Play the Rossolimo Sicilian with GM Jan Werle

by Tanmay Srinath
10/21/2020 – In this day and age, it is not so important to get an opening advantage - it is more important to get a playable position that you understand better than your opponent. With the Sveshnikov all the rage at the top, and the Open Sicilian no longer guaranteeing White his birthright opening advantage, top players have moved on to exploring lesser known but sound systems, and one such opening is the Rossolimo. Almost all the top players play this opening with both colours, its chief advocate being the American No.1 Fabiano Caruana. Jan Werle recently authored a DVD on the subject, and Tanmay Srinath takes a closer look at the Dutch GM's debut offering for ChessBase, along with a brief interview with the author about these DVDs.

These DVDs will show you dangerous new sidelines that are ideal for combatting the Sicilian after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6/d6 3.Bb5(+), with your author giving you the positional ideas behind less well-trodden Sicilian paths that avoid the main and winding main

The Sicilian Defense is a real beast! In the main lines often Black sacrifices objective equality for positions where he can out calculate White and win with a counter-attack. My transition with this venerated opening has been rather amusing - I myself used to play it as Black at the very beginning of my career, inspired by Kasparov's Scheveningens! Slowly I realised that my style is not one of deep memorization, so I switched to the French. But as White my troubles against the Sicilian continued. I initially relied on the Open Sicilian with 2.Nf3 and 3.d4, but a bad loss in the Chinese Dragon drew me away from the sharp stuff. I soon began experimenting with the closed Sicilian, and it brought me some reward, but again not such great positions. It was then the time of the Smith Morra Gambit, and I achieved some scintillating results with it. However, as with the extremes of Chess, I soon found myself stuck against great defenders, and the quest for the best opening continued. However, I feel I have found my Golden Fleece with these latest offerings by ChessBase and Werle, and I hope to enlighten the readers through this review why the Rossolimo is perhaps the most critical test of the Nc6 Sicilian! We will also include titbits from my conversation with Werle in between, and the reader can gain a greater insight into chess in general and these systems in particular from our conversation.

A few facts before the author of the DVD , Jan Werle, before we start:

1. At Liverpool in 2008, he made only a last-minute decision to enter the EU Individual Open Chess Championship and surprised everyone by winning the event, ahead of many of Europe's leading players, including Michael Adams, Nigel Short, Étienne Bacrot and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave.

2. Peak rating of 2607.

3.Runner-up at Groningen 2005 and at the Corus 'C' Group (Wijk aan Zee) 2006.

4.Medal-winning performances at the European Youth Chess Championships at Kallithea in 2000 and 2001, where respectively, he took bronze in the Under-16 and silver in the Under-18.

5. Studied Law at Groningen University, and these days plays chess professionally.

6. He is also an accomplished chess trainer and (yet to be released) author - he will have a two part series on defense in collaboration with Thinker's Publishing titled Unbeatable!

GM Jan Werle, a man of many talents

Obviously a very impressive bio, but when going through his games I did notice a few things that might seem a bit peculiar to the readers of the review when viewed in context to this DVD Series:

1. Werle has nearly always preferred 1.d4 and 1.Nf3 on move 1.

2. He has only 19 games with 1.e4.

3. His main weapon as Black? The Sicilian!

Thus, compared to the previous authors on the Rossolimo, Werle not only has little experience in the line as White, he is also a firm adherent of the Sicilian from the Black side. How then did he choose the Rossolimo as the subject of his DVD?

When discussing this with Jan, he said,

As a Sicilian player I had a hard time facing these systems. Thus I decided to investigate these systems in depth, as I could never understand the structures arising from them. I liked to conduct extensive research, so I spent quite a lot of time on these unknown territories. These are very typical structures, as in the Rossolimo we have the fight between the bishop pair for Black and the better structure and lead in development for White. This can be noticed especially in 9.Be3 line in the 3...g6 variation. There Black has the bishops, the semi open b-file and the pawn breaks, but why does the computer like White? After going through the lines deeply I understood that both these bishops can be restricted - the c8 bishop with f3,h3 and g4 and the g7 bishop with the pawn center e5-d4. This was very fascinating to understand.

I think this encompasses my views as well - I have always viewed chess as a battle between statics and dynamics, and the 3.Bb5 Sicilians have these sorts of battles in almost all the positions arising from them. Now without further delay let me go through the contents of the DVD one by one:

It's always good to make a decent first impression, and Werle in my opinion has managed to do so!

 

Against the sidelines White usually has very little to be worried about - here is an example from the 3...a6 line. White will play against the bad bishop on c8 and aim to place his pawns on the light squares.

 

This line is a little more concrete, but it shows how one should always be flexible - White opens the position despite missing one of his bishops, mainly due to the concrete reasons being more valuable than static ones - here it is Black's lack of development that has him punished.

 

The 3...Nf6 Rossolimo was experimented by Carlsen, but the lack of repetition clearly points to the line being a one trick pony if anything. Against this, Werle recommends a central approach with chances of an eventual kingside attack.

A pertinent question that I asked Jan was how much time one should focus on the sidelines when preparing for the game. His explanation was,

It is really difficult to say, because these days the sidelines are becoming as popular as the main lines as the main aim of the opening has not become equality for Black or advantage for White, but instead taking your opponent into territory where you know your stuff and he doesn't.

Wise advice, and truth being spoken here - I myself play a Sicilian sideline as White, so I understand where this is coming from. Thus, Werle's coverage of the sidelines is perfect considering his advice on preparation - focus on Black's main tries there with explanations on what to do in general.

 

Once you finish the sidelines, you realise how much effort Werle has put into the creation of this DVD. His idea of 6.h4!? seems quite fascinating to me, and I can't see how Black equalises fully even if he plays the best moves. Quite a learning!

Talking about how he decided to present this idea as a suggestion for White, Jan explained that this idea was not his, but the resulting positions really appealed to him,

It caught my eye when I was checking it with LC0. It's a known idea, and it is very aggressive. It is a really hard line to play as Black - I would often wonder what to do with my g-knight - should I go to f6 or e7? If I go to f6 White has the chance to place the pawn on e5 with tempo. Since I have an extra light squared bishop I want to put my pawns on dark squares with d6-e5, and the knight will be perfect on g6. Thus came the idea of h4 - Black is maneuvering without completing development, and it makes sense to disturb his plans.

 

Against 3...g6 too Werle goes into full innovation mode! His recommendation of 9.Be3!? has only been tried around 30 times, and the positions White gets from this line are at least easier for him to play, if not objectively superior.

This I feel is one of the best discoveries in the Rossolimo in recent times. When asked how he found this idea, Werle explained that it draws its roots from Nimzowitch's old teachings

I was checking this variation out with the latest software, and I was reminded of the old masters' idea of over-protection. So the thing is that instead of protecting an important central point 3 times for example, which is necessary not to lose it, you do it 4 times, so that the superfluous defender is free to move to other points. 9.Be3 attempts to do the same -  instead of protecting the d4 square twice White does it thrice, and later on either his extra defender is free to move. Black's counterplay is based on targeting d4, and so it made sense to over-protect it while developing a piece.

This answer was a revelation for me. I am not so well versed in very old masters like Nimzowitch, but using their teachings one can come up with some really modern concepts! It also shows how one should prepare openings - based on sound positional principles.

Here is a recent example of the same - Caruana proved to be too powerful for Daniil Dubov

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 g6 4.0-0 Bg7 5.c3 Nf6 6.Re1 0-0 7.d4 d5 8.e5 Ne4 9.Be3 Qb6 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Qc1 Rb8 12.b3 Qa5 13.dxc5 Rxb3 14.axb3 Qxa1 15.b4 Qa4 16.Nd4 Bxe5 17.f3 Nf6 18.Qa3 Qxa3 19.Nxa3 Re8 20.Bg5 Bxd4+ 21.cxd4 Kg7 22.b5 Bd7 23.bxc6 Bxc6 24.Bd2 a6 25.Nc2 Bb5 26.Ra1 Nd7 27.Nb4 e6 28.Bf4 Ra8 29.Ra5 Nb8 30.g4 Kf8 31.Kf2 Ke8 32.g5 Nd7 33.Bc7 f6 34.h4 Ra7 35.Bd6 Ra8 36.Ke3 Kf7 37.f4 Kg7 38.Kd2 h5 39.Kc3 Kf7 40.Nd3 Bc6 41.Kb4 Ra7 42.Ra3 Kg7 43.Nc1 Kf7 44.Nb3 Bb5 45.Na5 Ra8 46.c6 Nb6 47.c7 f5 48.Re3 Rc8 49.Nb7 Nc4 50.Re1 Bd7 51.Kc5 Ke8 52.Be5 Kf8 53.Ra1 Bb5 54.Bd6+ Ke8 55.Na5 Nd2 56.Be5 Kd7 57.Kb6 Nc4+ 58.Nxc4 dxc4 59.Kc5 Re8 60.Rd1 Ba4 61.Ra1 Bb5 62.Ra2 Kc8 63.Kd6 Kb7 64.Bf6 Kc8 65.Bd8 Kb7 66.Ke5 Rf8 67.Ra3 Kc8 68.Kxe6 Re8+ 69.Kf7 Re4 70.Kxg6 Rxf4 71.Kxh5 Rxd4 72.g6 Rd6 73.Kg5 Rd3 74.g7 c3 75.Kxf5 Rg3 76.Bg5 Bc4 77.Rxa6 c2 78.Rc6 Bb3 79.h5 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Fabiano Caruana2822Daniil Dubov26831–02020B31Tata Steel Masters7.3

This should pretty much cover the portions regarding the opening videos. Before coming to the exact pros and cons of the presentation, it makes sense to look at a few examples of the remaining two sections - the illustrative games and memory markers:

The following game's inclusion really impressed me - despite it not being part of Werle's theoretical recommendation he took time out and explained the nuances of the Rossolimo Middlegame - this shows a lot of character!

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Magnus Carlsen: "My game against Gelfand in round 10, annotated by Peter Heine Nielsen below, represents the level of chess I aspired to play at in the Candidates. Although I did not succeed in every game, I take great comfort in having reached the main objective which was to qualify for the World Championship match against V. Anand. I would like to express my gratitude to Peter Heine and the other seconds for their valuable help in reaching this goal." 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 Openingwise the players are basically 2 opposites. While Carlsen moves around a lot, Gelfand, both in the WC-match with Anand and in this Candidates tournaments stayed completely loyal to the Grünfeld against 1.d4 and the Sveshnikov against 1.e4. 3.Bb5!? Sveshnikov was right! At least judged by the current trends, White players seems to concede that the actual Sveshnikov Sicilian is fine for Black, and that 3.Bb5 is the way to fight for the advantage. As Sveshnikov claimed years back. Anand did well with Bb5 in the match, and later both Caruana and Ponomariov posed Gelfand some problems. e6 4.0-0 In round 7 Magnus played 4.Bxc6 against Radjabov, and after bxc6 5.b3 d6 6.0-0!? tried this idea, deviating from 6.e5 which was both played by McShane and Grischuk against Radjabov. The idea is that after 6...e5 we have a position known from 3...d6 4.Bxc6 bxc6 5.0-0 only with the white pawn on b3 instead of b2. Not a huge difference, but definitely leading to a playble position for White. Here Radjabov played Ne7!? and in a complex position, Magnus hallucinated, and was suddenly lost, but saved the game after inaccurate play by Radjabov. 4...Nge7 5.Re1 a6!? In the Tashkent Grand Prix against Caruana and Ponomariov, Gelfand chose 5...Nd4, but part of the reason behind being able to succesfully repeat his openings, is having small surprises within them, and for this candidates he had prepared 5.. .a6, and employed it already succesfully with Grischuk in round 6. 6.Bf1 d5 7.exd5!? I was seconding Magnus in London, but also got help from other seconds online. They suggested this line, thinking it leads to a moderately pleasant position, with a long game ahead, which should suit Magnus style excellently. Grischuk played 7.d3 and we saw an unusually sharp fight for pawn structure with big decisions early on: d4!? 8.e5!? Nd5 9.c4!? dxc3 10.bxc3 Rb8 11.Bb2 b5!? and after a tactical error by Grischuk Gelfand got a winning position, although the game ended in a draw. 7...Nxd5 8.d4 Nf6 9.Be3 cxd4 9...Be7 might be slightly more accurate as after 10.c4 0-0 11.Nc3 cxd4 12.Nxd4 instead of 12...Bd7 also 12...Qc7 indenting ... Rd8 is possible. 10.Nxd4 Bd7 11.c4 This is the concept. White has a bit more space and a queenside majority. Black of course a healthy and solid position though. Nxd4 11...Be7 12.Nc3 0-0 13.Nf3!? White has been quite succesful with, and this is an argument for Gelfand's choice, securing relieving exchanges before it is too late. 11...Bb4!? is a principled choice, but after 12.Nc3 Bxc3 13.bxc3 0-0 14.Bf4 White's activity more than compensates for the structural weaknesses. After Nxd4!? 15.cxd4 Bc6 surprisingly suddenly we have the typically Nimzo pawn structure, very similar to game 11 in the Anand-Gelfand match, where Gelfand had a pleasant position with the 2 bishops, before that game was drawn. 12.Bxd4 Bc6 13.Nc3 Be7 14.a3!? Magnus was happy with this decision, as he thought the interpolation of a3/a5 is probably favouring White. 14.Qd3 0-0 15.Rad1 This was played in the stem game Kinmark (that's actually an anagram of Kramnik as my Swedish friends have pointed out!) -Paoli 1975, also being slightly more pleasant for White. 14...a5!? The principled approach, and what one would expect from Gelfand. 14...0-0 15.b4 is what White wants, but as usual only a slight edge. 15.Qd3 0-0 15...a4?! is an ambitious attempt, but after 16.Rad1 0-0 17.Qg3 White's initiative becomes too strong. 16.Rad1 Qc7 17.Be5 Qb6 18.Qg3 Rfd8 18...Nh5!? 19.Qh3 Nf6 would be an interesting way to defend, as now Bc7 no longer annoys Black, and Black is threatening ...Rfd8. 20.Bd3 h6 21.Bd4 Qc7 22.b4! and White still keeps an edge though. 19.Rxd8+ 19.Nd5 Magnus said at the press-conference that he had wasted quite some time on this move, which fails due to a small tactic: exd5 20.Bd4 Bc5 21.Bxf6 Bxf2+! leading to a drawish ending. 19...Qxd8 20.Rd1 Qb6 20...Qf8!? Speelman mentioned this move at the press conference, to which Gelfand quite rightly replied that from a practical perspective it has no huge relevance. Gelfand's plan was hampering Black's queenside play in an ambitious manner, but this more defensive move does have some bite, as the following tactic: 21.b4!? axb4 22.axb4 Nh5! 23.Qg4 Bxb4 24.Qxh5 f6! 25.Bd3 g6! amazingly holds up for Black, as after 26.Bxg6? 26.Qg4! fxe5 27.Qxe6+ Qf7 28.Qxe5 Ra5 and Black has enough compensation to draw here 26...hxg6 27.Qxg6+ Qg7 and due to the mate on g2, White can't take on f6 with the queen, and thus suddenly ends up a piece short! Instead of 21.b4, probably 21. Bd3!? is stronger, and White remains comfortably placed. 21.Bd4 Qb3 22.Rd3 22.Rd2 is more modest, but White still has a pleasant game after eg. a4 23.Qc7 Nd7 24.Be3 Bd8 25.Qg3 But the game puts much more direct pressure on Black. 22...Qc2 23.b4! axb4 24.axb4 Nh5 25.Qe5 25.Qe3!? This computer move also keeps an edge, the main point being Bxb4 26.Qg5 g6 26...f6! a much better fighting chance 27.Qxh5 e5 28.Qf5 Rf8! () and although White is better, Black keeps definite figthing chances 27.Ne4! Bxe4 28.Qe5! and Black's position suddenly collapses. 25...Bf6 The toughest defence. Both players saw 25...Ra1 26.Nd1! Rxd1 27.Rxd1 Qxd1 28.Qb8+ Bf8 29.Bc5 h6 30.Qxf8+ Kh7 and now 31.Qd6! is the key bringing back the queen for defence, and the ensuing endings will just be winning for White due to the queenside majority and the pair of bishops. 31.Qxf7? Be4! however would completely reverse the situation, as ...Bd3 can't be stopped. 26.Qxh5 Bxd4 27.Rxd4 Qxc3 28.Qa5! The point behind 23.b4, without this, White wouldn't even be better. But now with this intermezzo, White just manages to coordinate in time, and thus his queenside majority secures a huge edge. Rf8 29.Qb6 e5 The only way to fight. 30.Rd1 30.Rd8!? g6 31.b5 Be4 32.Rd7 transposes to the line below. 30...g6 31.b5 Be4 32.Qf6?! 32.h4!? 32.Rd7 This seems almost winning, the idea being Qd6 next, and if now ...Bf5, then Rxb7. Qe1 33.Qd6± 32...h5?! 32...Bf5! A very good fighting chance, 33.Rd5 Be6 34.Qxe5 Qxe5 35.Rxe5 Rc8 as this could be easily drawn for Black, White should probably not liquidate into this ending. An important line is 36.c5 Kf8 37.Bd3 Bd7! followed by ...f6 winning back the pawn. 33.h4 Bf5 34.Rd5 Qc1!? 34...Be6 35.Qxe5 Qxe5 36.Rxe5 Rc8 37.c5 Kf8 38.Bd3 Bd7 is now different, as ...f6 would weaken the g6-pawn, and thus h4/h5 greatly favours White. 35.Qxe5 Be6 36.Rd4 Ra8 37.Qe2 Gelfand has reasonable activity for the pawn, but in time pressure commits a few inaccuracies, which Magnus punished mercilessly. Kh7?! 37...Qa1 38.Qd1 Kg7 eg. was a much tougher defence 39.c5? Qc3! being one resource. 38.Rd1 Qc3 39.Qe4 Ra1? But ...Ra7 as the computer thinks, fights on. But it is impossible for a human to play. 40.Rxa1 Qxa1 41.c5! The time control has been reached, but now White is completely winning, as nothing stops his pawns marching forward. Qc3 42.Qxb7 42.b6 would indeed be safer, but Magnus missed Gelfand's reply to his next move. 42...Qe1!? 42...Qxc5 43.b6 followed by Qa6, and the pawn just queens. 43.b6 Magnus said at the press conference that he quite quickly recovered from the shock, and that despite losing the bishop on f1, it doesn't really change much, as what matters is that the white pawns are queening. Bc4 44.Qf3! Qxf1+ 45.Kh2 Qb1 46.b7 Qb5 47.c6 Bd5 48.Qg3! Controlling g2, and h4, eliminating even any small attempts at counterplay, and simultaneously queening the b-pawn made Gelfand resign. Probably Magnus' best game in London. He achieved only a small edge in the opening, but with some precise tactics managed to enlarge it, and then increased it to decisive proportions in Gelfand's time trouble. This gave Carlsen the sole lead, but much more was still to happen... 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2872Gelfand,B27401–02013B30Candidates Tournament10

Before championing the Black side of the Sicilian, Carlsen was famous for his virtuoso play in the Bb5 Sicilian! | Photo: Alina l'Ami/Tata Steel Chess 2020

The Memory Markers were also quite instructive - Werle takes key positions and asks the viewer to find the move he has recommended in the theoretical section. I found this section rather entertaining and helpful, and in my opinion this is the best way to test our knowledge of a new opening. Apart from this, the DVD also contains a bonus portion, containing games played in this opening, all the lines that Werle has shown us, and a complete final analysis database, containing 3 lines - sidelines, 3...e6 and 3...g6. Quite a useful addition. Now, we enter the business end of the review. Should I recommend this to prospective buyers? Well, let me be as objective as possible, and this is my attempt to provide as honest a picture as possible - a list of pros and cons.

Pros

1. This is clearly a DVD of a very high level of analysis, with respect to the improvements found in the 3...e6 and 3...g6 lines.

2. Werle is very easy to understand, and doesn't have much of an accent, so he should be comprehensible to most of the audience.

3. Unlike most presenters, Werle repeats that the lines that he is showing are illustrative, and not absolute. This is some objectivity!

4. There is a lot of content to be digested! 38 Memory Markers, 17 Illustrative games and a database of 83 illustrative games - this is clearly a DVD that impresses with quantity at least!

5. There is a balance between plans and concrete moves that makes this DVD fun to watch!

Is it a bed of roses? I'd thought otherwise, but the cons that I found had nothing to do with the author of the DVD, and after my chat with Jan I decided not to list all of them here. This was a conscious decision I took, as these take nothing away from the sheer quality of the content presented. However, with this being an objective review, I will state two of them here:

Cons

1. The editing of the DVD leaves a lot to be desired. There are too many small chinks that have gone amiss, and that is sad considering the quality Chessbase usually provides. The most glaring is the inclusion of a clip from the Moscow Variation in the Illustrative games!

2. There has been a mini - miss in the 3...g6 line - after 7.d4 Black has the interesting 7...a6!?, which has recently (December 2019 for the precise ones out there!) become really popular among the top, with Carlsen and David Anton giving it a go from the Black side. However, considering how rare the line is relative to the main line, I won't be too critical - on the contrary I will offer players an antidote to it with some illustrative lines. Here it is:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 g6 4.0-0 Bg7 5.c3 Nf6 6.Re1 0-0 7.d4 a6 8.Bf1! cxd4 9.cxd4 d5 10.e5 Ne4 11.Be3 f6 11...Be6 12.Nbd2 f6 13.exf6 exf6 14.Nb3 b6 15.Rc1 11...Qb6 12.Nc3 Nxc3 13.bxc3 Na5 14.Bg5 Qc7 15.Qa4 b6 16.Qb4 11...Bg4 12.h3 Be6 13.Nbd2 f5 14.Nb3 h6 15.Nc5 Nxc5 16.dxc5 f4 17.Bd2 g5 18.b4 11...f5 12.g3 e6 13.Nc3 Bd7 14.Rc1 h6 15.h4 Be8 16.Kg2 12.exf6 exf6 13.Nc3 Be6 14.Na4 Qe7 15.Rc1 f5 16.Nc5 Rac8 17.b4!
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Rossolimo 7.d4 a6!?--2020B31

Having said all this, it is time to conclude. Should this DVD be recommended? After some contemplation, my answer is yes. The sheer quality of the new ideas in the e6 and g6 titled the balance in the author's favour, and one should not forget that this is Werle's debut venture (as far as I know). Thus, one should encourage such strong GMs to make such series from time to time, so that the general chess enthusiasts benefit from their knowledge.

I will end this review with two of the most instructive (for me) moments from this DVD:

 

Credit to Jan Werle for keeping the DVD as objective as possible. Here he shows a very interesting plan for Black. Can you find it?

 

A very similar position to the one on top, but with some subtle differences. Can you find the best plan for White here?

Stay tuned for part two of the Anti Sicilian Repertoire Review, where I speak with Jan on the Moscow DVD, his future plans and some coverage of more general topics.

My thanks to Jan for doing an interview with me! It helped gain insight into how a strong GM prepares for his games, and how he thinks!

About the product

Jan Werle's Rossolimo Sicilian has a run time of nearly 5 and a half hours!


The review on the Moscow variation will be published soon, but you can get the bundle of Rossolimo + Moscow from the links below.

This DVD will show you dangerous new sidelines that are ideal for combatting the Sicilian after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5, with your author giving you the positional ideas behind less well-trodden Sicilian paths that avoid the main and winding main lines.


Tanmay Srinath has been writing for ChessBase India since quite some time now. His tournament reports and depth of analysis have been widely appreciated. Pursuing a full-fledged career in engineering Tanmay doesn't get enough time to pursue chess, but he loves to follow top-level encounters and analyzes those games with his Fat Fritz engine. We hope you find his analysis useful in your games.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.