Ding is the sole leader at the Sinquefield Cup

by Venkatachalam Saravanan
8/28/2019 – Another intense day of fighting chess and drama in the tenth round of the Sinquefield Cup. Ding Liren shot into sole lead with six points out of ten games. It was a day when joint leader Ian Nepomniachtchi once again produced a horrendous blunder akin to the first round to lose dramatically against Maxim Vachier-Lagrave. Magnus Carlsen's winless drought finally ending with a smooth victory over Wesley So. IM VENKATACHALAM SARAVANAN reports all action from the venue. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Master Class Vol.7: Garry Kasparov Master Class Vol.7: Garry Kasparov

On this DVD a team of experts gets to the bottom of Kasparov's play. In over 8 hours of video running time the authors Rogozenko, Marin, Reeh and Müller cast light on four important aspects of Kasparov's play: opening, strategy, tactics and endgame.

More...

Carlsen ends his draw streak

We have an exciting final round on the cards on Wednesday, with Ding Liren on six points trailed by Carlsen, Nepomniachtchi, Anand and Karjakin all on 5½ points, followed by Caruana, MVL and Mamedyarov all on five each. It is going to be an epic clash!

Online viewers of the tenth round had the pleasure of hearing from none other than Garry Kasparov, who always delights the audience with his frank views. Terming the Sinquefield Cup as a 'very exciting event', he wondered,

I am appalled to hear the comments (online) that the event is the end of classical chess...There are many draws...but it's high quality, and a lot of excitement...You can hardly call (anyone) for lack of fighting spirit.

As Garry described, immediately off the blocks, chess lovers who enjoy the historical aspects of the game were delighted to a heartwarming sight.

Aronian vs Ding Liren - from the yesteryears of Two Knights folklore | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour 

 

This old romantic spectacle of the Two Knights gambit variation from a bygone era, revisited with a curious twist in recent times: 10.d3!?

The established way to play the position is 10.♗e2 h6 11.♘f3 e4 and the knights gets hounded. The text aims to solve the problem in a simple way, to retreat 10...h6 11.♘e4. Simple.

How do such an obscure forgotten gambit suddenly gains notoriety and comes to the fore?! Typically, a top grandmaster would notice such a variation revisited by amateurs or correspondence players, and adopt it in a serious game. If the idea is worth its salt, it gets picked up by his colleague and played around. When it is played at the highest level by a player of Aronian's calibre against Ding, that's when it gains immortality. Prediction: we can all expect an article soon in a magazine or opening manual on this move analysed to its barest details and filed with conclusions. (If it hasn't been done already.)

When Ding didn't even blink an eye and made his moves rapidly, that is when we understand that, at this level of chess, nothing is unexpected. “I forgot my preparation. I knew that this was a slightly worse variation, but I forgot how to equalize”, were the curious words of Ding after the game.

 

15...b4

Ding confessed, I knew (this to be) not a good move. May be I misplayed before, I (have forgotten) the correct line. So I went for this”.

Aronian enjoyed a slight advantage with 16.xb4 cxb4 17.e1 b8 18.g3 xd3 19.xe5, but misplayed the position later on.

 

24.h4

One of those 'creative' moves of contemporary chess which invariably gets praised for its ambiguity, but in this particular position it's not worth it. White could have retained a token edge with the simple 24.♘g3 ♜fd8 25.♖d3 and he has a reasonably important pawn on d4 to emphasize his advantage. In the game, Ding equalized with a nice manoeuvre: 24...fd8 25.d2 a4 26.d1 axb3 27.axb3 a5! taking care of the d5-square and the kingside in one go and nullifying White's advantage. Building on yesterday's praise for Ding's nuanced positional play against Caruana, such clarity of concepts is the strength of the Chinese ace.

Another short draw featured not much of a fight, but an amusing finale. 

 

This resembles one of those Queens Gambit Ragozin positions where, to prevent white's e3-e4 break, black keeps his pawns secure on f5 and d5 and a terrible looking bishop on b7. Now the trick for White is to activate his pieces while Black would want to use his queenside pawn majority.

19.e1 g6 This move makes sense, to counter 20.♗g3 with 20...f4.

20.a5 Makes sense — now that white's dark bishop is not able to enter into the kingside, it tries the queenside.

20...e7 Almost makes sense to counter 21.♕d2 with 21...♞c6 thus preventing 22.♗b4.

21.e1?! This, however, doesn't make much sense! If White wanted to make headway, he could have simply continued 21.♕d2 ♞c6 22.♗b6! with the idea of 23.♗c5 and he would have a slight advantage.

21...g6 Aha! This made perfect sense again. If two chess players want to end a game in which an agreed draw is not allowed, they will find a way to repeat moves thrice, even if the reasoning is not entirely logical!!

Anish Giri reaching the tournament hall with his second Vladimir Chuchelov | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Two of the boldest players of the tournament decided to let their hair down and engage in a sharp clash. Mamedyarov was understandably proud of the fight, Today we played a very interesting game. Fabiano and me, both want(ed) to win...(giving) chances to (each other)”. Caruana's views were surprising, for someone who has delighted in this tournament with his level of opening preparedness,

It was kind of silly that I forgot everything in the opening — I could not remember anything! It is a huge theoretical line known to be a forced draw. The one you play either to check your opponent's memory or you really don't feel like playing that day.

Mamedyarov reaching the tournament hall with his second Rauf Mamedov | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour 

 

In a sharp position from the ♕c2 variation of the Nimzo-Indian defence, Caruana erred with 14...gxf4? Mamedyarov called this a mistake, but couldn't recollect the theory here in spite of consuming huge amounts of time. Indeed, the better alternative being 14...exd5.

15.dxe6 xe5 16.xe4 g4

 

17.exf7? Mamedyarov mentioned that Caruana considered this to be a mistake, preferring 17.♘f3. Indeed, possibly also 17.h4. The problem with the text is that, though winning a pawn, it opens up White's kingside for attack.

Black gained the upper hand with 17...♜xf7 18.h4 fxg3 19.fxg3 e3 winning an exchange, but in a sharp tactical position, he fell for a 'cheapo'.

 

Black is an exchange up, but has to develop his queenside pieces. In his effort to be quick, Caruana hurried into a mistake with 23...h3? and fell for 24.f5! after which White managed to salvage a draw.

The point behind the trick is that, on 24...♝xf5 25.♘xf5+ ♛xf5 there follows 26.♕xb7 winning the rook. From this variation, it is obvious that Black should play the prophylactic 23...♚h8! from the diagram. A wild little skirmish, nevertheless.

Caruana reaching the tournament hall with Rustam Kasimdzhanov | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

It was curious to see how Anand would approach the game today. Even though he hasn't lost one in the tournament, the former world champion has had a mixed outing so far. He has been failing to convert winning or advantageous positions in about four games, and being obviously upset in post-game interviews about his play. It was interesting to see that in spite of that baggage, he continued with his brand of dynamic chess today too.

In fact, Kasparov talked about Vishy directly:

What I feel a bit sad is Vishy's performance. He is playing Robinhood! It is so painful watching him build... strong position(s), some games by force, and then age tells.

Anand's opponent Karjakin too joked after the game:

My plan was to make a solid draw (today) and afterwards tell Vishy, 'this was the first game in which you were not winning!', but I didn't manage!

Indeed, Anand's play was impressive, almost without traces of the bumpy road so far. 

 

7...a6

A rare continuation, 7...♝b7 being the popular move here 8.cxd5 xd5!? 9.xd5 Technically this was the new move. 9.0-0 c5 was an earlier game Keymer vs Matthiesen, Helsingor 2018, not capturing the offered pawn but play on the strength of the mildly better centre control 9...xd5 10.xc7 Karjakin captured this pawn after a five minutes thought, probably indicating he had not anticipated the pawn sacrifice here, but admirably deciding to accept the challenge.

 

10...a5+ 11.f1 The point. For the sacrificed pawn, Black gains the initiative in view of the uncastled white king and a lead in development.

 

White has tucked away his king to safety, which means that Black should act fast: 17...g5!? It was difficult to believe this, but Anand played the entire opening moves fast, indicating that the former world champion had come to the board with everything worked out. Incredible preparation! 18.hb1 h5!? True to his style, Anand throws his forces on the kingside, making his intention to have a full-fledged battle, in spite of the scar of missed moments in this tournament. Bravo!

 

21.e1? Facing Anand's initiative right from the opening, Sergey 'The Minister of Defence' Karjakin finally slips up. 21.♘e5 ♞xe5 22.dxe5 ♛d2 and though objectively White is better, it isn't easy to face Black's initiative over the board. 21...d2 22.e4 f6 23.b7 e8 and Black gained counterplay.

The game looked like getting very complicated and ended with a few electrifying moments. 

 

A wild position where both the kings are hunted down!

28...f2 29.d2 xd3! 30.xf2 e4+ 31.g1 xe3+ 32.h1 h6+ with a draw.

Karjakin vs Anand - an electrifying finish | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Magnus Carlsen finally won a game, outplaying Wesley So in a familiar way.

 

The centre is quite a picture! White's fractured pawn-structure actually does him a lot of favours — keeping Black's knights from reaching b4 and g4 with the d5-square being the ultimate destination for the white knight. Carlsen's next few moves are simple and beautiful.

24.c1! Attacking h6. But beyond that, can you see where the bishop is headed? And why?!

24...g7 25.e3

A cosy square for the bishop, but can you see the point?

25...xd1 26.xd1 d8

 

27.b1! b8 and both the ♞-c6 and ♜-b8 are fixed, as they have to defend against threats of xc5 and ♜xb6. Now white proceeded with 28.g2! Can you now see where the knight is headed? 28...f6 29.e2 Making way for the bishop 29...e8

 

30.f2! The point — the White knight on g2 is headed to d5! 30...d6 31.e3 e7 32.d5! and White is overwhelmingly better.

The final beauty of the position was demonstrated by Carlsen in the post-game analysis.

 

35...fxe4 36.fxe4 and the position is already lost for Black, as he has no defence against ♗f2-e1-c3 here. There was a picturesque finish shown by Carlsen: 35...♚f6 36.g4 f4 37.♗e1 g5 and now...

 

38.c3! Zugzwang! A beautiful example of why we all love chess!

Magnus Carlsen — when the going gets tough, we produce zugzwangs | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Now to the game which provided the ultimate drama of the day.

 

After a complicated opening struggle, the game equalized and reached this position, and Nepomniachtchi came up with a howler.

21.d7??

As MVL declared in the confession booth,“...If he goes 21.♘c6 instead of 21.♘e7 we (could) shake hands already probably...”. The blunder was committed after a thought of just 26 seconds. After Black's reply with 21...d6, Nepomniachtchi went into the players' lounge adjacent to the tournament hall, and didn't reappear for another fifteen minutes probably contemplating what he had done. The players table was empty, without both the players for the duration.

The playerless board being examined by curious spectators | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Later, MVL would admit that he 'was a bit surprised' with the blunder.

It was a bit of payback for him playing so fast in every game and today it cost him... He has been putting pressure on time on all his opponents...Yesterday I was pretty pissed about my play, and looking at Ian, all his wins, his playing so fast... I thought, let us not be confused by his quick play, let's punish his mistakes!

MVL reaching the tournament hall | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour


Round up show by IM Lawrence Trent


Games analysed by V. Saravanan
 

Standings after round 10

 

All games

 

Commentary webcast

Commentary by WGM Jennifer Shahade and GMs Yasser Seirawan and Maurice Ashley

Links




Saravanan is an IM from Chennai, the southern-most state of Tamil Nadu, India. He has been an active chess player in the Indian circuit, turning complete chess professional in 2012, actively playing and being a second to strong Indian players. He has been consistently writing on chess since late 1980s and is a correspondent to national newspapers and news channels.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 8/28/2019 11:26
Of course its worth it to expend extraordinary effort in opening preparation. The top players woudn't do it if it was not worthwhile. Just look at the number of games lost because of not remembering a line (not in this tournament, but overall). The idea of playing a line to "test the opponent's memory" has become standard. Not remembering a line means a player has to expend tremendous effort in order to find a draw. That is taxing and will take its toll on later days. And Carlsen knows a tremendous amount of opening theory and has played a fair number of novelties, especially as of late it seems he is studying openings much more than before.
sceptic101 sceptic101 8/28/2019 05:39
Let no one presume too much about his own knowledge and supposed ignorance of every one else. By way of courteous reminder, here is the ChessBase Rule for Reader Comments:
“We place a great deal of importance on comments being objective, as well as on the tolerance and respect of the opinions of others.” Trust, it would be followed in letter and spirit.
Rikis Rikis 8/28/2019 12:51
Carlsen - So : 43.d6 and Black resigned. Now, as the bulk of comment writers are patzers, complaining about drawn games instead of absorbing highest quality chess, which they presumably are not capable of, I will explain you why Black resigned, because most of you would have spoiled White's win irreparably. Here we go : 43...Rd4 44.e5+ Kf5 45.d7 a4 46.e6 a3 47.Re8 a2 48.Ra8 K:e6 and White has squandered his win and must now fight for a draw. The key move, which indeed requires guts, is 45.g4+!!, for example 45...Kf4 and only now 46.d7 a4 47.e6 a3 48.Re8 a2 49.Ra8, when the e6-pawn is untouchable and White wins.
Phillidor Phillidor 8/28/2019 12:35
Such an enjoyment reading these articles, really like the author's style.

Not to be only off-topic, regarding @JanneKejo comment, I think it's worth a discussion. There's obviously a dilemma about in which areas of play is it worth to put the most energy. As far as I know Magnus Carlsen isn't supposed to be a famous theoritician, so that partly answers the question. On the other hand, his game with Ding is a good illustration of how hard it can be to find good (or even "only") moves over the board. Watching this game I thought Ding is going to crack at some point, at least many players would in his shoes. But it seems that not everyone would be comfortable entering such a position (Nepo for example pragmatically avoided some theoretical discussions yesterday), but Ding seems to be profiled to play sound chess regardless of how hard it would be to defend. That said, the diversity of players makes it all so interesting. The draw issue, as one could complain, I don't really see it. It's not about sponsors, it's about chess. As long as sponsors are happy with (and recognise) such tremendeus games, it's all only good for chess I think.
JanneKejo JanneKejo 8/28/2019 12:19
It's interesting that so many players said they didn't remember the theory lines (which they obviously had used time and energy to study) and still came out of it alright. This makes one wonder whether it's worthwhile to use so much time and energy to try to learn the opening lines by heart -- when it anyway turns out that you didn't remember the lines and still managed to get (at least) a draw. (And your opponent did remember the line and still didn't manage to win.) It's good to see that the positional understanding is still the most important thing. Carlsen's game was brilliant.
1