Van Foreest beats Giri in Armageddon, wins Tata Steel Masters

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
2/1/2021 – There was no lack of excitement on the last day of action at this year’s Tata Steel Masters tournament. Jorden van Foreest defeated Nils Grandelius from the white side of a Najdorf to catch up with Anish Giri, who drew David Anton with the black pieces — these results meant an all-Dutch playoff would decide the winner. Two draws in the blitz tiebreakers were followed by an Armageddon decider, in which Giri got a major advantage but ended up losing in a wild time scramble. | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit – Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2021

ChessBase 16 - Mega package Edition 2021 ChessBase 16 - Mega package Edition 2021

Your key to fresh ideas, precise analyses and targeted training!
Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.

More...

An all-Dutch finale

The much-anticipated 2021 edition of the Tata Steel tournament in Wijk aan Zee was an all-around success, providing chess enthusiasts with high-quality games and an exciting final day of action. The organizers of the event took a major risk in putting together an over-the-board tournament amid the worldwide crisis, and luckily managed to overcome all the obstacles that came up.

Chess-wise, we got to enjoy high-quality games by extremely well-prepared players, who probably saved their opening surprises for a classical event during the period of blitz and rapid online tournaments. Notably, the Sicilian Najdorf was explored repeatedly in Wijk.

It was also a major success for the Netherlands, as the two Dutch representatives tied for first place, securing tournament victory for a local player no matter the result of the playoff — a Dutch player won the event for the last time back in 1985, when Jan Timman scored 9/13 to finish ahead of John Nunn and Alexander Beliavsky, who shared second place a full point behind.

Jorden van ForeestSurprisingly, though, it was the younger Dutch player who clinched the title. Jorden van Foreest was the fourth lowest-rated player in the lineup, but managed to catch up with his compatriot Anish Giri by beating Nils Grandelius in the final round. Van Foreest would go on to survive three inferior positions in the blitz tiebreaker to win the tournament.

The 21-year-old grandmaster from Utrecht had a great performance throughout and, like Giri, finished the event undefeated. A second of Giri in many elite tournaments, he acknowledged the fact that the blitz decider could have gone either way:

Blitz is just a coin flip basically, so full credit to him, he played a really good tournament, and he really deserved to win it — he could have won both of his last games too I think, but this is just how it goes.

A member of the noble Van Foreest family, Jorden is the eldest of five siblings. His brother Lucas (b. 2001) won the 2019 Dutch Championship after beating Jorden on tiebreaks, while his sister Machteld (b. 2007) was the first girl ever to win the Dutch U-12 Championship.

Van Foreest gained 30.2 rating points in Wijk and will join the 2700-club in the next official FIDE ratings list. For the time being, however, he does not think he will achieve such a good result in the future:

I think there is basically a zero percent chance that I will do this any time soon again.

While a number of chess players and followers have expressed heartfelt congratulations to Van Foreest for his magnificent showing, many have also referred to the fact that this might have been a painful loss for Giri. The higher-rated Dutchman gained 12.4 rating points and has climbed to number 7 in the world ranking, but given the circumstances he most likely had a single goal going into the last round — to win the tournament.

This is the second time Giri shares first place ‘in regulation’ and fails to win the event on tiebreaks, as he lost the title to Magnus Carlsen in 2018 after collecting 9 points in the classical section. Furthermore, a year later, he scored 8½/13 — the same score as this year — to finish a half point behind the world champion.

The winner of the 2020 edition, Fabiano Caruana, aptly described the final result of the players tied for first place:

For Anish is sort of an expected result to be leading — I mean he’s a top player and +4 is a good result, but it’s nothing that we would consider too surprising. Jorden I think played amazingly well, it was super impressive. [...] I feel like this might correspond to his strength — it didn’t feel like a fluke or anything.

Anish Giri

Anish Giri | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

Winners and losers

With all the drama pertaining the fight for the title, other major results might go slightly unnoticed — both positive and negative. 

The tournament was an outstanding achievement for the three youngest players in the field. Alireza Firouzja (17 years old) finished a half point behind the leaders and was inches away from catching up with them in the final round (more on that below); Andrey Esipenko (18) defeated Alexander Donchenko on Sunday to get third place on tiebreak criteria; while Van Foreest, of course, achieved the biggest success of all.

Firouzja gained 10.2 rating points and is now the 13th highest-rated player in the world, while Van Foreest (+30.2) and Esipenko (+24.1) made their way into the 2700-club.

Andrey Esipenko

18-year-old Andrey Esipenko had a breakthrough performance | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

On the other side of the spectrum, it was quite a disappointing tournament for some of the ‘veterans’ in the field. 

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave lost four games and won one for a 5/13 performance. The Frenchman lost a whopping 26.3 rating points, falling to number 15 in the ratings list, while Polish stars Radoslaw Wojtaszek and Jan-Krzysztof lost over 10 rating points in the last two weeks.

Also disappointing, given his standards, was Carlsen’s performance. The seven-time winner of the tournament in Wijk aan Zee won three games and lost to Esipenko for a 2771 TPR. The world champion lost no less than 15.3 rating points and later confessed:

The overall performance was shameful, to be honest. There were really very, very few moments of redemption in the tournament. [...] I have to do better in the future.

Donchenko finished in clear last place, but it would not be fair to call his performance a major failure, as he was invited as a (very) late replacement when Daniil Dubov cancelled his participation.

Magnus Carlsen

World champion Magnus Carlsen | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

Firouzja gets justly upset

Prior to the final round, three players knew that they would get a chance to catch the leader if they won and Giri only collected a half point. With Caruana’s draw and Van Foreest’s victory already in the books, the one player still fighting over the board was Firouzja. Going into the sixth hour of play, the youngster had a better position against Radoslaw Wojtaszek.

By that time, the spectators and players that had finished their games already knew that even if Firouzja won his game and joined the leaders Giri and Van Foreest would reach the playoff according to the tiebreak criteria. We do not know whether Firouzja was aware of this, but while he still was trying to convert a sharp position into a win the arbiters asked him and Wojtaszek to move to another board in order for the Dutchmen to occupy centre stage.

 

This was the position Firouzja was trying to convert, with his bishops pointing directly at the opponent’s kingside and his own king vulnerable to potential attacks if the position opened up.

As shown in the official webcams, Firouzja was visibly upset when they asked him to move to another board, as he either thought he still had chances to reach a playoff or was trying to finish a remarkable event with a win over a fellow top grandmaster.

In the end, the 17-year-old finished his game while Giri and Van Foreest were already playing blitz, and only managed to get a half point in his last-round encounter.

 

Radoslaw Wojtaszek, Alireza Firouzja

Radoslaw Wojtaszek facing the brilliant Alireza Firouzja | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

Van Foreest, Carlsen and Esipenko score

While the blitz games in the tiebreak could have gone either way, credit should be given to Van Foreest for having won his last classical game of the tournament in style. Facing Grandelius’ Najdorf, he gave up a pawn out of the opening and made the most of the initiative in a sharp encounter while knowing all too well that a win would most likely get him to a playoff. The Dutch grandmaster found the most precise manoeuvre to increase his advantage on move 21:

 

21.Nb5 axb5 22.cxb5 and Black immediately gave back the piece with 22...Bxb5 23.Qxb5 as the connected passers would otherwise easily march down the board.

Van Foreest continued to impress with his play until he got the full point. A king march was a stylish way to finish off his opponent:

 

By move 46 the white king had reached h6 with decisive effect:

 

46...fxe5 47.Qxe5 and Black resigned.

Carlsen and Esipenko also finished the event on a high note. The world champion defeated Vachier-Lagrave with white while the young Russian got the better of Donchenko with the black pieces.

 

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Jorden van Foreest

Jorden van Foreest defeated Nils Grandelius | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit

The blitz tiebreaker

Both 5-minute games (with 3-second increments) saw Giri getting the upper hand, simplifying into slightly superior positions and failing to convert them into wins as they required utmost precision. Van Foreest should again be given credit for the way he handled his nerves under the pressure.

In Armageddon, Giri had the white pieces and needed to win in order to claim the title. He got a dream position out of a London System, with all the positional trumps on his side and an extra minute on the clock:

 

Black is in deep trouble, with his light-squared bishop a particularly useless piece stuck behind his own pawn structure. Instead of playing the natural 26.Qc3, though, Giri spent a whole minute (there were no increments before move 60) calculating the forcing 26.c6, which in fact gave up his edge — both on the clock and in the position.

What transpired from that point on was a typical time scramble between two players that are fully aware of the fact that the game has almost nothing to do with the quality of the moves as the clock keeps ticking down. In the end, the younger Dutchman prevailed.

 

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Anish Giri

Back in the day, in the Wijk aan Zee tournament, in case of a tie for first place the players were declared co-winners — if those rules were still be in place, Anish Giri would have claimed the title twice already | Photo: Jurriaan Hoefsmit


Round 13 results

 

Final standings

 

All games

 

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 2/6/2021 06:17
Thanks for the link, but it does not explain much. There is rampant speculation in the comments regarding what was said and how he was approached, whether there was a distraction before move 60, and a multitude of other things. Plus it is entirely unclear what "rules" the players were discussed beforehand and whether knowing the tiebreak time was going to imply disturbances to other games in progress (like making them move!) or how a fixed tiebreak time can be reconciled with games of variable duration, and so on.

I believe it is against FIDE rules to disturb a player, so not sure how this event's rules can contravene that.
Why didn't they play the tiebreak elsewhere? Were there really paying spectators during the covid crisis of which they needed to be mindful?

And I hear a lot of blame on the chief arbiter, but what about the assistant arbiter? Some blame should also go there.
Pemoe6 Pemoe6 2/3/2021 11:53
Have a look to
https://twitter.com/tatasteelchess/status/1356357694656012291
That answers all questions. And yes - Firouza's blunder (which ruined his position) came 2 moves later.
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 2/3/2021 05:04
I did not see the event, but is it true that Firouzja was asked to change tables DURING a game? Does that mean they transferred the chess board/pieces to another table? How can this be? Why didn't Firouzja or his opponent protest?
And if it was the arbiter's decision, why didn't the assistant arbiter say/do anything?

Also why was it necessary to ask them to change tables? If it was for a playoff, why wasn't the playoff done on the other table?
KrushonIrina KrushonIrina 2/3/2021 04:59
Great tournament. But Firouzja was doubly insulted in final round: a) Starting playoff while he's still playing, and b) asking him to move his game in the middle of it. That's TD malpractice.
satman satman 2/2/2021 02:05
After the way he was treated it would be quite understandable if Firouzja told them politely (or even impolitely!) that he wouldn't accepting any further invitations to their tournament in future.
adbennet adbennet 2/1/2021 11:37
@Pemoe6 @fr5nk - Right, Firouzja finished with 48 S-B points. If he had won the last game he would have had +2.5 more, still behind Giri at 52.25.

But I think it was grossly unfair of the organizers to start the playoff while games are underway. Even without moving the table, it's a disruption.

And when they created the schedule *before* the start of the last round, they couldn't know that any unfinished game would not affect the final playoff. So they must have made a decision to start the playoff *early* based on already knowing who the players would be. A terrible decision by the organizers, and the arbiter should have refused to allow it.
twamers twamers 2/1/2021 09:28
I loved the tournament and many of the games so thanks to the players for giving such great entertainment. But I absolutely hate the blitz and armageddon finish. That is for me a very bad way to finish the tournament.
Pemoe6 Pemoe6 2/1/2021 09:23
@fr5nk: The rules were clear: Alireza was hopeless behind in SonnebornBerger ... But however, there is the question of prize money: shared first place vs. fourth. His blunder to miss the blow 61....e5 was clearly a result of this ugly disorder made by the organisers.
jose urbina jose urbina 2/1/2021 06:53
Is there a phychological element that preven Giri from winning?
Gerald C Gerald C 2/1/2021 06:50
To end up such a prestigious tournament by 2 blitz games and an Armageddon is simply ridiculous.
fr5nk fr5nk 2/1/2021 05:06
This great tournament returning to OTB chess during Covid times has been enjoyed by many chess patzers like me thanks to watching online. That said, I remain totally confused by what went down at the finish. Why was Alireza not allowed to finish his game before the Dutch playoff started?
Had Alireza won that game, would the Dutch playoff have been aborted after it had started?

The playoff rules are not clear, especially the wording within the parentheses:

In case two players share first place (if more players share first place, the first two players will be selected, according to criteria listed below), they will play a tiebreak. This consists of two blitz games, possibly followed by an Armageddon game. The time control for two Blitz games is 5 min + 3 sec. An Armageddon game will consist of 5 minutes for white and 4 minutes for black, with a 3 second increment after the 60th move.
Tiebreak criteria for a play-off in case more than two players share first place:
the mutual result;
the Sonneborn-Berger score;
the player with more number of games with black;
drawing of lots.
Drawing of lots will be done by the Chief Arbiter.
Somewhat Experienced Somewhat Experienced 2/1/2021 02:31
Truly great tournament but - as always - rather disappointing that Lady Luck has the final say...
lajosarpad lajosarpad 2/1/2021 12:56
I always find strange that low-quality games decide the outcome of a tournament which is all about high-quality games. Anyway, this tournament was absolutely great!
gerando gerando 2/1/2021 12:48
The Firouzja incident was very unprofessional from the organisation. It's a lack of respect towards professional players, but also against their own tournament, since it implies that a last-round game which was critical for the podium was not so important. A formal apology would be in order.
rubi1 rubi1 2/1/2021 12:48
Well without shootout Jorden would have won on SB. But both had a great tournament .
Letolk78 Letolk78 2/1/2021 12:13
I can understand Firouzja's discontent and I am a bit surprised by this lack of tact from the organizers.
mc1483 mc1483 2/1/2021 12:00
I fully agree. Blitz and Armageddon to decide such tournaments are even worse than shootouts in fottball. Giri deserved to be the winner.
Jack Nayer Jack Nayer 2/1/2021 11:14
Wijk aan Zee has always been a superb tournament. Its participants deserve a lot better than this despicable Armageddon circus.
1