Sydney: What is dead may never die

by Daniel Fernandez
5/2/2019 – Regular ChessBase contributor GM DANIEL FERNANDEZ got major déjà vu while playing the newly revamped Sydney International Open, which a decade ago regularly saw the participation of distinguished overseas guests like Li Chao and Gawain Jones. The event, which ran from the 24th to 28th of April after a 5-year break, returned under a mix of old and new management with a 1st prize of A$3000. It was won by FM Raymond Song, an ex-prodigy (=1st at World Youth U10 2004) returning to the game after his own (even longer) break. | Photos: Helen Milligan/New Zealand Chess News

Chess News


The Petroff (or Russian) Defence which is characterised by the moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 has been popular at the highest levels for many years and enjoys the reputation of being an extremely solid defence.

Sydney International Open 2019

While earlier editions of the tournament had been held in Parramatta, a suburb around 20 minutes train ride to the west of Sydney's central business district, the event's new home this year was the leafy Macquarie University campus in North Ryde and it came packaged as part of the Macquarie University Chess Festival.

Alongside the main open, the traditional fixtures of an Australian tournament were in evidence: the blitz tournament, the challengers' section and the commentary by GM Ian Rogers.

Boulevard

The path to the playing venue | Photo: Helen Milligan/New Zealand Chess News

Added to these was an element that piqued my interest: the promotion of a new game called Chess Plus, an Australian innovation which promises to become popular with players worldwide and has already won several awards for design.

The defining feature of the game is that pieces can split and merge, changing their powers along the way. A variant of the game has been played in amateur circles in at least three countries before, but never commercialized! Chess Plus features sleek, Scandinavian-birch type pieces that slide into each other to pair up (only two pieces can be joined at a time) and a detailed printed rule set. The contrast could not be greater with the first time I got introduced to a similar game by Chinese now-GM Fang Yuxiang (in Hungary in 2014) with the laconic line: "兵 吃马 的 时候 就 可以 加 上 马 的 功 能" (When a pawn takes a knight, it gains the knight's powers)!

The first I heard of this year's festival was in January, when British-Australian IM Gary Lane told me it was being revived. (It didn't take me long to fire off an email about conditions and get a reply from Shaun Press — an old acquaintance who I wrongly assumed was the chief organiser!) In fact there was a new chief organiser, but Gary was nevertheless well-connected enough to hear about the event within days of its confirmation; at the closing ceremony it was revealed that the event had only been confirmed with four months lead time.

Gary Lane and Shaun Press

Veteran organiser Shaun Press (R) with IM Gary Lane | Photo: Helen Milligan

This itself was the first sign that déjà vu was about to hit big time: I first played Gary in the old tournament and had barely seen him since. Checking an early version of the starting list, I saw this familiar name crop up:

Kunte

GM Abhijit Kunte | Photo: Helen Milligan

The last time I'd played a competitive game in Sydney had been against him, a full nine years ago; the result was a study-like endgame swindle that attracted a little notoriety at the time. Oddly, this year too I was to have a lucky endgame escape and finish on 6½/9... 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
43...fxg4 44.Rxe6 Bxe6 45.hxg4 Kh7 This endgame looks like an unlikely candidate for a fortress. But around this point, I realised that in fact I only need to push ...g5 and transfer my bishop from e6 to g6 and White would in fact have no way in. 46.f3 Ba2 47.Qe7 This is a step in the wrong direction- simply restricting my king a tiny bit more isn't a winning plan because I didn't want to move it anyway. 47.Kf2 Bb1 48.Qc1 Ba2 49.Qc2 Bg8 50.g3 Be6 51.Qc6 Ba2 52.Ke3 Bb1 53.f4 exf4+ 54.gxf4 Now there will be no fortress: White wants Qb5 and f5 next. 47...Bb1 48.Kf2? This throws away the win. The question remains of whether White wins simply by shortening the b1-h7 diagonal with 48.g5 . I suspect not, because following h5 49.g3 Bf5 White will need to play g4 in order to chase the bishop away, which is a prerequisite for bringing the king in without facing .. .e4+. Then Black would draw by simply playing his bishop to g8 and sitting tight. However, it could be that White has a clever way to arrange to trap the bishop using some tactics on the h-file. 48.Qb4 or something else that disrupts ...g5 would win too, because White's plan is not time-critical. 48...g5! Fortress complete. 49.Ke3 Bg6 50.Kd2 Kg8 51.Qe6+ Kh7 52.g3 Bh8 53.Ke3 Bg7 54.f4 exf4+ 55.gxf4 gxf4+ 56.Kxf4 Bh8 57.g5 h5 Here, I genuinely do not recall whether White jokingly played Qxg6 while offering the draw, or not... ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Kunte,A2528Fernandez,D2299½–½2010E90Sydney open9

Later I noticed more names that I had barely seen (if at all) since the 2010 event: GM-elect George Xie and FM Raymond Song. Truly, the pieces were coming together. The latter proceeded to win the event and will be the subject of a later interview in these pages; his comeback to chess is something of a sensation in Asia-Pacific circles at the moment because he's just made 2 IM norms and his next rating will be around 2450!

Raymond Song

FM Raymond Song | Photo: Helen Milligan

Fast-forwarding to the actual week of the event, it seemed I wouldn't have such a rosy experience this time: I'd be going straight to the first round from the airport, having just travelled back from Malaysia, and the public transport links from my student accommodation in Sydney to the venue weren't particularly easy. Additionally, I had the makings of a moderate-to-severe cold. 

So it wasn't a bad thing that my first round was a win by default. Later, though, this was to complicate matters: it turned out my opponent had actually requested a bye which had simply not been processed, so he had to receive a half point and the game couldn't be counted as a win for me for tie-break purposes, even though it did in the cross-table.

After that I noticed my first serious problem with the tournament: the gap between games was too short to do anything with (like watch a movie in the nearby mall, or go home) but too long to do nothing with! The tournament was played to an odd schedule with double-rounds each day at 12 noon and 6pm, and with a time-control of "90/30" it was pretty clear that almost every game would be over within 4 hours. My own preference would be to have the rounds at 9:30am and then 2:30 or 3pm, but this being the first iteration of the event, everyone will doubtless have their feedback to give, and the organiser Paul Russell has already been quite responsive to mine.

As with all double-round tournaments, things proceeded apace. There was barely time to breathe, let alone prepare, and certainly not to take stock. But by the second day it was already clear to most observers that Song, who made his first IM-norm just the previous week, was still on good form, beating his future co-winner in an opening where it seemed White was lacking fresh ideas (so much so that a recent game between top players included the baffling retreat 13.♗c1!?)

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 d5 4.Nf3 Be7 5.Bg2 0-0 6.0-0 dxc4 7.Qc2 a6 Raymond Song's opening versatility in this tournament was commendable. 8.a4 Obviously the main move is still 8.Qxc4 b5 9.Qc2 Bb7 and now one of three moves with the c1-bishop 8...Bd7 9.Qxc4 9.Ne5 Nc6! 9...Bc6 10.Nxc6 Nxc6 11.e3 Na5 12.Nd2 and White regains the pawn while keeping the bishop-pair. It is important to note the wrinkle c5 13.dxc5 Rc8 14.b4! 10.Qxc4 Nd5! 10...Nxe5 11.dxe5 Nd5 12.Nc3 11.Nxd7 Na5! 12.Qd3 Nb4 13.Qc3 Qxd7 14.Nd2 Rfd8= Black has enough compensation for the bishop-pair, when we consider the short-term factors. 9...Bc6 10.Bf4 Bd6 11.Qc1! A recent elite game went: 11.Bg5 Nbd7 12.Nc3 h6 13.Bc1 Even the official commentary stream was powerless to explain this move, which seems to rely on considerations that are so long-term as to be practically non-existent. 13.Bxf6 Nxf6 14.Rfd1 really does seem like a better try for an advantage, even if it should also not work. Qe7 15.Nd2 15.Ne5 Bxg2 16.Kxg2 c5= Kuzubov,Y-Bologan,V Plovdiv 2012 15...Bxg2 16.Kxg2 Bb4!= 13...a5 14.b3 Qe7 15.Bb2 Rfd8 16.Rac1?! On one level there is nothing so wrong with this, and on another it signs away most of White's winning chances. As Mamedyarov commented in his press conference, ... Bxf3 is often a terrible idea when White has both bishops, but after one pair has been traded off, Black can worry less and can perhaps even think about winning the battle of minor pieces. 16.e3 was a little more ambitious- it is still not completely clear to me how Black intends to deploy his pieces. White's queen can retreat to e2 and he can consider playing for e4, or even Bh3 and Nd2-c4. Nd5 can for instance be met. 17.Nxd5 Bxd5 18.Qc2 f5 19.Nd2 16...Ba3! 17.Bxa3 Qxa3 18.Nb5 Qe7! 19.Qc2 19.Nxc7?? Nb6-+ is a rather useful detail 19...Bxf3 20.Bxf3 c6= Black was very much fine in Ding, L-Mamedyarov,S Shamkir Chess 2018 11...Nbd7 12.Nc3 Qe7 13.Bg5!? An interesting and very logical move, threatening e4-e5, which I hadn't previously considered. 13.Re1 Bxf3 14.Bxf3 Bxf4 15.Qxf4 c6 16.a5 e5!= 17.dxe5 Nxe5 18.Bg2 Rad8 19.b4 19.Red1= 19...Rd7 20.Bh3 Rd6 Inarkiev,E-Leko,P Riadh 2017 13.a5!? 13...h6 14.Bh4 Consistent. 14.Bxf6 Nxf6 15.Rd1 a5 16.Nh4 Bxg2 17.Kxg2 c5 18.Nf3 was agreed drawn in the rather less inspiring Hillarp Persson,T-Sjodahl,P Norrkoeping 2016 14...Bxf3?! 14...Qe8! Since I really don't like the text, there's only really one other way to stop White from playing e4-e5. The hope here is that the awkwardness of White's bishop being on h4 will counterbalance that of Black's queen being on e8. 14...g5?? simply doesn't work immediately: 15.Nxg5 Bxg2 16.Kxg2 hxg5 17.Qxg5+ Kh7 18.Ne4 and Black loses at least his f6-knight. 15.Bxf3 g5?! The lesser evil, as in the examples above where Black also took on f3, was 15...c6!? 16.Ne4 16.e4 e5 16...a5 This is a position I don't really know how to assess, except that Black isn't better. Probably White, after messing around to some extent, will find there is no better alternative than swapping both pairs of minor pieces and then playing for b4 somewhere deep in an ending, and Black should hold. 16.Bxg5 hxg5 17.Qxg5+ Kh8 18.Bxb7 Ra7 For me, 18...Rab8 19.Bxa6 Rxb2 is a lot more natural, but Black is still worse. 19.Bg2 Nh7 20.Qd2 White's plan of f4 and e4-e5 is extremely simple and hard to combat, though maybe White would have been better served with the bishop on c6 than on g2. f5?! Maybe Black's best shot at counterplay was to try and establish a pawn presence in the centre immediately with 20...c5 and if 21.d5 then perhaps Rb8 or ...Ndf6 with the idea of ...e5. 21.e4 f4 22.e5 Bb4 23.Rfe1 f3 I remember being a bit surprised Black didn't immediately go 23...c5 , and the computer bears out this assessment. 24.Bf1 Nb6 25.Re4 c5 26.Rh4 cxd4 The position was definitely closer to being recoverable if Black traded the other rook: 26...Rd7 27.Rd1 Rxd4 28.Rxd4 cxd4 29.Qxd4 Bc5 27.Qxd4 Bc5 28.Qe4 Now White obtains a 4th pawn for the piece by force and the game is practically over. Rd7 29.Rd1 Rxd1 30.Nxd1 a5 31.Bd3 Rf7 32.Nc3 Rg7 33.Kf1 Nd7 34.Qa8+ Qf8 35.Qxa5 Nxe5 36.Bxh7 Rxh7 37.Qc7 Nf7 38.Rxh7+ Kxh7 39.Qb7 Kg7 40.Qxf3 Qd6 41.Ne4 Qd4 42.Nxc5 Qxc5 43.Qc3+ Qxc3 44.bxc3 Ne5 45.a5 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Song,R2329Padmini,R23641–02019E05Sydney International Open4

On this DVD Grandmaster Daniel King offers you a repertoire for Black against the Catalan, based around maintaining the rock of a pawn on d5. Keeping central control ultimately gives Black good chances to launch an attack against the enemy king.


It seemed at that stage like the only player who could match him was the top seed GM Abhijit Kunte, and the two were due to face off in the 5th round. In spite of (or because of) the result, it seems that Raymond was the more energised afterwards, while Kunte sank back when at 4½/5 and began making draws (starting with one against yours truly), with only one of those draws being double-edged.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.d4 Nd7 5.0-0 Ngf6 6.b3 0-0 7.Bb2 e6 8.c4 b6 In a few moves this setup will end up looking quite passive, and the main place Black needs to watch out in the short/ medium-term is the c-file. 9.Nc3 Bb7 10.Ne5 Qc8?! In our Facebook conversation, Raymond criticised this move, saying that he is almost lost after it, and in fact I agree with his assessment. 10...Ne4! Black needs to stop marking time and exchange some pieces to ease his defensive task. 11.cxd5 Nxc3 12.Bxc3 Nxe5 13.dxe5 Bxd5 14.Bxd5 Qxd5 15.Qxd5 exd5 16.Rfd1= White's position is more pleasant to play, but nothing more than that. 11.cxd5 This is the problem: Black is never able to arrange ...c5 now, because the hanging pawns are just chronically weak. Nxd5 12.Nxd5 exd5 13.Nd3 a5 14.Rc1 Qd8 15.e3± Black's position is very unpleasant, perhaps at the elite-GM level it could already be considered as lost. The rest is one-way traffic to a great extent. Re8 15...c5 will never work tactically again, e. g. 16.Nf4 Nf6 17.Ba3 16.Qc2 c6 17.b4 Maybe this wasn't strictly necessary but it does give Black something extra to think about. axb4 After 17...a4 we can only assume the intention was to go 18.b5 cxb5 19.Qc7 and this pattern will be repeated throughout the game. 18.Nxb4 Re6 19.a4 Ra5 20.Bc3 Continuing to build pressure. Here it wasn't totally stupid to think about 20.Nxd5? even though it doesn't work right away due to cxd5 21.Qc7 Qxc7 22.Rxc7 Bc6 and there's an escape for the bishop on a4. 20...Qa8 21.Ra1 Re8 22.Rfb1 Ra7 23.Qb3 Rc8 24.Rd1 Bf8 25.Nd3 Ba6 26.Ne5! Nxe5 27.dxe5 Bc4 28.Qxb6 Bg7 29.a5 Rb7 30.Qd4 Qa6 On 30...c5 I am sure White would have at least been tempted by the spectacular 31.Qxc4 dxc4 32.a6 Rb6 33.Bxa8 Rxa8 34.Ra5 when the endgame should be relatively trivial. 31.Qd2 Rd8 32.Rdb1 c5 33.Rxb7 Qxb7 34.Qb2 Qa7 35.Qb6! To play this, White had to calculate to the end. 35.a6 is possible, but not as convincing. 35...Qxb6 36.axb6 d4 37.exd4 cxd4 38.b7 dxc3 38...Bxe5 39.Ra8 Rb8 40.Bxd4+- 39.Ra8 c2 40.Rxd8+ Bf8 41.Rxf8+ Kg7 42.Rg8+! A cute move to finish the job and leave White a whole rook up. Kh6 43.h4 c1Q+ 44.Kh2 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Kunte,A2485Song,R23291–02019D02Sydney International Open5

The Nimzo-Indian, the Gruenfeld and the King's Indian Defence are three incredibly uncomfortable defences to meet. This hypermodern DVD gives new ideas on how to squash these setups with sound, positional play based on double fianchetto systems.


The last-mentioned game (round 6) between the two top seeds was so dull that my opponent took barely half an hour to play it, while I amused myself with seeing which arbiters and organisers (other than those already mentioned) I could recognise! First mention should go to the photographer who took all these images — Kiwi WFM Helen Milligan, who I believe once arbitrated a match of mine in the 2010 Olympiad; there were some other familiar faces as well as some new ones in roughly even measure, as you'll see a bit later.

Top results and standings after Round 6

Name Pts. Result Pts. Name
Fernandez Daniel Howard 4 ½ - ½ Kunte Abhijit
Ikeda Junta 4 1 - 0 4 Puccini Jack
Song Raymond 4 1 - 0 4 Gong Daniel Hanwen
Lane Gary W 4 1 - 0 Zhang Jilin
Hu Jason 0 - 1 Padmini Rout
Rk. Name Pts.  TB1 
1 Song Raymond 5,0 0,0
2 Lane Gary W 5,0 0,0
3 Kunte Abhijit 5,0 0,0
4 Ikeda Junta 5,0 0,0
5 Padmini Rout 4,5 0,0
6 Fernandez Daniel Howard 4,5 0,0
7 McClymont Brodie 4,0 0,0
8 Gong Daniel Hanwen 4,0 0,0
9 Solomon Stephen J 4,0 0,0
10 Puccini Jack 4,0 0,0

The Home Stretch: Rounds 7-9

With three rounds to play, there was a large group of players in contention for the top prizes, and at this point the games became interesting to me from an opening point of view as well as a practical one!

Fernandez

Yours truly, the day before a major shave | Photo: Helen Milligan

In round 7 I almost got the chance to test one of the critical but unplayed lines from my DVD over the board. As it is I was able to demonstrate safe equality for Black in another line. After missing the tactic in the late middlegame and being told about it afterwards, I became quite demoralised for the following games and was quite lucky to not lose either, while my opponent seemed to gain strength from it and won rounds 8 and 9...

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Be7 7.0-0 Nd6 A system which I have played on numerous occasions, dating back to 2013. It avoids heavy theory and Black's ideas are incredibly easy to remember. 8.Re1 0-0 9.Bf4 9.Nbd2 Now the following game gives a good illustration of another of Black's freeing mechanisms, i.e. ...Bg5: Re8 10.Nf1 c6 11.Ng3 Nd7 12.c3 Bf6 12...Nf8= improves slightly 13.Bf4 Rxe1+ 14.Qxe1 Nf8 15.Qe2 Ng6 16.Be3 Bg4 17.h3 Bxf3 18.Qxf3 Bg5= In McPhillips,J-Fernandez,D Coulsdon 2017 I tried for a long time to win a drawn knight endgame but could not. 9...Re8 9...Bg4?! This was my choice against Nigel Short, but it leaves the b7-pawn weak. 10.Nbd2 Nd7 11.c3 11.c4 Here this isn't good because Black is too active. dxc4 12.Nxc4 Nxc4 13.Bxc4 Nb6 14.Bb3 c6= 11...Nf6 12.Qb3 Rb8 13.Re2 Re8 14.Rae1 White has consolidated his opening edge. Bf8?! 15.Rxe8 Ndxe8 16.Ne5 Bh5?! 17.h3 Bg6 18.Nxg6 hxg6 19.c4 Bd6 20.Bg5 c6 21.c5± White had a serious advantage already in Short,N-Fernandez,D London 2016 10.Nbd2 Here, on my DVD from last year, I commented that the text is the most challenging way for White to meet my system, keeping the option of c4 open. Nd7 11.c3 This, however, is not especially testing. 11.c4! After this critical move, I include a large chunk of my analysis from the DVD, but to get it in readable format you will have to buy the work. dxc4 12.Nxc4 Now Black has three logical moves with the d7-knight, of which 2 seem to equalise. Nf6!? 12...Nxc4 13.Bxc4 Nb6 13...Rf8 14.Rc1 c6 15.d5± 14.Bxf7+‼ The point of 11.c4. Kxf7 15.Ng5+ Bxg5 16.Qh5+ Kf8 17.Bxg5 Qd7 18.Qxh7+- 12...Nb6 13.Nxd6 Bxd6 14.Qd2 Rxe1+ 14...Rf8!? is not as stupid as it looks 15.Rxe1 Bxf4 16.Qxf4 g6 Now the only way I can think of to stop ... Be6 completing development for more than a move is 17.Ng5 f6 18.Ne4 18.Nf3 but still, after the cold-blooded Qd6 Black should be fine. 18.Ne6 Bxe6 19.Rxe6 Nd5 20.Qf3 c6 21.Bc4 Kf7 22.Bxd5 cxd5 23.Re5 Rc8! Black is on time with the counterplay 18...Bf5 19.Bc2 Kh8 20.g4 Bxe4 21.Qxe4 c6= 13.Rc1 13.Nxd6 Bxd6 14.Rxe8+ Qxe8 15.Be5 15.Bxd6 cxd6 15...Qe7 16.Qb3 b6= Once it reaches high depth, the engine realises that after ...Be6 comes, Black will be completely fine. 13...h6 13...Nd5 14.Nxd6 Bxd6 15.Rxe8+ Qxe8 16.Bxd6 cxd6 17.Qb3 14.Qb3 14.Nxd6 Bxd6 15.Rxe8+ Nxe8= is still nothing 14.Ne3 is logical, trying to prevent ...Nd5, but Black can bring more pieces to bear on this square. c6 15.Be5 Be6 16.Bb1 Nd5 17.Qd2 Qd7= As so often in the Petroff, Black is fine if he only stays calm. 14...Bf8 15.Rxe8 15.Nxd6 Rxe1+ 16.Rxe1 cxd6 17.Bc4 White cannot rely on a static advantage either, e.g. 17.h3 Qb6 18.Qxb6 axb6 19.a3 Be6 17...Qc7 18.d5 Bf5= 15...Ndxe8 16.Ne3 A wide variety of moves are possible, but we need only consider the ones which impede Black's developing plan of ...Nd5, ... c6, . ..Nd6 etc. 16.Be5 a5 17.Bxf6 Nxf6 18.Nce5 Nd5= 16...Be6 17.Qxb7 17.Bc4 Bxc4 18.Rxc4 Nd5 19.Bg3 Nxe3 20.fxe3 Nd6 21.Bxd6 cxd6! 22.Qxb7 22.Rc3 Qd7 with dynamic equality 22...Rb8 23.Qxa7 Qe8! 24.d5 Rxb2= 17...Nd5! 18.Nxd5 18.Be5 Rb8 19.Qxa7 Ra8 19...Rxb2 20.a4 20.Qb7 Nd6 21.Bxd6 Bxd6 22.Ne5 Bxe5 23.dxe5 Nxe3 24.fxe3 Rxa2= 18...Bxd5 19.Qa6 Bxf3 20.gxf3 Qxd4 21.Qc4 Rd8 21...Qxb2 22.Qe4 22.Qxd4 Rxd4 23.Be4 Bd6 24.Be3 Rb4 25.b3 Nf6 26.Bc6 a6= Both sides have wrecked pawn structures and safe kings. 11...Nf8 12.Qc2 g6 13.Re2N Only this is new in my practice, but of course the idea is natural. 13.b3 c6 14.c4 Bf5 15.c5 15.Bxd6 Bxd3 16.Bxe7 Bxc2 17.Bxd8 Raxd8 18.cxd5 cxd5 19.Rxe8 Rxe8 20.Rc1 fails to get an edge: Bf5 21.Rc7 Bc8! and if anything Black is for choice 15...Bxd3 16.Qxd3 Nf5 17.g4 Ng7 18.h3 a5 18...h5 19.a3 Jablonicky,M-Fernandez,D Budapest 2018 13.h3 c6 14.Re2 Bf5 15.Bxf5 Nxf5 16.Rae1 Ne6 Black was slightly more comfortable in Anderson, J-Fernandez,D Hastings 2013 13.Rac1 c6 14.h3 Be6?! 14...Ne6 Black should have stuck to the plan with 15.Be5 Ng7= and here it bears mentioning that after 16.g4 Black can usually justify extreme measures like f5!?∞ 15.Nf1 f6 16.Ng3 Kg7 17.h4 Schroeder,J-Pap,M Ditzingen 2017 13...c6 14.Rae1 Ne6 15.Bg3 Ng7 16.h3 Bf5 17.Be5 Bxd3 18.Qxd3 Qd7 The final stereotyped move for this opening. Now, I was perfectly ready to offer a draw, had White not fallen into a small positional trap: 19.Bxg7?! Here, the bishop is considerably stronger than the knight, particularly if it can get onto the h6-c1 diagonal. Any number of moves like 19.Nf1 are just equal. 19...Kxg7 20.Ne5 Qc7 21.Qf3 Bg5 22.Qd3 Be7 23.g3 Bf8 24.Kg2 f6 25.Nef3 Qd7 26.Re3 Prophylaxis against ...Kf7- White sets up Ne5 tricks. However, Black can choose to place his king somewhere else. Kg8 Now Black is probably slightly better. 27.Rxe8 Rxe8 28.Rxe8 Qxe8 29.h4 Qe6 30.b3 Bh6 31.a4 Kf7 32.h5 Ne4 33.hxg6+ hxg6 Black has made all his natural moves. Anything more (like . ..a5) will entail a possible opening of the position. 34.Nf1? This move gives me a massive chance, which I failed to take. Nd6? 34...Qh3+‼ This would have been the logical culmination of Black's strategy and is a tactic well worth bearing in mind. Of course after 35.Kg1 the follow-up is the no less spectacular Qh1+ forcing the win of the f2-pawn. I was only looking at ideas of 34...Qf5 which threatens ...Nxg3. Now due to the pin on the f3-knight White has to play 35.Ne3 Bxe3 36.Qxe3 and here Black can probably try and press with his slightly more active pieces in some line like g5 37.Ne1 Nd6 This would also have been better than the game. 35.N1d2 a5 36.c4 Here too, Black has various options but I wasn't able to find an advantageous one. Qf5 36...Bxd2!? 37.Nxd2 Ne4 37...dxc4 38.bxc4 b5!? 37...Qf5 Even this straight knight ending is not necessarily trivial. 36...Ne4 It's also still possible to just go back to e4, though who's to know whether I'd have found ...Qh3 if given any more (or even arbitrarily many) chances. 37.Qxf5 Nxf5 38.cxd5 cxd5 This was my last chance to make the game interesting- by removing the imbalance, ironically- albeit White has more options than before. 38...Bxd2 39.dxc6 bxc6 40.Nxd2 Nxd4= White is fine and faces only practical problems. Usually these relate to Black obtaining a well-placed knight on e7 and king on b4. 39.Nb1 Ke6 40.Nc3 Nd6 41.Kf1 g5 42.g4 f5 43.gxf5+ Nxf5 44.Nb5! The last precise move to make sure there is no play left in the position. Now this is a dead draw. g4 45.Ne1 g3 46.Nc2 b6 47.Kg2 gxf2 48.Kxf2 Ne7 49.b4 Nc6 50.bxa5 Nxa5 51.Nb4 Nc4 52.Nc7+ Kd6 53.Nb5+ ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Padmini,R2364Fernandez,D2467½–½2019C42Sydney International Open7

Padmini

IM Padmini Rout | Photo: Helen Milligan

In round 8 my good friend and ambitious Australian IM Junta Ikeda very much had the top seed on the ropes, having taken a quick draw in round 7 so as to be well rested. Under normal circumstances I expect he would have won, but with the game stretching well past 10pm and both clocks running quite low, eventually he let the grandmaster wriggle loose. As luck would have it, he then probably went slightly 'on tilt' just at the moment when Padmini (see above) was picking up some momentum, and was paired against her in the final round.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 One game I played in this tournament began: 1.Nf3 e6 2.g3 b5!? 3.Bg2 Bb7 4.d3 Nf6 5.c4 bxc4 6.dxc4 Bb4+ 7.Kf1!? which gives a good idea of how much I dislike letting Black exchange his dark-squared bishop in such structures! 1...Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 4.Bd2 a5 5.Nc3 It is slightly more common to leave the knight at home until Black's b4-bishop has made a decision: 5.g3 b6 6.Bg2 Bb7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Bg5 Since the position is quite closed, White should generally be fine to take on f6. 5...b6 6.Bg5 Bb7 7.e3 a4 Black commits to playing aggressively: ...h6 and ...g5 will usually be necessary to compensate for his lack of control elsewhere. After the immediate 7...h6 8.Bh4 Black can choose between two quite different move-orders to try and reach the same position. g5 8...d6 9.Bd3 Nbd7 10.Qc2 This is what White has to do here to avoid ...Ne4 ideas. 10.0-0 Bxc3 11.bxc3 g5 12.Bg3 Ne4 13.Qc2 f5 gets back to the game Bunzmann,D-Buhmann,R Leinfeld 2002 10...e5?! 10...g5 11.Bg3 Bxc3+ 12.bxc3 Nh5 should be preferred 11.dxe5 Nxe5 12.Nxe5 dxe5 13.0-0-0 Bxc3 14.Be4 Qc8 15.Bxb7 Qxb7 16.Qxc3± White was somewhat better, but Black survived in Epishin, V-Smyslov,V Biel 1993 9.Bg3 Ne4 10.Qc2 d6 11.Nd2!? On some kind of sophisticated level this move tries to claim that Black has wasted time on ... a5. 11.Bd3 f5 12.0-0 Bxc3 13.bxc3 Nd7 14.d5 Ndc5 15.Nd4 Qf6 16.f3 The position is definitely hard to handle, but the 16.Bxe4 fxe4 17.f3 0-0-0 18.fxe4 Qg6 19.e5 Qxc2 20.Nxc2 exd5 21.exd6 dxc4 22.Na3 Ba6 23.dxc7 Rd2 24.Rab1 of Dias,P-Fernando,D Santo Antonio 2002 should not have promised an advantage: Nd7!N 16...Nxg3 17.hxg3 0-0 17...exd5!= 18.dxe6 Nxd3 19.Qxd3 Bunzmann,D-Buhmann,R Leinfeld 2002 11...f5 11...Bxc3!? 12.bxc3 Nxd2 13.Kxd2 Nd7 14.f3 Qe7 15.Bd3 0-0-0 16.e4 h5 led to a similar material balance to our main game in Damm,F-Lieb,H Bad Woerishofen 2001 12.f3 White would be slightly better in case of 12.Ndxe4 Bxe4 13.Qd2 because Black doesn't have enough time to stabilise his kingside against h4, as well as his queenside against c5. h5 14.f3 14.h4!? 14...h4 15.Bf2 Bb7 16.a3 At least half the position will be opened and usually that is all that the player with the bishops needs. 12...Bxc3 13.bxc3 13.fxe4 Bxd2+ 14.Qxd2 Bxe4 is a pawn 13...Nxg3 14.hxg3 Qf6 15.e4 White correctly opens the centre before Black can get castled; he must almost inevitably go queenside because of the half-open h-file. 15.Bd3 Nd7 16.0-0-0 0-0-0∞ 15...f4 16.c5 dxc5 17.e5?! 17.Bb5+! Nd7 18.Bxd7+ Kxd7 19.dxc5 bxc5 20.Nc4 is given by Ftacnik. 17...Qg7 18.Bb5+ 18.Bd3 fxg3 19.Bg6+ Kd8 20.Be4 Bd5∞ 18...Nd7 18...Bc6 19.a4 fxg3 20.Ne4 19.Bxd7+ 19.Rb1 Rd8 20.Bd3 Nf8= 19...Kxd7 20.Ne4 Rad8 The remainder of the messy game Sokolov,I-Movsesian,S Sarajevo 2005 can be found annotated in CBM 108 by Ftacnik. 8.a3 Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 Ra5 10.Bh4 d6 11.Bd3 Consistent play from both sides. The following game is instructive in its entirety: 11.Nd2 Nbd7 12.f3 h5 13.Bd3 g5 14.Bf2 h4 15.h3 Nh5 16.Rb1 Qa8 17.Qc2 Ke7 18.Kd1 Bc6 19.Re1 Bb7 20.Rb4 Bc6 21.Kc1 Bb7 22.Kb1 Bc6 23.Ka1 Qg8 24.Bf1 Qh7 25.Bd3 Qg8 26.Reb1 Qa8 27.Qd1 Bb7 28.Be2 Bc6 29.R4b2 Qg8 30.Bf1 Qg6 31.Rb4 Qh7 32.Be2 Qg6 33.Nf1 Qh7 34.Bd3 Qg8 35.Bc2 Qa8 36.Bg1 Ra7 37.Qd2 Ra5 38.Bh2 Qg8 39.e4 Nf4 40.Ne3 Qg7 41.Ng4 Nh5 42.e5 dxe5 43.d5 exd5 44.Ne3 Kd8 45.cxd5 Bb7 46.d6 Qf6 47.dxc7+ Kxc7 48.Rc4+ Nc5 49.Ng4 Rd8 50.Qe1 Qe6 51.Qxe5+ Qxe5 52.Bxe5+ Kd7 53.Rxb6 Bd5 54.Rd4 Ke7 55.Nf6 Nb3+ 56.Bxb3 Bxb3 57.Rxd8 Kxd8 58.Rb8+ 1-0 Pinter,J -Turov,M Austria 2011 11...Nbd7 12.0-0 Qa8 This is as close as we can get to a formal 'end' to the opening- both sides have developed their pieces to the squares on which they will play their main middlegame roles, more or less. It is fair to say that Black has won the opening battle. 13.Ne1 g5 14.Bg3 h5 15.f3 h4 16.Bf2 g4 17.e4 gxf3?! Looking over at this game from my own, I remember thinking that Black seemed to be better, but was surprised to see this move appear on the board. 17...h3 is almost certainly the best move in the position, and simple enough to play from a human perspective, but not the move my attention was drawn to. 17...Rg5!? This is an ambitious try to break up White's pawn structure. It rests upon the soundness of stuff like 18.f4 Rgg8 19.e5 g3!? 17...g3!? This risky pawn sacrifice was my first instinct- it is always easier to sacrifice others' pieces. And, in fact, to move their kings: 18.hxg3 hxg3 19.Bxg3 and now one idea could be Ke7!? White has a major defensive task ahead of him. 19...Rah5 and ...Qa5 is also sensible 18.gxf3 Rg5+ 19.Kh1 Ke7 20.Rg1 With the g-file open, paradoxically it seems to be White's defensive chances that have increased. Qg8 21.Rxg5 Qxg5 22.Qc1 Qh5 23.Qe3 Qa5 24.Rc1 Rh5?! Now Black stands worse. 24...h3 was better played immediately. Black needs to radically rethink almost everything in his position in order to keep it playable- starting with ...e5. 25.Ng2 h3 26.Nf4 Rh8 27.Qd2 Nf8 28.Rg1 Ke8 29.Rg3 Bc8 30.Rxh3 Rxh3 31.Nxh3 Qh5 32.Ng1 e5 33.Bc2 Bd7 34.Qd1 Ne6 35.Bxa4 Affirming the advantage by claiming a second pawn. Bxa4 36.Qxa4+ Ke7 37.Qc2 Nh7 38.Be3 Nhf8 39.Qg2 Ng6 40.Qh3 Qh4! A good practical decision. The way Black handles the remainder of the game is admirable- the best he could have done under the circumstances. 41.Qxh4+ Nxh4 42.Bf2?! White will regret letting an enemy knight into f4, even if the position remains winning after this. 42.h3! followed by Kh2-g3 seems like a clean enough way to remove the nuisance of the h4-knight and win 42...Ng6 43.Ne2 c5 44.Kg2 44.d5 should get the job done in the long run: Nef4 45.Nc1! and White trades his bishop for the f4-knight instead of his knight, then plays for a5 while activating his king slowly on the other side of the board. It isn't clear to me if Black can get any play at all. 44...Ngf4+ Now Black is getting a knight to d3, and it will get into b2 from there. Any win now is likely to be quite tricky. 45.Nxf4 Nxf4+ 46.Kf1 Nd3 47.Be3 Nb2 48.d5 It seems just about winning to do the same thing with a pair of pawns off the board: 48.dxc5 dxc5 49.Bc1 Nxc4 50.a4 The point is that White has gained a tempo for this move and so need not sacrifice a pawn to get it in. Kf6 51.Ke2 Kg6 52.Kd3 Nd6 53.f4 f6 54.fxe5 fxe5 55.h4! Perhaps even the only move to win, but good enough. White wants Bg5-d8. In case of c4 Black was able to get his knight to c6 in time, but now there is no time for anything except Kh5 56.Bg5 c4+ 57.Kc2! Nxe4 58.Be3 or similar, when the a-pawn wins the game. 48...Nxc4 49.Bc1 Now Black has two more or less equivalent moves. The difference is that by delaying ...f5, Black makes sure White doesn't have time to react when it does happen if White plays the way he did. b5 The computer suggests playing 49...f5 first, to gain a tempo in case White doesn't take. However, the move-order finesses are more tricky than even our silicon friend thinks. 50.exf5! 50.a4 f4 51.Ke2 Na5 White's bishop is totally locked in and it seems he's out of tries. 50.Ke2 f4 51.Kd3 Na5 52.c4 Kf7 53.Bd2 Kg6 54.Bxa5 bxa5 55.Kc3 a4! 50...b5 51.Ke2! 51.h4 Kf6 transposes to 51.exf5 51...Nb6 52.h4 Nxd5 53.c4 bxc4 54.Bg5+ Kf7 55.Kd2 c3+ 56.Kc2 Nb6 57.Bd8 57.Kxc3 d5 The jury is still out here, although I suspect it's winning. 57...Nc4 58.a4 Ne3+ 59.Kxc3 Ke8 60.Bg5 Nxf5 61.a5 Kd7 62.h5 Kc6 63.h6 Nxh6 64.Bxh6+- 50.h4 50.Ke2! transposes to all the favourable versions above. 50...f5 51.Bg5+? Now this throws away the win. 51.Ke2! This is still probably best, although it's different to before because Black has ...f4. f4 52.Kd3 Nb6 53.c4! Stopping Black from sealing up the position. bxc4+ 53...Nxc4 54.a4 Nb6 55.axb5 is similar, just with a b-pawn instead 54.Kc2! Kf7 55.Bd2 Kg6 56.Ba5 White is too fast on the queenside. White can try to play as in the game while economising on the check. 51.exf5 Kf6! 51...Nb6 52.h5 Nxd5 53.c4 With 3 passed pawns White should be winning. 52.Ke2 Kxf5 53.Kd3 Nb6 54.c4 bxc4+ 54...Nxc4 55.a4 Nb6 56.axb5 Nxd5 57.Bg5!+- The knight is dominated. 55.Kc3 e4! The slight inaccuracy of White's h4 means that Black gets time to exchange a pair of pawns. 56.fxe4+ Kxe4 57.h5 Kf5 White has made his task quite complicated by leaving himself with (realistically) only the wrong rook's pawn- but it seems even this is winning. 58.h6 Kg6 59.Bg5 Kh7 60.Bd8 Nxd5+ 61.Kxc4 Ne3+ 62.Kb5 There is no way to stop the a-pawn. 51...Kf7 52.exf5 Nxa3 53.Ke2 Nc4?! This gives White some hope again. 53...b4 54.cxb4 cxb4 While White chases down the rogue b-pawn Black will either obtain both White f-pawns or the following fortress: 55.Kd3 Nb5 56.Kc4 Nd4 57.Kxb4 Nxf5 58.h5 Nd4 59.f4 e4 60.Kc4 Nf5= 54.h5 54.Bd8!? This is the last try White had. It cuts out ...Nb6 ideas. b4 55.cxb4 cxb4 56.Kd3 b3 57.Bg5!? Otherwise there is ...Ne3. Na3 58.Kc3 Nb5+ 59.Kxb3 Nd4+ 60.Kc4 Nxf5 61.Kd3 Black needs a few nuts and bolts to hold this new fortress together- it isn't as watertight as the one where White has f4 and h5 instead of Kd3, and Black has ...e4. 54...Nb6 55.h6 Nxd5 56.Be7 Nxe7! Accurately calculating(or so I infer from the time usage stats) that the new queen on b1 will cover mate on g6. This is now a dead draw. 57.h7 Ng6 58.fxg6+ Kg7 59.Ke3 d5 60.f4 d4+ 61.cxd4 cxd4+ 62.Ke4 exf4 63.Kxf4 b4 64.Ke5 b3 My last note would be well illustrated by the line 64...d3?? 65.Ke6 d2 66.h8Q+ Kxh8 67.Kf7 d1Q 68.g7+ Kh7 69.g8Q+ Kh6 70.Qg6# 65.Ke6 b2 66.h8Q+ Kxh8 67.Kf7 b1Q 68.g7+ Kh7 69.g8Q+ Kh6 70.Qg7+ Kh5 71.Qxd4 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Junta,I2441Kunte,A2485½–½2019E11Sydney International Open8

Junte

IM Junta Ikeda | Photo: Helen Milligan

Finally, round 9 saw the opening testing-ground of my dreams: on the top 2 boards, both Black players badly needed to win, and both chose the Modern! I'm currently writing a book on the opening and am trying to test a range of lines within it when I have a chance. As you might have deduced, though, things didn't go exactly to plan:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
As mentioned, this was a must-win game for me. 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 a6 4.f4 d6 Because of the speed of my opponent's play, I rejected one of my standard 'dice rolls'- 4...b5 5.Nf3 b4 6.Ne2 Bb7 7.Ng3 h5? This loses to the instructive piece sacrifice 8.f5! h4 9.fxg6 hxg3 10.gxf7+ Kxf7 11.Ng5+ Ke8 12.Be2! 5.Nf3 Nd7?! I decided to break my own advice from my upcoming book, because I wanted to test a sideline. 5...b5 This is main, and here my opponent had prepared 6.a4 b4 7.Ne2 According to what I understand, the main thing here for Black is to avoid playing ...Bb7, and instead use the b-file for a rook. e6 8.Ng3 Nd7 9.c3 bxc3 10.bxc3 Ne7 11.Bd3 11.h4 White's attack lacks, in many cases, the extra momentum of a queen or bishop swinging in, so this move misses the mark a bit, for instance: c5 12.h5 0-0 13.Rb1 Qc7 14.Bd3 Rb8 11...0-0 12.0-0 c5 13.Rb1 13.f5 cxd4 14.cxd4 exf5 15.exf5 Nf6= 13...Rb8 14.Rxb8 Nxb8
White should try and play concretely, because otherwise his queenside will be vulnerable to ideas like ...Qa5, ...Bd7, or ...cxd4 followed by ...Nbc6. However after 15.dxc5 dxc5 16.e5 Bb7 Black obtains a perfectly decent game anyway.
6.Bd3?! Now we re-enter main line theory, but as it turns out, I can no longer get the version I want. 6.Bc4! Black has no time to play ...b5 because of the sacrifice, so the choice is between e6 7.f5 exf5 8.exf5 Nb6 and something like 6...Nh6 7.a4! which would probably lead to bad Sicilians. Here, I think the position is better for White, but also of a type which allows Black to play for a win- think 9.fxg6 hxg6 10.Bb3 Ne7 Black will play 'light-square only' chess with ...d5, ...Bg4 etc. and White will probably sacrifice the d4-pawn somehow. 6...c5 7.Be3 It is not in White's interest to play structures like 7.d5 b5 7...b5 7...cxd4 8.Bxd4 Bxd4 9.Nxd4 is always worth thinking about, and here Black has some interesting options: Qb6 9...b5!? is justified by the tactical oddity 10.e5?! dxe5 11.Be4 exd4 12.Qxd4 e5! 13.fxe5 Qb6= 10.Nb3 Ngf6 11.Qf3 Nc5 8.e5 In this system, White always wants to get a structure where he takes on c5 and Black takes back with the pawn. However, trying to do so immediately doesn't work, so it's better for him to play e5 first and then arrange, by tactical means, for Black to not be able to take back on e5 instead. Bb7 Only at this moment did it occur to me that it was no longer possible to obey my 'golden rule' for such positions- always meet e5 with ... Nh6. 8...cxd4!? 9.Bxd4 dxe5 10.fxe5 Nh6 11.e6 Nf6 12.g4 0-0 13.g5 Bxe6 14.gxh6 Bxh6 is a messy line that nobody has any business entering without some prep- otherwise White is simply a piece up. Objectively, this line is of approximately equal merit to the 9.g4 Bxg4 Dragon. 9.Be4 Qc8 10.0-0 White can consider the immediate 10.Bxb7 Qxb7 11.dxc5 dxe5 11...dxc5 12.Qd5± 12.Qd5 Qxd5 13.Nxd5 Rc8 when there are several good options in this ending. 10...b4?! It seemed to me that White was probably threatening dxc5, so I forced matters. 10...Nh6! This is the most principled move, and if White doesn't have a concrete answer then it should be played. I was afraid of 11.Bxb7 Qxb7 12.dxc5 due to the x-ray attack from the e3-bishop on the h6-knight, but it turns out I have a choice! Ng4! 12...dxe5?! 13.Qd5 13.Nxe5 Nxe5 14.fxe5 Nf5 13.Qd5 13.Qe1 0-0= 13...Qxd5 14.Nxd5 Nxe3 15.Nxe3 dxe5! If not for this detail, Black would be worse- as it is, he could be better. 16.c6 Nb6 17.fxe5 Rc8 11.Bxb7 Qxb7 12.Ne2 12.Na4 Nh6 13.dxc5 Nf5 14.Bd4 Nxc5 15.Nxc5 dxc5 16.Bxc5 Rc8 I was prepared to play this kind of pawn sacrifice, but probably White has a way to give it back and be better. 12...Nh6 Now Black has equalised, though as I was to learn, the position is still a bit more unpleasant to handle in a practical game, because the 2 minor pieces on the kingside need to be brought in. 13.c3 0-0 14.h3 bxc3 I was suspicious of lines like 14...Nf5 15.Bd2 bxc3 16.bxc3 Qe4= because in all probability, my queen and knight will be sent back to the squares from which they came- but the cold blue light of computer analysis indicates that this is not so. 15.bxc3 Rfd8?! 16.Qe1 It is already possible to play 16.g4 because the x-ray attack on h6 prevents Black from taking e5. Qe4 17.Kf2 Rab8 18.Rb1 cxd4 19.cxd4 f5 Black is struggling. 16...Nb6!? It seemed to me that the d7-knight was not playing a role in the game, and that correcting this state of affairs was worth a pawn. 16...cxd4 17.cxd4 Rac8 Black's other potential source of counterplay is getting a rook to the 7th. 17.dxc5 Nc4 I was trying to force Bd4 rather than Bf2, but there is a slight problem. None of the moves equalise, mostly for the same reason. 17...Nf5 18.Bf2 Nd5 19.Qb1 17...Nd5 18.Bf2 18.Ng3! Rac8 19.cxd6 Nxe3 20.Qxe3 exd6 18...dxc5 19.Bxc5 Rac8 This is the only way Black is getting compensation. 18.Ng3! As above, if White has a chance to get this move in then he should take it. Nxe3 18...Rac8 Having sacrificed a pawn, maybe this move is more consistent. 19.Bf2 dxe5 20.fxe5 Qd5 21.Bd4 Rxc5!? 19.Qxe3 Qa7 20.Rfd1 Rac8 21.Rd5 dxc5? Thus finally fixing the structure first mentioned after 9 moves. 21...Re8!? This was exactly the kind of tricky move I was looking for, but I didn't see it. 22.Rad1 dxe5 23.fxe5 e6 24.Rd7 Qxc5 25.Qxc5 Rxc5 26.Ne4 Ra5 White clearly has good practical chances, but a way through is not apparent. 21...dxe5! Continuations like 22.Rxd8+ Rxd8 23.fxe5 Rd5 24.Ne4 Nf5 25.Qf2 h5 gave me anxiety that I'd never recover the pawn on c5 and then it'd become a queen, but this is by far the least evil and White needs to be very exact to keep any kind of advantage. 22.Rad1 Rxd5 23.Rxd5 e6 24.Rd2 Nf5 25.Nxf5 gxf5 26.g4± fxg4 27.hxg4 Qb7 28.Kg2 Qb1 29.Ng5 This move is a strong indication that White is thinking of an ending- which is, of course, the professional way to handle such positions. I thought 29.Kg3 was coming- and intended h6 when it is just a bit harder for White to get his knight on a good route. 29...Qg6 30.Kf3 To be honest, I still didn't expect the ending but rather 30.Kg3 h6 31.Ne4 h5 32.g5 Qf5 33.Qf3 h4+ 34.Kg2 Rb8 35.Nd6 Qb1 because queens are quite good at taking pawns while keeping up pressure. 30...h5 31.Qe4 hxg4+ 32.Kxg4 Qxe4 33.Nxe4 This ending is winning for White. But now, interesting things started to happen. Bf8 34.f5 Following the logical, mate-seeking 34.Rd7 Rb8 35.Ng5 the computer takes much too long to realise that Bh6? 36.Nxf7 Bxf4 37.Kxf4 Rf8 38.Kg5 Rxf7 39.Rxf7 Kxf7 40.Kh6 is a lost pawn ending. 34...exf5+ 35.Kxf5 Be7 36.c4 36.Rd7 Kf8 37.Ra7 was Ian Rogers' approach. 36...Rc6 37.Nf6+?! Practically, this move throws the outcome into question. 37.Rd7 Kf8 38.Nd6 a5 39.Ke4 is also clean. 37...Kf8 There was no need for this, giving White an additional chance to keep minor pieces on. 38.Rh2 Bxf6 39.exf6 Kg8 40.Rg2+ Kh8 41.Rg7? With best play we are now in the drawing zone. White should hasten to swap his f-pawn for Black's c-pawn, whereupon the position should be winning, though there is still a trick or two. 41.Ke5 Re6+ 42.Kd5 Rxf6 43.Kxc5+- 41...Rc7! Our post-mortem conclusion was that this position was still winning, but it's by now study-like. On examining the lines with the engine, it actually appears the position is in fact simply drawn. 42.Ke4!? White tries to lose a move. The best try was 42.Rg4! which cuts out ...Rd4 ideas and steers the game to a c+a ending. Rd7 43.Re4 Rd2 44.a4 a5 Having reached this position, White has two tries: take c5 with the rook, or with the king. 45.Re8+ 45.Re5 Rf2+ 46.Ke4 Kh7! 47.Rxc5 Kg6! 48.Rxa5 Kxf6 This should be drawn with good play. 45...Kh7 46.Rf8 Rf2+ 47.Ke5 Re2+ 48.Kd6 Kg6 49.Ra8 Rc2 50.Kxc5 Kxf6 51.Rxa5 Ke6 This is also drawn, but it's getting very dicey since White is now taking the f-pawn by force. 42...Rd7 43.Ke5 a5 44.a4 44.a3!? This was the move which we thought was good enough in the post-mortem. a4 45.Kf5 Rd4! And this is the defence we missed. 46.Rxf7 Kg8 47.Ra7 Rxc4 and Black just holds. 44...Rb7 45.Rg1 Obviously, in case White goes for the pawns Black can now go rogue with his rook: 45.Kd5 Rd7+ 46.Kc6!? 46.Kxc5 Rc7+ 47.Kb5 Rc5+= 46...Rd6+ The most practical decision is to begin checking along the 6th rank sooner rather than later. 46...Rc7+ 47.Kb5 Rb7+ 48.Kxa5 Ra7+ 49.Kb5 Rb7+ 50.Kc6 This might seem to be winning, but in fact there are more subtleties to come. Rb6+ 50...Rc7+ 51.Kd6 Rd7+ 52.Ke5 and there isn't another check! 51.Kd7 Rd6+ 51...Rxf6 52.Rg3 Ra6 53.Ra3 is hopeless. 52.Ke7 Rd7+ 52...Re6+ 53.Kf8 is the same 53.Ke8 Rd8+ 54.Kxf7 Rf8+ 55.Ke7 Re8+!= It turns out that despite having acquired multiple new routes to refuge, White is unable to escape the attention of the Black rook. 47.Kb5 Rb6+ 48.Kxa5 Ra6+ 49.Kb5 Rb6+ 50.Kxc5 Rc6+ 51.Kd5 Rd6+= 45...Rd7 I considered 45...Rb6 but this should lose straightforwardly to 46.Kd5 Rxf6 47.Kxc5 46.Rb1?! White was short on winning tries by now, but there were still ways to get to decent c+a versions. Rd4 47.Rb5 Rxc4 48.Rxa5 Kh7! This is not an intuitive move- why would you choose to lose a tempo? However, the rook desperately needs to get to c1 safely, and for that, it's worth the time. 48...Rc1? 49.Ra8 Acknowledging equality. Most humans would try 49.Ra7 Kg6 50.Ra8 to take the tempo. I was intending Rh4!? 51.Rg8+ Kh7 52.Rg7+ Kh8 53.Rxf7 Rxa4 and hoping that the c-pawn doesn't complicate the draw too much (it doesn't, but it would on c6 or c7.) 49...Rc1 50.a5 c4 51.Kd4 Kg6 52.a6 Kxf6 53.Rc8 Rd1+ 54.Kc3 Ra1 55.Rc6+ Ke5 56.Kxc4 f5 57.Kb5 f4 58.Rc8 f3 59.Rf8 Ke4 60.Kb6 Ke3 61.a7 f2 Draw agreed.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Song,R2329Fernandez,D2467½–½2019B06Sydney International Open9
Padmini,R2364Ikeda,J24411–02019B08Sydney International Open9

The upshot of those two results was that Padmini and Song jointly won the tournament on 7/9, with the latter gaining the shinier trophy due to direct encounter being the tiebreak. However, the top prizes of AUD $3,000 (about USD $2,100) and $1,500 were both split two ways. (Anyone else think that's generous? There must surely be more GM entries next year!)  Meanwhile, the two top seeds had to be content sharing 3rd place, a half point behind:

Russell, Song, Pdamini

(L to R) Organiser Paul Russell, FM Raymond Song, IM Padmini Rout | Photo: Helen Milligan

Russell, Kunte, Fernandez

(L to R) Russell with GM Abhijit Kunte, GM Daniel Fernandez | Photo: Helen Milligan

Possibly, in the above you may have got the idea that the tournament was more or less a one-man show. This would not be accurate, and there were an army of people working hard to make it possible — including a remarkable number of new faces.

Organisers and arbiters

Clockwise from left: Experienced New Zealand organiser Hilton Bennett was playing as well as helping out; Chief arbiter Alana Chibnall; Newly trained New Zealand arbiter was managing the live board transmission; Pasan Perera was a big help in liaising with the university chess scene in Sydney — including myself! | Photos: Helen Milligan

Obviously, with any new event there are going to be some things that don't go smoothly — aside from the odd round times there were one or two issues with lighting. Equally, obviously, I didn't play as well as I hoped, but since I'm now 24 years old and not 15 like before, it's a lot easier for me to distinguish feelings about the tournament as a whole from the emotional roller-coaster of individual wins and losses! I very much hope this event continues and that it will attract an even stronger field in years to come, regaining or surpassing its former glory.

Final standings (Open — top 20)

Rk. Name Pts.  TB1 
1 Song Raymond 7,0 1,0
2 Padmini Rout 7,0 0,0
3 Kunte Abhijit 6,5 0,5
4 Fernandez Daniel Howard 6,5 0,5
5 Lane Gary W 6,0 0,0
6 Xie George Wendi 6,0 0,0
7 Zhang Jilin 6,0 0,0
8 Ikeda Junta 6,0 0,0
9 McClymont Brodie 6,0 0,0
10 Johansen Darryl K 6,0 0,0
11 Solomon Stephen J 6,0 0,0
12 Hu Jason 5,5 0,0
13 O`Chee Kevin 5,5 0,0
14 Largo Bengt 5,5 0,0
15 Rodgers Jack 5,5 0,0
16 Gong Daniel Hanwen 5,5 0,0
17 Puccini Jack 5,5 0,0
18 Hamal Manish 5,0 0,0
19 Dale Ari 5,0 0,0
20 Winkelman Albert 5,0 0,0

Final standings (Challengers — top 10)

Rk. Name Pts.  TB1 
1 Keating Jack 8,0 0,0
2 Chek Adrian Carl 7,0 0,0
3 Iandolo Marco 6,5 0,0
4 Vincent Alaina 6,5 0,0
5 Lee Lachlan 6,5 0,0
6 Lane Ryan 6,5 0,0
7 Sandoval Anthony 6,0 0,0
8 Tulevski Vasil G 6,0 0,0
9 Kumar Viney 6,0 0,0
10 Wang Aaron Ziwen 6,0 0,0

All available games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 0 c5 0 2.Nf3 0 e6 0 3.c3 0 Nf6 14 4.e5 0 Nd5 6 5.Bc4 0 d6 49 6.d4 0 cxd4 13 7.cxd4 35 Be7 26 8.0-0 26 0-0 11 9.Qe2 15 b6 0 10.Nc3 4:25 Nxc3 16 11.bxc3 6 Bb7 5 12.Bf4 3:14 Qc7 6:52 13.exd6 11:00 Bxd6 6 14.Bxd6 13 Qxd6 0 15.Ne5 45 Nd7 13 16.f4 2:04 Rac8 57 17.Rac1 2:32 Rc7 3:42 18.Bd3 10:30 g6 3:27 19.Ng4 16:39 Rxc3 0 20.Qe3 20:43 Rxc1 3:13 21.Rxc1 21 h5 2:06 22.Ne5 9:05 Rc8 2:44 23.Rxc8+ 2:44 Bxc8 6 24.f5 2:46 exf5 0 25.Bxf5 2:41 Nxe5 8 26.Bxc8 29 Nc6 8 27.d5 3:11 Ne7 7 28.Bb7 55 Nxd5 9 29.Qd4 46 Qe7 0 30.Ba6 45 Qe1+ 7 31.Bf1 2 Ne3 8 32.Qd8+ 2:01 Kh7 5 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
McGowan,C2085Kunte,A-0–12019B22Sydney Open 20191.1
McGowan,C2085Kunte,A24850–12019B22Sydney Open 20191.1
Fernandez,D2467Bierkens,P20781–02019Sydney Open 20191.2
Kunte,A2485Steadman,M22581–02019E65Sydney Open 20192.1
Fernandez,D2467Largo,B-1–02019A41Sydney Open 20192.2
Ikeda,J2441Zhang,J22431–02019B06Sydney Open 20192.3
Gong,D2246Dale,A2372½–½2019B03Sydney Open 20192.4
Nakauchi,G2221Padmini,R23640–12019C67Sydney Open 20192.5
McClymont,B2360Winkelman,A22121–02019B35Sydney Open 20192.6
McClymont,B2360Kunte,A2485½–½2019C95Sydney Open 20193.1
Wagdy,A2308Fernandez,D24670–12019A07Sydney Open 20193.2
Clarke,M2113Ikeda,J2441½–½2019A87Sydney Open 20193.3
Padmini,R2364Lane,G23571–02019C84Sydney Open 20193.4
Dale,A2372Song,R23290–12019B46Sydney Open 20193.5
Xie,G2359Hu,J21321–02019D11Sydney Open 20193.6
Song,R2329Padmini,R23641–02019E05Sydney Open 20194.1
Fernandez,D2467McClymont,B2360½–½2019B51Sydney Open 20194.2
Kunte,A2485Clarke,M21131–02019E63Sydney Open 20194.3
Ikeda,J2441Solomon,S23381–02019B25Sydney Open 20194.4
Puccini,J2261Xie,G23591–02019B21Sydney Open 20194.5
Gong,D2246Wagdy,A23081–02019A45Sydney Open 20194.6
Kunte,A2485Song,R23291–02019D02Sydney Open 20195.1
Puccini,J2261Fernandez,D2467½–½2019B06Sydney Open 20195.2
Gong,D2246Ikeda,J2441½–½2019D02Sydney Open 20195.3
McClymont,B2360Lane,G23570–12019C78Sydney Open 20195.4
Padmini,R2364Johansen,D2364½–½2019B66Sydney Open 20195.5
Xie,G2359Barker,G2114½–½2019C10Sydney Open 20195.6
Fernandez,D2467Kunte,A2485½–½2019A30Sydney Open 20196.1
Ikeda,J2441Puccini,J22611–02019E62Sydney Open 20196.2
Song,R2329Gong,D22461–02019E62Sydney Open 20196.3
Lane,G2357Zhang,J22431–02019B53Sydney Open 20196.4
Hu,J2132Padmini,R23640–12019E67Sydney Open 20196.5
Hamal,M2008Xie,G23590–12019D78Sydney Open 20196.6

Links


Once part of a 'golden generation' of young players in Singapore, he moved to England in his late teens and attended Cambridge University. Immediately after graduation, he began training as a time series analyst and also working on his chess, finally becoming a grandmaster in November 2017. He writes chess articles frequently and with enjoyment, and his first chess book is out in May. Away from the board, he enjoys table-tennis and language learning.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.