Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.
With the advent of Magnus Carlsen as the new world champion, the 16th in the line of classical chess, we decided to compile a few lists regarding the records and results, the stats and the facts.
Less than two months after this picture, Magnus Carlsen
would be the youngest world number one in history
There is no question the World Champion is the youngest number one player in the world, but can you name the second youngest? Hint: it may surprise you. What about the third, and the fourth? For players preceding the FIDE ELo system, we have resorted to the calculations and results published by Chessmetrics. Even if the ratings do not agree with FIDE's, they still calculate quite well who the best performing players are at a given moment.
|
Rank
|
Name
|
Age
|
When
|
|
1
|
Magnus Carlsen | 19 years 1 month 2 days | January 1, 2010 |
|
2
|
Vladimir Kramnik | 20 years 6 months 7 days | January 1, 1996 |
|
3
|
Garry Kasparov | 20 years 8 months 19 days | January 1, 1984 |
|
4
|
Robert Fischer | 20 years 10 months 23 days | February 1964 |
|
5
|
Mikhail Tal | 21 years 10 months 22 days | October 1958 |
When the January 1996 ratings list came out, both Vladimir Kramnik and Garry Kasparov held the exact same 2775 rating. Although Kramnik was shared first, and not sole first, there is no reason why it should not count. According to Chessmetrics, Bobby Fischer was the top performing player in February 1964, and if one counts it as a ratings list published on the first of the month, he would have been 20 years 10 months and 23 days old.
Young Vladimir Kramnik was a force to reckon with and was
already in the top five in 1993
What about prodigies such as Capablanca? Interestingly, Chessmetrics only considers he could lay claim to the title of number one in May 1914, when he was 25 years 5 months 12 days old. Between Lasker, Rubinstein, and Maroczy, he had his work cut out for him.
José Raul Capablanca (right) had to reckon with players such as Akiba Rubinstein (center).
By 1914 though, he was ready to claim the mantle.
Almost any chess player can name the youngest world champion ever, Garry Kasparov, or the second youngest, Magnus Carlsen, but what about the third, fourth or fifth?
|
Rank
|
Name
|
Age
|
When
|
|
1
|
Garry Kasparov | 22 years 6 months 27 days | November 9, 1985 |
|
2
|
Magnus Carlsen | 22 years 11 months 24 days | November 23, 2013 |
|
3
|
Mikhail Tal | 23 years 5 months 28 days | May 7, 1960 |
|
4
|
Anatoly Karpov | 23 years 10 months 11 days | April 3, 1975 |
|
5
|
Vladimir Kramnik | 25 years 4 months 10 days | November 4, 2000 |
|
6
|
Emanuel Lasker | 25 years 5 months 2 days | May 26, 1894 |
When Bobby Fischer resigned his title, FIDE still attempted to negotiate with the champion, but for better or for worse, he refused to reconsider and as a result, Anatoly Karpov was declared the champion by default on April 3, 1975.
Since world championship matches have varied greatly in their lengths, the only proper parameter is the winning percentage. The honor of the most crushing victory ever goes to Emanuel Lasker, who wiped out David Janovsky in the world championship match in 1910 by 9.5-1.5 for an 86.3% result, however he also played at a time when the champion could handpick his opponent. Rubinstein or Capablanca would unquestionably have given him a far tougher match.
David Janovsky (left) was clearly not Emanuel Lasker's (right) greatest threat
As a result, the list only includes matches played from 1950 and later, and does not include the FIDE Knockout matches. The winner is in italics.
Magnus Carlsen's 65% winning percentage is the greatest since FIDE took
over the selection process
|
Rank
|
Players
|
Year
|
Win %
|
|
1
|
Anand-Carlsen |
2013
|
65%
|
|
2
|
Kasparov-Short |
1993
|
62.5%
|
|
3
|
Botvinnik-Tal |
1961
|
61.9%
|
|
4
|
Karpov-Korchnoi |
1981
|
61.1%
|
|
5-6
|
Botvinnik-Tal |
1960
|
59.5%
|
|
5-6
|
Fischer-Spassky |
1972
|
59.5%
|
|
7
|
Anand-Kramnik |
2008
|
59.1%
|
A case can be made that without the default loss, Fischer’s winning percentage would be greater. If the match was considered to have lasted 20 games instead of 21, his win rate would have been 62.5%, tying him with Kasparov-Short.
Graeme Cree, (Austin, TX) informed us:
As an interesting factoid, Carlsen-Anand marks only the third time that the black pieces have come out victorious in a World Championship match. The only other two were Alekhine-Bogoljubov II in 1934, and Botvinnik-Bronstein in 1951. At 55.0%, Carlsen-Anand marks the second best performance by Black ever, after 1934.
Another curiosity pointed out by GM Jon Hammer: Game Nine of the match was probably the first time Black had won a game without ever moving the queen from its starting square or exchanging it. Defaults don't count.
