Princeton wins Ivy Chess Challenge

by Qiyu Zhou
11/30/2018 – The inaugural Ivy Chess Challenge was the one of the strongest collegiate tournament to be ever held in North America, after the Pan-American Collegiate Championships. Though the name is a bit misleading, as only three out of the six teams were Ivy Leagues, the tournament nevertheless boasted very strong chess-players, on both rating and academics. QIYU ZHOU was there representing the host University of Toronto and sends this report. | Photo: Changong Yu

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

The Ivy League goes to Toronto

The students from Princeton, Yale, and Harvard University, as well as University of Michigan and Toronto played 5 rounds (90 min + 30 sec) during the three days. As the host, University of Toronto participated with two teams, named respectively University of Toronto A and B. The University of Toronto’s iconic Hart House [pictured], established in 1919, was one of the beautiful venues for the event.

Hart House

Perhaps what is most unique about the Ivy Chess Challenge is that all the players have incredible academic backgrounds, along with impressive chess strengths. Getting into any of the Ivy League universities, or the University of Michigan and the University of Toronto is difficult enough on its own, but these players achieved a high level of chess skill while maintaining top grades throughout high school and college.

As the tournament kicked off, University of Harvard were the rating favourites with an average of 2328, followed by the University of Michigan at 2264. The strong players in the pool included GM Darwin Yang (2488), IM Larson Matthew (2408), IM Shetty Atulya (2395), FM Chandran Kapil (2393), IM Bora Safal (2392), IM Richard Wang (2332) and myself, WGM Qiyu Zhou (2227) to name a few.

A note about the University of Toronto A and B teams: Toronto A is the “varsity team” which will be representing the university at Pan-Americans in December. As I, unfortunately, missed the qualifiers in October due to a timing conflict with the World Chess Olympiad, I played on Toronto B, which had a higher average rating.

Yale Toronto

Yale against Toronto B... (Photo taken by Changong Yu)

The best game award for the tournament was given to Chandran vs Shetty.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 The Slav, apparently one of Atulya's favourite openings. Other games by Shetty this tournament that featured a draw in the Slav was his round 2 draw against Matthew Larson, and round 4 draw against Darwin Yang. 3.Nf3 3.cxd5 cxd5 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 1/2-1/2 Shetty Atulya - Larson Matthew, round 2 3...Nf6 4.Nc3 4.e3 Bf5 5.Be2 Ne4 6.0-0 Nd7 7.Qb3 Bg4 8.Bd3 Bf5 9.Be2 Bg4 10.Bd3 Bf5 11.Be2 1/2 - 1/2 Yang Darwin - Shetty Atulya, round 4 4...a6 5.e3 g6 6.Bd3 Bg7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Qe2 Bg4 9.h3 Bxf3 10.Qxf3 e6 11.Rd1 Nbd7 12.e4 e5 13.Be3 Nh5 14.Bf1 dxe4 15.Nxe4 f5 16.dxe5!? I remember walking past the game at this point and just thought to myself, is that not just a free knight? Nxe5 However, 16...fxe4? is better for white because of 17.Qg4 17.Qe2 Qh4 18.Nd6 f4 19.Bd4 f3 20.Qe3 fxg2 21.Bxg2 Nf4= 21...Qe7 the only move that maintains a slight advantage for black. 22.Ne4 Nxc4 23.Qc3 b5 24.Bxg7 Qxg7 25.Qxg7+ Kxg7 with a slightly better endgame for black 22.Bxe5 forced. After this the game is just drawn. Nxg2 23.Kxg2 Bxe5 24.Qxe5 Qxf2+ 25.Kh1 Qf3+ 26.Kg1 Qf2+ 27.Kh1 Qf3+ ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Chandran,K-Shetty,A-½–½2018D94Ivy Chess Challenge1
Results for Round 1

Princeton 1½ : 2½ Michigan

Harvard 3½ : ½ Toronto A

Toronto B 1½ : 2½ Yale 

Round 2

The students/players were evidently tired during the second round of the day, and the reason I discovered (and can relate to) was that they were staying up late to… work on assignments! Every undergraduate I talked to had some schoolwork to do, whether it was homework, midterms to study for or assignments to hand in. As Ethan Li said, he was trying to pretend he was playing blindfold chess but was in fact just falling asleep at the board!

Round 2

Board 2 for Princeton, FM Ethan Li (2248), doesn’t look too satisfied with his position…or maybe he is just tired! | Photo: Changong Yu

Results for round 2

Princeton 2½ : 1½ Harvard 

Michigan 2½ : 1½ Yale 

Toronto A 1½ : 2½ Toronto B 

Round 3

For a change in scenery, the third round was held on the 31st floor of the Manulife Centre in downtown Toronto, which is also where the teams were staying.

Darwin Yang

The highest rated player in the tournament, GM Darwin Yang, a fourth-year undergraduate in economics at Harvard | Photo: Changong Yu

Results for round 3

Toronto B ½ : Princeton

Harvard 2½ : Michigan 

Yale 3½ : ½ Toronto A

Round 4

This was the round I was looking forward to the most because I was playing against my friend of 11 years and my teammate on numerous occasions. Thus, a draw was agreed to due to the quiet nature of the Sicilian opening…

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
I was very excited to play this game and had briefly checked Richard's games before the tournament and before the round. After the game he told me how he did the same, and had spent 40 minutes before the round considering what to play. 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Bg7 6.Be3 Nf6 7.Bc4 0-0 8.Bb3 d6 9.h3 Bd7 10.0-0 up to here was preparation. Rc8 Draw offer from black, which was instantly accepted. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Zhou,Q-Wang,R-½–½2018B72Ivy Chess Challenge4

Afterwards, we decided to play blitz to determine the 'real' winner, which ended up in a 1-1 anyway.

Zhou vs Wang

Richard stays cool during the blitz games… | Photo: Leslie Tang

After the rounds, the more studious players chose to return to their rooms in order to catch up on schoolwork, while some opted to hang out in the skittles room.

Playing pool

The pool table was put to good use… | Photo: Changong Yu

billiard table chess

...it doubles as a table for chess analysis!

Results for round 4

Princeton 3½  : ½ Yale

Michigan 3½ : ½ Toronto A (3.5 – 0.5

Harvard 3 : 1 Toronto B 

Pub Night/Chess & Drinks

In true spirit of university life, a pub night is of course necessary. Unfortunately, since pubs in Ontario require patrons to be 19, and check IDs, the 18-year olds were unable to stay. As a result, the pub night was moved to the organizer’s personal apartment in the Manulife Center.   

pub night

'Pub' night | Photo: Qiyu Zhou

The tournament organizer Panagiotis Tsialas working hard during all stages of the tournament — tirelessly executing this 'challenge', which, despite the lack of funding and sponsorship, was a big success.   

What resulted was a fun night of drinks (for the 19+ year olds of course), lots of bughouse, slapjack and even pushups...the loser in slapjack was made to do pushups until they dropped!

pushups

Penalty pushups | Photo: Qiyu Zhou

The exasperation when you lose in bughouse is something I’m sure a lot of chess players can relate to…

Bughouse

Bughouse late into the night…or not so late because the decisive last round was at 9:30 am! | Photo: Qiyu Zhou

Round 5

The tournament was decided by Princeton’s win over the University of Toronto A. My own game against IM Safal Bora lasted more than four hours, in which white couldn’t quite find the win in the endgame:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.g3 e6 3.Bg2 d5 4.0-0 Be7 5.c4 0-0 6.d4 c6 7.Ne5 first time seeing this move! b6 7...Nbd7 8.Nd2 Nxe5 9.dxe5 Ng4 10.Nf3 f6= is possible 8.Nc3 Bb7 9.Bf4 Nbd7 10.Rc1 Rc8 another possibility was 10...Nh5 11.Bd2 Nxe5 12.dxe5 g6 11.e4 dxc4?! black's position is pretty bad after this 11...Nxe5 12.dxe5 Nxe4 13.Nxe4 dxe4 14.Bxe4 Qc7 12.Nxc4 Ba6 13.b3 Nb8 14.Re1 b5 15.Ne5 Qb6 16.Be3 Rfd8 17.Qc2 Qa5 18.Red1 Ba3 19.Rb1 h6 19...Nbd7 20.Nd3 b4 21.Na4 Bb5 20.Nd3 Bb4 better was 20...b4 21.Na4 Bxd3 22.Rxd3 Nbd7 21.Nxb4 Qxb4+- 22.h3 22.e5 Nd5 23.Ne4 Nxe3 where black is just too weak on the dark squares 24.fxe3 22...Bb7 23.Rbc1 Nbd7 24.Ne2 Qa3 25.Nf4 a5 26.Nd3 Qe7 27.f4 Ne8 28.a4 Nc7 29.Nc5 29.Bd2 Ra8 30.Be1+- and black literally has no useful moves 29...Nxc5 30.Qxc5 Qxc5 31.dxc5 Kf8 32.Rd6 Ke7 33.e5 33.Rcd1 Ne8 34.Rxd8 Rxd8 35.Rxd8 Kxd8 36.Bd4± is also a better endgame for white 33...b4 34.g4 Ne8 35.Bf2 this exchange sacrifice by white lead to a very interesting endgame with chances for both sides. f6 36.Kh2 Nxd6 37.cxd6+ Kd7 38.Bb6 Rf8 39.Kg3 g5 40.Bxa5 40.fxg5 hxg5 41.exf6 Rxf6 42.Bxa5 40...gxf4+ 41.Kxf4 fxe5+ 42.Kxe5 Rf2 43.Be4 Rcf8 43...Rg8 44.Bxb4 Re2 45.Bc5 Ba6 46.Rc3 Rf1 47.Be3 c5 48.h4 Rfe1 49.Kf4 Kxd6 50.Bxc5+ Kd7 51.Bf3 Rf1?+- I had to play 51...e5+ 52.Kg3 Rd2 52.Kg3 Ree1 53.g5?! 53.Be3+- just winning the h6 pawn and most likely the game 53...hxg5 54.hxg5 Re5 55.Be3 Rf5 56.Be4 Re5 57.Bf3 Rf5 58.Bg2 Re1 59.Be4 59.g6 Rxe3+ 60.Rxe3 Rg5+ 61.Kf2 Rxg6 62.Rg3 Rh6± is a better version of the game for white 59...Rxg5+ 60.Bxg5 Rxe4 61.Be3 e5 62.Bc5 Re1 63.Kf2 Re2+ 64.Kf3 e4+ 65.Kf4 Bd3 66.Ke5 Ra2 67.Kd4 Kc6 68.Ba3+ 68.Rc1 Bc2 69.Kc3 Bd3 70.Be3 Kb7 71.Rh1 Rc2+ 72.Kb4 Kc6± 68...Kb7 69.Bc1 Rc2 70.b4 Rxc3 71.Kxc3 Kc6= 72.Be3 Be2 73.Kd4 Bd3 74.Ke5 Be2 75.Ke6 Bd3 76.Ke7 Be2 77.Kd8 Ba6 78.Bf2 Bd3 79.Kc8 Be2 80.Kb8 Bd3 81.Be3 Be2 82.Ka7 Bd3 83.Bc5 Bc4 84.Be3 Bd3 85.a5 Bb5 86.a6 Bc4 87.Bd4 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Bora,S-Zhou,Q-½–½2018E16Ivy Chess Challenge5
Results for round 5

Toronto A 1 : 3 Princeton

Toronto B 1 : 3 Michigan

Yale 1½ : 2½ Harvard

Prize Giving

Interestingly enough, there was a three-way tie for first, as Princeton, Harvard and the University of Michigan all had 8 match points. However, the trophy went to Princeton on tiebreaks.

Princeton team

(Left to right) Princeton: FM Ethan Li (2248), Aaron Balleisen (2195), Isaac Martinez (2127), FM Chandran Kapil (2393) | Photo: Changong Yu

Blitz Tournament

The blitz tournament (time control of 3 min + 2 sec) was won by IM Atulya Shetty (2395) of University of Michigan, with second place going to FM Kapil Chandran (2393) of Princeton University.

blitz winner

Photo: Qiyu Zhou

Brett Sherman has taken excellent video footage of the event:

Impressions from Day 1

Impressions from Day 2

Final Results

1. Princeton University (RtgAvg:2241, TB1: 8 / TB2: 2)

Bo.

 

Name

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

Pts.

Games

RtgAvg

1

FM

Chandran Kapil

2393

USA

½

½

1

1

1

4

5

2333

2

FM

Li Ethan

2248

USA

0

0

½

1

½

2

5

2212

3

 

Balleisen Aaron

2195

USA

0

1

1

½

½

3

5

2101

4

 

Martinez Isaac

2127

USA

1

1

1

1

1

5

5

1645

2. Harvard University (RtgAvg:2328, TB1: 8 / TB2: 2)

Bo.

 

Name

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

Pts.

Games

RtgAvg

1

GM

Yang Darwin

2488

USA

1

½

½

½

½

3

5

2314

2

IM

Wang Richard

2332

USA

1

1

0

½

1

4

5

2195

3

FM

Krishnan Varun

2253

CAN

½

0

1

1

½

3

5

2083

4

 

Hu Bryan

2240

USA

1

0

1

1

½

4

5

1617

3. University of Michigan (RtgAvg:2264, TB1: 8 / TB2: 2)

Bo.

 

Name

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

Pts.

Games

RtgAvg

1

IM

Shetty Atulya

2395

USA

½

½

½

1

1

4

5

2333

2

IM

Bora Safal

2392

USA

1

1

1

½

½

4

5

2183

3

FM

Heimann Mark

2368

USA

1

1

0

1

1

4

5

2067

4

 

Webster Kyle

1902

USA

0

0

0

1

½

2

5

1690

4. Yale University (RtgAvg:1842, TB1: 4 / TB2: 0)

Bo.

 

Name

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

Pts.

Games

RtgAvg

1

IM

Larson Matthew

2408

USA

½

½

1

0

½

3

5

2330

2

 

Fabbri Alexander

2067

USA

0

0

1

0

0

1

5

2248

3

 

Vishwanathan Ram

1893

IND

1

0

½

½

½

3

5

2162

4

 

Vemuri Harish

0

USA

1

1

1

0

½

4

5

1870

5. University of Toronto B (RtgAvg:2164, TB1: 2 / TB2: 0)

Bo.

 

Name

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

Pts.

Games

RtgAvg

1

FM

Gusev Nikita

2253

CAN

½

0

0

½

0

1

5

2361

2

FM

Qiyu Zhou

2207

CAN

1

1

½

½

½

4

5

2220

3

 

Haizhou Xu

2116

CAN

0

 

0

 

0

0

3

2152

4

 

Zehn Nasir

2081

CAN

0

½

0

0

½

1

5

1832

5

 

Yu Jonathan

2057

CAN

 

1

 

0

 

1

2

1620

6. University of Toronto A (RtgAvg:1765, TB1: 0 / TB2: 0)

Bo.

 

Name

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

Pts.

Games

RtgAvg

1

 

Bellissimo  Joseph

2121

CAN

0

1

0

0

0

1

5

2387

2

 

Fu James

2061

CAN

0

0

0

½

½

1

5

2249

3

 

Lei Sean

1876

CAN

½

½

½

0

½

2

5

2158

4

 

Huang Xiaoshi

0

CAN

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

1865

Qiyu with trophies

Your author, Qiyu Zhou (University of Toronto), with the individual trophies | Photo: Changong Yu

Links


WGM Qiyu Zhou [pronounced Chee-you Jo], born in 2000, is a Canadian chess player who has competed for team Canada at the Women's Chess Olympiad since 2014 and who won the Canadian women's championship in 2016.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.