Focusing on the players
Classical chess can be exciting, and getting slow games to be entertaining has a lot to do with who is playing — talk about an obvious proposition. The organizers of the Wijk aan Zee events know it all too well, as they avoid the usual pitfalls related to trying to put forth ‘the strongest tournament ever’, or something of the sort, and focus instead on bringing together a mix of extremely strong players (ratingwise) and ambitious, fighting contenders.
Smyslov cultivated a clear positional style and even in sharp tactical positions often relied more on his intuition than on concrete calculation of variations. Let our authors introduce you into the world of Vasily Smyslov.
With the likes of Daniil Dubov, Jan-Krzysztof Duda, Richard Rapport and Shakhriyar Mamedyarov in the lineup, we are all but guaranteed to at least see a couple of exciting encounters in every round. Moreover, in this year’s edition, two of the aforementioned players are sharing first place after five rounds — Rapport and Mamedyarov won with white on Thursday to join Vidit Gujrathi in the lead of the Masters.
Exciting draws were also on the menu in round 5. Nils Grandelius and Magnus Carlsen fought hard out of a sharp Sicilian; Fabiano Caruana got winning chances in a double-edged position against Andrey Esipenko; while Duda agreed to a draw in a winning position against Sergey Karjakin, as he was running very low on time shortly before move 40.

Good friends — Anish Giri drew co-leader Vidit with the white pieces | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Two decisive results
After kicking off the event with three straight draws — ‘despite’ playing enterprising chess — Mamedyarov collected his second consecutive victory in round 5, as he got the better of Jorden van Foreest with the white pieces. We did not mention the Dutchman in our introduction’s list of fighting players, but the defending champion has been playing some of the most exciting chess in the tournament.
In a rather imbalanced opening setup, the contenders followed theory until move 14, when they deviated from a correspondence-chess game played in 2018. Things got markedly sharp quickly afterwards.
Van Foreest vs. Mamedyarov
At first sight, it looks like White blundered a piece, as removing the knight from d4 could be followed by 19...c4, forking bishop and queen. However, White here has 19.Bc2, threatening mate on h7 and gaining a tempo to save his piece — this is also the first suggestion of the engines. But Van Foreest wanted more, and he opted for a sharper alternative: 19.e6
Cold-bloodedly, Shakh responded with 19...Be8, and there followed 20.Ng5 f5 21.Nf7
Once again, Black was confronted with a tough decision, and once again Shakh was up to the task, as he found the one continuation that gave him an advantage — 21...Rxf7 22.exf7+ Bxf7 23.Nxf5 c4
These DVDs are about Understanding Middlegame Strategies. In the first DVD dynamic decisions involving pawns are discussed. The second DVD deals with decision making process concerning practical play.
Both players had correctly calculated the sharp sequence of captures, which continued with 24.Bxc4 Nxf5 (not 24...dxc4 due to 25.Qxd8+ Rxd8 26.Nxe7+) 25.Bxa6. Unfortunately for Van Foreest though, entering this line was not favourable for White — of course, it was impossible to foresee that Black would not falter in the complex struggle, while evaluating all the potential resulting positions is never easy, even for top grandmasters.
Once the dust settled, Black had two pieces for a rook in an endgame with queens still on the board. The conversion was not at all trivial, but a mistake by Van Foreest on move 35 allowed Shakh to regroup, making his task easier to handle.
Going for activity with 35.Qb7+ was the right alternative for White, while the defensive 35.Rc1 gave Black a key tempo to reroute his queen with 35...Qc7.
Shakh coordinated his army successfully and collected the full point nine moves later.

Fearless — Shakhriyar Mamedyarov | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit
Much like in the game shown above, Rapport and Praggnanandhaa followed theory until move 14 out of an imbalanced opening variation. In the ensuing struggle, Rapport showcased his hard-earned ability to navigate complex positions — activating his king in a sharp middlegame proved to be the right decision down the stretch.
Rapport vs. Praggnanandhaa
White here ignored his bishop on g2 and went for Black’s b-pawn with 46.Kc7. Importantly, after 46...Nxg2, the rook can grab the dangerous black passed pawn with 47.Rxd2, as the king is no longer blocking the rook along the file.
Rapport captured his opponent’s queenside pawn on the next move and went on to push his connected passers until provoking Pragg’s resignation on move 56.
You can go through both decisive games of round 5 in the replayer below.
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.a4 9.c3 Bc5 10.Nbd2 0-0 11.Bc2 Nxf2 12.Rxf2 f6 13.Nf1 Bxf2+ 14.Kxf2 fxe5 15.Kg1 Bg4 16.Bg5 Bxf3 17.Qd2 Qd6 18.gxf3 e4 19.fxe4 Ne5 20.Kh1 Nf3 9...b4 10.Be3 Be7 11.a5 11...0-0 12.Qd3 Nc5 13.Bxc5 Bxc5 14.c3 14...Ne7N 14...d4 15.Bxe6 fxe6 16.c4 Rf4 17.Nbd2 Qd7 18.b3 Rf5 19.Rfe1 Raf8 20.Re2 Qf7 15.Nbd2 bxc3 16.bxc3 Ba7 16...Bf5!? 17.Qe2 c6= 17.Nd4 Bd7 18.N2f3 c5! 19.e6 19...Be8 20.Ng5 f5! 20...Ng6? 21.exf7+ Bxf7 22.Nxf7 Rxf7 23.Nc6+- 21.Nf7 Rxf7 21...Bxf7 22.exf7+ Rxf7 23.Ne6= 22.exf7+ Bxf7 23.Nxf5 c4 24.Bxc4 Nxf5 25.Bxa6 Nd6 26.Qf3 Bc5 27.Bd3 Rxa5 28.Rxa5 Qxa5 29.h4 h5 29...g6 30.Rc1 Qa3 30.g3 Ne8 31.c4 31.Bh7+ Kxh7 32.Qxf7 Nf6 31...dxc4 32.Bh7+ Kf8! 33.Bg6! Nf6 34.Bxf7 Kxf7 35.Rc1? 35.Qb7+! Kg6 36.Qb1+ Kf7 37.Qb7+ Kg6 38.Qb1+ Kf7 39.Qb7+ 35...Qc7 36.Kg2 Bd4 37.Qa8? 37.Rb1 Bb6 38.Rc1 37...c3-+ 38.Qa2+ Kg6 39.Qc2+ Kh6 40.Qd3 Qb7+ 41.f3? 41.Qf3 Nd5 42.Kh1 41...Qb2+ 42.Rc2 Qb1 43.Qf5 Be3 44.Kh3 Qd1 0–1 - Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Van Foreest,J | 2702 | Mamedyarov,S | 2767 | 0–1 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.4 |
Rapport,R | 2763 | Praggnanandhaa R | 2612 | 1–0 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.5 |
Please, wait...
The Scandinavians’ Sicilian
In their direct encounter, the Swedish and the Norwegian in the field did not go for 1.e4 d5 (the Scandinavian Defence), but entered a sharp struggle in the Sicilian instead. Grandelius had the white pieces and saw his famed opponent going for an adventurous (and incorrect) pawn push on move 18.
The continuous stream of new ideas in the Sicilian makes 1..c5 the most popular answer to 1.e4. On this DVD I do give an introduction to the most important Sicilian systems.
Carlsen’s 18...d5 — instead of the more sensible 18...Nf7 or 18...Bc6 — allowed White to get the initiative with 19.Bxb5+. Naturally, given the position’s complexity, extreme precision was needed to prove White’s advantage, and after 19...Kf8 Grandelius failed to correctly evaluate that 20.Qb4+ was the best continuation for White — the Swedish grandmaster did think for 17 minutes before choosing 20.Ba4, rerouting his bishop to the more stable b3-square.
The mayhem continued, with Carlsen later missing some chances as well. A draw was signed on move 54, with the contenders and friends — Grandelius worked as Carlsen’s second at the 2018 World Championship match — sharing a smile as they shook hands after a hard-fought battle.

Magnus Carlsen and Nils Grandelius | Photo: Official site
Round 5 results
Standings after round 5
All games - Round 5
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.c4 c6 9.Re1 Bf5 10.Qb3 Qd7! 11.c5 Bc7 12.Nc3N 12.Nbd2 Be6 13.Nf1 Na6 14.Ng3 Ba5 15.Re2 Rae8 16.Ne5 Qc8 17.Qa4 Bc7 18.Bxe4 dxe4 19.Nxe4 12...Re8 12...Nxc5!? 13.Bxf5 Nxb3 14.Bxd7 Nxa1= 13.Be3 Na6 14.Ne2 f6 15.a3 g5 16.Qc2 h5 17.Rad1 h4 18.Nd2 18.Nxh4! gxh4 19.f3 18...Qh7!= 19.Nxe4 Bxe4 20.Bxe4 Qxe4 21.Qxe4 Rxe4 22.Nc3 Re7 23.h3 Rae8 24.Kf1 Bb8 25.Bd2 Nc7 26.Rxe7 Rxe7 27.a4 Ne6 28.Ne2 b6 29.cxb6 axb6 30.b4 Ra7 31.Ra1 Kf7 32.Ke1 Ke8 33.Kd1 ½–½ - Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Giri,A | 2772 | Vidit,S | 2727 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.1 |
Grandelius,N | 2672 | Carlsen,M | 2856 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.2 |
Esipenko,A | 2714 | Caruana,F | 2792 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.3 |
Van Foreest,J | 2702 | Mamedyarov,S | 2767 | 0–1 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.4 |
Rapport,R | 2763 | Praggnanandhaa R | 2612 | 1–0 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.5 |
Duda,J | 2760 | Karjakin,S | 2743 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.6 |
Dubov,D | 2720 | Shankland,S | 2708 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Masters 2022 | 5.7 |
Please, wait...
Replay all the Masters’ games at Live.ChessBase.com
Arjun keeps on winning
There is no stopping 18-year-old Arjun Erigaisi in the Challengers tournament, as the Indian collected his fourth consecutive win to get a one-point lead atop the standings table. Arjun defeated Russian rising star Volodar Murzin with the white pieces.
In over 4 hours in front of the camera, Karsten Müller presents to you sensations from the world of endgames - partly reaching far beyond standard techniques and rules of thumb - and rounds off with some cases of with own examples.
In this heavy-piece endgame — which the engines evaluate as very slightly better for Black — it was the older player (Murzin is only 15!) who proved to be stronger technically. Murzin lost the thread shortly before the time control and ended up losing the 71-move encounter.
Three players are sharing second place on 3½ out of 5, with Surya Ganguly and Rinat Jumabayev winning in round 5 to join Thai Dai Van Nguyen in the chasing pack.

The Challengers | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit
Round 5 results
Standings after round 5
All games - Round 5
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.cxd5 cxd5 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bf4 Bd6 6.Bg3 Nc6 7.e3 Nf6 8.Bd3 Bxg3 9.hxg3 9...Qd6N 9...e5 9...Bd7 10.Nf3 Rc8 11.a3 Na5 12.Ne5 Nc4 13.Bxc4 dxc4 14.e4 Bc6 15.Nxc6 Rxc6 10.g4!± Ng8 11.f4 11.Rxh7 Rxh7 12.Bxh7 Qh2! 13.Bxg8 Qxg1+ 14.Ke2 Qxg2 11.g5 11...Nge7 11...Bd7 12.Nf3 12.Rxh7 Rxh7 13.Bxh7 g6± 12...Bd7 13.Rc1 13.Rxh7 Rxh7 14.Bxh7 g6 13...f6 14.g5 14.Rxh7?! Rxh7 15.Bxh7 e5= 14...0-0-0 15.Nb5 15.Rxh7?! Kb8= 15.a3! 15...Qb4+ 16.Kf2 Kb8 17.a3! Qa5 18.b4 Qb6 19.Nc3 Rdf8 20.Na4 Qd8 21.Nc5 Bc8 22.b5 Na5 23.Kg1 23.Rxh7 Rxh7 24.Bxh7 23...Nf5= 24.Qe1 h5 25.gxf6 gxf6 26.Nh4 Nxh4 27.Rxh4 Rfg8 28.Rc2 Nc4 29.Bxc4 dxc4 30.Qf2 30.Ne4= 30...b6 30...Rh7 31.Na6+ Bxa6 32.bxa6 Qd5 33.a4 f5 34.Qe2 Qe4 35.Rh3 35.Qxc4? Rc8 36.Qxc8+ Rxc8-+ 35...h4 36.Rxc4 36.Qxc4? Rc8 37.Rxh4 Rhg8 38.Qxc8+ Rxc8 39.Rxc8+ Kxc8-+ 36...Rg4 36...Rh7!= 37.Qf3± Qd5 37...Qxf3± 38.Rxf3 Rc8 39.Rxc8+ Kxc8 38.Qxd5!+- exd5 39.Rc2 Rc8? 39...Rhg8 40.Rh1 R8g7 40.Rxc8+ Kxc8 41.Kf2 Kd7 42.Rh1 Kd6 43.Rh3? 43.g3+- 43...Ke6? 43...Kd7!= 44.Rh1 44.g3 44...Kd6 45.a5 bxa5 45...Kc6 46.Rc1+ Kb5 46.Ra1 Rg8 47.Rxa5 Rb8 48.Ra1 Rb6 49.Kf3 Ke7 50.Rh1! Rh6 51.g4 51.g3!+- 51...fxg4+± 52.Kxg4 Rg6+ 53.Kf5 Rxa6 54.Rxh4 54.Ke5! 54...Re6 55.Rh7+ Kd6 56.Rh3! a5 57.Kg5! a4? 57...Re8± 58.f5+- Re4 59.Rh6+ Ke7 60.Rh7+! Kd6 61.Ra7 Rxe3 62.Rxa4 Re4 63.Kf6 63.f6 Re2 64.Ra7 Rf2 65.f7 Ke6 66.Kg6 Rg2+ 67.Kh7 Rf2 68.Kg8 Rg2+ 69.Kf8 63...Kd7 64.Kf7 Kd6 65.f6 Kd7 66.Kf8 Rf4 67.f7 Rg4 68.Ra7+ Kd8 69.Ra6 Kd7 70.Rh6 Rg5 71.Rh7 1–0 - Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Erigaisi Arjun | 2629 | Murzin,V | 2519 | 1–0 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.1 |
L'Ami,E | 2622 | Nguyen,T | 2609 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.2 |
Bjerre,J | 2586 | Warmerdam,M | 2599 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.3 |
Ganguly,S | 2627 | Vogel,R | 2452 | 1–0 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.4 |
Jumabayev,R | 2631 | Dardha,D | 2533 | 1–0 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.5 |
Zhu,J | 2478 | Van Foreest,L | 2530 | ½–½ | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.6 |
Shuvalova,P | 2516 | Maurizzi,M | 2496 | 1–0 | 2022 | | 84th Tata Steel Challengers 2022 | 5.7 |
Please, wait...
Replay all the Challengers’ games at Live.ChessBase.com
Links