The final years of Zukertort

by Stephan Oliver Platz
1/31/2018 – In 1886 Johann Hermann Zukertort played the first official match for the World Championship and lost to Steinitz. But at that time Zukertort already suffered from severe health issues which two years later led to his early death. Stephan-Oliver Platz takes a look at the health of Zukertort in the final years of the chess legend.

Follow the World Champion and your chess friend next door. Start your success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more! In addition to the ChessBase 14 Program, the Premium Package contains:
• Access to the Live-Database (8 million games)*
• Mega Database 2018
• ChessBase Magazine subscription for a full year (6 issues)
• Database-Update-Service through end of 2018
• Full year Premium membership for playchess and for the ChessBase Accounts
• Corr Database 2018
• Endgameturbo 4

Tragic end of a great player

Johannes Hermann Zukertort (*7.9.1842 +20.6.1888) was one of the strongest chess players of his time and — after losing the World Championship match 1886 against Wilhelm Steinitz — the first official Vice World Champion in the history of chess. According to Jeff Sonas at his peak Zukertort had a historical rating of 2798 and was close to the 2800 mark. A couple of times he is first on the historical rating lists. (a) He also won two great international tournament: Paris 1878 and London 1883, the latter with a three point margin on Steinitz. In this article I want to have a look at Zukertort's final years (1886 – 1888).

When J. H. Zukertort died on 20 June, 1888, in London, he was not yet 46 years old. In the last two years of his life he had to cope with serious health issues which of course also affected his results in tournaments and matches. What health issues did he have and what was the reason for them?

The World Championship match Zukertort — Steinitz

Probably Zukertort's poor health in the first three months of 1886 also affected the outcome of the World Championship match against Wilhelm Steinitz. The course of the match supports this assumption: after five games Zukertort was leading 4-1,  after 10 games the score was 4-4, with two draws. After 15 games Steinitz narrowly led with 6-5 (4 draws) but then Zukertort lost 4 of 5 remaining games (one game ended in a draw) resulting in a final score of 10-5, with 5 draws which might easily give the impression that Steinitz' victory was clear and never in doubt.

To make matters worse the match was played in three American cities: in New York, in St. Louis, and in New Orleans. Today this would not be much of a problem because nowadays we have airplanes and air conditioned rooms. But in 1886 it meant exhausting travels by ship, stage coach, horse and cart or seemingly prehistoric trains drawn by steaming locomotives, in short, travels which could last days or weeks. In some of these vehicles it was definitely very drafty, and it does not astonish that many a passenger fell ill soon after his journey or arrived ill at his destination.

The last phase of the match was played in New Orleans and in their biography about Zukertort C. W. Domanski and T. Lissowski write:

Reports by the press drew attention to the visibly weakened physical and mental disposition of Zukertort. He had rings under the eyes, an emaciated face, and showed all signs of a fever. (b)

We can assume that the World Championship match would not have ended that much in favour of Steinitz if the match that began on January 11, 1886, in New York would have been played to its end in this city. However, I believe that Steinitz in this case would also have had good chances to finish on top though maybe very narrowly because he was simply the better strategist. This is particularly apparent in the third game of the match. If we look at the position after White's 37th move we can conclude easily that Zukertort had been completely outplayed strategically. With 37...f5 Steinitz could have prevented any counterplay White might get with g2-g4. The later course of the game shows the different playing approaches of Steinitz and Zukertort: Steinitz thinks first of all strategically, without giving too much heed to tactical possibilities. Zukertort, however, sees the combinations and wins tactically:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
White's position is terrible: the knight on f2 is passive, the bishop on c3 is bad but needs to defend b2. Not to mention the black bishop on d3 and the black rook on b3 and the fact that Black is a pawn up! 37...Bd8 Steinitz wants to play Bd8-a5 to get rid of the bishop on c3 that desperately keeps White's position together. The bishop-move is not a mistake but more careful was 37...f5!-+ and it is hard to see how White can drum up any form of counterplay. 38.g4 hxg4? But this is a mistake. Steinitz still had a number of continuations that promised him a win, e.g. 38...h4 setting the trap 39.g5? Bxg5! 40.fxg5 Qxg5+ 41.Ng4 Qxg4+ 42.Kf2 Qg3# or 38...Bc7 with the idea 39.gxh5? Bxf4! because 40.exf4? is not possible due to e3+ And there was nothing wrong to continue with the intended 38...Ba5 e.g. 39.gxh5 or 39.Nd1 hxg4-+ 39...Bxc3 40.bxc3 Rab8 41.hxg6 Rb2 42.Qd1 The black king escapes after 42.Rh7+ Kxg6 43.Rah1 Kf6! 44.Ng4+ Ke7 but the white queen is lost. 42...Be2! 43.Qg1 Bf3+ 44.Kg3 Bxh1 45.Qxh1 Rh8 46.Qxe4 f5-+ Steinitz ignores all these tactical possibilities and underestimates the counterchances White obtains after the opening of the h-file. This shows that he first of all thought strategically and not tactically. Against a player who had such a keen sense for combinations as Zukertort this can easily backfire - as we will see. 39.Nxg4 Suddenly Black has problems to solve because the white pieces gather for an attack on Black's king. Ba5? Steinitz does not notice the danger. He had to go on the defensive: 39...f5! 40.Ne5 Bf6 41.Kg3 Rbb8 42.Nxg6! 42.Qg2 Bxe5 43.dxe5 Rh8 44.Kf2 Rxh1 45.Rxh1 Rh8 46.Rxh8 Kxh8 47.Qxg6 Bc2= 42...Kxg6 43.Qg2 Be2! 44.Qxe2 Rh8 45.Kf2 Kf7 46.Rag1 Rag8 47.Rh5! 40.Rh7+! Kf8 40...Kxh7? 41.Nf6++- 41.Rh8+ Kg7 41...Ke7 42.Rxa8 Qxa8 42...Bxc3 43.Ra7+ 43.Bxa5+- 42.Rh7+ Kf8 43.Qf2! Zukertort is not content with a repetition of moves but plays for a win. Bd8 Other moves also fail to save the game. 43...Bxc3 44.bxc3 Rab8 45.Qh4+- or 43...Ke7 44.Ne5 Rf8 45.Bxa5 because after even better than 45.Nxg6+ 45...Qxa5? White wins with 46.Nc6++- 44.Ne5 Kg8 45.Rah1 Bf6 46.Rxf7 Rf8 47.Rxf6! 47.Rxf6 Rxf6 48.Qh4 and Black cannot defend against the mate. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Zukertort,J-Steinitz,W-1–01886WM 18863

If Steinitz had won this game — and this was quite possible — Zukertort would have led only 3-2 after 5 games, and not 4-1. But let's leave speculation aside to return to the facts: how did Zukertort live after his return from the U.S.?

On June 28, 1886, the City of London Chess Club hosted a reception for Zukertort. In a speech he praised the "friendly and attentive reception" with which the Americans had treated him, and his opponent in the match, Wilhelm Steinitz, who "from the first to the last moment had behaved most honourable and fair towards me". This sounded much more conciliatory than an interview which had been published two years before in the "Salt Lake City Tribune" of June 28, 1884. Asked about Steinitz' attacks against him in the press, in this interview Zukertort had said about his future opponent: "Steinitz is a troublemaker and has been thrown out of all clubs in England which he had ever joined."

Zukertort blamed the changes of climate as main reason for his defeat: "In New York, where the atlantic breeze blew I felt rather well, but less so in St. Louis, in the depth of the continent. In New Orleans, at the Mexican Gulf, I finally collapsed." In all fairness he added: "Of course, the change of climate influenced me as well as my opponent. We were both exposed to the same stress and I fully acknowledge that my opponent coped better with the severe test." At the same time Zukertort expressed the wish for a rematch in England, but this did not happen because his health soon deteriorated rapidly.

The probable cause for Zukertort's health problems

In their biography of Zukertort Domanski and Lissowski refer to a relevant observation by Leopold Hoffer, co-editor of  The Chess Monthly:  "Leopold Hoffer noticed in Zukertort increasing problems to articulate and general vapidity." (c)

This observation is an important hint what happened to Zukertort. The mentioned problems to articulate are typical for a stroke or an attack similar to a stroke. Thus, the book Selbstdiagnose – Handbuch der Gesundheit (Self-diagnosis — a health compendium) by Volkwart E. Strauss has the following to say under "Problems to speak":

 "First question: Do you have one or more of the following symptoms:
 
 - Dizziness
 - Vapidity (slight palsy) in the arms or legs, usually on one side
 - Sensibility disorder (formication or no feeling for touch and pain)
 - Vision disorders
 
If YES → Call your doctor immediately! You probably suffered a stroke or an attack similar to a stroke." (d)

 

Johannes Zukertort

I cannot definitely say that Zukertort in 1886 in addition to his articulation problems indeed showed one of the symptoms described here, but a number of things support this assumption: two years later a stroke caused by a brain haemorrhage cost him his life and the autopsy report established that "the great veins at the base of the brain had been significantly degenerated". (e)

V. E. Strauß writes: "In most cases a stroke is caused by cerebral sclerosis. Cerebral sclerosis leads to blood flow disorders and subsquently to an undersupply of brain cells." (f)

Transient ischaemic attacks  ("TIA") are "often only marked by a slight disturbance of consciousness, a short palsy of an arm, or slight articulation problems" but "TIA return in different intervalls. They can be the first sign of a stroke." (e)

Let us compare this with Zukertort's reaction when he suffered from a sudden feeling of faintness during the last game he ever played, on June 19, 1888, in London. In the evening Zukertort went to visit "Simpson's Chess Divan" and just played a game against Sylvain Meyer. What followed was described by Hermann Lehner, editor of the Austrian magazine "Österreichische Lesehalle":

"He [Zukertort] had perhaps played about 25 minutes when he suddenly startled, throwing some pieces from the board. The waiter James Stammers rushed over and gathered the pieces that had been thrown an the floor and handed them to Zukertort who, however, was obviously not able to put the gathered pieces back to their squares. The waiter, taken aback by the odd behaviour of the guest asked him whether anything had happened to him and whether he could help him in any way. 'No', replied Zukertort and added in some words that in a few minutes the sudden fit would be completely over again."

This indicates that such attacks had happened before. But this time Zukertort was wrong because he only improved temporarily. Hermann Lehner continues his report:

"Stammers brought him a glass of fresh water and a bit later some brandy to help him regain strength. Zukertort took what was offered and apparently improved a bit. Now he was brought back to the British Chess Club where he was much better known. But his condition got alarmingly worse and in the same night the seriously ill Zukertort had to be transported to the Charing Cross hospital. The right side of his face was hidden by a stroke and he apparently was without consciousness. At five a palsy of the arm made matters worse..." (g) Zukertort died in the hospital on the very same day, on 10 o'clock in the morning of June 20, 1888.

These and other descriptions suggest that Zukertort had been suffering from occasional transient ischaemic attacks during the last two years of his life.

Last tournaments and the match against Blackburne

When we consider these health problems and a possible temporary undersupply of the brain one understands why Zukertort in the last two years of his life could no longer sufficiently cope with the pressure of a longer tournament or a match. This sheds a different light on his tournament and match results:

In the Masters Tournament of the British Chess Club in London 1886 Zukertort shares seventh place with 6.0 / 12 (13 participants). He wins five games and loses five games, two end in a draw. Joseph Henry Blackburne and Amos Burn win the tournament with a score of 8½ / 12 each.

In Nottingham 1886 Zukertort scores 6.0 / 9 and shares third place (with Isidor Gunsberg) behind Amos Burn (8) and Emil Schallopp (7). He wins five games and loses only two. Two games (against Gunsberg and tournament winner Burn) end in a draw.

From May 7, to June 9, 1887 Zukertort plays a match against Blackburne and loses clearly with 1-5 and 8 draws. In 1881 he had defeated Blackburne with 7-2 and 5 draws.

Zukertort plays his last great international tournament in Frankfurt/M, in 1887. He finishes on a disappointing 16th place (21 participants). He loses nine games, wins six, five end in a draw. Tarrasch dupes him with a simple opening trap and later writes that he had only played against Zukertort's "shadow".

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0-0 Nxe4 5.d4 a6 6.Ba4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Be7 10.Re1 0-0 11.Nd4 Qd7? Ein grober Schnitzer. Schwarz sollte sich lieber auf die nach 11...Nxe5! 12.f3 entstehenden Verwicklungen einlassen, z. B. Bh4 oder 12...Bd6!? 13.fxe4 Bg4 , die sogenannte "Breslauer Variante" 13.g3 13.Re2!? Nf2∞ 13...Bxg3 13...c5!? 14.hxg3 Nxg3 15.Rxe5 Qh4 12.Nxe6 fxe6 Auch wenn die Dame auf e6 schlägt, folgt 13.Rxe4!+- Oh je! Die Dame d7 ist ungedeckt und daher der Bauer d5 gefesselt. Jetzt hätte Zukertort getrost aufgeben können. Es folgte noch: Bc5 13...dxe4? 14.Qxd7 14.Be3 Bxe3 15.Rxe3 Rf5 16.Bc2 Rf7 17.Nd2 Noch stärker wäre 17.Bxh7+! Kxh7 18.Rh3+ Kg8 19.Qh5+- gewesen, denn nach Rff8? folgt 20.Qh8+ Kf7 21.Rf3+ Kg6 22.Rg3+ Kf7 23.Rxg7+ Ke8 24.Qh5++- 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Tarrasch,S-Zukertort,J-1–01887C83DSB-05.Kongress20

At the Masters Tournament of the British Chess Federation in London 1887 things go better. Zukertort scores 6.0 / 9 and finishes fourth among 10 participants, behind Burn and Gunsberg (both with 8.0 / 9) and Blackburne who has 6½ / 9.

A closer look at Zukertort's games of this time reveals that he made a number of (otherwise) inexplicably mistakes and sudden bouts of "chess blindness" but in other games showed the strong and impressive chess he used to play. The following game shows that Zukertort did not at all forget how to play:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.d3 d6 5.Na4 Bb6 6.c3 Nf6 7.Nxb6 axb6 8.f4 Na5 8...d5!? 9.exd5 Nxd5= 9.Bb5+ Bd7 10.Bxd7+ Qxd7 11.Nf3 Nc6 12.0-0 0-0 13.h3 Rad8 14.Qe1 Nh5? Ein Tempoverlust, der es Weiß erlaubt, energisch die Initiative zu ergreifen. Zunächst sollte Schwarz auf f4 tauschen: 14...exf4! 15.Bxf4 Nh5 16.Bh2 f5= 15.f5 Nf6 Wenn 15...Qe7 , so 16.Nh2! besser als 16.Bg5 f6 17.Be3 g5 16...f6 17.Qd1 Qf7 18.g4 Nf4 19.Bxf4 exf4 20.Rxf4± Schwach wäre der Versuch, mit 15...h6? das Feld g5 in die Hand zu bekommen: 16.Qh4 Nf4 oder 16...Nf6 17.Bxh6!+- 17.Bxf4 exf4 18.f6!+- und die schwarze Königsstellung wird aufgerissen Hübsch ist 15...d5?! 16.Qh4 dxe4 17.dxe4 Nf6 18.Bh6! Qe7 oder 18...gxh6 19.Qxf6 Qd6 20.Qh4± und wieder ist die schwarze Königsstellung aufgerissen, und es droht f5-f6 19.Qg3 Nh5 19...Ne8 20.f6! Qxf6 21.Bg5± 20.Qg4 Rd6 20...Qc5+ 21.Kh2 Rd6 22.f6 Rxf6 23.Bg5± 21.f6! immer wieder dasselbe Motiv! Rxf6 22.Bg5± 16.Bg5! Qe7 17.Nh2! 17.Qh4 d5! 17...Nb8 18.Ng4 Nbd7 19.Qh4 All dies wirkt wie eine Vorwegnahme glasklarer Capablancascher Logik. Der spätere Weltmeister aus Kuba sollte jedoch erst 1888 das Licht der Welt erblicken. Kh8 20.Rae1 Rg8 21.d4 Ra8 22.a3 b5 23.Kh1 Ra6 24.Rf3 c5 25.Rd3 Rc6? Danach kann Zukertort die Partie mit einer hübschen Kombination sofort entscheiden. Am besten war noch 25...cxd4 26.cxd4 exd4 27.Rxd4 Ra4 28.e5! Rxd4 oder 28...dxe5 29.Rxe5!+- 29.exf6 Qf8 30.fxg7+ Rxg7 nach 30...Kxg7? wird Schwarz mattgesetzt: 31.Bf6+ Nxf6 32.Qxf6# schlecht ist auch 30...Qxg7? wegen 31.Bh6+- mit Damengewinn 31.Bh6 Rdxg4! 32.hxg4 Rxg4 33.Qxg4 Qxh6+ 34.Kg1 Ne5 35.Qg3+- Schwarz hat zwar einen starken Zentralspringer und einen Bauern für die Qualität, aber alle seine Bauern sind schwach (isoliert bzw. verdoppelt), und darüber hinaus steht sein König gefährdet. 26.dxe5 dxe5 26...Nxe5? 27.Nxf6 Qxf6 27...h6 28.Bxh6!+- 28.Bxf6 Nxd3 29.Re3 Ne5 30.Rg3 Rcc8 31.Qg5+- 27.Rxd7! Ein prächtiges Qualitätsopfer, um dem Springer f6 mit einem Schlage zwei Deckungen zu entziehen. Qxd7 28.Nxf6 Rxf6 oder 28...gxf6 29.Bxf6+ Rg7 29...Rxf6 führt zur Partieforsetzung 30.Bxe5+- 29.Bxf6 gxf6 30.Qxf6+ Rg7 31.Qxe5 Qd2 droht Matt und Turmgewinn 32.Rg1 h6 oder 32...Qxb2 33.Qe8+ Rg8 34.Qxf7 Qxc3 35.Qxb7 b4 36.axb4 cxb4 37.Qe7!+- mit der Drohung f5-f6 33.Qxc5 33.Qe8+!? Rg8 33...Kh7 34.f6+- 34.Qxf7+- 33...Qd3? Ein Fehler, aber die Partie war ohnehin nicht mehr zu retten. Nach 33...Qd7 hat Weiß zwei Mehrbauern und die bessere Stellung. 33...Qxb2? 34.Qf8+ ist schwach 34.Qf8+! Kh7 34...Rg8? 35.Qxh6# 35.f6 Rg3 Droht Matt in 2 Zügen durch Tg3xh3+! 36.Qxf7+ Kh8 37.Qe6 Rxg2 37...Rg6 38.f7! Rxe6 39.f8Q+ Kh7 40.Qf7++- 37...Qd8 38.f7 Qf8 39.Qe5++- 38.Qc8+ Kh7 39.Qf5+ Kh8 40.Rxg2 Qd1+ 41.Kh2 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Zukertort,J-Mortimer,J-1–01886C25British CA Congress-02 Masters4

Translation from German: Johannes Fischer

Sources and notes:

(a) Jeff Sonas calculated the historical Elo-ratings and published them here: www.chessmetrics.com
(b) Cezary W. Domanski and Tomasz Lissowski, Der Großmeister aus Lublin, Berlin 2005, p. 153
(c) Cezary W. Domanski and Tomasz Lissowski, Der Großmeister aus Lublin, Berlin 2005, p. 161
(d) Volkwart E. Strauß, Selbstdiagnose – Handbuch der Gesundheit, Munich 1986, p. 110
(e) Cezary W. Domanski and Tomasz Lissowski, Der Großmeister aus Lublin, Berlin 2005, p. 169
(f) Volkwart E. Strauß, Selbstdiagnose – Handbuch der Gesundheit, Munich 1986, p. 320
(g) Österreichische Lesehalle 1888, No. 92, p. 242f.


The "Mega" is the database every serious chessplayer needs. The database contains 7.1 million games from 1500 to 2017, in highest quality standard, full of top level analyses and completely classified.


Stephan is a passionate collector of chess books and for years he has been successfully playing as an amateur for his German club. The former musician and comedian works as a freelance journalist and author in Berlin and in the Franconian village Hiltpoltstein.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.