= Carlsen, M-Caruana,F London WC (2) 2018 11...dxc4 12.Bxc4 12.Nxc4!? Rxd1+ 13.Qxd1 Qd8 14.Qxd8+ Nxd8 Caruana might have intended to defend this position, or a similar one, and make the structure into 'his Berlin'. Certainly, with the centre nearly bereft of pawns, it is difficult to turn the engine's '0.4' into something a human would recognise as a clear and lasting plus. 12...Be7 13.0-0 Qh5 14.Nde4 Rxd1 15.Qxd1 Qxd1 16.Rxd1 Nxe4 17.Nxe4 e5!= Roiz,M-Khamrakulov,D Tashkent 2011 11.Nd2 11.Be2 e5 is the point 11...e5 12.Bg5 Nd4 13.Qb1! 13.Qc1 Bf5 is liable to lead to a forced draw. 14.Bxf6 Nc2+ 15.Ke2 Nd4+= Carlsen, M-Nakamura,H Douglas 2017 13...Bf5 14.Bd3 White might have had a tiny something in Mamedyarov-Anand, Tata Steel 2018, but this was ultimately neutralised. 10.Ra2!? This move is nice and experimental, but after the accurate retreats Be7 11.b4 Qd8 12.h3 Black should deviate from a Topalov game and play d4!= 10...Qd8 Perhaps Caruana is getting some kind of thrill out of playing this kind of thing: personally I don't consider Nd2 anywhere near the size of concession Black needs to extract to merit the 2 tempi. 10.Ra2, on the other hand, would do. The question was asked by a perplexed Anna Rudolf of exactly what Black has gained by these perambulations, as White always seems to win at least one tempo during them. 10...Bb4!? 11.cxd5 exd5 12.Nb3 Bxc3+ 13.bxc3 Qd8 This continuation was seen in Topalov,V-Nakamura,H Paris 2017, and perhaps slightly biased by the fact that Black won the game, I concluded it was unlikely anyone would play 10.Nd2 for an advantage. To be honest, I still don't know what White would do here. 10...Be7 This move was the majority choice in the 'live commentary' room helmed by GM Judit Polgar, as well as among grandmasters who have reached this position. 11.Rd1 is main and now England's fast-rising talent Shreyas Royal opined, completely correctly, that Black has to go ...e5! and let the pawns take care of themselves! 11.Bg3!? is an interesting idea that may give chances 11...e5 12.Bg5 12.Nb3 Qb6 gives White an extra tempo, but there is still nothing after 13.Bg5 d4 14.Bxf6 Bxf6 15.Nd5 Qd8= 12...d4 13.Nb3 Qd8 14.exd4 Nxd4 15.Nxd4 exd4 16.Nb5 Now, in my considered opinion, Black has to know about, and play, the ultra-precise Bd7! and only then does he stand equal. 11.Nb3 Bb6 11...Be7 is maybe just a little bit too easy for White to play, as there isn't any idea of ...d4 left. 12.cxd5 12.Rd1 e5 should again be fine 12...Nxd5 13.Rd1 12.Be2 Giving up on an opening advantage. 12.Rd1 This move springs to mind immediately for anyone with even a passing knowledge of the structure, and doesn't run the risks of castling. A process of logical elimination tells us that Carlsen must have seen, and disliked, the Black idea of a5!? 13.Bg5 a4 14.Nd2 d4!? when the battle for loss of frivolous tempi might actually be won by White. Certainly, over the board this could be difficult to assess. In this position, after 12.0-0-0 Bd7! 13.g4! the incredibly messy complications can be analysed almost to a forced draw. 12...Qe7= One last time: are you SURE you don't want me to have an IQP? 13.Bg5 13.cxd5 Nxd5 14.Nxd5 exd5= is nothing though; White's pieces are poorly placed to cope with Black's forthcoming ideas like ...Be6, ...Rac8, ...Rfd8. 13...dxc4 This exchange made sense on the previous turn too, but here it is close to being forced. 14.Nd2 Carlsen thought for some time about 14.Bxc4 ,clearly wondering whether it was actually such an amazing idea to move the knight another 2 times. A bit of analysis, though, indicates that it is with the direct recapture that White risks becoming worse. Bd7 15.0-0 Ne5 16.Be2 Rfc8!? Here, in a bizarre echo of the 6.Be3 Najdorf, Black is intending to put his opponent in a highly annoying double-pin with ...Ba4. 17.Nd4 h6! 18.Bxf6 gxf6!? and play is for 3 results. 14...Ne5 15.0-0 15.Nxc4? Nxc4 16.Bxc4 Qc5! simply gains the bishop pair for nothing. 15.Nce4!? is a meaningful alternative, and Magnus said it was his 'main chance to play dynamically' but, as above, Black doesn't need to tremble in fear at the prospect of being left with doubled f-pawns. Indeed, neither player particularly believed it. Bd7 16.Nxc4 16.Qc3!? was the move both players suggested in the press conference. Nxe4! 17.Nxe4 f6 18.Qxe5 fxg5 19.Bxc4 Rac8 20.Bb3 h6 with a dynamically balanced game. 16...Nxc4 17.Bxc4 Rac8 18.0-0 Bc6= The tactical issues faced by each side more or less balance each other out, and the most likely scenario is that all the pieces, save either 1 or 2 pairs of rooks, will be vacuumed off the board quite soon, leaving a draw. 15...Bd7! 16.Bf4! White should hurry to take back the pawn, in whichever way he chooses to do that. 16.Rfd1 Rac8 17.Nde4 is plausible, but without the engine around we don't actually know whether White will regain the pawn or not. Bc6 17...Bc7!? 18.Bxc4! Bc6 19.Bb5 Bxe4 20.Qxe4 a6 21.Be2 Nxe4 22.Bxe7 Nxc3 23.bxc3 Rfe8= and both sides play for a win. The position is reminiscent of my game against Gawain Jones in the British Championships 2018. 18.Nd6 Rcd8 19.Nce4 19.Nxc4 Nxc4 20.Bxc4 Qc5 21.Bxf6 gxf6 22.Bd3 f5= Now White has to trade off light-squared bishops with some urgency, or else simply stand worse. 19...h6! 20.Bh4 g5 21.Nxf6+ Qxf6 22.Bg3 Bc7 23.Nxc4 Nxc4! 24.Bxc7 Rc8 25.Bxc4 Rxc7= The position is ever so slightly more comfortable for Black, but is still well within the 'equal' band in objective terms. 16.Nxc4 Nxc4 17.Bxc4 Qc5 18.Bxf6 Qxc4 19.Rfd1 Bc6 20.Bd4!= 16...Ng6! 16...Qc5 is a hard move to make, because of all White's Ne4/b4 tactical ideas. Nevertheless, the computer sees it as best, and then obliges White to take the pawn back immediately: 17.Bxe5 Qxe5 18.Nxc4 Qc7 19.b4!? 19.Rac1 Bc5 20.b4 Be7= is an equal position where Black might stand better after a few moves 19...Rac8 20.Rac1 Rfd8 21.Nxb6 Qxb6 22.Rfd1= 17.Bg3! With their last moves, both players have shown that they appreciate the full value of the bishop pair in this position- even where the two flanks are largely distinct from each other and the engine doesn't mind White giving it up. Bc6 A correct response from Caruana, who understands that White's dark-squared bishop is better than his own, and takes steps to trade them off. 18.Nxc4 Bc7 19.Rfd1 Rfd8 20.Rxd8+ This move smacks of boredom; surely normally Magnus would ask himself whether it's impossible to gain some other minor edge while Black is troubling himself with the exact mechanics of the double-rook trade? Rxd8 21.Rd1 Possibly, somewhere at the back of Magnus' mind, there might have been an idea of eventually making an edge like 'slightly better light-squared bishop' or 'slightly better knight' count; however, as it turned out there wasn't a concrete opportunity to play for a win. From this point onwards, the objective evaluation never veered from complete equality, but I have tried to point out marginally more ambitious ideas for each side. Rxd1+ 22.Qxd1 Nd5 23.Qd4 Nxc3 24.Qxc3 Bxg3 My own personal feeling about this move was that it gives White unnecessary chances. After all, White's pawn structure is improved and furthermore there's a possibility that Black's kingside could become very cramped indeed. The engine, of course, doesn't think this is a problem. 24...Bb5 seemed a lot more normal to me. 25.hxg3 Qd7 26.Bd3 At this point, White decided his plan, which was to make it inconvenient for Black to play ...f6/...e5, and to go for Bxg6, f3, e4 himself. Otherwise there is a chance he might have seen the idea of 26.f4 followed by g4-g5 (if allowed) as being more auspicious. 26...b6 This was Black's chance to play 26...f6 but possibly he just found ideas like 27.Qc2 Kf7 28.Na5 to be a little annoying. 27.f3 Bb7 27...f6!? 28.g4 Kf7 29.g5 Bd5= Black's construction looks a little loose, but there is nothing objectively wrong with it. I would personally think of it as a reasonable choice if Black wanted to retain the possibility of perhaps one day winning the game. 28.Bxg6!? This had been coming for a while- White was hardly going to play e4 without it- but I do wonder if maybe it could have been delayed a further move. 28.g4 Qc7 29.f4= is quite ambitious. 28...hxg6 29.e4 Qc7! From a human perspective, this looks clearly correct. Black needs to make the queen trade White seeks as inefficient as possible. 29...f6 30.e5! has become, practically speaking, a little difficult. 30.e5 Qc5+ 31.Kh2 31.Ne3 Qxc3 32.bxc3 Ba6= One of the hardest things for a human player to realise in this position (and related ones which we shall come to) is that if Black can come with his king to c6, then in spite of his awful bishop, which possesses a grand total of no targets to aim at, he is the one playing for a win! 31...Ba6 31...f6!? leads to the same thing: 32.Nd6 Qxc3 33.bxc3 Ba6 32.Nd6 Qxc3 33.bxc3 f6 34.f4 The next note is the move suggested by a friend with whom I was watching the games, live and in person. Around this time, we made a bet (which I won) about the sequence of moves that would finish the game... 34.Kh3?! fxe5 35.Kg4 Kf8 36.Kg5 Bd3 It is White treading on thin ice here (though the position is still a draw.) It is not clear to me how White regains a pawn without suffocating his own knight, and g2 is also weak. 34...Kf8 35.Kg1 Ke7 36.Kf2 Kd7 With Black's king active, it is difficult to be ambitious. 37.Ke3 Bf1 I did wonder whether Black could play for a win: 37...fxe5!? 38.fxe5 Kc6 39.c4 Kc5 40.Kd3 b5 41.Ne4+ Kc6 Now White has a choice of ways to draw, which differ only in the multiplicity of the choice that he has thereafter. 42.Kd4! 42.cxb5+ Bxb5+ 43.Kd4 Be2 43...Bf1 44.Nc5 Bg4= Both sides have fortresses, despite the World Champion's skepticism about the concept, but it is still easier for White to go wrong. 42...bxc4 43.g4 c3 44.Nxc3 g5 45.g3 Bf1 46.Ne4 Be2 47.Nxg5 Bxg4 48.a4= 38.Kf2 Ba6 39.Ke3 Bf1 40.Kf2 Here Caruana claimed a draw, by the approved method. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M-Caruana,F-½–½2018World Championships 7

The Petroff (or Russian) Defence which is characterised by the moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 has been popular at the highest levels for many years and enjoys the reputation of being an extremely solid defence.


Match standings


Round-up shows


All games of the match

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 g6 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.d3 Bg7 6.h3 Nf6 7.Nc3 Nd7 B31: Sizilianisch (Rossolimo-Variante) 7...0-0 8.0-0 Ne8 9.Be3 b6 10.e5 f6 11.Re1 Nc7 12.Qd2 fxe5 13.Bh6 Rxf3 14.Bxg7 Kxg7 15.gxf3 Bxh3 16.Rxe5 e6 17.Rg5 1-0 (33) Caruana,F (2827)-Gelfand,B (2703) Batumi 2018 7...b6 8.Be3 e5 9.0-0 0-0 10.a3 Qe7 11.Qb1 Nh5 12.b4 f5 13.bxc5 f4 14.Bd2 bxc5 15.Qb3+ Be6 0-1 (39) Caruana,F (2820)-Carlsen,M (2862) Wijk aan Zee 2015 CBM 165 [Stohl,I] 8.Be3 e5 9.0-0 b6 LiveBook: 6 Partien 10.Nh2 Nf8 11.f4N Vorgänger: 11.Qd2 Ne6 12.Bh6 0-0 13.Bxg7 Kxg7 14.Ne2 Qg5 15.f4 exf4 16.Nxf4 1-0 (45) Manik,M (2440)-Nayhebaver,M (2005) Kosice 2010 11...exf4 12.Rxf4 Be6 13.Rf2 h6 14.Qd2 g5 15.Raf1 Qd6 16.Ng4 0-0-0! 17.Nf6 Nd7 18.Nh5 Be5 19.g4 f6 20.b3 Bf7 21.Nd1 Nf8 22.Nxf6 Ne6 23.Nh5 23.Nd7!? Bf4 24.Nf6= 23...Bxh5 23...Bg6 is interesting. 24.Kh1 Qe7 25.Qe2 Rdg8 26.Rg1 Kb8 24.gxh5 Nf4 25.Bxf4 gxf4 26.Rg2 Rhg8 27.Qe2 Rxg2+ 28.Qxg2 Qe6! 29.Nf2! Rg8       Schwarz hat starke Initiative. 30.Ng4 Qe8 31.Qf3 Qxh5 32.Kf2! Bc7 33.Ke2
33.e5! Kb7 34.Nf6 Qh4+ 35.Ke2 33...Qg5!-+ 34.Nh2 34.Qf2 war nötig. 34...h5 35.Rf2 Qg1 36.Nf1 h4 36...Qg7-+ 37.Nd2 Kb7 37.Kd2? 37.e5! 37...Kb7 38.c3 Be5 Droht ...Tg3! und aus. 39.Kc2 Qg7 39...b5-+ zielt auf ...Tg3! ab. 40.Qe2 b4 41.cxb4 Bd4 40.Nh2! Bxc3 41.Qxf4 Bd4 42.Qf7+ Ka6! 43.Qxg7 Rxg7       Endspiel KTL-KTS Doch nicht 43...Bxg7?! 44.Rf5= 44.Re2 Rg3 45.Ng4 e5 ist eine echte Drohung. Rxh3 Weiss muss nun ...Tg3 beachten. 46.e5 Rf3 47.e6 Rf8 48.e7 Re8 49.Nh6! h3 50.Nf5
Und weiter mit Th2 wäre nett. 50...Bf6! 51.a3 b5 Günstiger ist 51...Ka5 52.b4= cxb4 53.axb4
53...Bxe7!       54.Nxe7 54.Rxe7 Rxe7 54...h2 55.Rxh2 Und Th7 würde nun gewinnen. Rxe7 KT-KT 56.Rh6 Kb6 57.Kc3 Rd7 58.Rg6 Kc7 59.Rh6 Rd6 60.Rh8! Rg6 61.Ra8! Kb7 62.Rh8 Rg5 63.Rh7+ Kb6 64.Rh6 Rg1 Weiss sollte ...a5 verhindern. 65.Kc2 Rf1 66.Rg6 Rh1 67.Rf6 Rh8 68.Kc3 Ra8 Mit der Idee ...a5. 69.d4 Rd8 70.Rh6 Rd7 71.Rg6 Kc7 72.Rg5 Rd6 73.Rg8 Rh6 74.Ra8 Rh3+ 75.Kc2 Ra3 76.Kb2 Ra4 77.Kc3! a6 78.Rh8 Ra3+ 79.Kb2 Rg3 79...Rd3 feels hotter. 80.Rh7+ Kd6 81.Ra7 Rxd4 82.Ka3 Rd3+ 80.Kc2 Rg5 81.Rh6 Rd5 82.Kc3 Rd6 83.Rh8! Rg6 84.Kc2 Kb7 85.Kc3 Rg3+ 86.Kc2 Rg1 87.Rh5 Rg2+ 88.Kc3! Rg3+ 89.Kc2 Rg4 90.Kc3 Kb6 91.Rh6 Rg5 92.Rf6 Rh5 93.Rg6 Rh3+ 94.Kc2 Rh5 95.Kc3! Rd5 96.Rh6 Kc7 97.Rh7+ Rd7 98.Rh5 Rd6 99.Rh8! Rg6 100.Rf8 Rg3+ 101.Kc2 Ra3 102.Rf7+ Kd6 103.Ra7! Kd5 Droht stark ...Kc4. 104.Kb2 Rd3 105.Rxa6 Rxd4 106.Kb3 Re4 107.Kc3 Rc4+ 108.Kb3 Kd4 109.Rb6! Die Stellung ist ausgeglichen. Kd3 110.Ra6 Rc2 111.Rb6! Rc3+ 112.Kb2 Rc4 113.Kb3 Kd4 114.Ra6 Kd5 115.Ra8 Precision: Weiß = 71%, Schwarz = 67%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M2835½–½2018B31World Chess Championship 20181
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F2832½–½2018D37World Chess Championship 20182
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M2835½–½2018B31World Chess Championship 20183
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F2832½–½2018A29World Chess Championship 20184
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M2835½–½2018B31World Chess Championship 20185
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F2832½–½2018C42World Chess Championship 20186
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F2832½–½2018D37World Chess Championship 20187
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M2835½–½2018B33World Chess Championship 20188
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F2832½–½2018A29World Chess Championship 20189
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M2835½–½2018B33World Chess Championship 201810
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F2832½–½2018C42World Chess Championship 201811
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M2835½–½2018B33World Chess Championship 201812
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F28321–02018A22World Chess Championship 201813.1
Caruana,F2832Carlsen,M28350–12018B33World Chess Championship 201814.1
Carlsen,M2835Caruana,F28321–02018B44World Chess Championship 201815.1

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.