Speelman's Agony #67

by Jonathan Speelman
12/31/2017 – A Happy New year to readers as we embark on the final Agony column of this year with two fascinating games by Murray Campbell. Fancy Jon taking a look at your games? Send them in! If you appear in the Agony column, not only will you get free detailed commentary of your games by one of chess’s great authors and instructors, and former world no. 4 player, but you also win a free three-month ChessBase Premium Account!

Fritz 16 is looking forward to playing with you, and you're certain to have a great deal of fun with him too. Tense games and even well-fought victories await you with "Easy play" and "Assisted analysis" modes.

Last Agony of 2017

A Happy New year to readers as we embark on the final Agony column of this year with two fascinating games by Murray Campbell an Australian who is about the same age as me.

He writes:

Murray CampbellI was once fairly active in Queensland chess, what now seems like a lifetime ago. I never won the Queensland title, my best being second in 1991. I drifted away from tournament play due to work and family responsibilities but the game never truly lets go. I am personally cast in the Karpov mode and competently play a number of different games, such as bridge, scrabble and backgammon, even supporting myself once through university playing poker with some fairly shady characters. But chess was always my first love.

I have recently retired from academia, the public service and the private sector where my professional area of expertise was psephology [The statistical study of elections and trends in voting -JS]. I have now partially returned to my old love and am currently coaching senior chess at two of Brisbane's high schools. If you remember the central metaphor about the cat and dog from the recent movie "Queen of Katwe", I coach the canines. The students' enthusiasm for the game is so infectious, they are slowly encouraging me to return to competitive chess.

(I haven't seen this film and asked Murray to explain. He says that he was being a little ironic and that in the film, there is a tale of a dog chasing a cat through the slums of Uganda. Eventually the cat escapes. The point of the metaphor is that the slum students learning chess are fighting for their lives while the private school chess students like the dog are only fighting for a meal. So the cats never give up while the dogs are somewhat less concerned.)

Murray continues:

I have sent in two of my short games from city and state championships in the 1990s. The first is a tale of two early queens. I particularly enjoy this game because of its conclusion, culminating in an elegant checkmate that my opponent kindly allowed me to play at the board. No one threw any gold coins, but this was one of the very few times that a number of the other players clapped me at the finish. The second was a toe-to-toe slugfest including a novel, though admittedly forced, queen sacrifice which unfortunately ended when I tripped over my shoelaces in time trouble and knocked myself out. This game was played in an early round against the eventual winner of that year's Queensland Championship and represents one that got way — agony indeed.

Murray annotated the games in some detail to which I've as usual added as JS. We start with the Agony:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
C77: Ruy Lopez: 3...a6 4 Ba4 Nf6, unusual lines 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.Qe2 JS This a line championed by Sergei Tiviakov. b5 6.Bb3 Bc5 7.a4 Rb8 8.axb5 axb5 9.Nc3 0-0
10.Nxb5?! a bit greedy - JS Yes this is really pushing it when Black can blast things open with d5 before White is castled and with the knight somewhat loose on b5. 10.0-0 b4= 10...d5! the start of a real dogfight 11.exd5 what choice? 11.Nc3? Bg4 11.Bxd5? Nxd5 12.exd5 e4 11.0-0? dxe4 11.d4? exd4 12.e5 Bg4 11...e4! now Black is on top 12.Ng5 the best of a bad bunch 12.dxc6?? taking the knight will lose the game exf3 13.Qxf3 13.gxf3 Re8-+ 13...Bg4 12...Nxd5?! the weaker choice allowing White to contest the initiative - JS Yes Ne5 should be devastating. 12...Ne5!? 13.Kf1 13.Nc3? Rxb3! the move Black missed in his calculations 14.cxb3 Nd3+ 15.Kf1 Nxf2 13.0-0? JS Bg4 14.Qe1 Rxb5 13.h3 h6 14.Nxe4 Nxe4 15.Qxe4 Rxb5 16.0-0 Qf6 JS and Black should win since if 17.d4 Bxd4 13...Re8 13...Bg4 JS is more forcing 14.f3 exf3 15.gxf3 15.Qxe5 Rxb5 15...Nxf3 14.Nc3 JS and Black has several very strong continuations including Bg4 15.Qa6 15.Qe1 Rxb3! 16.h3 Nd3 17.cxd3 exd3 18.Ne6 fxe6 19.hxg4 exd5 20.Qd1 Rb4 21.g5 Ng4 22.Qf3 Nxf2 13.d4! White starts counterpunching 13.Nxe4!? might be even better Nf4 JS No after 14.Qf3 Rxb5 15.Qxf4 Nd4 16.Ba4 Rb4 it's unsurprising that Black has a massive attack: 17.c3 Bd6 13...e3?! trading blows 13...exd3 14.Qxd3 Qe7+ 15.Be3 Nf6 16.Nc3 Nb4 17.Qe2 Ba6 14.Qh5?! both players lose their way slightly in the complications 14.dxc5!? deserves consideration Qxg5 15.fxe3 Rxb5 16.Qxb5 Nd4! 16...Qxg2 17.Rf1 Bh3 18.Bd2 17.exd4 Qh4+ JS It's rather surprising that this makes a draw and certainly my first instinct was Qxg2 and using the e file somehow after the engine flagged up Nd4 and I began to ask why. 18.Kf1 Qf6+ 19.Ke1 Qh4+= 14...exf2+ best 15.Kf1
15.Kxf2? Nf6 16.Qe2 Nxd4 17.Nxd4 Qxd4+ 17...Bxd4+?! 18.Kf1 18.Kf1 Bg4-+ 15...Nf6?! an oversight with a saving clause 15...Bf5! 16.dxc5 16.Qf3 Nde7 16...Rxb5 17.Qf3 17.Nxh7? Qe7 18.Bg5 Qxc5 19.Nxf8 Rxb3!-+ 17...Qe7 17...Rxc5! 18.Qxf2 Rxc5 19.Nf3 JS With White so badly developed, Black is well on top. 16.Nxf7! Black has underestimated White's counterplay.The tempo of the game increases yet again Nxd4! now Black must step up a gear: a bold queen sacrifice! 16...Nxh5?? avaricious play 17.Nxd8+ Kh8 18.Nxc6 18.dxc5?! is clearly worse Rxd8 19.Bg5 Rd7± 18...Rxb5 19.dxc5 Rxc5 20.Nd4+- 16...Rxf7? JS also loses to 17.Bxf7+ Kh8 18.Qxc5 17.Nxd8+ White must continue the merry dance 17.Qxc5? Nxb3 18.Nxd8 Nxc5-+ 17...Nxb3 Black's game hangs by a thread 18.Qe2 where else? 18.Qe5? Rxd8 18.Qd1? Nxa1-+ 18...Rxd8
and what is Black's compensation? 18...Nxa1? 19.Nc6 19.cxb3 but 19.Be3? Nxa1 20.Bxc5 Re8 19.Bg5? Re8 20.Qc4+ Be6 19.Qc4+?? Kh8 20.Nc3 Nxa1 21.Qxc5 Ng4-+ 19...Bf5!
the key to the combination: Black wins back the queen 20.Qc4+ 20.b4?! Bd3 21.bxc5 Bxe2+ 22.Kxe2 Rxb5 20...Kh8?! 20...Rd5!? is a wiser choice 21.b4! 21.Qxd5+? Nxd5 22.Ke2 Rxb5-+ 21.Qxc5? Rxc5 22.Nd4 Rd8 23.Be3 Ng4 21...Bd3+ 21...Bb6 JS is more challenging. The point of b4 was to prepare Ra3 defending d3 but it seems that Black still has enough play by harrassing the queen: 22.Ra3 Be6 23.Qe2 Bg4 24.Qc4 Be6 25.Qc2 Bf5 26.Qc4 Be6= 22.Qxd3 Rxd3 23.Ke2 Rb3 24.bxc5 R8xb5 with a minimal edge for black 21.Qxc5
21...Rd1+?? What a pity: in time trouble the wrong check. Black loses the game when the end of the complications is in sight 21...Bd3+ 22.Kxf2 Ne4+ JS In fact, this is distinctly uncomfortable for White after 23.Kf3 Nxc5 24.Nc3 Nxb3 25.Ra7 c5 22.Kxf2+- Ne4+ 23.Ke3 Rxh1
and the fight is over 23...Nxc5 is also hopeless 24.Rxd1 Re8+ 25.Kf2 Bc2+- 24.Qxf5 Re1+ 24...Nf6 is no salvation 25.Nxc7 Rxh2 26.b4+- 25.Kd3 Rd8+ 26.Kc2 JS A ferocious battle in which, as you'd expect in such a complicated position, both players made serious mistakes but sadly for Murray his was the last and decieive one when he played 21...Rd1+?? 26.Kc2 Nf6 27.Ra7+-
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
P Halpin,2-Murray Campbell,2-1–0 C77Qld Champs
M Campbell,2-A Pardoen,2-1–0 B11

Click or tap on the second game in the game list below the board to switch


The purpose of this DVD is to teach players how to conduct the attack on the black king using different methods. Although the Italian Game and the Ruy Lopez are mostly positional openings, it is very often possible to make use of attacking methods of play


Submit your games!

Did you enjoy the column and instructive analysis by GM Jonathan Speelman? Do you wish you could have a world-renowned grandmaster analyzing your play? You can!

To submit your games just upload a PGN or ChessBase file, along with your name and e-mail address. Send one success story (Ecstasy) and one loss (Agony).

Tell why you chose them, where or when they were played. Please also include your email address, so Jon can reply, and preferably a photo of yourself for our article.

If your game is selected Jon will contact you personally, and not only will you get free detailed commentary of your games by one of chess’s great authors and instructors, and former world no. 4 player, but you also win a free three-month ChessBase Premium Account!


At the airport, in the hotel or at home on your couch: with the new ChessBase you always have access to the whole ChessBase world: the new ChessBase video library, tactics server, opening training App, the live database with eight million games, Let’s Check and web access to playchess.com


A three-month Premium subscription to ChessBase Account means you get:

  • Premium access to the Playchess server with ratings, simuls, lectures, and live commentary of top games
  • Access to all Web apps with no restrictions, such as the Cloud database (MyGames.chessbase.com), and more!
  • Full access to the Video archive, which not only includes all the past lectures by Daniel King, Simon Williams and others, but also a large number of full ChessBase products you would normally need to buy in the ChessBase Shop but that you can view for free as a Premium subscriber.

See also:


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.