Speelman's Agony #80

by Jonathan Speelman
7/23/2018 – Jonathan looks at his own agony / ecstasy pair of games from the recent World Senior Team Championship near Dresden. In two weeks he'll be back to looking at reader submissions — and Jon can always use more material from readers. If your games are selected for the Agony column, not only will you get free detailed commentary of your games by one of chess’s great authors and instructors, and former world no. 4 player, but you also win a free three-month ChessBase Premium Account!

Fritz 16 is looking forward to playing with you, and you're certain to have a great deal of fun with him too. Tense games and even well-fought victories await you with "Easy play" and "Assisted analysis" modes.

Senior league travails

The (relative) Agony and Ecstacy this week are my own from the World Senior Team Championships in Radebeul near Dresden which took place from July 7th to 15th.

Following the withdrawal of Nigel Short and later John Nunn, my team England I were seeded 4th behind the USA and the two best of the many German teams: Germany I with Philipp Schlosser on top board and the Lasker Chess Foundation with Alexander Graf and Artur Yusupov on the top two boards.

Somewhat to our surprise we defeated the USA early on but we drew with Lasker after I managed an unlikely escape against Graf and after leading going into the final round, were defeated 1½ : 2½ by Germany I The outcome was that the USA were first ahead of England and Lasker with us second on tie-break.

England vs USA

A good start in Dresden, beating the top-seeded USA squad, but 2nd in the end | Photo: Alex Yermolinsky

Losing the final match was a bit sad but certainly not Agonising and the nearest we got to this unfortunate state was actually away from the chess board on the journey back.

This was supposed to be the relatively straightforward Dresden to Frankfurt to London but waking up on the Monday morning we discovered that the initial flight had been cancelled overnight “for technical reasons” and we'd helpfully been rebooked on a flight just before 7am the next morning.

John Emms and I went to the airport anyway and after lengthy discussions and a certain amount of dialectic, it was agreed that we'd be rebooked on a later flight from Frankfurt and take a train there. Then another option was suggested: to go south to Las Palmas and then back to London and to avoid the faff of changing trains with luggage we went for that.

Stewart Reuben and Sheila Jackson had arrived at the airport after us and also (apparently) took this option but after we arrived in Las Palmas and checked, it turned out that they weren't on the passenger list for the London flight.

Since we'd been booked by Lufthansa to travel by Eurowings to Las Palmas and then British Airways to London there was immense scope for the various apparatchiki we approached to deny all responsibility. We started with Iberia BA's handlers at the airport and were then sent supposedly to Lufthansa which turned out to be Eurowings. We then sought the Lufthansa office and after a tragi-comedy lasting more than an hour going up and down in lifts between the two levels (Arrivals and Departures) and searching to the furthest ends of both finally located the Lufthansa office (which handled other airlines too and went by some other name).

There a wonderful woman — Paloma I believe — sorted us out over the next half hour or so.

In the rush at Dresden, Reuben and Jackson hadn't actually been issued with any paperwork for the Las Palmas to London leg and it turned out that they had indeed been booked on a London flight but one only a short while after we arrived in Las Palmas and so, what with reclaiming our luggage and checking in again, totally unrealistic.

The excellent Paloma tried one BA number and then another and we were finally all able to fly back to London together though by the time I got home — and some of them would have taken longer — it was already later than 11 pm on London and so past midnight in Germany.

Leaving this minor Agony aside, we move on to the chess board and a couple of my games starting with the save against Graf which was certainly awful for him. 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 d5 4.d4 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 0-0 7.0-0 c6 8.Qc2 b6 9.Rc1 I thought (!) I'd played this in the senior teams last year when I won a nice game against Russia but probably you should really go Rd1 like everybody else. 9.Rd1 In fact the game the previous year had gone 9.Bf4 Ba6 10.cxd5 cxd5 and then 11.Rc1 Nbd7 12.Nc3 Nh5 13.Qa4 Nxf4 14.Qxa6 Nxg2 15.Kxg2 Qc8 16.Qxc8 Rfxc8 17.Nb5 Bf8 18.Nc7 Rab8 19.a4 Nc5 20.dxc5 Rxc7 21.cxb6 Rxc1 22.bxa7 Ra8 23.Rxc1 Rxa7 24.b3 g6 25.Nd4 Kg7 26.Nc6 Rb7 27.b4 1-0 (27) Speelman,J-Ionov,S Crete World Senior tch 2017 9...Bb7 10.Bg5?! 10.Bf4 Nbd7 11.cxd5 Nxd5 12.Nc3!? 12.Bd2 c5 12...Nxf4 13.gxf4 Qc7 14.e3 Rac8 is a reasonable way for White to play. You don't really want to exchange on d5 until the knight is committed away from c6. 10.cxd5 cxd5 11.Bf4 Nc6 12.Nc3 Rc8 must be about equal. 10...h6 11.Bxf6 Bxf6 12.Nbd2 12.e3 Na6 looks fairly equal. 12...Na6 13.e4 13.a3 c5 13...dxe4 13...dxc4 14.Nxc4 Bxd4 15.Nxd4 Qxd4 16.a3! is pretty good for White but he'd judged the coming variation much better than me. 14.Nxe4
14...c5! 15.Nxf6+ Qxf6 16.Ng5 hxg5 17.Bxb7 Nb4 18.Qb3 Rab8 19.Bg2
19...Qf5! This excellent move gives the knight the d3 square. White should now play d5 though it's not especially pleasant. 20.a3? unprotecting the queen and forgetting that this gave him an opportunity next move. 20.d5 exd5 21.cxd5 Rfd8 After playing a3?. I wondered during the game about 20.h3 Nd3 20...Rbd8! is good because if 21.g4 Qg6 22.a3 Nd3 23.Rd1 simply Rxd4 21.Rd1 Nxf2 when 22.Rf1? 22.g4 Qf4 23.Rf1 is quite nice. 22...Nxh3+ 23.Kh2 Qh7 wins for Black but 20...Nd3 21.Rd1 Nxf2 22.Rf1
22...Qd3! The opportunity I'd created by unprotecting the queen. 22...Nh3+ 23.Kh1 Qh7?! should be okay for White. 23...Nf2+ 24.Kg1 Qd3! 23.Qxd3 23.Qc3? cxd4 would make things even worse. 23...Nxd3 24.d5! The only chance. If 24.b3 cxd4 25.Rad1 Ne5 26.Rxd4 Black has total control and should certainly win slowly. 24...Nxb2 25.Rfc1 Later I thought that the other rook might have been better. 25.Rac1 25...exd5 26.Bxd5 Nd3 27.Rc3 Ne5 28.Re3 Ng4 29.Re7 a5 30.Rae1 Nf6
31.Ra7 This ought to lose but at least the passed d-pawn may create some confusion. Nxd5 32.cxd5 Rbd8 33.Re5 Rd6 34.Rxg5 White would certaibnly lose if Black got in g4 so it made sense to take the pawn. Rfd8 35.Rb7
35...c4 35...g6 36.Kf2 R8d7 should win slowly. But the cleanest route was 35...Rxd5 36.Rxd5 Rxd5 37.Rxb6 Rd3 38.a4 Rd4 39.Rb5 Rxa4 40.Rxc5 Perhaps White should try 40.Kg2 c4 41.Rc5 40...Ra2!
This looks like it should be winning. The white rook is on the best possible square attacking the pawn from the side but White's kingside is very weak and I must guard against Black advancing the a-pawn all the way to a2 and getting a passed f-pawn. Things can go wrong for Black but I think it ought to be enough. Some lines: 41.g4 41.h4 a4 42.Rc4 a3 43.Rc3 Kh7 44.g4 f6 45.g5 f5 45...fxg5? 46.hxg5 Kg6 47.Rg3 looks like a draw. If Ra1+ and a2 it doesn't matter that the g6 pawn drops off and otherwise after Kf5 48.g6! White can keep the g6 pawn 46.h5 Ra1+? 46...f4! 47.Kh1 Ra1+ 48.Kg2 a2 49.Ra3 f3+ 47.Kg2 a2 48.Ra3 f4 49.Ra8 f3+ 50.Kxf3 Rf1+ 51.Kg4 Rg1+ 52.Kh4 is a lovely draw. 41...a4 42.Rc4 a3 43.Rc3 f6 44.h3 Kf7 45.Kf1 Kg6 46.Kg1 Kg5 47.Kh1 g6 48.Rb3 Ra1+ 49.Kg2 a2 50.Ra3 f5 51.gxf5 gxf5 52.Ra8 f4 53.Ra7 f3+ 54.Kf2 Rh1
36.Rg4! 36.Rc7 Rxd5 37.Rxd5 Rxd5 38.Rxc4 looks winning with Black in total control of the queenside. 36...Rxd5?! 37.Rxc4 In time-trouble my opponet now blundered. Rd1+?! 38.Kg2 R8d2+? 38...R1d2+ 39.Kh3 R8d6 was a better chance. 39.Kh3 Rh1 40.Rb8+ Kh7 41.Rh4+ Kg6 42.Rxb6+ f6 43.Rg4+ Kh5 44.Rh4+ Kg5 45.Rg4+ Here we agreed a draw. If, for example 45.Rg4+ Kh6 46.Rh4+ Kg6 47.Rg4+ Kh7 48.Rh4+ Kg8 49.Rb8+ Kf7 50.Rb7+ Ke6 51.Re4+ Kd5 52.Ra4 52.Rd7+ Kxe4 53.Rxd2 Ra1 54.Rd7 g5 55.Kg4 Rxa3 56.Ra7 52...Rhxh2+ 53.Kg4 Rd4+ 54.Rxd4+ Kxd4 55.Rxg7
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Speelman,J-Graf,A-½–½2018E11World sen teams4
Speelman,J-Weitzer,S-1–02018A04World sen teams6

Click or tap the second game in the game list below the board to switch


In computer chess there is no getting past Komodo, a two-time ICGA Computer World Chess Champion. Find out how Komodo can take your game to the next level!


Submit your games and win free Premium!

Did you enjoy the column and instructive analysis by GM Jonathan Speelman? Do you wish you could have a world-renowned grandmaster analyzing your play? You can!

To submit your games just upload a PGN or ChessBase file, along with your name and e-mail address. Send one success story (Ecstasy) and one loss (Agony).

Tell why you chose them, where or when they were played. Please also include your email address, so Jon can reply, and preferably a photo of yourself for our article.

If your game is selected Jon will contact you personally, and not only will you get free detailed commentary of your games by one of chess’s great authors and instructors, and former world no. 4 player, but you also win a free three-month ChessBase Premium Account!

A three-month Premium subscription to ChessBase Account means you get:

  • Premium access to the Playchess server with ratings, simuls, lectures, and live commentary of top games
  • Access to all Web apps with no restrictions, such as the Cloud database, and more!
  • Full access to the Video archive, which not only includes all the past lectures by Daniel King, Simon Williams and others, but also a large number of full ChessBase products you would normally need to buy in the ChessBase Shop but that you can view for free as a Premium subscriber.

See also:


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.