Van Foreest beats Giri in Armageddon, wins Tata Steel Masters

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
2/1/2021 – There was no lack of excitement on the last day of action at this year’s Tata Steel Masters tournament. Jorden van Foreest defeated Nils Grandelius from the white side of a Najdorf to catch up with Anish Giri, who drew David Anton with the black pieces — these results meant an all-Dutch playoff would decide the winner. Two draws in the blitz tiebreakers were followed by an Armageddon decider, in which Giri got a major advantage but ended up losing in a wild time scramble. | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit – Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2021

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

An all-Dutch finale

The much-anticipated 2021 edition of the Tata Steel tournament in Wijk aan Zee was an all-around success, providing chess enthusiasts with high-quality games and an exciting final day of action. The organizers of the event took a major risk in putting together an over-the-board tournament amid the worldwide crisis, and luckily managed to overcome all the obstacles that came up.

Chess-wise, we got to enjoy high-quality games by extremely well-prepared players, who probably saved their opening surprises for a classical event during the period of blitz and rapid online tournaments. Notably, the Sicilian Najdorf was explored repeatedly in Wijk.

It was also a major success for the Netherlands, as the two Dutch representatives tied for first place, securing tournament victory for a local player no matter the result of the playoff — a Dutch player won the event for the last time back in 1985, when Jan Timman scored 9/13 to finish ahead of John Nunn and Alexander Beliavsky, who shared second place a full point behind.

Jorden van ForeestSurprisingly, though, it was the younger Dutch player who clinched the title. Jorden van Foreest was the fourth lowest-rated player in the lineup, but managed to catch up with his compatriot Anish Giri by beating Nils Grandelius in the final round. Van Foreest would go on to survive three inferior positions in the blitz tiebreaker to win the tournament.

The 21-year-old grandmaster from Utrecht had a great performance throughout and, like Giri, finished the event undefeated. A second of Giri in many elite tournaments, he acknowledged the fact that the blitz decider could have gone either way:

Blitz is just a coin flip basically, so full credit to him, he played a really good tournament, and he really deserved to win it — he could have won both of his last games too I think, but this is just how it goes.

A member of the noble Van Foreest family, Jorden is the eldest of five siblings. His brother Lucas (b. 2001) won the 2019 Dutch Championship after beating Jorden on tiebreaks, while his sister Machteld (b. 2007) was the first girl ever to win the Dutch U-12 Championship.

Van Foreest gained 30.2 rating points in Wijk and will join the 2700-club in the next official FIDE ratings list. For the time being, however, he does not think he will achieve such a good result in the future:

I think there is basically a zero percent chance that I will do this any time soon again.

While a number of chess players and followers have expressed heartfelt congratulations to Van Foreest for his magnificent showing, many have also referred to the fact that this might have been a painful loss for Giri. The higher-rated Dutchman gained 12.4 rating points and has climbed to number 7 in the world ranking, but given the circumstances he most likely had a single goal going into the last round — to win the tournament.

This is the second time Giri shares first place ‘in regulation’ and fails to win the event on tiebreaks, as he lost the title to Magnus Carlsen in 2018 after collecting 9 points in the classical section. Furthermore, a year later, he scored 8½/13 — the same score as this year — to finish a half point behind the world champion.

The winner of the 2020 edition, Fabiano Caruana, aptly described the final result of the players tied for first place:

For Anish is sort of an expected result to be leading — I mean he’s a top player and +4 is a good result, but it’s nothing that we would consider too surprising. Jorden I think played amazingly well, it was super impressive. [...] I feel like this might correspond to his strength — it didn’t feel like a fluke or anything.

Anish Giri

Anish Giri | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

Winners and losers

With all the drama pertaining the fight for the title, other major results might go slightly unnoticed — both positive and negative. 

The tournament was an outstanding achievement for the three youngest players in the field. Alireza Firouzja (17 years old) finished a half point behind the leaders and was inches away from catching up with them in the final round (more on that below); Andrey Esipenko (18) defeated Alexander Donchenko on Sunday to get third place on tiebreak criteria; while Van Foreest, of course, achieved the biggest success of all.

Firouzja gained 10.2 rating points and is now the 13th highest-rated player in the world, while Van Foreest (+30.2) and Esipenko (+24.1) made their way into the 2700-club.

Andrey Esipenko

18-year-old Andrey Esipenko had a breakthrough performance | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

On the other side of the spectrum, it was quite a disappointing tournament for some of the ‘veterans’ in the field. 

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave lost four games and won one for a 5/13 performance. The Frenchman lost a whopping 26.3 rating points, falling to number 15 in the ratings list, while Polish stars Radoslaw Wojtaszek and Jan-Krzysztof lost over 10 rating points in the last two weeks.

Also disappointing, given his standards, was Carlsen’s performance. The seven-time winner of the tournament in Wijk aan Zee won three games and lost to Esipenko for a 2771 TPR. The world champion lost no less than 15.3 rating points and later confessed:

The overall performance was shameful, to be honest. There were really very, very few moments of redemption in the tournament. [...] I have to do better in the future.

Donchenko finished in clear last place, but it would not be fair to call his performance a major failure, as he was invited as a (very) late replacement when Daniil Dubov cancelled his participation.

Magnus Carlsen

World champion Magnus Carlsen | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

Firouzja gets justly upset

Prior to the final round, three players knew that they would get a chance to catch the leader if they won and Giri only collected a half point. With Caruana’s draw and Van Foreest’s victory already in the books, the one player still fighting over the board was Firouzja. Going into the sixth hour of play, the youngster had a better position against Radoslaw Wojtaszek.

By that time, the spectators and players that had finished their games already knew that even if Firouzja won his game and joined the leaders Giri and Van Foreest would reach the playoff according to the tiebreak criteria. We do not know whether Firouzja was aware of this, but while he still was trying to convert a sharp position into a win the arbiters asked him and Wojtaszek to move to another board in order for the Dutchmen to occupy centre stage.

 
Firouzja vs. Wojtaszek
Position after 59.Bc3

This was the position Firouzja was trying to convert, with his bishops pointing directly at the opponent’s kingside and his own king vulnerable to potential attacks if the position opened up.

As shown in the official webcams, Firouzja was visibly upset when they asked him to move to another board, as he either thought he still had chances to reach a playoff or was trying to finish a remarkable event with a win over a fellow top grandmaster.

In the end, the 17-year-old finished his game while Giri and Van Foreest were already playing blitz, and only managed to get a half point in his last-round encounter.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 Nd7 3.d4 Nb6 4.Nc3
4...Nf6N Predecessor: 4...Bf5 5.a4 a5 6.Nh4 e6 7.Bg2 Nf6 8.Nxf5 exf5 9.0-0 Bb4 10.Qd3 g6 11.Bg5 0-1 (39) Svane,R (2349)-Bluebaum,M (2470) Playchess.com INT 2020 5.a4 a5 6.Bg2 D02: 1 d4 d5 2 Nf3 sidelines, including 2...Nf6 3 g3 and 2...Nf6 3 Bf4. h6 7.0-0 Bf5 8.Nh4 White has an edge. Bh7 9.f4 e6 10.f5 Be7 11.Bh3 Qd7 12.Qd3 Qc6 13.Nb5 Nc4 14.Bf4 Nd6 15.Qe3 Nc4 16.Qd3 16.Qf3 e5 17.dxe5 17.Bxe5 0-0= 16...Bd6 17.Nxd6+ Nxd6 18.Be5 Nde4 19.Qa3 Qd7 20.c4 c6 21.fxe6 fxe6 22.cxd5 Nxd5 23.Bg2 Nd2 24.Rfc1 Rf8 25.Nf3 Nxf3+ 26.Bxf3 aiming for Rf1. Kf7 27.e4 Nb4 28.Qe3 Kg8 29.Rc3 Rad8 30.h4 b6 31.Be2 Qe7 32.Bg4 Qf7 33.h5 Qe7 34.Rac1 Qe8 35.Bc7 Rd7 36.Bxb6 And now Bc5 would win. Na2 37.Rxc6 Better is 37.Bxa5± Nxc1 38.Rxc1 37...Nxc1 38.Rxc1 Rb7 39.Bc5 Rff7 40.b3 Rfc7 41.Re1 Rc6 42.Be2 Qb8 43.Bb5 Rc8 44.Bc4! Kh8 45.Rf1 Bg8 46.Kg2 Rd7 47.Rf2 Qb7 48.Re2 Qc7 49.Ba3 White should try 49.e5± 49...Qb6 50.Bb2 Bh7 50...Rf8= keeps the balance. 51.Qf4± Bg8 52.Qg4 52.d5!± exd5 53.exd5 52...Rcd8 53.Bc3 Qc6? 53...Rxd4 54.Bxd4 Rxd4 54.Bxa5+- Rb8 55.Qf4 Rdb7 56.Qe3 Qe8 57.g4 Qd7
intending ...e5. 58.Qg3 58.Kh3!+- 58...Qxd4± 59.Bc3 Qd1
59...Qd8± 60.Rd2 60.Be5!+- Threatens to win with g5. Rc8 61.Qe1 60...Qb1! White is slightly better. 61.Qf4 Strongly threatening Rb2. e5! 62.Bxe5 Bxc4 63.bxc4 Weighted Error Value: White=0.17/Black=0.17 63.Bxb8 Rf7 64.Qe3 64.bxc4 Rxf4 65.Bxf4 Qxe4+ Double Attack 66.Kg3 Qxc4 64...Bxb3 65.Bf4 Bxa4 66.Kg3
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Firouzja,A2749Wojtaszek,R2705½–½202183rd Tata Steel Masters 202113.6

Radoslaw Wojtaszek, Alireza Firouzja

Radoslaw Wojtaszek facing the brilliant Alireza Firouzja | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

Van Foreest, Carlsen and Esipenko score

While the blitz games in the tiebreak could have gone either way, credit should be given to Van Foreest for having won his last classical game of the tournament in style. Facing Grandelius’ Najdorf, he gave up a pawn out of the opening and made the most of the initiative in a sharp encounter while knowing all too well that a win would most likely get him to a playoff. The Dutch grandmaster found the most precise manoeuvre to increase his advantage on move 21:

 
Van Foreest vs. Grandelius
Position after 20...Nf6

21.Nb5 axb5 22.cxb5 and Black immediately gave back the piece with 22...Bxb5 23.Qxb5 as the connected passers would otherwise easily march down the board.

Van Foreest continued to impress with his play until he got the full point. A king march was a stylish way to finish off his opponent:

 
Position after 40...Qh1+

By move 46 the white king had reached h6 with decisive effect:

 
Position after 46.Kh6

46...fxe5 47.Qxe5 and Black resigned.

Carlsen and Esipenko also finished the event on a high note. The world champion defeated Vachier-Lagrave with white while the young Russian got the better of Donchenko with the black pieces.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 Nf6 2.g3 e6 3.Bg2 d5 4.Nf3 dxc4 5.Qa4+ Nbd7 6.Qxc4 a6 7.Qc2 c5 8.Nc3 Qc7 A13: English Opening: 1...e6. 9.0-0 b6 10.d4 Bb7 The position is equal. 11.Bf4 Bd6 12.Bxd6 Qxd6 13.Rfd1 0-0 14.e4 Qc7 15.Rac1 cxd4 16.Nxd4 Rad8
17.Qe2N Strongly threatening Nd5. Predecessor: 17.f4 e5 18.Nd5 Qxc2 19.Nxc2 exf4 20.gxf4 Nc5 21.Nce3 Bxd5 22.exd5 Rfe8 23.Nc4 1-0 (51) Giri,A (2779)-Karjakin,S (2748) Riga 2019 17...Qb8! 18.Rc2 b5 19.Nb3 19.e5!? Bxg2 20.exf6= 19...Ne5 20.Nc5 Bc8 21.Rcd2 Qc7 Hoping for ...Rxd2. 22.Nd3 Nxd3 23.Rxd3 b4 24.Rxd8 Rxd8 25.Rxd8+ Qxd8 26.Nd1 Bb7 27.e5 Bxg2 28.Kxg2 Qd5+! 29.Kg1
White should play 29.Qf3 Ne4 30.Ne3 Qxe5 31.Qe2 29...Nd7! 30.Ne3 Qxa2 31.Qd1 Nf8 32.Qd4 a5 33.Nc4 h5 34.Nd6 Ng6 35.Qa7?
35.Kf1 was worth a try. 35...Qb1+!-+ 36.Kg2 Nxe5 37.Qxa5 Qxb2 38.Qa8+ Kh7 39.Qe4+ f5 40.Qh4 Qe2 41.Qxb4 Nd3 42.Qb6 h4 Weighted Error Value: White=0.47/Black=0.02
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Donchenko,A2668Esipenko,A26770–1202183rd Tata Steel Masters 202113.2
Carlsen,M2862Vachier-Lagrave,M27841–0202183rd Tata Steel Masters 202113.3
Van Foreest,J2671Grandelius,N26631–0202183rd Tata Steel Masters 202113.4

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Jorden van Foreest

Jorden van Foreest defeated Nils Grandelius | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

The blitz tiebreaker

Both 5-minute games (with 3-second increments) saw Giri getting the upper hand, simplifying into slightly superior positions and failing to convert them into wins as they required utmost precision. Van Foreest should again be given credit for the way he handled his nerves under the pressure.

In Armageddon, Giri had the white pieces and needed to win in order to claim the title. He got a dream position out of a London System, with all the positional trumps on his side and an extra minute on the clock:

 
Giri vs. Van Foreest - Armageddon
Position after 25...Na3

Black is in deep trouble, with his light-squared bishop a particularly useless piece stuck behind his own pawn structure. Instead of playing the natural 26.Qc3, though, Giri spent a whole minute (there were no increments before move 60) calculating the forcing 26.c6, which in fact gave up his edge — both on the clock and in the position.

What transpired from that point on was a typical time scramble between two players that are fully aware of the fact that the game has almost nothing to do with the quality of the moves as the clock keeps ticking down. In the end, the younger Dutchman prevailed.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d3 c6 4.Nf3 d5 5.Bb3 a5 And now ...a4 would win. 6.Nc3 C24: Bishop's Opening: 2...Nf6. 6.Nxe5? a4-+ 6...Bb4 Strongly threatening ...a4. 7.a3 Don't go for 7.Nxe5? a4-+ 7...Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 a4 9.Ba2 dxe4 10.Nxe5 0-0 11.0-0
11...Qe7N Predecessor: 11...Nbd7 12.Nxd7 Bxd7 13.dxe4 Nxe4 14.Qf3 Qe7 15.Rb1 Nd6 16.c4 c5 17.Qd5 Rfe8 18.Qxc5 1/2-1/2 (54) Jensen,K (2276)-Dutra,A (2431) ICCF email 2018 12.d4 Nbd7 13.Bf4 Nd5 14.Qd2 14.Nxd7 feels hotter. Bxd7 15.Bd2 Rfe8 16.Re1 Nf6 17.Qb1 14...Nxf4 15.Qxf4 Nxe5 16.dxe5 Ra5 17.Qxe4 Qxe5 18.Qb4 Rb5 19.Qxa4 Qxc3 20.Bb3 Rg5 Black is more active. 21.Rfe1 21.Qf4 Rg4 22.Qe3 Qxe3 23.fxe3 21...Bh3 ( -> ...Qf3) 22.Qf4 White threatens Qxf7+! and mate. Rxg2+ 23.Kh1
Intending Qxf7+! and mate. 23...g5! 24.Qe3 Qxe3 25.Rxe3 g4 26.f3
26.Rg1 Rxg1+ 27.Kxg1 26...h5? 26...g3!-+ 27.hxg3 Rd8 27.fxg4 hxg4 White must now prevent ...Rd8. 28.Rg1! Rxg1+ 29.Kxg1 Endgame KRB-KRB Rd8 Hoping for ...Rd2. 30.Re7 Double Attack. The position is equal. Rd1+ 31.Kf2 Rf1+ 32.Kg3! b5 33.Rc7 Rf6 34.a4 bxa4 35.Bxa4 Rf3+ 36.Kh4 Rf2 37.Bb3 Kf8 38.Rxc6 Rxh2 39.Rf6 Ke8 40.Rxf7 Rxc2 41.Bxc2 Bb3 is the strong threat. Kxf7 42.Bf5 Kf6 43.Bxg4 Bxg4 44.Kxg4 Weighted Error Value: White=0.21/Black=0.21
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Van Foreest,J2671Giri,A2764½–½202183rd Tata Steel Masters 2021-TB1.1
Giri,A2764Van Foreest,J2671½–½202183rd Tata Steel Masters 2021-TB1.2
Giri,A2764Van Foreest,J26710–1202183rd Tata Steel Masters 2021-TB1.3

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Anish Giri

Back in the day, in the Wijk aan Zee tournament, in case of a tie for first place the players were declared co-winners — if those rules were still be in place, Anish Giri would have claimed the title twice already | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit


Round 13 results

 

Final standings

Loading Table...

All games

 
Loading...
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.