Throwback Thursday: Karjakin beats Svidler in rollercoaster World Cup final

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
6/24/2021 – In one of the most memorable finals played in a World Cup, Sergey Karjakin beat Peter Svidler in a match brimming with ups and downs. After winning the first two classical games, Svidler only needed a half point in the next two games to secure tournament victory — the player from Saint Petersburg went on to miss winning chances in game 3 before losing both that encounter and the next one. Blunders also played a big role in the tiebreaks, with Karjakin finally emerging as the winner.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Fatigue-induced blunders

FIDE World Cup 2021A bit over two weeks from now, the 2021 edition of the World Cup will kick off in Sochi. For the first time, a Women’s World Cup will be played concurrently. The top two finishers in the open tournament and the top three finishers in the women’s event will get a spot in the next edition of the Candidates and Women’s Candidates tournaments respectively.

The tournament will run from July 12 until August 6, which means the participants will fight for no fewer than 25 days in a row — in what is perhaps the most physically demanding tournament of the year (for those reaching the final stages). It is true that if a player manages to advance to the next stage without needing tiebreaks he or she gets a free day, but it must be noted that the fatigue is not only induced by playing and preparation, as abundant nervous energy is spent by the players in an event that heavily punishes the slightest of errors.

One of the most unequivocal examples of how fatigue can play a big role in the knockout event was seen at the 2015 edition in Baku. In the all-Russian final between Peter Svidler and Sergey Karjakin, a series of unlikely errors by both players — Svidler’s being the most baffling — led to Karjakin taking the title in a 10-game match devoid of draws.

Svidler had won the event four years earlier (in Khanty-Mansiysk 2011), while Karjakin, aged 25 at the time, had already shown his fierce fighting spirit in 2007, when he reached the semifinals and was eliminated by none other than Alexei Shirov. 

On his way to the 2015 final, Svidler knocked out Emre Can, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu, Teimour Radjabov, Veselin Topalov, Wei Yi and Anish Giri; while Karjakin knocked out Ernes Espinoza, Alexander Onischuk, Yu Yangyi, Dmitry Andreikin, Shakhriyar Mamedyarov and Pavel Eljanov. Svidler and Karjakin entered the event as the 16th and 11th seeds, respectively.

Peter Svidler, Sergey Karjakin

An eventful final match

A 35-year-old Svidler kicked off with what Alejandro Ramirez described as “simply a perfect game”. In the second encounter, Karjakin blundered twice in a row and found himself in the worst possible situation going forward — two points down with two games to go.

 
Karjakin vs. Svidler - Game 2

White had a pawn for a piece, but still had plenty of defensive resources before blundering with 37.Rb5, a rather aimless move by Karjakin. Svidler responded with 37...Kh8, unpinning the rook, and Karjakin once again blundered, this time with 38.Rd5, which was followed by 38...Nb6 and resigns.

The whole sequence is difficult to understand, since even after 37...Kh8 White could have fought for a draw with the forcing 38.Bxf7 Qxb5 39.Qd5

 
Analysis diagram

Black is still a piece up, but converting this into a win is by no means trivial. Certainly a puzzling couple of misses by Karjakin, a player known for being a staunch defender.

Peter Svidler

By that point, it seemed more than likely that the match would be decided in three games, as a draw with white against an opponent that came from blundering away a full point was enough for Svidler to take the title. But the fun (for the audience) was only about to begin.

First, Svidler blundered instead of entering a forced line that almost certainly would have led to a draw.

 
Svidler vs. Karjakin - Game 3

The awful 29.Qd2 fails immediately to 29...Rxf2, as after 30.Qxf2 Black gains the rook on e1 (notice that the queen on h4 is on the same diagonal as the white rook). Svidler played 30.Qc3+ and resigned after 30...d4. In the diagrammed position, the forcing 29.Qxe8 Qxf2+ 30.Kh2 Qxb6 31.Re7+ Kh6 would most likely end in a draw, as the black king is too weak.

Karjakin had survived, and now needed a win with the white pieces to level the score. In a less-than-stellar game by both sides, the 25-year-old from Simferopol managed to tie the overall score with a 56-move victory, which meant the match would be decided in tiebreaks.

Classical games - Annotated by GM Alejandro Ramirez

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.g3 d5 3.Bg2 Svidler actually repeats Eljanov's approach in the rapids against Karjakin. In that match, Black's positions out of the opening seemed a little suspicious to say the least. Karjakin comes up with a different approach, going for a more classical and conservative set up than what he did against Eljanov. e6 4.0-0 Be7 5.d3 5.c4 5.d4 usually lead to the Catalan positions, though White has managed to side-step the new Bb4+ ideas, Black also is doing quite solidly well in the Open Catalan with an early dxc4, which was probably what Karjakin was going to do. 5...0-0 6.Nbd2 Everything indicates that Svidler is going to go for an early e4 and Re1, known as the King's Indian Attack set up. The computers hate these kind of positions for White, but they rarely understand just how dangerous this can be for Black's kingside. c5 7.e4 Nc6 8.Re1 b5 9.exd5!? Actually rather rare, though playable. This move changes the character of the position. 9.e5 has been seen many times... including Svidler-Karjakin 2014 (!) and Karjakin-Dominguez from the first tiebreak game in their match this World Cup! 9...Nxd5 9...exd5 Is waht almost everyone plays (Topalov-Caruana 2014, Movsesian-Karjakin 2013, among others). Karjakin decides to take with the knight, which is also viable. 10.Ne4 Bb7 11.c3 a6 Black's position out of the opening seems to be good. He has decent development and his piece placement is not bad. 11...a5!? was also possible, trying to expand further in the queenside. 12.a4 After a nearly 20 minute think. It's honestly not so easy for either side to figure out a continuation path. Both Black and White have difficulties putting their pieces in optimal squares. Breaking the queenside is obvious, but allows b4 which weakens c3. b4 13.Bg5 f6 This is not a move Karjakin wants to play, but its better than exchanging the dark squared bishops and leaving c5 weakened. 14.Bd2 e5 A Maroczy type of structure. 15.Rc1! Rf7?! 15...Qd7 16.d4 cxd4 17.cxd4 exd4 gives White compensation for the pawn, but still Black's position looks ok. 16.d4! This move is now very uncomfortable to deal with. It is known in chess that when one side spends resources to prevent a pawn break, and the opponent executes it successfully regardless, bad things can happen. bxc3? in my eyes opening the b-file only helps White. 16...exd4 17.cxd4 cxd4 18.Bh3 Bc8! White retains some pressure, but this looks acceptable. 17.bxc3 cxd4 18.cxd4 Nxd4 19.Nxd4 exd4 20.Qb3 White is down a pawn, but his pieces are coordinating much better than Black's. All of Karjakin's pieces are a target now, and the potential pins on the d5 knight are difficult o deal with. Already Black has to be careful of not losing material, but honestly he might already be worse. Rb8 20...Qd7 21.Ba5! Rc8 22.Rxc8+ Qxc8 23.Nxf6+ Bxf6 24.Bxd5 Bxd5 25.Qxd5 is very unpleasant for Black to say the least. 21.Rb1 Qd7 22.Rec1! Wonderful patience from Svidler. He is not in a rush to recover material, but simply improves his pieces. Black is completely tied down and his extra pawn is just for show. Qe6? Losing a piece, though it was already hard to suggest a move. 22...f5 23.Nc5 23.Ng5!? 23...Bxc5 24.Rxc5 Nf6 25.Bf4 Rc8 26.Rxc8+ Bxc8 27.Qc4 Looks ugly. Rb8 is coming, among others. 23.Nc5 Bxc5 24.Rxc5 Rd8 25.Ba5 Rd6 26.Qc4 The threat is Rxb7 and Bxd5. Black has no answer at all against this. Nc3 27.Rxb7 Other moves won as well. Qe1+ 28.Bf1 The rook on b7 cannot be taken, so the game is over. Ne2+ 29.Qxe2 29.Qxe2 Qxe2 30.Rb8+ Rf8 31.Rxf8+ Kxf8 32.Bxe2 is two extra bishops. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Svidler,P2727Karjakin,S27621–02015FIDE World Chess Cup 20157.1
Karjakin,S2762Svidler,P27270–12015FIDE World Chess Cup 20157.2
Svidler,P2727Karjakin,S27620–12015FIDE World Chess Cup 20157.3
Karjakin,S2762Svidler,P27271–02015FIDE World Chess Cup 20157.4

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

The tiebreaks

A total of six games were played on October 5. The contenders first traded wins with white in the 25-minute games (with 10-second increments); then they traded wins with black in the 10-minute encounters (again with 10-second increments); and finally Karjakin prevailed in the last two games, which were played with a time control of 5 minutes and 3-second increments.

In his column for the Huffington Post, Lubomir Kavalek thus described what had transpired on the event’s final day of action:

In the tie-breaks, both players saw their lead in rapid games disappear. Game 9, the first blitz game, was a comedy of errors and went to Karjakin. He also won the second blitz game and the Cup. Both players looked exhausted and Svidler compared the event to an ancient Roman circus, where the public decides who is going to live and who dies at the end.

Peter Svidler

Much like in the most recent World Championship cycles, both finalists of the World Cup got a spot in the next Candidates Tournament. Karjakin would go on to win the Candidates, thus gaining the right to challenge Magnus Carlsen for the World Championship title in November 2016 — Carlsen won that match, played in New York.

Tiebreak games - Annotated by GM Alejandro Ramirez

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.e3 g6 4.d4 cxd4 5.exd4 d5 6.cxd5 Nxd5 7.Qb3 Bg7 8.Bc4 e6 9.Bg5 Qa5+ 10.Bd2 Qd8 11.Bg5 Qa5+ 12.Nc3 Nxc3 13.bxc3 Nc6 14.0-0 0-0 15.Bh4 Qc7 16.Bg3 Qd8 17.Qa3 b6 18.Rfd1 Na5 19.Be2 Bb7 20.Ne5 Rc8 21.Rac1 f6 22.Nf3 Qd5 23.Bf1 Bh6 24.Rc2 Rf7 25.Bd3 Qd7 26.h3 Bd5 27.Ba6 Bb7 28.Bd3 Nc4 29.Bxc4 Rxc4 30.Qxa7 b5 31.Ne1 Rf8 32.Qa3 Ra8 33.Qb2 Rca4 34.Qb1 Bd5 35.Nd3 Bf8 36.Rdd2 Qc6 37.f3 Bc4 38.Bf4 Qd5 39.Nf2 Black is clearly better. His two bishops are very powerful and he can recover a2 whenever he feels like it. Rxa2 39...Qf5! 40.Be3 Rxa2 was even stronger, though not as logical. 40.Rxa2 Bxa2 41.Qe1 Bc4 42.Ng4 Qf5?! 42...Be7 was safer and better. 43.Ne3= 43.Qe4 Ra1+ 44.Kh2 h5? Without much ado losing a pawn. 44...Bg7 seems to preserve around equality. 45.Qxf5 exf5 46.Nxf6+ Now Svidler will be tortured in a long endgame. Kf7 47.Nd7 Bg7 48.Be5 Bh6 49.f4 Ra2 50.Rxa2 Bxa2 51.Kg3 Bf8 52.Bc7 Ba3 53.Ne5+ Kf6 54.Bd8+ Kg7 55.Kh4 Bd6 56.Kg5 Bxe5 57.fxe5 Kf7 58.g3 Be6 59.Kf4 Bd5 60.Ke3 Ke6 61.Kd2 Bg2 62.h4 Bd5 63.Kc2 Kd7 64.Ba5 Kc6 65.Kd3 Kd7 66.Kc2 Kc6 67.Kb2 Be6 68.Ka3 Bd5 69.Kb4 Be6 70.Bd8 Bd5 71.Ka5 Be6 72.Ka6 Bc8+ 73.Ka7 Be6 74.Bg5 Bd7 75.Bf4 Be6 76.Kb8 Bd7 77.Bg5 Be6 78.Bh6 Bd7? Karsten Muller knows more about endgame than me, but I believe this to be the losing move. Had Svidler cleared f5 for his bishop, I don't see how Karjakin can make progress. Of course, this is easier said in hindsight, over the board it looks illogical to just give up a pawn for free. 78...f4 79.Bxf4 79.gxf4 Bf5= 79...Bd7 80.d5+ Kxd5 81.Kc7 Bf5= 82.Kd8 Ke6= 79.Bf4 Be6 80.d5+! Bxd5 80...Kxd5 81.Kc7 and the king penetrates, with similar results to the game 81.Kc8 Bb3 82.Kd8 Bc4 83.Ke7 Bb3 This is the issue, basically. Ideally, Black would like to put a bishop on f5 and a king on d5/e6 to prevent activity, but he can't because he doesn't have access to that square. 84.e6 Bc4 85.Kf6 Bb3 86.Bc1 Bc4 87.Ba3 Bb3 88.e7 Kd7 89.Kxg6 This is completely winning. White will create a second passed pawn and win easily. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Karjakin,S2762Svidler,P27271–02015FIDE World Cup 20157.5
Svidler,P2727Karjakin,S27621–02015FIDE World Cup 20157.6
Karjakin,S2762Svidler,P27270–12015FIDE World Cup 20157.7
Svidler,P2727Karjakin,S27620–12015FIDE World Cup 20157.8
Karjakin,S2762Svidler,P27271–02015FIDE World Cup 20157.9
Svidler,P2727Karjakin,S27620–12015FIDE World Cup 20157.10

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.