Single battles

by Jonathan Speelman
12/6/2021 – Match chess is very different from tournament play and, with no respite from your only enemy, considerably more stressful. The first game of a World Championship is a huge deal even for the defending champion (who has played championship matches before) and more so for debutants. In an excellent column, Jon Speelman looks at four first games from matches for the crown, all played between 1954 and 1972. | Pictured: Mikhail Tal | Photo: Bert Verhoeff, Anefo

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

The importance of the first game

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

Mikhail BotvinnikWith the World Championship match centre stage, I wanted to write about it this week but not in a newsy way — I’m doing this several days in advance and news isn’t my shtick in this column, anyway.

The 4NCL met last weekend in Milton Keynes for the first session since February 2020. I did play a few London League games over the board subsequently with the last one on March 11th, but these were still my first couple of over-the-board games for 20 months, and I was pleased not to do anything really stupid and to get a win and a draw.

The weekend was just after game 1 in Dubai, and of course we talked about the match a lot at the team meal on Saturday night and in the bar. I found myself going back to two memorable first games of matches just within my lifetime (though I was quite little and didn’t know about them at the time) but way before the possible memories of everybody else. These were the first games of Botvinnik v Tal 1960 and Botvinnik v Petrosian 1963, and I thought I’d add to them with a couple of other decisive (losing) first World Championship games by debutants.

Match chess is very different from tournament play and, with no respite from your only enemy, considerably more stressful. A match is a series of linked battles in an overall war, and you could reasonably say that a war of fourteen games (insert number as appropriate) begins with a single battle.

This, the first game of a World Championship is, as always, a huge deal even for the defending champion (who has played championship matches before) and more so for debutants such as Nepomniachtchi. I suspect that he was reasonably happy to draw as White to get into the match, but of course couldn’t remotely admit this to Magnus.

It wasn’t too surprising that the challenger got slightly outplayed after the opening and when he fought back to equality, or maybe even a sniff at an edge, honours were about even in this opening encounter. Both players showed their mettle but Carlsen did have to reveal an important piece of reconnaissance to Nepo (though of course as I write on Monday it may have been a bluff) — that he intends to defend the Marshall.  

The two main games I’m looking at this week were utterly different in character. Mkhail Tal knew that to beat the Patriarch Mikhail Botvinnik, he had to take him out of his comfort zone and he did so consummately in the French Winawer, in which he played what was certainly a surprise at the time: Kd1.

Mikhail Tal

Mikhail Tal at the 1973 Hoogoveens Tournament | Photo: Bert Verhoeff, Anefo

It’s said that when the Armenian hero Tigran Petrosian was preparing to take on Botvinnik they banned traffic from his street in Erevan so that he could concentrate properly. It didn't help him in game 1 since he was horribly nervous and was routed after playing in his own words “roughly at first category strength not even at candidate master”. But he recovered, won the famous game 5 in which his white king marched to g7, and subsequently triumphed.

In the build up to the match, Petrosian had had sufficient political clout to get FIDE to remove the return match clause which had helped Botvinnik against Smyslov and Tal — and Petrosian defended his title once against Boris Spassky before Spassky beat him in 1969 leading to the match with Bobby Fischer in 1972.

The first game from 1972 is in the database too. It’s the one where Fischer equalized and then played Bxh2 getting his bishop trapped. I once did a vast amount of analysis on it for one of my books (“Analysing the Endgame”). When I checked with an engine years later I’d done fairly well but missed something somewhere. I’m afraid I can’t find my version at the moment, but have put in the one in MegaBase with annotations by a smorgasbord of giants mostly from the past.

Boris Spassky, Bobby Fischer

The 1972 Reykjavík match between Boris Spassky and Bobby Fischer

To finish off briefly, completely unchronologically, the first game Vassily Smyslov ever played against Botvinnik in a World Championship. As with Petrosian, it didn’t go well for him, though certainly not as badly as for the wounded tiger.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,166,62354%2421---
1.d4947,29855%2434---
1.Nf3281,60256%2441---
1.c4182,10256%2442---
1.g319,70256%2427---
1.b314,26554%2427---
1.f45,89748%2377---
1.Nc33,80151%2384---
1.b41,75648%2380---
1.a31,20654%2404---
1.e31,06848%2408---
1.d395450%2378---
1.g466446%2360---
1.h444653%2374---
1.c343351%2426---
1.h328056%2418---
1.a411060%2466---
1.f39246%2436---
1.Nh38966%2508---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Qc7 7.Qg4 f5 8.Qg3 Ne7 9.Qxg7 Rg8 10.Qxh7 cxd4
11.Kd1 Tal himself later appended a "?" to this move, although it is not clear whether he does so in jest. Bd7 11...Nbc6 12.Qh5+ Ng6 12...Kd8 13.Bg5 (Tal) 13.Ne2 dxc3 14.f4 Qc5! (Euwe 76) 13.Nf3 Tal,M-Botvinnik,M (12)/Wch24-Moscow/ 1961/1-0/ 13.Ne2
This is a position too difficult for normal human beings and certainly not congenial to the orderly mind of the Patriarch. With the help of an engine you can get a sensible view today of course, and Houdini actually wants to play the crude dxc3 rather than Botvinnik's choice of d3. 13.Qh7 Ne7 14.Nf3 14.Qh5+ (Thomas) 14...Qxc3 15.Ra2 (Schwarz 67) 13.Bg5 Ba4! 14.Ra2 Nc6 (Ragosin) 13.cxd4? Qc3! (Schwarz 67) 13...d3! "Botvinnik spent [37 minutes] deliberating over this position, from which it can be inferred that he had not covered all the subtleties of the variation in his home laboratory." (Tal 77) 13...Nc6!? 14.cxd4 Rc8 14...0-0-0= (Thomas) 15.Ra2 (Tal 77) Hoapparenyl +- 13...dxc3? was given at the time 14.Nf4 Kf7 15.Qh7+ 15.Bd3 Nc6 15...Qxe5 16.g4 Nc6 16...Qh8 17.Nxg6 17.gxf5 exf5 18.Rb1 b6 19.Rb5 Nce7 20.Re1± (Schwarz 67, Euwe 76) 16.Bxf5! exf5 16...Ncxe5 17.Bxe6+! Bxe6 18.Qh7+ Rg7 19.Qxg7+‼ Kxg7 20.Nxe6++- (Schwarz 67) 17.e6+! Bxe6 18.Qh7+ Rg7 19.Qxg7+! (Tal 77) Kxg7 20.Nxe6++- Kf7 21.Nxc7 Rc8 22.Nb5 15...Rg7 16.Qh6 Qxe5 16...Nxf4 17.Bxf4 Nc6 Houdini gives this as += continuing 18.Qf6+ Kg8 19.Bh6 Rg4 20.Be2 20.f3 Rd4+ 21.Bd3 Qxe5 20...Qxe5 21.Qxe5 Nxe5 22.Bxg4 Nxg4
Engine Variation after dxc3. I'm sure that Botvinnik would have been delighted to escape to this position after the opening, and Tal conversely crestfallen even if it is still a tad better for White.
17.Nh5 Nc6 18.Qxg7+ Qxg7 19.Nxg7 Kxg7 20.f4 (Coles)
13...Qxe5 14.cxd4 13...Ba4 14.Nf4 Qxc3 15.Bd3 15.Ra2 Kf7 16.Bd3! (Schwarz 67) 15...Qxa1 16.Nxg6 Nc6 17.Nf4+! (Tal 77) 17.Ne7+ Kd7! 18.Nxg8 Rxg8 (Tal 77) 14.cxd3 Ba4+?! 14...Nc6! (Tal) 15.Ke1
15...Qxe5? 15...Nc6!? 16.f4 16.d4 0-0-0 17.Bg5 (Pachman 68) 17.f4 Na5 18.Qf3 Bc2! (Boleslavsky) 17.h4 Ncxe5 18.dxe5 Nxe5 19.Rh3 Be8! (Kotov) 17...Rd7 16...0-0-0 17.Bd2±
(Tal) This certainly looks very good for White, but to my surprise the engine disagrees, suggesting that Black can create enough play to more or less hold the balance. Its main line goes: 17...Kb8 18.h4 Qb6 19.Qf3 d4 20.Rc1 Nge7 21.Rh3 Qb2
15...Bb5?! Podgorny 16.Bg5! 16.Bd2 Bxd3 17.f4 Nc6 (Ragosin) 16...Bxd3 17.Kd2± (Tal) 15...Nd7! 16.d4 0-0-0 17.Bg5 (Pachman 68, eco 81) 17.Bd2 17...Rdf8 <=> (Euwe) +/= |^ (eco 74) 16.Bg5! The ChessBase game has a quote here which I presume is form Tal himself: "The basic problem which now confronts White is how to keep the black king in the center. In this respect, the loss of White's king pawn played into White's hands, since new threats can be created by openning the king file." White now already has a big advantage since the black king is in such trouble, and to some extent the game was almost already over. Nc6 16...f4?! 17.d4! Qf5 17...Qe4 18.Bxf4± (Schwarz 67) 18.Nxf4 Qc2 19.Ne2± (Tal 77) 16...d4 17.cxd4 Qa5+ 18.Bd2!± (Schwarz 67, Euwe 76) 17.d4 Qc7 17...Qe4?! 18.Rc1!± (Schwarz 67) 17...Qh8?! 18.Nf4!± (Schwarz 67) 18.h4!±
(Keres 69, eco 74/81, Suetin 88, mco 90) 18.Nf4? Nxd4!-+ 18...e5!? A desperate attempt to get play, but although his king is on e1 White is very well coordinated so this doesn't matter, and opening the position makes it easier for him. 18...Nce7 19.Bxe7 19.Rh3! Rh8 19...0-0-0 20.Re3 (Schwarz 67) 20.Qf3 0-0-0 21.h5!± (Schwarz 67) 19...Qxe7 20.Nf4!? 20.Qg5+- (Tal) 20...Qf6 21.Nxg6 Rxg6 22.g4! 0-0-0 23.g5 (Petrosian) 19.Rh3!± (Pachman 68) Qf7 19...e4 20.g4 fxg4 21.Rg3 Qf7 22.Qxg4 19...f4? 20.Qg4!± (Tal) is the sensible move keeping some control, but engines prefer the temporarily messy 20.dxe5 Qxe5 21.Kd2 wehn the point is that if Kd7 22.Nxf4! 20.dxe5 Ncxe5 20...Rh8? 21.e6! Qxe6 21...Rxh5 22.exf7+ Kxf7 23.Ng3!± (Euwe 76) 22.Re3 Rxh5 23.Rxe6+ Kf7 24.Rxg6! (Tal 77) Kxg6 25.Nf4++- 21.Re3 Kd7 21...Rh8? 22.Rxe5+ Kd7 23.Re7+ Qxe7 24.Qxg6+- (Tal 77) 22.Rb1 b6?! 22...Bc6! 23.Nd4 23.Rb4? Rh8-+ 23.Nf4 Rae8 24.Qd1 Ng4 25.Rxe8 Rxe8+ 26.Be2 Nxf4 27.Bxf4 Qf6 (Euwe 76) 23...f4 24.Rxe5! Nxe5 25.Qxf7+ Nxf7 26.Bxf4 Rae8+ 27.Kd2± (Tal 77) 23.Nf4 Rae8 23...Rh8 24.Nxg6! Nxg6 25.Qe2 (Tal 77) Rxh4 26.Qa6± 24.Rb4!± (Schwarz 67) Bc6
25.Qd1! Nxf4 25...Ng4 26.Rxe8 26.Re2 26...Rxe8+ 27.Be2+- (Tal 77) Nxf4 28.Rxf4+- 26.Rxf4 Ng6 27.Rd4 Rxe3+ 27...f4 28.Qg4++- 28.fxe3 28.Bxe3 f4 28...Kc7
29.c4! Smashing the position open in preparation for the final attack. dxc4 29...Ne7 30.cxd5 Bxd5 30...Nxd5 31.Bc4 Kd6 32.Bf4+ Kc5 33.Qc2+- (Euwe 76) 31.Bxe7 Qxe7 32.Qc1++- (Tal 77) 32.Rxd5 Qxe3+ 33.Qe2+- (Euwe 76) 30.Bxc4 Qg7 31.Bxg8 Qxg8 32.h5 A terrific game by Tal in which he forced Botvinnik very early on into a position form his worst nightmares.
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Tal,M-Botvinnik,M-1–01960C18World Championship 23th1
Petrosian,T-Botvinnik,M-0–11963E35World Championship 25th1
Spassky,B2660Fischer,R27851–01972E56World Championship 28th1
Smyslov,V-Botvinnik,M-0–11954C18World Championship 20th1

Select an entry from the list to switch between games



On this DVD Dorian Rogozenco, Mihail Marin, Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller present the 8. World Chess Champion in video lessons: his openings, his understanding of chess strategy, his artful endgame play, and finally his immortal combinations.


Links


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.