Sinquefield Cup: Nothing yet decided

by Venkatachalam Saravanan
8/27/2018 – Everything looked set for a day full of fireworks when the eighth round of the Sinquefield Cup had just begun — Grischuk opened with 1.f4, Karjakin and Nakamura went into what seemed to be a sharp Catalan and Carlsen surely was in the mood to avenge his Biel loss against Mamedyarov. The players did try to fight, but the final result was, once again, five drawn games. Curiously, with one round to go, all the GCT "regular" players still have chances to qualify to the final stage in London. V. SARAVANAN reports. | Photo: Saint Louis Chess Club / Lennart Ootes

Mega Database 2018 Mega Database 2018

The "Mega" is the database every serious chessplayer needs. The database contains 7.1 million games from 1500 to 2017, in highest quality standard, full of top level analyses and completely classified.

More...

The Bird and other opening adventures

The eighth and penultimate round of the Sinquefield Cup was the round of the openings. The mood of the day got kindled when Alexander Grischuk confidently made his first move and surprised Wesley So: 1.f4!

A spirited Grischuk with his ‘emergency opening’ | Photo: V. Saravanan

Explaining what made him choose The Bird, Sasha admitted that he has thought about playing it for a while. “Today was a good opportunity to try it out, because I really needed to try to win. For quite some time it was my ‘emergency idea’ ”.

Nakamura and Karjakin decided to delight us next, going for an apparently sharp line which promised a full-fledged fight:

 

The Catalan — and this very variation — is part of both players’ repertoire, and it was remarkable that Nakamura went for this line at the crucial penultimate round, with his seat at the final stage of the Grand Chess Tour up for grabs and all…

Nakamura, the remarkable | Photo: Saint Louis Chess Club / Lennart Ootes

 

Compared to the previous two games, we do not see any tactical content in the position here, but the interesting aspect was the choice of opening. The World Champion has frequently demonstrated his ability to play a vast number of opening systems with either colour. Probably surprised by Carlsen’s opening choice, Mamedyarov comes up with a counter-surprise here: 6.Nbd2!? Previously, Shakh had employed only 6.Qb3 and 6.cxd5 here, which means that he decided to surprise Carlsen, probably after being surprised himself facing the Neo-Grunfeld setup. 6...a5!? An idea of Ivanchuk. Game on!

Surprise and counter-surprise | Photo: Saint Louis Chess Club / Lennart Ootes

The remaining two games followed established scripts. Aronian has already expressed his fascination towards the Berlin Defence when he defeated Karjakin in the first round with the white pieces — yesterday, he repeated the dreaded opening with Black. And yes, he had turned up in one of his brilliant shirts:

 

13.Nd4 Novelty. Vachier-Lagrave himself has played 13.Be3 in this position earlier.

Fascinated with the Berlin, in a fascinating shirt | Photo: Saint Louis Chess Club / Lennart Ootes

Vishy Anand has employed the Queen’s Gambit Declined thrice in this tournament already, and he did not see the necessity to change it. In a world where even top GMs shift frequently between openings, does he still feel safe sticking to a solid opening? If there is the necessity to play more tactical in a game, doesn’t he feel like having another ‘wall’ behind him?

“You are assuming way too much planning! It’s a luxury if you have four openings, and you can pick and choose [between them], but nowadays it takes so much work to work through all the opening ideas. In most of the [opening systems] you can be [tested from] many many sides — It takes time to work through all the material”.

Vishy Anand, the principled | Photo: Saint Louis Chess Club / Lennart Ootes

Anand is known for his completeness in preparation. He is ready to repeat the same opening against all the players in the same tournament, which shows thoroughness and confidence in himself, and poses a challenge to his opponents — whatever you come up with, this is what he is going to do! And that is what he did on Sunday too:

 

16.Nf3. A Novelty, but hardly a surprise, as the move is perfectly logical. So, a game of principled defence from a QGD was on.

So, on one end of the spectrum you had Grischuk, who has wildly rotated his openings, and on the other you have Vishy, who has stuck to the QGD with Black on principle. Thus, we were ready to witness interesting clashes in all the boards, as per what everyone believed to be their opening philosophy…

 

16...Nd5 Novelty! While watching the game, Black’s play looked scary, but Karjakin followed confidently, thus showing the depth of his opening preparation… 17.Nxd5 cxd5 18.Nxc4

 

18...dxc4?! This did not look convincing. We were anticipating 18...Nf6 19.Nxa5 Ba6 with complicated play. 19.Bxb7 Rb8 20.Bd5?! Missing Black’s reply? (20.Bc6 Rb6 21.Qd5 and White’s pieces looked dominating). 20...Ne5 and suddenly Nakamura found himself without any advantage, and the game liquidated into equality quickly.

This game was quite disappointing — after witnessing Nakamura’s spirit in employing such a dynamic system in a crucial round, many were routing for him here. And a word for his opponent too — it was remarkable that Karjakin decided to go into this line even when he might be having doubts about his own form. Bravo!

Soon, the Berlin practitioners could not make much headway and drew their game too:

 

True to his proclamation, Aronian does enjoy playing the Berlin, and Vachier-Lagrave confessed that he felt he was a little worse here, as he had overlooked the efficient 19...Kd8!

Still, the game never entered the threshold of danger for either player. Aronian philosophized, "I have to be practical about it and not just sacrifice everything for this tournament, because the main goal is to qualify and win the Grand Chess Tour. I felt it was a good game for me, but unfortunately with the Berlin, the best version of the Berlin normally leads to a draw”.

For his opponent, there was another consideration — a "perfect" 9 draws in the Sinquefield Cup now would almost guarantee him a place in the Grand Chess Tour final in London. Aha!

Somewhere along the way in erecting his ‘perfect wall’, Anand had got into difficulties:

 

This was the pivotal moment of the game, which could have decided the tournament in favour of Caruana.

He had played steadily to develop a slight advantage when he went wrong with 27.Qb4?! [Here, the engines suggested a clever move 27.Bf1! with the point that 27...Qd8 is now met with 28.Rb6 and white’s pawn on a5 is stable now, unlike in the game. 27...Qd8 28.Ra1 Ba6 29.Bxa6 Rxa6 30.f5 d4 with dynamic equality, and the game ended in a draw soon.

Caruana missed the pivotal moment | Photo: Saint Louis Chess Club / Lennart Ootes

Talking to Chessbase later about this position, Anand had his viewpoint, “Bf1 is the sort of a move which the computer spots, and no one else spots! I felt slightly uncomfortable [out of the opening], but I couldn’t pinpoint a moment. So, my instincts were correct, though I hadn’t specifically seen that line. It wouldn’t surprise me White was better. I need to find out what I did wrong [earlier]”.

How uncomfortable was he? Did he smell real danger or was it just a feeling that he was slightly worse? “Uncomfortable means uncomfortable! (chuckles). Simply a feeling that the position keeps surprising you — White has more resources... My evaluation was this should be equal, but not in a clean way”.

By now, the World Champion’s game was highly charged, but it all started nicely for Mamedyarov:

 

Carlsen rightly remarked about the opening phase, “If anybody had anything going, it was definitely him”. In this position, when it looked like White was gaining a nice advantage, Shakh unexpectedly played 16.Bxe4?!, when either 16.Qb5 or 16.f3 would have preserved his small advantage — a ‘side move’ as noted by Mamedyarov. 16...dxe4 17.Qb5 Rb8 18.Qc4 Bxe5 19.dxe5 Qd3 and Carlsen started getting optimistic about his position.

 

Around here, Carlsen said he really liked his knight, but could not get any mating ideas to work. Mamedyarov creditably held the draw.

By now, what started as an interesting round had trudged off to a snail’s pace, inviting disappointing moans all around:

And there was someone else sitting all the way far at Netherlands, smiling at all the draws happening at Saint Louis:

Finally, it again came to the Birdmen to show us the best fight of the day:

 

After an originally played opening, the position has reached a crossroad, and Grischuk played for a direct assault here: 17.f5?! weakens the position. He could have played more pragmatically with 17.Qf3 followed by Ra1-e1 etc. 17...Qd7 18.g4 b5! White is already in trouble here. You have got to really admire Wesley. After losing the first round, he has bid his time all this while and spiritedly strikes back at the final stages of the tournament.

 

Here, Grischuk blundered a pawn with 23.gxf5? (23.Qxe7 still held a lot of fight in the position). 23...Rxf5 and only now Grischuk realised that he cannot really play 24.Qxe7 because of 24...Qc6+ 25.Qe4 Qg6+ 26.Kh1 Rxf1+ 27.Rxf1 Qxe4 28.dxe4 d3 and Black is clearly better.

 

On the threshold of Grischuk’s time pressure, Wesley missed a win here after 30...Qf2, with the point that after 31.Nf5 Bf6 32.Nxe7? Bxe7 33.Qxe7 Qf3+ 34.Rg2 Rg8 35.Qe2 Qxg2+ 36.Qxg2 Rxg2 37.Kxg2 Kg8! Black wins the pawn ending! 30...Qb2? 31.Nf5= Be5 32.Rg2 Qc1+ 33.Rg1 with a repetition of moves. Understandably, Wesley was visibly disappointed when he offered the draw.

Realisation | Photo: V. Saravanan

Proposal | Photo: V. Saravanan

Agreement | Photo: V. Saravanan

We feel that many in this tournament are suffering from fatigue by now, hence the calculation mistakes and inability to create chances, which results in a high number of draws. Consider this: out of a total of 40 games, only 6 games have ended decisively — 15%. Surely, having the Rapid & Blitz and the Sinquefield Cup one after the other should be the main reason.

Daily Round-ups

The first round-up is free for everyone! Subsequent daily highlight videos will be accessible for ChessBase Basic account holders. Sign-up for a FREE 90-day trial today! Of course, the entire ChessBase Videos library is accessible to Premium members.

IM Lawrence Trent presents the highlights of the day

Standings after Round 8

 

Round 8 games and commentary

Annotated by GM Daniel Fernandez
 

Commentary by GM Yasser Seirawan, GM Maurice Ashley and WGM Jennifer Shahade

All games

 

Links




Saravanan is an IM from Chennai, the southern-most state of Tamil Nadu, India. He has been an active chess player in the Indian circuit, turning complete chess professional in 2012, actively playing and being a second to strong Indian players. He has been consistently writing on chess since late 1980s and is a correspondent to national newspapers and news channels.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 8/29/2018 06:53
Dear Saravanan, that is very interesting and I did not realize the effect of fatigue at the very top level.
Chanakyan Chanakyan 8/28/2018 05:16
Dear fgkdjlkag (nice name!)

This was my personal viewpoint. Since players are suffering from fatigue, they are not able to create chances. Since all of them are very well prepared in openings, they emerge out of the openings with equality and are almost never able to change course of the games. And even when they are able to create 'something' and able to get slightly better positions, they are not able to convert because of calculation / comprehension mistakes (e.g Caruana - Anand, .Grischuk - Wesley So...). There will be more decisive games if players are fatigued only in case of outright blunders - these are the top of the world players who are too strong for THAT! I understood that this was a contentious viewpoint, but I felt that writing is never interesting if you are not willing to state your true opinions openly. Even if those opinions are WRONG, the debate is what makes the whole writing interesting. Cheers! Saravanan
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 8/27/2018 11:32
Great coverage as usual by Saravanan.

This comment seemed strange: "We feel that many in this tournament are suffering from fatigue by now, hence the calculation mistakes and inability to create chances, which results in a high number of draws. Consider this: out of a total of 40 games, only 6 games have ended decisively — 15%. Surely, having the Rapid & Blitz and the Sinquefield Cup one after the other should be the main reason."

If players are suffering from fatigue, I would expect more decisive games, not fewer. To determine if there are more draws, just compare this tournament to other tournaments with similar ratings, that do not have an immediately preceding event, and see if the draw percentage is the same.

I also think that it makes more sense to come up with incentives to avoid draws, whether they be a different scoring system, bonuses, or something else, rather than just prohibiting draw agreements.
Vidmar Vidmar 8/27/2018 06:24
I agree with Giri.
If you want decisive games, let these guys play "regular grandmasters".
If you want to see the highest level of chess, watch them play each other!
Vidmar Vidmar 8/27/2018 06:19
It's just tough to beat a ~ 2800 player, even for another ~2800.
A hard fought draw is still an interesting game.
1