Women's Candidates: Gunina saves a half point

by Antonio Pereira
6/1/2019 – The 2019 Women's Candidates Tournament started on Friday in Kazan. All four games of round one were drawn, but a couple of them could have easily finished decisively. Valentina Gunina faltered in time trouble against Kateryna Lagno, but later showed great resourcefulness to save the half point, while Aleksandra Goryachkina missed a couple of chances against Alexandra Kosteniuk. | Photo: Anastasya Karlovich

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Looking for a challenger

The new FIDE administration has decided to partially mimic the open World Championship cycle in the women's circuit. Despite having left the cycle alleging it was unfair to have different formats in the open circuit and the women's circuit, Hou Yifan rejected the invitation to take part in the Candidates — this surely has to do with the fact that she is now studying at Oxford with a Rhodes Scholarship. Nonetheless, the eight players in Kazan are now fighting for the opportunity to challenge the current Women's World Champion, Ju Wenjun.

Four representatives from Russia, two from Ukraine, one from Georgia and one from China are taking part in the double round robin, which will run until June 17th. In order to avoid any sort of collusion, the regulations stipulate players from the same country must play against each other in the very first rounds both at the beginning of the tourney and after half-time, i.e. rounds one, two, eight and nine. Therefore, on Friday, we saw two all-Russian match-ups and the Muzychuk sisters paired up against each other.

Results from Round 1

NameRtg.Nt.Pts.Pts.NameRtgNt.
2563
0
½-½
0
2539
2506
0
½-½
0
2554
2546
0
½-½
0
2522
2510
0
½-½
0
2513

Anna and Mariya Muzychuk did not get in each other's way at the start of the event and blitzed out moves until reaching a triple repetition out of a Sicilian Defence. Meanwhile, Tan Zhongyi surprised Nana Dzagnidze by playing the Petroff Defence with the black pieces — the players reached a draw by repetition after 32 moves, with symmetrical pawn structures and not many chances to create imbalances.

Nana Dzagnidze, Tan Zhongyi, Anna Muzychuk, Mariya Muzychuk

Nana Dzagnidze v Tan Zhongyi and Mariya Muzychuk v Anna Muzychuk right before kick-off | Photo: Eteri Kublashvili

Gunina ½:½ Lagno: A narrow escape

After taking a long hiatus from chess, Kateryna Lagno was the runner-up in last year's World Championship knock-out event and then went on to win the World Blitz Championship in Saint Petersburg. Her opponent, Valentina Gunina, has also been doing well lately, as she recently won the inaugural Cairns Cup in Saint Louis. The two Russians are definitely capable of getting the ticket to face Ju Wenjun in the next match for the World Championship.

They played a Ruy Lopez. Gunina was the one with the initiative out of the opening, but Lagno reacted successfully and managed to keep things under control during the middlegame. When the time control was approaching, however, Kateryna took advantage of her opponent's overly ambitious play:

 
Gunina vs. Lagno
Position after 36.Rc8

White was putting all her hopes on her active pieces working against the rather loose black king, but Black was actually capable of defending against all the threats, while at the same time gaining a pawn on the queenside — the game continued 36...b2 37.h6 g7 38.f4 axa2.

Lagno had a considerable advantage, but Gunina's resourcefulness came to the fore on move 46 — the player from Murmansk gave up a rook in order to look for a perpetual check:

 
Position after 45...Kg7

After 46.a1, Lagno spent two minutes before deciding on the capture with 46...xa1. Kateryna later confessed that she thought there was an escape route for her king via h5 and g5, but White actually kept on giving checks endlessly, until the draw was signed after 60 moves.

In the post-game interview, both players complained about music being heard on the playing hall. In such tense struggles, such distracting inputs can easily have a real effect on the results of the games.

Anastasya Karlovich, Valentina Gunina

Anastasya Karlovich interviewing Kateryna Lagno and Valentina Gunina | Photo: Eteri Kublashvili


Post-game interview with Gunina and Lagno


Kosteniuk ½:½ Goryachkina: Black is better

Right from the get go, Aleksandra Goryachkina was the one with the more comfortable position, despite having the black pieces. Slowly but surely, the youngster gained space on the queenside, but Alexandra Kosteniuk seemed to be ready to shuffle her pieces passively until letting Black's edge fritter away. On move 44, however, the former Women's World Champion opened up the queenside, giving her opponent a chance to make something out of his positional trumps:

 
Kosteniuk vs. Goryachkina
Position after 43...a3

Later in the game, Kosteniuk's main problem was Black's passed a-pawn (her pawn on a2 was captured on move 47)...but she could have eliminated the invader when it got to a3, i.e. instead of her 44.b4, taking the pawn with 44...bxa3 was called for. In the ensuing position, the computers found some lines that would have given Black a bigger advantage, but Goryachkina could not find them. We cannot blame her, though, as some very precise manoeuvring was necessary.

Alexandra Kosteniuk

Former Women's World Champion Alexandra Kosteniuk during her game against Aleksandra Goryachkina | Photo: Eteri Kublashvili


Commentary webcast

Commentary provided by GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko and IM Elisabeth Paehtz


All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 d6 5.c3 Bd7 6.0-0 g6 7.d4 Bg7 8.Bg5 f6 9.Be3 Nh6 10.dxe5 dxe5 11.c4 C76: Ruy Lopez: Deferred Steinitz: 5 c3 Bd7 6 d4 g6 11.Bc5 Bf8 12.Bxf8 Kxf8 13.Qd2 Nf7 14.Rd1 Be8 15.Qxd8 Ncxd8 16.Bxe8 Kxe8 17.Nbd2 Nd6 18.Ne1 a5 ½-½ (29) Harikrishna,P (2744)-Mamedyarov,S (2799) Riadh 2017 11...Nf7 12.Nc3 Ne7N Predecessor: 12...0-0 13.b4 f5 14.b5 Na5 15.Bc5 Re8 16.bxa6 Bxa4 17.Qxa4 Rxa6 18.Rfd1 Qc8 0-1 (44) Zhigalko,A (2543)-Alekseenko,K (2639) Czech Republic 2018 13.Qb3 White is better. Bxa4 14.Qxa4+ Qd7 15.Qb4 b6 16.Rfd1 Qc6 17.Nd5 Nxd5 18.exd5 18.cxd5 looks sharper. Qd7 19.Rac1 Bf8 20.Qc4 Bd6 21.Ne1 18...Qd7 19.c5 bxc5 20.Bxc5 Nd6 21.Bxd6 cxd6 22.Rac1 0-0 23.Rc6 Rfb8 24.Qa3 Bf8 25.h3 Qb7 26.b3 Qb5 27.Qc1 a5 28.Nh2 f5 29.Qg5 29.Rc4= 29...Qb7 29...Rb7 30.Rdc1= Strongly threatening Rc7. Qe7 31.Qd2 e4 32.Rc7 Qe5 33.Re1 Rb5 34.Rd1 a4 35.bxa4 Rxa4 36.Rc8 Rb2 37.Qh6 37.Qg5 Ra7 38.a3 37...Qg7-+ 38.Qf4 Raxa2 39.Rf1 Rc2 39...Qe7 Hoping for ...e3! 40.Rc3 Qb7 40.Re8 40.Qxd6 Rxc8 41.Qe6+ Qf7 42.Qxc8 40...Qf7 41.Rb8 Rab2 Weaker is 41...Qxd5
42.Ng4!±      
42.Rxb2 Rxb2 43.Rd1 Qa7 ...Bh6! is the strong threat. 44.Nf1
44...Bh6!       45.Qh4 45.Qxh6 Qxf2+ 45...Kg7 45...Rc2 And now ...Kg7 would win. 46.Re1 Kg7 46.Ra1 Qxa1 Better is 46...Qf7 47.Qg3 Qf6 47.Qe7+= The position is equal. Kg8 48.Qe6+ Kf8 49.Qc8+! Ke7 50.Qc7+! Ke8 51.Qc8+! Ke7 52.Qc7+! Kf6 53.Qxd6+ Kg5 54.Qe7+ Kh5 55.g3! Bg5 56.Qxh7+ Bh6 57.Qe7 Bg5 58.Qh7+ Bh6 59.Qe7 Bg5 60.Qh7+ Accuracy: White = 48%, Black = 55%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Gunina,V2506Lagno,K2554½–½2019C75FWCT 20191.1
Kosteniuk,A2546Goryachkina,A2522½–½2019C60FWCT 20191.2
Dzagnidze,N2510Tan,Z2513½–½2019C42FWCT 20191.3
Muzychuk,M2563Muzychuk,A2539½–½2019A29FWCT 20191.4
Lagno,K2554Kosteniuk,A2546½–½2019C77FWCT 20192.1
Goryachkina,A2522Gunina,V25061–02019E15FWCT 20192.2
Tan,Z2513Muzychuk,M2563½–½2019D45FWCT 20192.3
Muzychuk,A2539Dzagnidze,N25100–12019B31FWCT 20192.4
Gunina,V2506Kosteniuk,A25461–02019C45FWCT 20193.1
Goryachkina,A2522Lagno,K25541–02019D85FWCT 20193.2
Tan,Z2513Muzychuk,A25391–02019D70FWCT 20193.3
Dzagnidze,N2510Muzychuk,M25631–02019D47FWCT 20193.4
Dzagnidze,N2510Gunina,V25061–02019C01FWCT 20194.1
Kosteniuk,A2546Tan,Z2513½–½2019C43FWCT 20194.2
Muzychuk,A2539Goryachkina,A2522½–½2019C54FWCT 20194.3
Muzychuk,M2563Lagno,K25540–12019C55FWCT 20194.4
Gunina,V2506Muzychuk,M2563½–½2019B40FWCT 20195.1
Kosteniuk,A2546Dzagnidze,N25101–02019B22FWCT 20195.2
Goryachkina,A2522Tan,Z25131–02019E04FWCT 20195.3
Lagno,K2554Muzychuk,A2539½–½2019C77FWCT 20195.4
Muzychuk,A2539Gunina,V25061–02019B13FWCT 20196.1
Muzychuk,M2563Kosteniuk,A25461–02019A22FWCT 20196.2
Dzagnidze,N2510Goryachkina,A25220–12019A06FWCT 20196.3
Tan,Z2513Lagno,K25540–12019D20FWCT 20196.4
Kosteniuk,A2546Muzychuk,A2539½–½2019C81FWCT 20197.1
Goryachkina,A2522Muzychuk,M2563½–½2019A04FWCT 20197.2
Lagno,K2554Dzagnidze,N2510½–½2019B30FWCT 20197.3
Gunina,V2506Tan,Z25131–02019C42FWCT 20197.4
Goryachkina,A2522Kosteniuk,A25461–02019D39FWCT 20198.1
Tan,Z2513Dzagnidze,N25101–02019D58FWCT 20198.2
Muzychuk,A2539Muzychuk,M2563½–½2019B19FWCT 20198.3
Lagno,K2554Gunina,V2506½–½2019C60FWCT 20198.4
Kosteniuk,A2546Lagno,K2554½–½2019B06FWCT 20199.1
Gunina,V2506Goryachkina,A25220–12019B10FWCT 20199.2
Dzagnidze,N2510Muzychuk,A25390–12019A35FWCT 20199.3
Muzychuk,M2563Tan,Z25131–02019C77FWCT 20199.4
Kosteniuk,A2546Gunina,V25061–02019C65FWCT 201910.1
Lagno,K2554Goryachkina,A2522½–½2019B19FWCT 201910.2
Muzychuk,A2539Tan,Z2513½–½2019C50FWCT 201910.3
Muzychuk,M2563Dzagnidze,N2510½–½2019B31FWCT 201910.4
Gunina,V2506Dzagnidze,N25101–02019A05FWCT 201911.1
Tan,Z2513Kosteniuk,A25461–02019E21FWCT 201911.2
Goryachkina,A2522Muzychuk,A2539½–½2019D70FWCT 201911.3
Lagno,K2554Muzychuk,M2563½–½2019B33FWCT 201911.4
Muzychuk,M2563Gunina,V25060–12019B12FWCT 201912.1
Dzagnidze,N2510Kosteniuk,A25461–02019A16FWCT 201912.2
Tan,Z2513Goryachkina,A2522½–½2019B12FWCT 201912.3
Muzychuk,A2539Lagno,K25541–02019C63FWCT 201912.4
Gunina,V2506Muzychuk,A25390–12019C58FWCT 201913.1
Kosteniuk,A2546Muzychuk,M25631–02019B29FWCT 201913.2
Goryachkina,A2522Dzagnidze,N2510½–½2019A62FWCT 201913.3
Lagno,K2554Tan,Z2513½–½2019C67FWCT 201913.4
Muzychuk,A2539Kosteniuk,A2546½–½2019C47FWCT 201914.1
Muzychuk,M2563Goryachkina,A25221–02019B12FWCT 201914.2
Dzagnidze,N2510Lagno,K2554½–½2019A05FWCT 201914.3
Tan,Z2513Gunina,V25061–02019C54FWCT 201914.4

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.