Vlastimil Hort: More about the man who was Doctor Zhivago

by Vlastimil Hort
2/17/2018 – Fedor Bohatirschuk was a strong Ukrainian chess player and a doctor by profession. He inspired Boris Pasternak to parts of his character of Doctor Zhivago. In 1944 Bohatirschuk played a handicap simul in Prague against eight Czech players. Vlastimil Hort shares memories of the eight players and translates a passage of Bohatirschuk's autobiography in which the chess master meets Nikolai Krylenko, prosecutor for Stalin and promoter of Soviet chess.

The "Mega" is the database every serious chessplayer needs. The database contains 7.1 million games from 1500 to 2017, in highest quality standard, full of top level analyses and completely classified.

Players from Prague

Recently André Schulz published an article about Fedor Bohartichuk which I read repeatedly and with great interest. Many years ago I had conversation about Fedor Bohatirchuk with former World Champion Boris Spassky, who had met Bohartirchuk in Canada. I collect (in modest fashion) old and antiquarian chess books, and I have always considered Bohartirchuk's book My way to Vlassov and to the Prague Manifesto as eminently readable. It is a book without chess diagrams, perhaps because Bohartirchuk was more of a doctor of radiology and less a chess professional.

As an amateur he played in the Canadian Championships several times and it is a pity that no one has ever measured his IQ. But he was certainly clever enough not to return to the Soviet Union with General Vlassov after World War II. He found a new home in Canada. According to my information his daughter wanted to marry a Canadian officer which also helped him on his life's journey.

Clock handicap simul

While preparing the "Prague Manifesto" Bohartirschuk showed his great strength by winning a clock handicap simul against eight players from Prague with 7½ : ½. I decided to take a closer look at the eight players. Did I know them all? What happened to them (chesswise)?

1. Ferdinand Krtichka, 1892-1951 (Master Class)

Several times participant of the Czechoslovakian Championships. He was an active member of my first chess club, Slovan Kladno, which I joined as a five-year old boy. I, and all the seniors from Kladno and environs, were present when he was laid to rest. All the men shook hands with a lady in black and I, too, gave her my little hand. Our "Ferda" still lives in the memory of the chess circles of Kladno.

2. Vasil Bacinsky (A Master from Prague)

"Je suis docteur en droit", an elderly elegant man addressed me during a tournament in San Bernadino (Switzerland). Then he tried it in Czech. He probably also made it. Not to Canada but to Switzerland. But how and in which year?

At the Swiss Team Championship I met a much younger Bacinsky. His son? No, his grandson, I am almost certain. As far as I know his descendant is also a passionate chess player. If he happens to come across this article more information about Vasil Bacinsky would be very helpful and welcome.

3. J. Runza, 1900-?  (Master Class)

For me, a mysterious figure. During my active time J. Runza no longer existed. I did research but in the Czechoslovakian Little Encyclopedia (the edition from 1989) his name cannot be found. But browsing through copies from 1946 to 1947 of the Czechoslovasky Sach chess magazine I was successful. J. Runza was a strong master from Prague who took part in the Czech Championship in Ostrava 1946. But all in all he had only moderate success in chess.

4. Karel Prucha, 1901-1980 (Master Class)

An enthusiastic organiser and chess promoter. He was a known expert for the Sicilian Dragon and I even had the chance to attack him with my pawns in one tournament game. Maybe he loved the Dragon fianchetto with g7-g6 so much because he liked to fly dragon kites at the banks of the Moldova in Prague when he was a little boy. He published chess leaflets and  supported junior chess for many years. From 1945 to 1953 he was captain of the national team and for his whole life he was a faithful member and also captain of Dynamo Praha, one of the best Czechoslovakian teams ever.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Bc4 Bg7 7.f3 0-0 8.Be3 Nc6 9.Qd2 Qc7!? 9...Qa5 9...Bd7 10.0-0-0 Rc8 10.Bb3 a6 White does not castle queenside but leaves his king in the center. Other moves that were tried here are 10...Bd7 and 10...Ne5 11.g4 11.0-0-0 Na5 12.h4 Nxb3+ 13.axb3 h5!? 11...Nxd4 The alternatives are 11...Ne5 or 11...Na5 12.Bxd4 Be6 13.h4 13.Bxe6?! fxe6= 13...Rad8 Black wants to open the position in the center to harass White's king. 13...h5!? 14.0-0-0± 14.h5!?± 14.0-0-0!?± 14...Bxb3 15.axb3 d5 15...e5!? 16.Be3 d5 17.exd5 e4 18.fxe4 Qg3+ 19.Qf2 Qxf2+ 19...Qxg4 is too dangerous. 20.Rh4 Qc8 21.h6 Bh8 22.Bd4+- 20.Bxf2± 16.e5 Nd7 17.f4 Nc5 18.Qe3 Rc8 18...Ne6!? was also worth considering. After 19.Bb6 19.0-0-0!? 19...Qc6 20.Bxd8 Rxd8 21.Qf3 g5 Black has some compensation for the exchange. 19.Nxd5 Simpler was 19.hxg6!? fxg6 20.Qh3 h6 21.g5 h5 22.Nxd5+- 19.f5!?+- 19...Qd7 20.c4 Nxb3 21.Qxb3 e6 22.Ne7+ Qxe7 23.h6 Rfd8 After 23...Bh8 24.g5 the bishop will be shut out for the rest of the game. 24.Bb6 Bf8 25.Bxd8 Qxd8 26.Rd1 White won an exchange but still has to parry a few dangerous attacks against his king. Qa5+ 27.Ke2 g5!? 28.Kf3 28.fxg5? Qxe5+= 28...gxf4 29.Kxf4 Qc5?! 29...Rc5!? 30.Rh5 Qc7 31.Rd4 Rxe5 32.Rxe5 f6 33.Kf3± 30.Rd2 30.Qe3!+- After Qxc4+ 31.Kg3 Rc5 White has the nice 32.Qg5+ Kh8 33.Qg7+ Bxg7 34.Rd8+ Bf8 35.Rxf8# 30...f6 31.Qe3 Qxc4+ 32.Qe4 32.Kg3! Qc7 33.Rf1+- 32...fxe5+ 33.Kf3 Qb3+ 34.Qe3 e4+ 35.Kxe4! Aber nicht 35.Kf4 e5+ 36.Kxe4 Rc4+ 37.Kf3 Rf4+ 38.Ke2 Qa4 and Black holds the draw: 39.Qd3 Rd4 40.Qc2 Re4+ 41.Kd1 Qa1+ 42.Qc1 Qa4+ 43.Qc2 35...Rc4+ 36.Kf3 Now White's king is safe and Black has nothing better than to exchange queens. Qxe3+ 37.Kxe3 Rxg4 38.Rd8 Rg3+ 39.Ke4 Rg4+ 40.Ke5 Rg5+ 41.Kxe6 Rg6+ 42.Kd7 Rd6+ 43.Kc7 Rf6 44.Kxb7 Kf7 45.Ra8 Bxh6 46.Rxa6 Rxa6 47.Kxa6 Kg6 48.Rxh6+! A nice last move by the 16-year old Vlastimil Hort. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Hort,V-Prucha,K-1–01960B77CSR-ch296

Volume one of the DVD deals with 9.Bc4, White's sharpest option, and shows how Black can counter this ambitious try by White with the main lines of the Soltis variation (12.h5), which was played by Magnus Carlsen regularly as well.


5. Dr. Milan  Bartosek , 1913-? (Master Class)

A professor of mathematics by profession. A member of Slavie Vysoke Skoly (the University Team). For him chess was a full-time hobby and his motto might have been olympic: "Participating is more important than winning!" I do remember his small glasses and his thick hair well. I was also trembling when the team result depended on his game.

6. Jiri Podgorny, 1912-1987 (Master Class)

He definitely liked to play correspondence chess where he managed to become an International Master. But he was also a remarkably strong tournament player. His small pocket chess set was always in reach. He wrote good articles for Czechoslovensky Sach and for Fernschach. His books Prag-Moskau 1946 (1947), Jan Foltys (1956), Könige der Schachwelt (1974) are of good quality. At the Chess Olympiad Skopje 1972 he was captain of the women's team and we shared a room. When I hear his name I always remember his black briefcase, his black umbrella, and his pocket chess set.

7. Cenek Kottnauer, 1913-1996 (International Master)

"Kentauer" (his nickname in Prague) — self-taught, winner of Zlin (Bata tournament) 1943, where the cream of Czechoslovakian chess was present. He had a very good understanding of the Sicilian with Black. In the match Prague vs Moscow 1946 he won against Smyslov, Kotov and Simagin and was the best Czech player. At the Chess Olympiad Helsinki 1952 he scored 12½ / 15 on board four; he won gold for the best individual result on board four. In 1953 he chose England as his new home and was the first in the wave of Czech emigrants. In London he was to teach many talented players (among them Nigel Short, Julian Hodgson, Stuart Conquest). The first time we talked was in Hastings 1966/7. (see Hort stories, part 3). Later we also met at Freddy Kornassel's in the chess club Tal Lichtenberg, where he played on first board. Here's a fine Sicilian by him:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e6 6.Be2 Be7 7.0-0 0-0 8.f4 Nc6 9.Kh1 a6 A normal Scheveningen with a position that today might appear on the board. 10.Nxc6?! Opocensky was an artist. But I cannot imagine that the Soviet GM Efim Geller, who was a great theoretician and a great expert of this line, would praise Opocensky's strategic understanding. bxc6 11.e5 Ne8!? The alternative was 11...dxe5 12.fxe5 Nd7 but "Kentauer" trusted his "Sicilian instincts". 12.Be3 ??! 12.Bd3! Qc7 13.Qe2∞ 12...Qc7! Now White can no longer keep e5. 13.exd6 Nxd6 14.Bd3 c5! 15.Ne4 Nf5 16.Bd2 c4 17.Be2 Bb7 18.Bf3 Rad8 18...Nh4 was a strong alternative. 19.Qe1 Rd7 20.Bc3 A pawn sacrifice. Opocensky hopes that the bishops will give him compensation.
20...Qxf4 21.Nf6+ gxf6! 22.Bxb7 Qh6 23.Rxf5 The long diagonal h1-a8 is irrelevant. After 23.Bc6 Black has Bd6!-+ 23...Bd6! An important "zwischenzug". 24.g3 exf5 25.Rd1 Re7-+ The e-file will quickly decide the game. 26.Qf2 Be5 27.Bxa6 Qh5 28.g4 "Opo's" exchange sacrifice brought him absolutely nothing. fxg4 29.Bxc4 Bxc3 30.bxc3 Rfe8 31.Rg1 f5 32.Qf4 Re4 33.Qc7 Re1 34.Bf1 Qg5
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Opocensky,K-Kottnauer,C-0–11942B84Prague Duras 60years Memorial1

8. Ludek Pachmann, 1924-2003 (International Grandmaster)

The youngest participant in the handicap simul. A politician? A chess player? Both! Strangely enough there a number of books by Ludek Pachmann — but, as far as I know, none about him. I promise to publish an article about my countryman this year. My dedication and my intention are firm...

Back then Ludek Pachmann annotated all games of this clock simul — in Czech. My friends Jan Michalek and Radek Turnier found these annotations and translated them into German — here they are.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 Die Sizilianische Verteidigung eignet sich am besten für den perfekten defensiven Stil des weltberühmten Großmeister Bohatirchuk. Die elastischen Position der Bauern und offene Linie, gibt den Schwarzen einen Vorteil für den Positionskampf und zwingt deshalb den Weißen gewaltsam versuchen diese Aufbau zu brechen. Dass jeder Angriff zu seiner eigenen Schwächung führt, die den Ausblick in das Endpiel noch schlimmer macht, ist offensichtlich. In den meisten Fällen der Sizilianischen Verteidigung geht es um, ob der Weiße durch den Angriff gewinnt oder im stellungskampf auf dem Damenflügel verliert. 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 Genauer ist wahrscheinlich 3...Nf6 weil nach 4.dxc5 Nxe4 5.cxd6 hatder Schwarze gleich zwei Wege, wie gutes Spiel zu ereichen: Qb6 5...Nxd6 6.Bf4 Nc6 7.Nc3 e6 8.Qd2 f6! 9.0-0-0 e5 und wenn 10.Nb5 dann Bg4! mit einem guten Spiel 6.Qd4 Qxd4 7.Nxd4 Nxd6 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 hier kann Weiß auch 5.f3 spielen. Dieses System führt aber zu einem schwierigen Positionskampf und ich wollte es einfach vermeiden. 5...a6 hiermit will der Schwarze den Keres-Angriff vermeiden 6.Bg5 durch diesen Zug lässt Weiß alle Theorie beiseite und möchte etwas eigenes spielen. Mit dem berühmten Richter-Angriff hat sein System nur den ersten Zug gemeinsam. Auf 6.Be2 würde Schwarz e6 spielen. sogar das Opocenski-System (gepielt gegen Lokvenc in Prag 1943) 6...b5 7.Bf3 e5! ist ebenfalls gut. 6...e6 7.Qf3 Sieht merkwürdig aus, blockt den f-Bauern. Der Zweck ist zweifach: es verhindert b5 und bereitet vor 0-0-0. Be7 8.0-0-0 Nbd7? der erste Fehler. Gegen Bedrohung e5 sollte Schwarz Dc7 spielen und beibehalten die Möglichkeit auch Sc6 spielen. 9.Be2 Qc7 droht b5. 10.Qg3! 0-0 weil nach 10...b5 11.Bxb5 axb5 12.Ndxb5 hat Weiß durch Sxd6 das besseres Spiel. 11.h4 Kh8 11...Kh8 ist notwendig weil nach 12.h5 ist möglich h6 12.f4 Nc5 hier habe ich mit absoluter sicherheit 12...b5 erwartet. Der Bohatichirchuk-Plan entspricht aber perfekt seinem abwartenden Stil. 13.Bf3 Bd7 14.e5 die erste Überquerung der Demarkationslinie und die beste Forsetzung dxe5 15.fxe5 Ng8 gleich nach dem Spiel habe ich zum Gegner gezeigt: 15...Bc6 16.Nxc6 bxc6 17.exf6! Qxg3 18.fxe7 Rg8 19.Rd8 h6 20.Rxa8 Rxa8 21.Rd1! mit Sieg 16.Bf4 Rfd8 17.h5 h6 Die erzwungene Schwächung gibt der schwarzen Stellung gibt dem weißen Angriff ein klares Ziel. 18.Rhe1? automatisch gespielt, nach einem Blick auf die Uhr. 18.Rd2 spart eine Tempo genauso auch 18.Qf2 18...Be8 19.Qf2 macht den g-Bauer frei für den Angriff Rd7 20.Rd2 Rad8 21.Red1 Bf8 Sie können jetzt die Richtigkeit des schwarzen Konzepts bezweifeln. 22.g4 Ne7 23.Qe3! Qb6! die einzige gute Verteidigung, die zur gleichen Zeit abdeckt das Feld h6 24.g5 Nf5! wie hat der Bohatirchuk nachher gesagt nach 24...Rxd4 25.Rxd4 Nf5 26.Rxd8 Nxe3 27.Rxe8 sollte Weiß viel "Holz" haben 25.Nxf5 exf5 26.gxh6 gxh6 Es ist hier, das Loch auf f6 und die Schwäche auf h6, wo wird es einfach hingehen? 27.Nd5 Qe6 28.Kb1 droht Sf6. Schwarz hat nur eine einzige Verteidigung Ne4! 29.Bxe4 fxe4 30.Qxe4 Ohne siegesgewisse Trunkenheit würde ich spielen: 30.Nf6 Rxd2 31.Rxd2 Rxd2 32.Qxd2 Bg7 33.Nxe8 Qxe8 34.Qd5 usw, 30...f5 31.Qf3 Bf7 32.c4 Qc6 Schwarz ist plötzlich aufgewacht und hat schönes Spiel. 33.Qc3? Weiß kann effektiv 33.e6 spielen Bxe6 oder 33...Qxe6 34.Re2 Qc6 35.Be5+ usw. 34.Be5+ Bg7 35.Qf4 Bxe5 36.Qxe5+ Rg7 37.Rg1 Rdg8 38.Rdg2 und wird gewinnen. 33...Be6! 34.Qb3?? Warum? Sehr einfach Zeitnot... b5! 35.cxb5 axb5 36.Qc3 Qb7?? 37.Ne3?? Nach dem richtigen 37.Nf6 ist den Spiel immer noch gewonnen 37...Qe4+ 38.Nc2 Rxd2 39.Bxd2 und jetzt sehe ich mit Entsetzen, dass 39.Rxd2 wegen Qh1+ nicht geht 39...Rc8 Die Figur ist verloren und deshalb ergibt sich Weiß. 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Pachman,L-Bohatirchuk,F-0–11944B95Prag1
Krticka,F-Bohatirchuk,F-0–11944B24Prag2
Podgorny,J-Bohatirchuk,F-0–11944A53Prag3
Bohatirchuk,F-Prucha,K-1–01944B66Prag4
Runza,J-Bohatirchuk,F-0–11944A46Prag5
Bohatirchuk,F-Bartosek,M-1–01944C18Prag6
Bohatirchuk,F-Kottnauer,C-1–01944B06Prag7
Bacinsky,V-Bohatirchuk,F-½–½1944B84Prag8

But I liked the game between Ludek Packman and Fedor Bohatirschuk with its complicated middlegame so much that I took a close look of my own. Here are my comments:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qf3 Be7 8.0-0-0 Nbd7 9.Be2 Qc7 Black decided against h7-h6. 10.Qg3 0-0 11.h4 At the age of 20 you find it easy to play moves like h2-h4 or g2-g4. Kh8 12.f4 Nc5 13.Bf3 Bd7 14.e5 dxe5 15.fxe5 Ng8 15...Rfd8? is not possible because of 16.Qf4+- 16.Bf4 White's pieces are well coordinated but Black's position has no weaknesses. Rfd8 17.h5 h6 18.Rhe1? A loss of time. The pawn on e5 did not need additional protection. Be8 19.Qf2 Rd7 20.Rd2 Rad8 21.Red1 Bf8 22.g4 Ne7 23.Qe3! Qb6! The position is for both sides difficult to play. 24.g5 White is ready for some risk. A good alternative was 24.Kb1± 24...Nf5 A must. 25.Nxf5 exf5 26.gxh6 gxh6 27.Nd5 Exchanging one rook first was also worth considering. 27.Rxd7 Rxd7 28.Nd5 Qe6 29.c4 b5 Or 29...Ne4 30.Bxe4 fxe4 31.Rg1 and the g-file decides. 30.Rg1+- 27...Qe6
28.Kb1? A loss of time. Too much prevention is bad. After 28.c4! b5 or 28...Ne4 29.Bxe4 fxe4 30.Rg1 29.Rg1 bxc4 30.Nf6+- White has a crushing attack. 28...Ne4! The best. 29.Bxe4 fxe4 30.Qxe4? 30.c4! 30...f5! Black understands the position very well. Being a pawn down is not that important. Most important is to give the Be8 something to chew on and to keep an eye on the achilles heel of the black position - g8. 31.Qf3 Bf7 32.c4 Qc6? Time-trouble. 33.Qc3? White could get the upper-hand again with 33.e6! Bxe6 33...Qxe6 34.Re2+- 34.Be5+ Bg7 35.Qf4 Bg8 36.Rg1!+- 33...Be6 34.Qb3? Why not 34.Rg1! ? Pachmann certainly saw the crazy line 34.Rg1 Bxd5 34...Bg7 35.Rg6 is also better for White. Correct is 34...b5! 35.e6+ Bg7 35...Rg7 36.e7!+- 36.Rxg7 Or 36.cxd5 36...Rxg7 37.Bxh6 and White is very much okay. 34...b5! Black finally gets going. 35.cxb5 axb5 36.Qc3 Qb7? 36...Bxd5 is a move every beginner sees. 36...Qa8! also wins. 37.Ne3?? The last mistake loses. 37.Nf6! defends e4 and was still playable. 37...Qe4+ 38.Nc2 Rxd2 39.Bxd2 Rc8 White resigns. Making mistakes is human. Also in a clock simul.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Pachman,L-Bohatirchuk,F-0–11944B95Prague

Visiting Nikolai Krylenko

Bohartirschuk's book My way to Vlassov and to the Prague Manifesto was published 1978 in San Francisco 1978 at SBONR (a Ukrainian publisher). It remains a mystery for me why the book has never been translated into English or German. If you start the book early in the evening you will keep reading till early morning. Radiology and chess were Bohartirschuk's fate.

I take the liberty to give a free translation of pages 106-108, "Arrest of the Secretary of the Ukrainian chess section Mr. S and the intervention by N.W. Krylenko", from the book to give readers an inkling of the "terrible times".

It is 1935 and F. Bohatirschuk has the floor:

After returning from the tournament in Moscow 1935 to Kiev unpleasant news were awaiting me. The secretary of the chess section N.S. had been arrested and his wife desparately asked me for help. N.S. was father of five children, a very humble and quiet person. I have never noticed that he attended to anything else than chess and his family.

He and political activities against the Soviet power? It was useless to probe the local institutions. I decided, so to speak, to grab the bulls by the horns and to ask for mercy in Moscow. The great commissioner of justice N. Krylenko was also president of the Soviet Chess Federation and it was known that he occasionally helped chess players who were in trouble.

I knew his reputation. His processes against the "enemies of the state" in which he set the "bar of punishment" very high gave me a lot of food for thought... He lived not far from the centre in a multistorey, ordinary house in which other high state officials also had their domicile and their offices.

The guard who apparently knew about me let me into the building and took the elevator with me. An elevator — what a luxury in these times! The flat was very modestly furnished. Until then I had seen N. Krylenko only from afar during his appearances at the Soviet Chess Federation. Seen up close the procurator was only of medium height but with a tendency for stoutness, and equipped with clearly apparent qualities of a leader.

His face could be described as friendly, almost good-natured. Neither did his mild movements and manners fit to the cruelty against the generals and officers who had fallen into his hands. In short, I was face to face with a an executioner with a human face, a character whom until then I had only known from literature. A fanatic procurator without any inhibition, always ready to declare and sign death sentences. But I thought that at the same time he could cry bitterly should his own cat or dog be severely injured or to mourn them for a long time.

Nikolai Krylenko

The young Nikolai Krylenko | Unknown photographer

Krylenko listened to me, and then he went into the adjoining room where the "government telephone" was. After a quarter of an hour he returned and told me: "I spoke to the president of the Ukranian NKVD (the People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs), Balickij, unfortunately too late. Your secretary N.S. just made a confession." In his mouth the word "confession" sounded very strange. Of course, Krylenko was very well acquainted with all methods the investigative judge might employ. I could even detect a trace of pity in his words.

What crimes did the secretary N.S. actually commit? But my mission was still successful. Over the phone the procurator recommended the "soft" treatment and N.S. was only sent for two years to Siberia.

I am convinced that without the intervention of the People's Commissioner he would have gotten ten years in Siberia followed by a ban on staying in Kiev.

On page 120, second paragraph, Bohartirschuk writes:

I made the following agreement with my wife: if I was not there and the NKVD visited us at home, she would put a bigger flower pot with a certain plant on the balcony. By that I at least hoped to gain time and to have a headstart. Maybe I would be able to find a place to hide and to consider my next move. No one can imagine what we had to go through.

Epilogue

But Krylenko did not escape the irony of fate. During one of Stalin's next purges he became a victim. Historical documents prove that a NKVD task force arrested him on January 31, 1938, in his dacha, and that he was later tortured until he "voluntarily" confessed everything. The trial against the "enemy of the state" Krylenko lasted only 20 minutes. On July 29, 1938, he was shot.

True or not? In the book about the Moscow tournament 1935, Krylenko wrote a foreword that is full of socialist optimism. After his liquidation the censors even tried to neutralise his foreword, that is to remove the relevant pages from the book. Should you have the original tournament book in Russian in your library, please have a look! If the book starts at page 9, you now know why...

It's a pity but my colleague Boris Spassky did not invite me to visit Bohartirschuk in Canada. A real pity! I would have asked him a thousand-and-one curious questions.

Translation from German: Johannes Fischer

Links


Vlastimil Hort was born January 12, 1944, in Kladno, Czechoslovakia. In the 1970s he was one of the world's best players and a World Championship candidate. In 1979 he moved to West Germany where he still lives. Hort is an excellent blindfold player, a prolific author and a popular chess commentator.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.