Chess Cash Kings 2012
By Peter Zhdanov
Annual money rankings are available for many reputable sports. For example,
lists by Forbes (highest-earning
tennis players; highest-paid
NHL players, best-earning
men in biathlon, etc.), or even an all-time
poker money list. Here are some numbers to give you an idea:
Sport |
Top player |
10th player |
Tennis |
$ 54,300,000 |
$ 8,800,000 |
Poker |
$ 23,800,000 |
$ 11,786,129 |
NHL |
$ 12,700,000 |
$ 7,740,000 |
Biathlon |
€ 188,425 |
€ 44,275 |
Unfortunately, such money rankings are not easily possible in chess, where
financial data is scarce, and secretly handing out fees in envelopes is a widespread
practice. This paper is a first attempt at creating a list featuring chess players
who have made more prize money than anyone else in year 2012.
Introduction
A stereotypical chess player is a noble intellectual who is not interested
in money. A common belief is that playing chess is not a profession; hence even
grandmasters are expected to have “real jobs”. Is it true or not? Today we are
publishing our own Chess Cash Kings 2012 rating – a list of chess players with
the highest prize money winnings in 2012.
Notably, there is a serious gap between the two players who played the World
Chess Championship match (Viswanathan Anand and Boris Gelfand) and everyone
else. Non chess-related activities were not accounted for, so you won’t see
Garry Kasparov or Anatoly Karpov on the list. It features only active top players
whose primary income sources are chess-related.
The list has been compiled using public information sources, namely, the official
websites of the tournaments and official regulations of the events. The figures
do not include endorsement deals and non-tournament chess earnings
(books, simultaneous exhibitions, coaching, scholarships, unofficial games,
etc.). Hence, the real earnings of the players are considerably higher. Another
confusing factor is taxes: some of the tournament organizers list the amounts
after tax deduction, while others provide pre-tax figures. Additionally, a lot
depends on the tax policies of different countries.
Most top tournaments conceal the amount of the prize money and the appearance
fees. They prefer to negotiate the conditions personally with each player without
informing the public about the details, thus saving money and avoiding paying
taxes. While common sense tells us that the chess community should be evolving
towards financial transparency and legal payments, it is clear that the organizers
and many of the players themselves will be reluctant to cooperate.
Of course, there are exceptions, but the average figure of the first prize
at a super tournament is $50,000-$100,000. The appearance fees for players rated
2700+ are usually in the $10,000-$20,000 range. The very top stars can negotiate
even better rates.
To make the list more representative, we tried to list the most important details
even when the data is missing. Please don’t judge this article too strictly:
as far as we know, it is the first attempt of this kind in the chess world.
Chess Cash Kings 2012 List
The Chess Cash Kings 2012 list sorted by estimates of prize money. It will
be updated and corrected as more information becomes available and is to be
found on the Natalia
Pogonina web site here.
#1 Viswanathan Anand, India, 43
FIDE rating in January 2012: 2799 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2772 (-27
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $2,000,000
- Bundesliga: unknown
- World Chess Championship Match, winner: $1,530,000
- Award from Tamil Nadu government for winning the WCC: $400,000
- Bilbao Chess Masters Final, 5: unknown. In 2008 the prizes were the following:
€150,000 for the first place, €70,000 for the second one, €60,000 for third,
€50,000 for fourth, €40,000 for fifth and €30,000 for sixth. Prizes were reduced
considerably in 2012 though.
- London Chess Classic, 5th: $14,500 (information about best games prizes
wasn't available)
- Endorsements: NIIT, TVH, AMD (earnings unknown)
#2 Boris Gelfand, Israel, 44

FIDE rating in January 2012: 2739 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2740 (+1
point)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $1,100,000
- World Chess Championship Match, runner-up: $1,020,000
- Tata Steel Chess, 10-12 out of 14: the main cash comes from appearance fees
(unknown), while the official prizes were relatively modest (€ 10,000 for
first place)
- World Rapid Chess Championship, 6: $14,000
- World Blitz Chess Championship, 10: $4,000
- World Chess Olympiad: unknown
- FIDE Grand Prix, London, 1st-3rd: $29,700
- European Club Cup: unknown
- FIDE Grand Prix, Tashkent, 10th: $11,900
#3 Magnus Carlsen, Norway, 22

FIDE rating in January 2012: 2835 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2861 (+26
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $480,000
- Tata Steel Chess Tournament, 2nd-4th: unknown
- Tal Memorial, 2nd in blitz, 1st in classical chess: $43,600 + appearance
fee
- World Rapid Chess Championship, 2: $33,000
- World Blitz Chess Championship, 2nd: $33,000
- Biel: appearance fee (unknown)
- Bilbao Chess Masters Final, 1st: unknown
- London Chess Classic, 1st: $72,600 (information about best games prizes
wasn't available)
- Gran Fiesta UNAM, 1st: unknown
- Endorsements: Arctic Securities, SIMONSEN Advokatfirma, VG, G-star (past)
In 2010 Magnus
Carlsen made over $1,500,000 and about $650,000 in 2009. Both figures refer
to aggregate income, not only prize money.
#4 Levon Aronian, Armenia, 30

FIDE rating in January 2012: 2805 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2802 (-3
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $330,000
- Tata Steel Chess Tournament, 1st: $13,200 + unknown appearance fee
- Kramnik-Aronian match, tie: unknown
- Tal Memorial, 5th in blitz, 7th in classical chess: $9,200 + appearance
fee
- World Chess Olympiad, team gold, individual gold: $50,000
- Bilbao Chess Masters Final, 3rd: unknown
- London Chess Classic, 6th: $14,500 (information about best games prizes
wasn't available)
- World Mind Sports Games, 4th in blitz, 1st in blindfold: $18,000
#5 Sergey Karjakin, Russia, 22
FIDE rating in January 2012: 2769 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2780 (+11
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $300,000
- Tata Steel Chess Tournament, 8th: unknown
- Russian Team Chess Championship: appearance fee (unknown)
- Dortmund, 2nd: prize unknown
- Region Blitz: $9,200
- World Rapid Chess Championship, 1st: $40,000
- World Blitz Chess Championship, 3rd: $27,500
- Russian Superfinal, 2nd: $25,000
- World Chess Olympiad, team silver, individual bronze: $25,000
- Bilbao Chess Masters Final, 4th: unknown
- FIDE Grand Prix, Tashkent, 1st-3rd: $29,700
- World Mind Sports Games, 1st in blitz: $10,000
- Piterenka rapid & blitz, 1st: 10 hundred square meters of land in Piterenka
village
- Endorsements: Alpari
#6 Fabiano Caruana, Italy, 20
FIDE rating in January 2012: 2736 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2781 (+45
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $290,000
- Tata Steel Chess Tournament, 2nd-4th: unknown
- 44 CIS Serie Master: unknown
- Sigeman, 1st: unknown
- Tal Memorial, 10th in blitz, 2nd in classical chess: $26,800 + appearance
fee
- Greek Team Cup, Greek Team Championship: unknown
- Dortmund, 1st: unknown
- Region Blitz: $1,100
- World Chess Olympiad: unknown
- Bilbao Chess Masters Final, 2nd: unknown
- King’s Tournament, 3rd: unknown
- FIDE Grand Prix, Tashkent, 4th-6th: $19,800
#7 Hikaru Nakamura, USA, 25
FIDE rating in January 2012: 2759 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2769 (+10
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $275,000
- Reggio Emilia, 4th: unknown
- Tata Steel Chess Tournament, 6: unknown
- Pacific Open, 1st: $3,000
- 44 CIS Serie Master: unknown
- US Chess Championship, 1st: $40,000
- Tal Memorial, 6th in blitz, 8th in classical chess: $5,000 + appearance
fee
- Biel: appearance fee, unknown
- World Chess Olympiad: unknown
- FIDE Grand Prix, London, 12th: $9,200
- European Club Cup: unknown
- Unive Hoogeven, 1st: unknown
- London Chess Classic, 3rd: $27,500 (information about best games prizes
wasn't available)
- World Mind Games, 2nd in rapid, 2nd in blitz, 2nd in blindfold: $30,000
#8 Vladimir Kramnik, Russia, 37

FIDE rating in January 2012: 2801 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2810 (+9
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $210,000
- Tal Memorial, 4th in blitz, 4th in classical chess: $13,700 + appearance
fee
- Kramnik-Aronian match, tie: unknown
- Dortmund, 4th: prize unknown
- World Chess Olympiad, team silver: $25,000
- London Chess Classic, 2nd: $39,000 (information about best games prizes
wasn't available)
- Endorsements: DGT, Blancpain (past?), also seen wearing a badge of some
sort (?)
#9 Alexander Grischuk, Russia, 29

FIDE rating in January 2012: 2761 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2764 (+3
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $185,000
- Tal Memorial, 4th in blitz, 7th in classical chess: $7,300 + appearance
fee
- World Rapid Chess Championship, 5th: $18,000
- World Blitz Chess Championship, 1st: $40,000
- Region Blitz: $5,300
- Russian Superfinal, 7th: $5,000
- Internet Grand Prix, semi-finalist: $3,300
- World Chess Olympiad, team silver: $25,000
- FIDE Grand Prix, London, 4th: $23,100
- European Club Cup: unknown
- World Mind Sports Games, 3rd in rapid, 7th in blitz: $14,000
- Moscow handicap blitz, 1st: unknown
#10 Dmitry Andreikin, Russia, 22
FIDE rating in January 2012: 2688 FIDE rating in January 2013: 2727 (+39
points)
Prize money in 2013 (estimate): $150,000
- Moscow Open, 15th-31st: a few hundred $
- Aeroflot Open, 4th-8th: $3,500
- European Chess Championship, 4th: $9,200
- Russian Team Chess Championship: appearance fee (unknown)
- Team Championship of Macedonia: appearance fee (unknown)
- Donskoi Rapid, 1: $2,000
- Region Blitz: $1,100
- World Blitz Chess Championship, 5th: $18,000
- Kazakhstan-Open: $3,500
- Russian Top League, 1st: $16,500
- Russian Superfinal, 1st: $33,000
- Internet Grand Prix, 1st: $6,600
- European Club Cup: unknown
- Nepomniatchi-Andreikin match, winner: unknown
- MGSU Cup, 1st: $3,300
- Sberbank Cup, 7th-9th: about $900
- Russian Rapid Chess Final, 5th-8th: $2,300
Methodology
Information about the prizes was obtained from open sources. All the money
fees were converted to US dollars using the appropriate exchange rates. In the
cases where the information was lacking, estimates were made by contacting a
few 2700+ players and interviewing them. While the abovementioned list is supposed
to convey a reasonably accurate picture of the earnings of the top players,
it is by no means a precise financial report. We would appreciate feedback from
players and their managers in order to improve the article.
Peter Zhdanov is an IT project manager, expert and author of two books on
parliamentary debate, BSc in Applied Mathematics and Computer Science and a
PhD student in Sociology. In chess he is a Russian candidate master, author,
manager of grandmaster Natalia Pogonina and editor of Pogonina.com.
Copyright
Zhdanov/ChessBase
Previous articles
 |
Geoffrey Borg replies to Zhdanov on the FIDE Women Grand
Prix
28.09.2012 – The call by Peter Zhdanov for
a "fair
player selection process" in the Grand Prix did not meet with universal
aclaim. In fact most readers disagreed with the notion that the cycle
could or needed to be run on purely strength-based criteria. "While we
thank Mr Zhdanov for his article," writes FIDE CEO Geoffrey Borg, "some
deeper research and objectivity would have been appreciated." Resounding
reply
|
 |
FIDE Grand Prix: A call for a fair player selection
process
27.09.2012 – How are the participants of the
FIDE Grand Prix chosen? Why are some top players not invited, while some
of their less distinguished colleagues are taking part? Is there anything
we can do about it? Peter Zhdanov reflects on the topic and pays special
attention to women’s chess, which is relatively neglected compared to
that of their male counterparts. What
do you think?
|
 |
Theory of success in life applied to chess
27.08.2012 – What are the factors that define
success? How does one become successful in life in general and in chess
in particular? Peter Zhdanov explains KPIs (key performance indicators)
used to measure success and seeks to apply them to the game we all love.
By objectively evaluating all the components described in his article,
you can create your own plan of becoming
a successful person.
|
 |
Is chess not for everybody? – Feedback from our readers
05.07.2012 – Boris Gelfand said he thought
that chess was not for everyone, Peter Zhdanov wrote a piece saying it
was. Chess must be presented to the general public for what it is: a sport,
an art and science. Many readers agree: "Let us make a Smörgåsbord and
have everyone decide what is tasty for them," writes one, and another
says we should emulate the
mentalist Derren Brown.
|
 |
Is chess not for everybody?
04.07.2012 – Recently Boris Gelfand said
he thought that chess was not for everyone. "Chess is for people who
want to make an intellectual effort, who have respect for the game,
and we shouldn't make the game more simple so that more people would
enjoy it,” said the world championship challenger. Do you think this
is true? Peter Zhdanov, IT project manager and debate expert, begs
to differ. |
 |
Do Women Have a Chance against Men in Chess?
08.03.2012 – As we know all too well: most
of the strongest players in the world are male. In the past we have speculated
on the reasons for this gender discrepancy, with vigorous
reader participation. On International Women's Day Peter Zhdanov,
who is married to a very strong female player, provides us with some valuable
statistics, comparing men and women on a country-by-country basis. Eye-opening.
|
 |
Do men and women have different brains?
30.06.2009 – In a recent thought-provoking
article WGM Natalia Pogonina and Peter Zhdanov presented their views
on the topic of why women are worse at chess than men. A number of our
readers were unconviced: they think that efforts at "explaining" differences
between the sexes only from environmental factors are doomed at the outset.
Recent studies seem to support this. Feedback
and articles. |
 |
Women and men in chess – smashing the stereotypes
20.06.2009 – On June 5, 2009
WGM Natalia Pogonina and Peter Zhdanov got
married – she a Women's Grandmaster, he a successful IT-specialist
and debate expert. Peter is also Natalia’s manager, together they are
writing a book called "Chess Kamasutra". Today they share with us their
views on the perennial topic why women are worse at chess than men, and
take a look at the future
of women’s chess. |