Sabrina Vega and Salvador del Río de Angelis are the 2018 Spanish Champions

by Antonio Pereira
9/6/2018 – Between 1978 and 2009, Linares hosted one of the most prestigious chess tournaments in the world. Nine years later, the city became Spain's chess capital once again by hosting the National Championships for men and women. Salvador del Rio de Angelis (who's known as "Gabriel") finished first on tiebreaks, while Sabrina Vega took gold in the female category. The fact that Spain does not organize a separate Women's Championship has been an issue for a while now — WGM MONICA CALZETTA shares her opinion on the subject. | Photos: Patricia Claros

Chess News


ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

Photo finish

From August 20th to 28th, the Spanish Championships for men and women took place in Linares, Jaén. All the players participated in the same 9-round Swiss open, with the best woman placed in the final standings declared the winner of the female section. No fewer than 125 players participated. The top three highest-rated competitors were David Antón, Iván Salgado and Manuel Pérez Candelario, all of them with a 2600+ rating. Francisco Vallejo was absent, as he will be from the Olympiad team for personal reasons.  

The Championship had a clear leader from rounds one to seven — Jose Cuenca was on 6½/7 after defeating the eventual champion (Gabriel) Salvador del Rio de Angelis. It looked like it was a closed deal for the player from Granada, as he was a full point ahead of the field with only two rounds to go. Round eight, however, saw him lose for the first time in the event, against the Catalonian IM Hipólito Asis. Asis took advantage of a small structural advantage, which he achieved from a Scotch Opening:

 

Del Río, Candelario and Cuenca | Photo: Patricia Claros

Three players that were on 5½/7 jumped into contention by winning their eighth-round games, making it a four-way tie before the final round. Besides Asis, Levan Aroshidze and, of course, Gabriel del Rio de Angelis joined the leading pack — they did it by defeating two younger opponents, Jaime and Miguel Santos, respectively. The final positions in these two encounters are curiously similar — in both cases, the vulnerable black kings fall prey to White's well-coordinated pieces:

 

The stage was set for an exciting final round. Co-leaders Asis and Del Río faced off on the first board, while Cuenca and Aroshidze were paired against lower-rated players on boards 2 and 3. Asis and Del Río de Angelis signed a 22-move draw. Aroshidze had a knight for two pawns in a difficult endgame with queens on the board, while Cuenca missed a chance to recover from his previous misstep. This was his position against IM Angel Espinosa:

 

Cuenca went for the immediate 38.Rc8+, when Black was able to answer with 38...Re8, blocking the check. The computer gives 38.Rc7 as winning, as Black now needs to move the queen away with 38...Qd3. After 39.Rc8+, Black cannot block with the rook and has no way to avoid the white queen from penetrating with 40.Qc7. White would play Qb8 later and the mating threats would be decisive.

In the game, more exchanges followed and Cuenca had to settle for a draw after 45 moves.

On board 3, Aroshidze found himself in a drawn endgame and signed the peace treaty on move 48. Therefore, all the co-leaders had added half-points to their tallies, so things would be decided according to tiebreaks criteria. Gabriel del Rio de Angelis was declared the champion, Jose Cuenca finished second and Hipolito Asis third. A result no one could have predicted after round seven!

Cuenca beat Del Río in round seven, but finished in second place nonetheles | Photo: Patricia Claros

Sabrina Vega triumphs amongst the women

In 2016, FEDA (the Spanish Chess Federation) decided to organize a single event to determine the champions in both gender sections, after having had separate tournaments in previous editions — the strongest Spanish female players had argued strongly in favour of playing separately and finally achieved their goal. The Federation, however, mentioned that this was a provisional decision, asserting that there were complications with scheduling in a year where an Olympiad was to be played.

One of the strongest female players in Spain, Monica Calzetta, gave us her opinion about this issue:

It is a little disheartening that this discussion about separate women's tournaments is still on the table. To mention key aspects like visibility, promotion, the creation of models for young girls and so on is even more tiring, as the ones that make the decisions are still men, which has kept us in the minority. We [the female players] need to decide. 

My favourite model is the one used in France: a closed tournament for the main title [open to men and women] and a closed tournament for women — concurrently, open tournaments are played to see who qualifies for next year's main events. In France, about a thousand players participate in the open events, making it possible for organizers to create the conditions and provide the prizes that the best players in the country deserve, while giving chess the level of prestige it deserves. The key points are prestige and visibility. That way, it will be an attractive event for the players. All the rest of pseudo-scientific discussions lead nowhere.

I also want to say that this prestige I talk about cannot be achieved only by improving women's chess. We need to face this problem as a whole and improve the general image of chess. It should not be that hard. Chess is one of the most fascinating disciplines, and there are a lot of highly interesting people amongst chess players. What happens then? Why are we still stuck in Byzantine discussions? Perhaps — and here I'm not impartial — there should be many more women not only playing but also making decisions, adding their own points of view.

Sabrina Vega during an interview | Photo: Patricia Claros

Five-time Spanish champion Sabrina Vega understands that the current system is prone to produce unfair results in the female section, as the set of players that the competitors are faced against can vary greatly and the tiebreak criteria have too much weight in the final standings. She has other goals in sight, however:

It is true that the women's title might be unfairly decided sometimes. But we need to keep in mind that this is a secondary reward. The main goal should be to finish in the top ten. And when we get that, we should target at getting a woman to win the Spanish [absolute] title.

Sabrina finished on 6/9, ahead of Ana Matnadze on tiebreaks. WFM Liudmila Kolotilina got the bronze.

Monica Calzetta kindly analysed one of Sabrina Vega's victories:

 

Ana Matnadze is the 2018 Rapid and Blitz Women's Spanish Champion | Photo: Patricia Claros

Final standings (top 20)

Pos. T. Name Club Pts. T1
1 GM Del Rio De Angelis, Salvador VAS 7 2428.7
2 GM Cuenca Jimenez, Jose EXT 7 2403.2
3 IM Asis Gargatagli, Hipolito CAT 7 2387.9
4 GM Aroshidze, Levan CAT 7 2383.0
5 GM Perez Candelario, Manuel EXT 6,5 2397.4
6 IM Teran Alvarez, Ismael AND 6,5 2365.0
7 IM Espinosa Aranda, Angel MAD 6,5 2331.9
8 FM Tejedor Fuente, Enrique CNT 6,5 2322.3
9 IM Merario Alarcon, Andres AND 6,5 2268.3
10 IM Garriga Cazorla, Pere CAT 6,5 2252.1
11 GM Santos Ruiz, Miguel VAS 6 2407.2
12 GM Santos Latasa, Jaime EXT 6 2404.9
13 IM Cruz Lledo, Pablo VAL 6 2321.0
14 IM Ladron De Guevara, Paolo AND 6 2308.3
15 GM Anton Guijarro, David MUR 6 2301.0
16 FM Serarols Mabras, Bernat VAL 6 2299.1
17 IM Vega Gutierrez, Sabrina CAN 6 2291.2
18 FM Domingo Nunez, Ruben AND 6 2274.2
19 FM Ayats Llobera, Gerard CAT 6 2274.1
20 FM Lianes Garcia, Marcos MAD 6 2265.4

All available games

 

Additional reporting by Nadja Wittmann

Links




Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

puertolajas puertolajas 9/6/2018 01:10
"Salvador" is most usually referred to as "Gabriel". He is better known for this name.
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 9/6/2018 08:00
Correction - should be "no fewer than 125 players participated"

How can the current system be "prone to produce unfair results in the female section", while not in the Open section? This does not make sense. Either the system is flawed for everyone, or it is okay. Whether tiebreaks is a fair system is another question, which is unrelated to the gender/section issue, and should not be conflated.

It is silly to think that women can decide the format of tournaments involving women, because there might be many women that disagree with Monica Calzetta's opinion. In fact Vega would seem to disagree. If she wants to get into the top 10 in a Spanish championship (and even states the goal should be to get A woman in the top 10), then it necessitates having a single section.

I would like to see additional games to determine a single winner instead of using tiebreak formulas.
1