Caruana and Robson score
Fabiano Caruana and Ray Robson were the only winners of the fourth round at the US Open Championship. Caruana slowly wore down Abhimanyu Mishra with white in a heavy-piece ending which emerged from the classical variation of the French Defence. The position further simplified into a rook ending in which the 2018 World Championship challenger gradually took all the pawns from his young opponent with sophisticated technique.
The Ruy Lopez is one of the oldest openings which continues to enjoy high popularity from club level to the absolute world top. In this video series, American super GM Fabiano Caruana, talking to IM Oliver Reeh, presents a complete repertoire for White.
In the game between Awonder Liang and Ray Robson, Liang fell behind while playing white out of a Najdorf Variation of the Sicilian and was eventually outplayed tactically.

Awonder Liang and Ray Robson | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Wesley So and Grigoriy Oparin played an interesting game in an unusual variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined. Playing black, Oparin was able to drive a passed pawn far forward on the d-file and keep his opponent busy. Eventually, an endgame with queens and bishops emerged. In the end, a draw was agreed with bare kings on the board.
In the game between Sam Shankland and Hans Niemann, Black was also able to advance a passed pawn all the way to the third rank. After this pawn was lost, though, Niemann had to fight for a draw in the minor piece endgame, which he managed effortlessly.

Sam Shankland pondering | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Standings after round 4
Rk. | | Name | Rtg. | Nt. | Pts. | n | | | | | | | | | | | | | TB | Perf. |
---|
1 | | | 2796 | | 3.0 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5.00 | 2892 |
2 | | | 2733 | | 2.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5.00 | 2818 |
3 | | | 2751 | | 2.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.25 | 2763 |
4 | | | 2689 | | 2.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.75 | 2758 |
5 | | | 2677 | | 2.0 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.25 | 2726 |
6 | | | 2677 | | 2.0 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.75 | 2710 |
7 | | | 2662 | | 2.0 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.50 | 2666 |
8 | | | 2738 | | 1.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.50 | 2639 |
9 | | | 2741 | | 1.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.00 | 2638 |
10 | | | 2693 | | 1.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.00 | 2619 |
11 | | | 2630 | | 1.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.00 | 2597 |
12 | | | 2590 | | 1.5 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.00 | 2596 |
TBs: Sonneborn-Berger |
All games
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Yip beats Krush in style
Carissa Yip had a strong start in Saint Louis, as she won three consecutive games at the outset of the US Women's Championship. In round 4, she faced the multiple national champion Irina Krush.
After a cautious opening amid a convoluted position, a spectacular and highly dramatic game developed when Yip went on the attack with the black pieces.
Let us learn together how to find the best spot for the queen in the early middlegame, how to navigate this piece around the board, how to time the queen attack, how to decide whether to exchange it or not, and much more!

Carissa Yip now has a full-point lead | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Megan Lee and Thalia Cervantes also won with the black pieces, against Tatev Abrahamyan and Jennifer Yu respectively.
The 15-year-old Alice Lee, sixth in the girls' world rankings, didn't quite get going yet and drew once again, this time against Rose Atwell. It is her fourth draw at this championship so far. The game between Nazi Paikidze and Atousa Pourkashiyan also ended without a winner.
Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova recorded the only win with the white pieces in this round, as she defeated Anna Zatonskih.

Atousa Pourkashiyan | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Standings after round 4
All games
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 d6 4.0-0 Bd7 5.Re1 Nf6 6.c3 a6 7.Bf1 Bg4 8.h3 Bxf3 9.Qxf3 e6 10.d3 Be7 11.Be3 d5 12.Bg5 0-0 13.exd5 Nxd5 14.Bxe7 Qxe7 15.Nd2 Rfd8 16.Rad1 b5 17.Nb3 Rac8 18.d4 cxd4 19.Nxd4 Qc7 20.Nxc6 Qxc6 21.Rd4 Ne7 22.Qd3 Rxd4 23.Qxd4 Nf5 24.Qd2 g6 25.Rd1 Kg7 26.Qe2 Qc5 27.Rd3 Ne7 28.g3 Nc6 29.Bg2 Ne5 30.Rd4 Nc4 31.Bb7 Rc7 32.Bxa6 e5 33.Rd1 Ra7 34.b3 Na3 35.c4 Rxa6 36.Rd5 Qc7 37.cxb5 Re6 38.Qb2 Qb7 39.Rxe5 Rxe5 40.Qxe5+ f6 41.Qc5 Nxb5 42.a4 Na7 43.b4 Nc6 44.b5 Ne5 45.b6 Nf3+ 46.Kf1 Nd2+ 47.Kg1 Ne4 48.Qd4 Ng5 49.Qc5 Ne4 50.Qd4 Qc6 51.Qb2 Nc5 52.a5 Nd3 53.Qd2 Ne5 54.Qb2 Nf3+ 55.Kf1 Qc4+ 56.Kg2 Ne1+ 57.Kg1 Nf3+ 58.Kg2 Ne1+ 59.Kg1 Qe4 60.Kf1 Qh1+ 61.Ke2 Qe4+ 62.Kf1 Nd3 63.Qc2 Qe1+ 64.Kg2 Qxa5 65.Qxd3 Qxb6 66.Qd7+ Kg8 67.Qe8+ Kg7 68.Qd7+ Kg8 69.Qe8+ Kg7 70.Qd7+ ½–½
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | Lee,A | 2395 | ½–½ | 2024 | B51 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 1.1 |
Paikidze,N | 2314 | Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | 0–1 | 2024 | D45 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 1.2 |
Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | Krush,I | 2388 | ½–½ | 2024 | B41 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 1.3 |
Lee,M | 2253 | Yu,J | 2267 | ½–½ | 2024 | B75 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 1.4 |
Zatonskih,A | 2312 | Atwell,R | 2185 | 0–1 | 2024 | A05 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 1.5 |
Yip,C | 2418 | Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | 1–0 | 2024 | D34 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 1.6 |
Lee,A | 2395 | Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | ½–½ | 2024 | D87 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 2.1 |
Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | Paikidze,N | 2314 | 1–0 | 2024 | B12 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 2.2 |
Atwell,R | 2185 | Yip,C | 2418 | 0–1 | 2024 | A11 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 2.3 |
Krush,I | 2388 | Lee,M | 2253 | 1–0 | 2024 | D91 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 2.4 |
Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | 0–1 | 2024 | D48 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 2.5 |
Yu,J | 2267 | Zatonskih,A | 2312 | ½–½ | 2024 | D02 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 2.6 |
Yip,C | 2418 | Yu,J | 2267 | 1–0 | 2024 | B75 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 3.1 |
Zatonskih,A | 2312 | Krush,I | 2388 | ½–½ | 2024 | D00 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 3.2 |
Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | Atwell,R | 2185 | ½–½ | 2024 | D27 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 3.3 |
Paikidze,N | 2314 | Lee,A | 2395 | ½–½ | 2024 | E04 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 3.4 |
Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | 0–1 | 2024 | C04 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 3.5 |
Lee,M | 2253 | Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | 0–1 | 2024 | B06 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 3.6 |
Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | Zatonskih,A | 2312 | 1–0 | 2024 | C13 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 4.1 |
Yu,J | 2267 | Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | 0–1 | 2024 | D02 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 4.2 |
Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | Lee,M | 2253 | 0–1 | 2024 | C55 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 4.3 |
Lee,A | 2395 | Atwell,R | 2185 | ½–½ | 2024 | D87 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 4.4 |
Krush,I | 2388 | Yip,C | 2418 | 0–1 | 2024 | A40 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 4.5 |
Paikidze,N | 2314 | Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | ½–½ | 2024 | B23 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 4.6 |
Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | Krush,I | 2388 | 0–1 | 2024 | A42 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 5.1 |
Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | Lee,A | 2395 | 0–1 | 2024 | B50 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 5.2 |
Zatonskih,A | 2312 | Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | 0–1 | 2024 | C02 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 5.3 |
Yip,C | 2418 | Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | 1–0 | 2024 | A08 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 5.4 |
Lee,M | 2253 | Paikidze,N | 2314 | 1–0 | 2024 | B67 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 5.5 |
Atwell,R | 2185 | Yu,J | 2267 | 0–1 | 2024 | E11 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 5.6 |
Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | Lee,M | 2253 | ½–½ | 2024 | D00 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 6.1 |
Krush,I | 2388 | Atwell,R | 2185 | 1–0 | 2024 | A28 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 6.2 |
Lee,A | 2395 | Yu,J | 2267 | 1–0 | 2024 | D30 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 6.3 |
Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | Yip,C | 2418 | 0–1 | 2024 | C54 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 6.4 |
Paikidze,N | 2314 | Zatonskih,A | 2312 | ½–½ | 2024 | D05 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 6.5 |
Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | 1–0 | 2024 | D00 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 6.6 |
Atwell,R | 2185 | Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | 0–1 | 2024 | C88 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 7.1 |
Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | 1–0 | 2024 | E29 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 7.2 |
Lee,M | 2253 | Lee,A | 2395 | 1–0 | 2024 | B30 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 7.3 |
Yip,C | 2418 | Paikidze,N | 2314 | 1–0 | 2024 | B12 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 7.4 |
Yu,J | 2267 | Krush,I | 2388 | 1–0 | 2024 | B21 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 7.5 |
Zatonskih,A | 2312 | Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | ½–½ | 2024 | E17 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 7.6 |
Lee,A | 2395 | Krush,I | 2388 | 1–0 | 2024 | E94 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 8.1 |
Lee,M | 2253 | Zatonskih,A | 2312 | ½–½ | 2024 | C11 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 8.2 |
Paikidze,N | 2314 | Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | ½–½ | 2024 | D30 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 8.3 |
Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | Yu,J | 2267 | ½–½ | 2024 | A11 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 8.4 |
Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | Yip,C | 2418 | 0–1 | 2024 | B06 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 8.5 |
Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | Atwell,R | 2185 | 1–0 | 2024 | B57 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 8.6 |
Krush,I | 2388 | Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | 0–1 | 2024 | A25 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 9.1 |
Yu,J | 2267 | Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | 1–0 | 2024 | A17 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 9.2 |
Yip,C | 2418 | Lee,M | 2253 | 0–1 | 2024 | C54 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 9.3 |
Zatonskih,A | 2312 | Lee,A | 2395 | ½–½ | 2024 | C00 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 9.4 |
Atwell,R | 2185 | Paikidze,N | 2314 | ½–½ | 2024 | B06 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 9.5 |
Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | ½–½ | 2024 | D02 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 9.6 |
Lee,M | 2253 | Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | 0–1 | 2024 | B32 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 10.1 |
Lee,A | 2395 | Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | 1–0 | 2024 | D07 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 10.2 |
Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | Krush,I | 2388 | 0–1 | 2024 | B43 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 10.3 |
Zatonskih,A | 2312 | Yip,C | 2418 | 1–0 | 2024 | B07 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 10.4 |
Paikidze,N | 2314 | Yu,J | 2267 | ½–½ | 2024 | D02 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 10.5 |
Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | Atwell,R | 2185 | 0–1 | 2024 | D00 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 10.6 |
Yip,C | 2418 | Lee,A | 2395 | ½–½ | 2024 | C42 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 11.1 |
Atwell,R | 2185 | Lee,M | 2253 | 0–1 | 2024 | A12 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 11.2 |
Tokhirjonova,G | 2374 | Abrahamyan,T | 2327 | 1–0 | 2024 | C18 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 11.3 |
Yu,J | 2267 | Pourkashiyan,A | 2269 | ½–½ | 2024 | A07 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 11.4 |
Cervantes Landeiro,T | 2302 | Zatonskih,A | 2312 | ½–½ | 2024 | D02 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 11.5 |
Krush,I | 2388 | Paikidze,N | 2314 | ½–½ | 2024 | E27 | USA-ch Women 2024 | 11.6 |
Please, wait...
Links