Wijk aan Zee turns 80 — and other stats

by Johannes Fischer
1/12/2018 – Today, Friday, January 12, is the official start of the Tata Steel Chess tournament in Wijk aan Zee. Tomorrow, Saturday, January 13th at 13:30 CET, the first round begins. The tournament in Wijk aan Zee is the first elite tournament of the year and always a great celebration of chess. It is also a tournament with a long tradition – this year it celebrates its 80th birthday. The tournament has written chess history and continues to do so today, which makes it tempting to look at some numbers. | Photo: TataSteelChess.com

Master Class Vol.8: Magnus Carlsen Master Class Vol.8: Magnus Carlsen

Scarcely any world champion has managed to captivate chess lovers to the extent Carlsen has. The enormously talented Norwegian hasn't been systematically trained within the structures of a major chess-playing nation such as Russia, the Ukraine or China.

More...

From Hoogovens to Tata

The "Archive" on the tournament website offers some statistics about the tournament and its history. The first "Hoogovens Schaaktoernooi" was played in 1938 in Beverwijk, with four participants, and was won by Jiling Van Dijk and Philip Bakker who shared first with 2½ / 3.

From then on the tournament has been played every year, even during World War II. Over the years, almost the entire world elite has played in the tournament, but two players won more often than any of their rivals: Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand. They both have won five tournaments each and they are also both in line-up for 2018!

Magnus Carlsen at the Wijk tournament 2015 | Photo: Alina l'Ami

In 2007, Carlsen first played in Group A and finished at the bottom of the table — 13th place! But in the years to come he won five of the nine Wijk tournaments he played in, the first in his second attempt in 2008 when he shared first place with Levon Aronian. In the penultimate round Carlsen scored an important win against Vladimir Kramnik and afterwards Carlsen annotated this game. These comments can still be found in the ChessBase Mega Database.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Before this game I had lost to Vishy in a complicated struggle, so for this game I decided that I should just try and make a draw, (which is not an easy task anyway) and not lose 3 out of the last four games, winning against van Wely only by a miracle. 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 I must admit that I rather expected the Catalan here, but possibly because I had defended quite confidently against his Catalan in the Tal he decided to switch this time c5 4.g3 b6 5.Bg2 Bb7 6.0-0 Be7 7.d4 7.Re1 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5 hasn't given White much lately, neither after 9.d4 Nor 9.e4 Nb4! 9...cxd4 As for instance in Aronian-Jakovenko 9...Nxc3 10.bxc3 Be4 11.Ne5 Bxg2 12.Kxg2 0-0 13.e4 Was probably somewhat better for White in Carlsen-Aronian, Elista 2007. 7...cxd4 8.Qxd4 d6 9.Rd1 a6 10.Ng5 A fairly old line I think, which is not considered especially dangerous for Black if he's well prepared. Unfortunately I couldn't remember anything, and so I had to start thinking from this point. Bxg2 11.Kxg2 Nc6 I didn't find a comfortable way to put this guy on d7, so I came up with this move, which is part of a plan which turned out to have a reasonably good reputation. 12.Qf4 0-0 13.Nce4 Ne8 Retreating is considered to be the normal reaction to Ne4. The black position is now slightly awkward, but the white knights are not perfectly placed either. 14.b3 Ra7 15.Bb2 Rd7 This move is probably not really necessary, but I thought that there was no better square for the rook anyway, and overprotecting the d6-pawn might turn out to be useful at some point. I had already spent a lot of time here, 45 minutes, but he had also spent some time, almost 40 minutes, which left me feeling relieved that he was not still in his preparation. Still, things are not really easy for Black. His coordination is somewhat worse than it usually is in the hedgehog, and I found it hard to find constructive waiting moves. 16.Rac1 h4 or Nf3 could also be considered, but the text is quite reasonable as well. Nc7 I spent quite some time on this move, which has the purpose of protecting e6, preparing f5. There were of course alternatives, the most natural being the more hedgehog-like 16...Qa8 17.Nf3 b5 I rejected it because I wasn't sure whether bxc4 bxc4 would really improve my position. That is why I decided that going for f5 and g5 was just according to the demands of the position. 17.Nf3 f5 18.Nc3 g5 Not especially aggressive or anything, just a normal continuation of the plan starting with Nc7. 19.Qd2 19.Qe3 g4 20.Nd2 Not 20.Nd4 Bg5 21.Nxc6 Bxe3 22.Nxd8 Bxc1 winning an exchange. 20...Bg5 21.Qxb6 was another, computer-like option. I thought that I would have very good counterplay after Qa8 22.f3 and now just 22...Ne5 or even 22...Rb8 23.Qf2 Ne5 gives Black active piece play and good compensation for a pawn. 19...g4 20.Ne1 20.Nd4?! would be worse, since now Bg5 21.e3 Ne5 leaves the knight practically untouchable on e5. Note that it also makes it more difficult to create active play for White, since b4 and c5 would be almost impossible to carry out, as Rxd4 and a knight move to f3 would probably be strong then. 20...Bg5 An important element in my plan. The weak f3-square will now be a constant worry for White. 21.e3 Rff7 A good prophylactic move, preventing Na4 and c5 and preparing to redeploy the knight with Ne8-f6-e4 without having to worry about Nd5. 22.Kg1 Ne8 23.Ne2 A natural manoeuvre. The diagonal is opened for his bishop and the knight is transferred to a better square. Nf6 24.Nf4 Qe8 I would have liked to play Ne4 immediately, but I rejected it because of the queen sac: 24...Ne4 25.Nxe6? Qe8 26.Nxg5 Nxd2 27.Nxf7 I don't really understand why though, since, as any engine points out, Ne4 28.Nh6+ Kf8 with the point that 29.Nxf5 Qf7 wins for Black. 25.Qc3 25.Bxf6 was an option, but at the same time it's hard to see how White can play for an advantage after giving up this bishop. 25...Rg7 I really wanted to get that thing to e4. I felt that the position was about equal or maybe slightly better for White, but I was rather worried that I would blow it before the time-control, as I only had 17 minutes left here. At the same time I saw that Kramnik clearly was suffering from a cold and was feeling uncomfortable, which comforted me a little (thinking about my chances in this game that is!). 26.b4 Ne4 27.Qb3 Rge7 28.Qa4?! Rybka's suggestion of 28.f3 gxf3 29.Nxf3 Bf6 really doesn't impress me much, but 28.h4 as suggested by Nigel Short during my press-conference after the round was probably an improvement of the white position, and certainly better than the text. After only h4 I can only repeat my evaluation after my 25th move: equal or slightly better for White. The knight on e4 is certainly pretty, but the f4-knight is a good piece as well. It's not easy to take advantage of my weakened king, and not easy to make any clear progress for either side. 28...Ne5 29.Qxa6? 29.c5 is well met by Nc4! so White should rather admit failure with 29.Qb3 after gaining two tempi Black is obviously slightly better, but the white position is certainly playable. 29...Ra7 30.Qb5 Having seen that 30.Qxb6 Reb7 31.Qd4 Bf6 would leave his queen trapped in the centre, Kramnik was forced to make this move, which he actually accompanied with a draw offer. I was slightly tempted of course, since I would have been happy with a draw before the game, but I realised that my position was so much better that I simply had to decline. 30...Qxb5 31.cxb5 Rxa2 32.Rc8+ Kf7 33.Nfd3 Bf6 34.Nxe5+ 34.Bxe5 dxe5 35.Rc6 Ng5 is winning for Black. 34...dxe5 34...Bxe5 was probably better, but in time-trouble I was reluctant to allow 35.Bxe5 dxe5 36.Nd3 which however is well met by Kf6 37.Rf8+ Kg7 38.Rd8 38.Rb8 Rd7-+ 38...Nc3 39.Rf1 39.Nxe5 Nxd1 40.Rxd1 is better but should lose as well. 39...Rd2! and wins. 35.Rc2 35.Nd3 leaves Black with a pleasant choice between Nxf2 and 35...Ng5 so White should rather retreat. 35...Rea7 36.Kg2 36.Kf1 was better, the king later headed in this direction anyway. 36...Ng5 37.Rd6? This pseudo-active move makes matters much worse for White, but Black had a practically winning positional advantage anyway. e4 38.Bxf6 Kxf6 39.Kf1 39.Rxb6 Ra1 40.Re2 Nf3 loses at once. 39...Ra1 40.Ke2 40.Rcd2 Rb1 41.Rd1 Rxb4 42.Rxb6 Rb2 leaves White defenceless against the threats of Raa2 and Nh3. 40...Rb1 I made this move with only some 15 or so left on the clock, but I actually even spent some seconds on Rb1, so I wasn't really worried about losing on time. 41.Rd1 41.Rxb6 or loses a piece after Rd7 41...Raa1 42.Kd2 42.Ng2 Nf3-+ 42...Rxe1 41...Rxb4 42.Ng2 Rxb5 Black is obviously winning now, and White might as well have resigned here. I understand that Kramnik chose to play on for a while though, as he couldn't have been especially happy about the way things turned out. 43.Nf4 Rc5 44.Rb2 b5 45.Kf1 Rac7 46.Rbb1 46.Kg2 allows the exchange of one rook, which is desirable for Black. Rc1 47.Rxc1 Rxc1 48.Rxb5 Nf3 49.Ne2 Re1 50.Rb2 Kg5 and White is completely tied up, he cannot even play h4 due to gxh3 and Re2. Black will win by playing e5 and h7-h5-h4. 46...Rb7 47.Rb4 Rc4 48.Rb2 b4 49.Rdb1 Nf3 50.Kg2 Rd7! The last good move, forcing the exchange of one rook. The rest doesn't require any comments. 51.h3 e5 52.Ne2 Rd2 53.hxg4 fxg4 54.Rxd2 Nxd2 55.Rb2 Nf3 56.Kf1 b3 57.Kg2 Rc2 I was obviously elated to win with Black against (a slightly weakened I have to add) Kramnik, I almost couldn't believe it. After this I again shared the lead, and even though I couldn't make anything of my slight advantage in the last game and win the tournament outright, I'm obviously very happy with my shared victory with Aronian. 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Kramnik,V2799Carlsen,M27330–12008A30Corus12

Mega Database 2018

The "Mega" is the database every serious chessplayer needs. The database contains 7.1 million games from 1500 to 2017, in highest quality standard, full of top level analyses and completely classified.


Anand had a better start than Carlsen. He achieved the first of his five victories in 1989, in his rookie year in the Masters tournament in Wijk. He then played no less than 17 times, although in 1994 he didn't play in the tournament but rather a candidate match against Arthur Jussupow which Anand won 4½ : 2½.

Vishy Anand | Photo: Alina l'Ami

But when Anand plays his first move of the first round in 2018 it will be exactly 29 years to a day that he played his first move ever in Wijk. On January 13, 1989, Anand achieved a fine and energetic victory against English grandmaster Anthony Miles:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.c4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Nf3 Be6 7.c5 g6 8.Bb5 Bg7 9.Ne5 Bd7 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.0-0 0-0 12.Re1 Be8 13.h3 Kh8 14.Bf4 Ng8 15.b4 f6 16.Nf3 Qd7 17.a4 a6 18.Bh2 g5 19.Qe2 h5 20.Qe6 Qxe6 21.Rxe6 Bh6 22.Nd2 Bd7 23.Ree1 g4 24.Nb3 e6 25.hxg4 hxg4 26.Re2 Ne7 27.Bd6 Rfe8 28.Bxe7 Rxe7 29.b5 axb5 30.axb5 Rxa1+ 31.Nxa1 cxb5 32.Nxd5 Rf7 33.Nb6 e5 34.d5 Bf5 35.Ra2 Bf8 36.Nb3 Rb7 37.Ra6 Kg7 38.d6 Rf7 39.Na5 b4 40.Nbc4 Bd3 41.Rb6 Ra7 42.c6 Ra8 43.c7 Bf5 44.Rb8 Ra6 45.Ne3 Be6 46.Re8 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Anand,V2515Miles,A25201–01989B13Hoogovens1

All in all, Anand has played 208 games in Wijk and scored an impressive winning percentage of 62.26%. Carlsen played 130 games with a winning percentage of 61.54%. But in the overall ranking of the "highest win percentage" Anand is "only" on place 26. That is, of course, due to the fact that the winning percentage tends to fall the more games someone plays. In fact, the player with the highest percentage to win is Arnold Van den Hoek, who in 1943 won with 5½ / 7.

Percentage-wise he is thus ahead of Boris Spassky who won in 1967 with 11 / 15, and Lev Polugaevsky who in 1966 and again in 1979, scoring 19 points from 26 games in total. On place four of this ranking list follows Garry Kasparov with 28½ points from 39 games.

Compared to Carlsen and Anand, Kasparov has played relatively few games in Wijk but when he did play he was very efficient. He started in three tournaments and won them all: 1999, 2000 und 2001. And in his very first tournament, in 1999, Kasparov played one of the most brillant games in the history of chess, defeating Veselin Topalov in an amazing game.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4       My comments to this fantastic game will be limited to some moments of interest, which I haven't seen highlighted before in the earlier published sources (Internet, various magazines etc.) d6 Topalov is a Sicilian player, but against Kasparov he prefers to spring a slight surprise on his well prepared opponent as soon as possible. 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Pirc is a somewhat rare opening in Gary's practice and he often used to react with 3.f3!? e.g. e5 4.d5 c6 5.c4 Qb6 6.Nc3 Be7 7.Nge2 0-0 8.Ng3 cxd5 9.Na4! Qc7 10.cxd5 Bd7 11.Be3 Rc8 12.Nc3 Na6 13.Be2 Bd8 14.0-0 Qa5 15.Kh1 Nc5 16.Bd2 Ne8 17.f4 exf4 18.Bxf4 Bf6 19.Bg4 Qd8 20.Bxd7 Qxd7 21.Qf3 Rc7 22.Nf5 Bxc3 23.bxc3 Na4 24.Qg3 Nxc3 25.Rae1 f6 26.Bxd6 Nxd6 27.Nxd6 Kasparov,G-Wahls,M/GER-Kasparov/1992/ But the Bulgarian was probably well prepared for a fight in the Saemisch, after all he is King's Indian expert. 3...g6 4.Be3 Bg7?! A major exponent of the 4.Be3 line GM Vlastimil Jansa would be dissatisfied with this move, as later Black will have to lose a tempo capturing on h6. 4...Ng4?! 5.Bg5 is also not ideal, as it rather loses than gains time. 4...c6!? has the best reputation. 5.h3! Black's most reasonable alternative is Less dangerous is ≤5.Qd2 Nbd7 6.Bd3 b5 7.Nf3 e5!? 5...Nbd7 ≤5...b5?! 6.e5! dxe5 6...Nfd7 7.exd6 exd6 8.d5 b4 9.dxc6 bxc3 10.cxd7+ Nxd7 11.b3 Be7 12.Bh6 Bb7 13.Nf3 Qa5 14.Be2 g5 15.Bg7 Rg8 16.Bd4 h5 17.Qd3 g4 18.hxg4 hxg4 19.Bxc3 Qd5 20.Qxd5 Bxd5 21.Nd4 Rc8 22.Bb4 Bxg2 23.Rg1 Ba8 24.Rxg4 Rh8 25.0-0-0+- Sokolov,A-Zakharevich,I/ Elista/1995/ 7.dxe5 Qxd1+ 8.Rxd1 Nfd7 9.f4 Bg7 10.Nf3 f6 11.e6 Nf8 12.Nxb5 Nxe6 13.Nxa7 Bb7 14.Bc4 Nc7 15.Kf2 Nd5 16.Nxc6 Bxc6 17.Bxd5 Bxd5 18.Rxd5 Rxa2 19.Rb5 0-0 20.Rd1 Nc6 21.Nd4 Nxd4 22.Bxd4 Rc8 23.Rd2+- Jansa,V-Schlosser,M/Muenster/1992/ ≤5...Bg7?! 6.f4! [+]() 0-0 7.Nf3 Nbd7 8.e5 Nh5 9.Ne2 Bh8 10.g4 Ng7 11.Bg2 dxe5 12.fxe5 Nb6 13.Bh6 Be6 14.0-0 Qd7 15.Nf4 Bd5 16.Nxd5 Nxd5 17.Qe2 Rad8 18.Rae1 Nc7 19.c3 Nce6 20.Nd2 Qc7 21.Ne4 a5 22.Rf2 b5 23.Ref1 Qb6 24.Kh1 Jansa,V-Hoi,C/Gausdal/ 1991/ 6.f4 e5 7.Qf3!? Black's main problem is to break up effectively the strong pawn cahin e4,f5, so deserving attention is b5!? 7...Qa5 8.Bd3 Bg7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.f5 b5 10...gxf5?! 11.Qxf5! b5 12.Nge2 b4 13.Nb1 Nb6 14.Qf2 Na4 15.0-0 Be6 16.b3 Nb2 17.Ng3 Nxd3 18.cxd3 Qb5 19.Nd2 Rd8 20.Bg5 Movsesian, S-Ftacnik,L/Hamburg op/1997/ 11.Nge2 ≤11.g4?! b4 12.Nd1 gxf5! 13.gxf5 b3+ 14.Nc3 bxc2 15.Nge2 Rb8 16.Bc1 Rg8 17.Bxc2 Bf8 18.b3 Ba6 19.Bd2 Bb4 20.a3 Nh5 21.Qxh5 Bxe2 22.Nxe2 Bxd2+ Kharlov,A-Labok,V/Podolsk/ 1992/ 8.0-0-0 8.Bd3 Bb7 8...b4 9.Nce2 Qe7 10.dxe5 dxe5 11.f5 gxf5 12.Qxf5 12.exf5?! Bb7 13.g4 Nd5 14.Bf2 e4 15.Qg3 e3 16.Be1 Bg7 17.g5 Be5 18.Qg4 h5 19.Qg2 0-0-0 20.Nf3 Nf4 21.Nxf4 Bxf4 22.Be2 c5 23.h4 Ne5 24.Rxd8+ Rxd8 25.Kb1 Nxf3 0-1,Wagener,C-Andersen,J/Szeged/1994/ 12...Qe6!?∞ <=> 5.Qd2 c6 6.f3 More consistent and preferred by Jansa is 6.Bh6!? as White can sometimes effectively play f4 later on. Bxh6 7.Qxh6 Qa5 7...b5 8.e5! b4 9.exf6 bxc3 10.bxc3 exf6 11.Bd3 Qe7+ 12.Ne2 Qf8 13.Qd2 Qe7 14.0-0 0-0 15.Rfe1 f5 16.c4 Nd7 17.Rab1 Nb6 18.Qa5 Be6 19.Nf4 Qf6 20.c5 dxc5 21.Nxe6 fxe6 22.Qxc5± Jansa,V-Gazik,I/CSR-chT/1992/ 8.Bd3 c5!? 8...b5 9.Nf3 b4 10.Ne2 Ba6 11.0-0 Nbd7 12.Ng3 Bxd3 13.cxd3 Rg8 14.Qd2 Rb8 15.a3 Qb5 16.axb4 Qxb4 17.Qxb4 Rxb4 18.Rfc1 Nb8 19.Rxa7 Rxb2 20.e5! עe8,Van der Wiel,J-Azmaiparashvili,Z/Wijk aan Zee/1993/ Rather passive is 8...Nbd7 9.Nf3 e5 10.0-0 exd4 11.Nxd4 Qh5 12.Qd2 0-0 13.Be2 Qe5 14.f4 Qe7 15.Bf3 Nb6 16.Rae1 Rd8 17.b3 c5 18.Nde2 Bd7 19.Ng3 Bc6 20.a4± (),[+]Adams,M-Nogueiras,J/Buenos Aires/1991/ 9.Nge2 ≤9.Nf3 Bg4!∞ 9...cxd4 10.Nxd4 Nc6!? Unplayable is 10...Qb6? 11.0-0-0 Nc6 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.e5! dxe5 14.Ne4 Be6 15.Qg7 0-0-0 16.Nxf6 exf6 17.Qxf6 Rhe8 18.Rhe1 Bg4 19.f3 e4 20.Rxe4 Rxe4 21.Ba6+ Qxa6 22.Rxd8+ Kb7 23.Qxf7+ Kb6 24.fxe4 1-0,Jansa,V-Hoffmann,H/BL2-O 9697/ 1997/ 11.Nb3 Qb6 12.Nd5 12.0-0-0 Be6 13.f3 0-0-0 14.Rhe1 Kb8 15.Bf1 Rc8 16.Qe3 Qxe3+ 17.Rxe3 g5 18.g3 h5 19.f4 h4 20.Bb5 Ng4 21.Re2 hxg3 22.hxg3 Rh3 Kroeze,F-Beim,V/Leeuwarden/1994/ 12...Nxd5 13.exd5 Nb4!? 13...Ne5 14.0-0 Bd7 15.Be2 0-0-0 16.a4 Kb8 17.a5 Qc7 18.c4 Bg4 19.Bxg4 Nxg4 20.Qf4 Ne5 21.Ra4 g5 22.Qd4 h5 23.Rc1 h4 24.Qe3 h3 25.g3 e6 26.Nd4 Qc5 27.Rc3 Ng4 28.Qd2 e5 29.Nb3 Qc8 30.c5 Hamdouchi,H-Chabanon,J/ FRA-chT/1998/ 6...b5 7.Nge2 White has various possibilities here. Not too promising is the old line 7.0-0-0 Qa5 8.Kb1 Nbd7 9.Bh6 Bxh6 10.Qxh6 Nb6 11.Nh3 Bxh3! 12.Qxh3 Na4! Ultra-sharp is 7.g4 h5!? 7...Nbd7 8.g5 Nfd7 9.f4 Nb6∞ 7...Nbd7 8.Bh6 Bxh6 9.Qxh6 Bb7 Black should strive for immediate counterplay. 9...e5!? 10.a3 and forcing a central exchange costs Black precious time, e.g. Too soft is ≤10.dxe5?! dxe5 11.Nc1 Bb7 12.Nd3 Qe7 13.g3 0-0-0 14.b4 a5 15.a3 Kc7 16.Be2 axb4 17.axb4 Ra8= Kristensen,B-Hansen,C/Vejle/1994/ 10...Qa5 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Nc1 Bb7 13.b4! Qb6 14.Nb3 9...Qa5 10.Nc1 b4 10...Qb6 11.Nb3 a5 12.a4 b4 13.Nd1 Ba6 14.Ne3 Bxf1 15.Rxf1 Qa6 15...c5!? 16.Nc4 Qa6 17.Nbxa5 cxd4 18.Qd2 16.Kf2 Rc8 17.Kg1 c5 18.dxc5 Nxc5 19.Nd4 Qb6 20.Nc4 Qa6 21.b3 Ncd7 22.Nb5 Ne5 23.Ne3 Qb6 24.Kh1 Rc5 25.Rad1 Rg8 26.Rd2 g5 27.Nxd6+ Qxd6 28.Rxd6 Rg6 29.Rxf6 1-0,Moroz-Janda/ Decin/1998/ 11.Nb3 Qh5 12.Qxh5 Nxh5 13.Nd1 a5 14.a3 Bb7 15.axb4 axb4 16.Rxa8+ Bxa8 17.Nf2 0-0 18.Nd3 c5 19.dxc5 dxc5 20.Nbxc5 Nxc5 21.Nxc5 Rc8 22.Nd3 Rxc2 23.Kd1 b3 24.Be2 Bb7 25.Re1 f5 26.exf5 gxf5 27.Nb4! Rantanen,Y-Jamieson,R/Haifa olm/1976/ 10.a3! The right moment for prophylaxis ≤10.0-0-0?! Qa5 Gary tries to achieve a better version of 10.Nc1 e5 11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Nb3 a6 13.0-0-0 Qc7!? 14.Qg7 Rf8 14...Rg8? 15.Rxd7+- 15.g3 0-0-0 16.Bh3 Kb8 17.Bxd7 Nxd7 18.Qxh7 a5 19.Kb1 a4 20.Nc1 a3 21.b3 b4 22.N3e2 c5 23.Qh6 f5!? Moroz,A-Yurasov, A/Simferopol/1991/ 10...e5 10...a5 11.Nd1 b4 12.Ng3!? As Black's K will have to castle <<, he doesn't want to weaken his position here any further. 11.0-0-0 Qe7 Black wants to get his K to safety as soon as possible. But interesting was 11...a6!? 12.Kb1 12.f4 Ng4 13.Qg7 Qf6= nikam nevedie a po 12...Qc7 /\ (Covers a5.) 13.dxe5 dxe5 14.Qg7 Ke7!? 12.Kb1 a6 13.Nc1! 0-0-0 14.Nb3 exd4!? Topalov realizes the danger, connected with Na5 followed by a timely d5-> and decides to open up the position and fight. 14...c5?! 15.d5± 15.Rxd4 15.Nxd4 c5 16.Nb3 -15.Rd4 15...c5 16.Rd1 Nb6 /\d5 16...Ne5 17.Be2 d5? 18.f4 /\e5+/- 17.g3 Kb8 17...d5!? 18.Bh3+ 18.Qf4 d4 19.Bh3+ Nfd7∞ 18...Kb8 19.exd5 19.Qf4+ Ka7! /\ 20.Nxc5? Nh5 21.Qe3 d4! 19...Nbxd5 20.Nxd5 Nxd5 20...Rxd5 21.Qf4+!? Qe5 22.Qxe5+ Rxe5 23.Rd6 21.Na5 18.Na5?! Kasparov already envisages the rich combinational possibilities, but this very natural move is probably objectively not the best. 18.Bh3!? /\Rhe1 d5 19.exd5 -17...d5!? Deserving attention is also 18.Qf4 Ka7 18...Ka8 19.Na5 19.g4!? /\Bb5 and Black can't play 19.Bxb5 Nh5 20.Qh4!? Qxh4 21.gxh4 axb5 22.Nxb5+ Kb8 23.Nxd6 f5 24.Nxc5 Bd5!?∞ 19...d5? 20.Nxc5!± 18...Ba8 19.Bh3 d5 20.Qf4+ Ka7 21.Rhe1 d4 Ftacnik: 'Black has achieved impressive success, but his position is a bit dangerous. Kasparov unleashes phantastic combination.' Opening the position is suicide, after 21...dxe4 22.fxe4 /\Nd5 Nxe4 22...Rxd1+ 23.Rxd1 Nxe4 24.Rd7+!+- 23.Nxe4 Rxd1+ 24.Rxd1 Bxe4 25.Re1 Re8 26.Rxe4! Qxe4 27.Qc7+ Ka8 28.Nc6+- 22.Nd5 '!' Ftacnik. Nbxd5 22...Nfxd5? 23.exd5 Qd6 24.Qxf7++- 23.exd5 Qd6 24.Rxd4!       24.Qxd6? Rxd6 25.b4 cxb4 26.axb4 Nxd5 24.Nc6+ Bxc6 25.dxc6 Qxf4 26.Re7+ 26.gxf4 Nd5!? 26...Kb6 27.gxf4 Nd5 28.Rxf7 Rdf8 24...cxd4? Ftacnik: 'It should be noted, that 24...Kb6! would most certainly save the game for black, but we would be robbed of some fascinating lines. ' 24...Kb6!= 24...Bxd5!? 25.Rxd5! Nxd5 25...Qxf4 26.Rxd8 Qh6 26...Qc7 27.Rxh8 Qxa5 28.Re7++- 27.Re7+ Kb6 28.b4!+- 26.Qxf7+ Nc7 27.Re6 Rd7 27...Qd1+ 28.Ka2 Rd7 29.Re7± 28.Rxd6 Rxf7 29.Nc6+ Ka8 30.f4 25.Re7+‼ The real point of the combination. 25.Qxd4+? Qb6! 26.Re7+ Nd7 27.Rxd7+ 27.Qc3 Qg1+ 27...Rxd7 28.Qxh8 Rxd5-+ 25...Kb6 25...Qxe7? 26.Qxd4++- 25...Kb8 26.Qxd4 Nd7 27.Bxd7 Bxd5 28.c4!+- 26.Qxd4+ Kxa5 26...Qc5 27.Qxf6+ Qd6 28.Be6‼ Bxd5 29.b4+- 27.b4+ Ka4 28.Qc3!? This shows Kasparov's combination was more intuitive, than arithmetically exact. Ftacnik: 'It seems, that white could have won more easily with the help of a fine move 28.Ra7!!' A simpler and even more beautiful win was found by (I think) Kavalek: 28.Ra7! /\ Bb7 28...Nxd5 Ftacnik 29.Rxa6+‼ Qxa6 30.Qb2 Nc3+ 31.Qxc3 Bd5 32.Kb2 Qe6 33.Bxe6 fxe6 34.Qb3+! Bxb3 35.cxb3# 29.Rxb7 Qxd5 29...Nxd5 30.Bd7‼ Ra8 30...Rxd7 31.Qb2 Nc3+ 32.Qxc3 Qd1+ 33.Kb2 Rd3 34.Ra7!+- 31.Bxb5+ axb5 32.Ra7+ Qa6 33.Qxd5 Qxa7 34.Qb3# 30.Rb6!+- 30.Rb6 Ra8 30...a5 31.Ra6 Ra8 32.Qe3‼ Rxa6 32...Rhe8 33.Rxa8 Rxa8 34.Kb2+- 33.Kb2 axb4 34.axb4 Kxb4 35.Qc3+ Ka4 36.Qa3# 31.Qxf6 a5 32.Bf1+- 28...Qxd5 29.Ra7 Bb7 30.Rxb7 30.Qc7? Qd1+= 30...Qc4 30...Rhe8 31.Rb6 31.Ra7? Rd6 32.Kb2 Qe5-+ 31...Ra8 32.Bf1‼+- /\Rd6 31.Qxf6 Kxa3 Now White wins by force. 31...Rd1+ 32.Kb2 Ra8 32...Qd4+ 33.Qxd4 Rxd4 34.Rxf7 Rd6 35.Re7 /\Be6 33.Qb6 Qd4+ 33...a5 34.Bd7! Rd5 35.Qe3 axb4 36.Ra7++- 34.Qxd4 Rxd4 35.Rxf7 a5 36.Be6 axb4 37.Bb3+ Ka5 38.axb4+ Rxb4 38...Kb6 39.Rxh7 and with 3 pawns for the exchange White gradually wins. 39.c3± _|_R 32.Qxa6+ Kxb4 33.c3+! Kxc3 33...Kb3 34.Qa2+ Kxc3 35.Qb2+ Kd3 36.Re7!+- 34.Qa1+ Kd2 34...Kb4 35.Qb2+ Ka5 35...Qb3 36.Rxb5+ 36.Qa3+ Qa4 37.Ra7++- 35.Qb2+ Kd1 35...Ke3? 36.Re7+ 35...Ke1 36.Re7+ Kd1 37.Bf1!+- is the same as in the game. 36.Bf1! Rd2 37.Rd7! Ftacnik: 'The final trick, but white is completely right, the game is finally over.' Rxd7 38.Bxc4 bxc4 39.Qxh8 Rd3 39...Rb7+ 40.Ka2 Kc2 41.Qd4+- 40.Qa8 c3 41.Qa4+ Ke1 41...Kd2 42.Qc2+ 42.f4 f5 43.Kc1 Rd2 44.Qa7 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Kasparov,G2812Topalov,V27001–01999B07Hoogovens4

Master Class Vol.7: Garry Kasparov

On this DVD a team of experts gets to the bottom of Kasparov's play. In over 8 hours of video running time the authors Rogozenko, Marin, Reeh and Müller cast light on four important aspects of Kasparov's play: opening, strategy, tactics and endgame.


However, the highest winning percentage of the players who played more than a hundred games in Wijk, was scored by Lajos Portisch. The Hungarian won the tournament no less than four times (1965, 1972, 1975 and 1978), scoring 84 points from 127 — that's a winning percentage of 66.67%!

Two Dutch players played the most games in total in the history of the tournament: Jan Hein Donner and Loek Van Wely. Donner played in 24 tournaments, won two of them, and played no less than 298 games in these tournaments. Van Wely played in 25 tournaments — in one more than Donner — but still played the same number of games as his Dutch compatriot. But unlike Donner, Van Wely never won in Wijk aan Zee. His best achievement was a fourth place in 2003.

These records of Donner and Van Wely will still be intact after the 2018 tournament. But Anand and Carlsen both have the chance to win their sixth tournament in Wijk aan Zee. The days to come will show whether they will write chess history again.


Complete Masters and Challengers groups

Name FED Elo World rank
Magnus Carlsen  Norway 2834 1
Fabiano Caruana USA 2811 2
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov Azerbaijan 2804 3
Wesley So USA 2792 6
Vladimir Kramnik Russia 2787 7
Peter Svidler Russia 2768 10
Viswanathan Anand India 2767 11
Sergey Karjakin Russia 2753 14
Anish Giri Netherlands 2752 15
Wei Yi China 2743 22
Maxim Matlakov Russia 2718 32
Hou Yifan China 2680 64
Adhiban Baskaran India 2655 96
Gawain Jones England 2640 127
Name FED Elo Born
Vidit Gujrathi     India 2718 1994
Bassem Amin Egypt 2693 1988
Michal Krasenkow Poland 2671 1963
Anton Korobov Ukraine 2652 1985
Matthias Blübaum Germany 2640 1997
Erwin l´Ami Netherlands 2634 1985
Jeffery Xiong USA 2634 2000
Jorden van Foreest Netherlands 2629 1999
Dmitry Gordievsky Russia 2622 1996
Benjamin Bok Netherlands 2607 1995
Aryan Tari Norway 2599 1999
Harika Dronavalli India 2497 1991
Olga Girya Russia 2489 1991
Lucas van Foreest Netherlands 2481 2001

Ratings as of January 1, 2018 | Source: FIDE

Daily live round-up shows

We'll be re-capping each day's action with a live webcast at 21:00 CET (3pm EST) from a variety of familiar ChessBase contributors:

13. Jan Round 1 Yannick Pelletier
14. Jan Round 2 Daniel King
15. Jan Round 3 Simon Williams
16. Jan Round 4 Daniel King
17. Jan Round 5 Simon Williams
18. Jan Rest day  
19. Jan Round 6 Simon Williams
20. Jan Round 7 Daniel King
21. Jan Round 8 Yannick Pelletier
22. Jan Rest day 2  
23. Jan Round 9 Lawrence Trent
24. Jan Round 10 Yannick Pelletier
25. Jan Rest day 3  
26. Jan Round 11 Daniel King
27. Jan Round 12 Lawrence Trent
28. Jan Round 13 Daniel King
ChessBase authors

GM Daniel King has already recorded a preview of the tournament for ChessBase Videos:

You'll find all round-up shows in a special section

Tata Steel Chess en Wijk aan Zee 2018

All the broadcasts on Playchess.com at a glance (guide)

Links

 


Johannes Fischer was born in 1963 in Hamburg and studied English and German literature in Frankfurt. He now lives as a writer and translator in Nürnberg. He is a FIDE-Master and regularly writes for KARL, a German chess magazine focusing on the links between culture and chess. On his own blog he regularly publishes notes on "Film, Literature and Chess".

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.