11/5/2015 – Did you enjoy the first part of our interview with the top Georgian player Baadur Jobava, he laid out a plan for ambitious players to become better. In part two he talks about great players like Alekhine, Capablanca, Carlsen, Kasparov, etc.; about his wife and new son Maximus, about Chess 960 and women's chess. In the end he has priceless advice for chess lovers who wish to improve.
new: ChessBase 16 - Mega package Edition 2022
Your key to fresh ideas, precise analyses and targeted training!
Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.
ChessBase is a personal, stand-alone chess database that has become the standard throughout the world. Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it.
This video course offers you a complete Black repertoire with 1.e4 d5. Covering all the critical attempts for White to punish Black’s provocative approach, as well as all the relevant minor options on move 2 and 3 for White.
€29.90
Living life the Jobi way (2/2)
Interview with Baadur Jobava by Sagar Shah
In the
first part of this unique on-the-wheels interview Baadur Jobava spoke
about his first few years in chess, how his style evolved and also suggested
a plan for ambitious players to become better. In part II he talks about
great players like Alekhine, Capablanca, Carlsen, Kasparov, etc. He also
speaks about his wife Aleksandra, his newly-born son named Maximus, best
friends, chess 960 and women’s chess. At the end he has a priceless
piece of advice for every chess lover who would like to improve.
SS: You did not fare well in Tata
Steel Masters 2015. Do you think that lack of a stable opening repertoire
was the reason for your downfall?
Baadur’s interview at the start of Tata
Steel 2015
BJ: Tata Steel 2015 was one of the hardest phases of my
life. I was going through a tough situation in my personal life and was
really in bad form. Just have a look at my game against Magnus Carlsen.
Everything was going pretty well and I just blundered in one move. These
personal problems are the reason why my rating dipped nearly 80 points.
Nobody can understand it, and they blame my poor play on many different
reasons. But I would not like to talk about it in this interview. Suffice
it to say that I am coming back. I won the HZ Open in Vlissingen, Netherlands
in August, and now gained a few rating points in Abu Dhabi. I am slowly
and steadily inching back towards 2700.
Baadur against Magnus in Tata Steel 2015
SS: Can you tell us something about
your game against Carlsen that you won in 2010?
BJ: First of all I was happy to play against Magnus after
five years. The first time I beat him was in 2005 in European Championships
in Warsaw. In the five years from 2005 to 2010 he made huge progress and
his rating was somewhere around 2830. Since childhood I would always relish
the opportunity of playing stronger opponents. I am not scared of anyone.
When I played against Carlsen in 2010 he was completely out of form. He
lost three games in that tournament: to me, Tomi Nyback and Sanan Sjugirov.
When I saw the move 6.e4!? it was a hard one for me to resist, because when
you are playing a strong opponent like Magnus you would always like to imbalance
the play. Turns out that 6.e4!? was a move that had never been played before,
apart from one or two amateur games.
Baadur Jobava – Magnus Carlsen, Olympiad 2010
6.e4!? was a typical Jobava move to complicate the game
[Event "Khanty-Mansiysk ol (Men) 39th"] [Site "Khanty-Mansiysk"] [Date
"2010.09.24"] [Round "4.1"] [White "Jobava, Baadur"] [Black "Carlsen,
Magnus"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E24"] [WhiteElo "2710"] [BlackElo "2826"]
[Annotator "Krasenkow,M"] [PlyCount "127"] [EventDate "2010.09.21"] [EventType
"team-swiss"] [EventRounds "11"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2010.11.18"] [WhiteTeam "Georgia"] [BlackTeam "Norway"] [WhiteTeamCountry
"GEO"] [BlackTeamCountry "NOR"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+
5. bxc3 Nc6 {A rare continuation (with the idea of ...e6-e5), to which
White replies with a genuine novelty on move 6!} 6. e4 $5 $146 {[%cal
Ge2e4]} Nxe4 7. Qg4 f5 8. Qxg7 Qf6 9. Qxf6 Nxf6 { This position presents
a typical positional conflict: White has a bishop pair with an asymmetrical
pawn structure (which should favour him), but his own pawn chain is damaged
(doubled pawns). Such positions are very hard to evaluate; usually the
better player prevails.} 10. Nf3 b6 11. d5 $5 {A curious pawn sacrifice,
which Black, however, rejects.} Na5 12. Nd4 Kf7 13. dxe6+ dxe6 14. Bf4
Ba6 {Black keeps the tension. He had a good chance to simplify the game:}
15. Nf3 Ne4 16. Ne5+ Kf6 17. f3 (17. h4 $5 Nxc3 18. Rh3 Ne4 19. Re3 $44
{[%cal Yg2g4]}) 17... Nd6 18. O-O-O Rhd8 $6 {Again avoiding drawish lines
like} 19. h4 $1 {Now White obtains pressure on the kingside.} Nf7 20.
Nd7+ Kg7 (20... Ke7 $2 21. Bg5+ $1 Nxg5 22. hxg5 $16) 21. Rh3 $1 (21.
g4 $5 Bxc4 22. Bh3 $36) 21... Kh8 $1 22. Bg5 $6 Nxg5 23. hxg5 Kg7 24.
Rh6 $1 Bxc4 25. Bxc4 Nxc4 26. Rdh1 (26. f4 $5) 26... Rh8 27. f4 $6 c5
$6 28. Rxe6 Rae8 29. Rxh7+ Rxh7 30. Rxe8 Kf7 31. Ra8 Rh1+ 32. Kc2 a5 33.
Ra7 Nxa3+ 34. Kd2 $1 Rh2 $2 35. Nxb6+ Kg6 36. Rxa5 Rxg2+ 37. Kd1 Nb1 38.
Rxc5 {and White converted his material advantage without major problems:}
Nd2 39. Nd5 Ne4 40. Rc6+ Kf7 41. Ne3 Rg3 42. Ke2 Ke8 43. Re6+ Kf7 44.
Re5 Nxc3+ 45. Kf2 Rh3 46. Rxf5+ Kg6 47. Rf6+ Kg7 48. Nf5+ Kg8 49. Kg2
Rd3 50. Rd6 Ne2 51. Rg6+ Kh8 52. Rh6+ Kg8 53. Ne7+ Kf7 54. Ng6 Kg7 55.
Kf2 Nc3 56. Ne7 Ne4+ 57. Ke2 Ra3 58. Nf5+ Kg8 59. Re6 Nc3+ 60. Kf3 Nd5+
61. Kg4 Ra1 62. Re5 Rg1+ 63. Kf3 Rf1+ 64. Kg2 1-0
SS: What do you think about Magnus
Carlsen’s style of play?
JB: Well what can I say? I have to agree that he is a
great player. I quite like his style of play. It’s original and he
is a big fighter. He has excellent fitness and plays right until the very
end. He is very strong, but that does not mean that he cannot be beaten.
If there is some weakness that I have to pinpoint it would be his theoretical
knowledge of openings, but now he has worked on it and improved substantially.
Many times he thinks he is too good and underestimates his opponents, making
poor moves which strong players can take advantage of. For example in his
game against Grischuk in the Sinquefield Cup he played very passively and
lost. After the game he said he was very ashamed of his game – these
are not my words.
SS: What about your encounter with
Garry Kasparov?
BJ: Kasparov is monster on the board and it’s very
difficult to play against him. I gave him a tough fight and at one point
the position was objectively drawn, but I was under time pressure and it
is not always easy to play against such a great player when low on time.
I blundered and lost the game but it was nevertheless a very good learning
experience. I am still searching for revenge (laughs), but maybe I will
not get it in this lifetime!
Baadur with Garry Kasparov and Giorgi Giorgadze
after winning the Gerogain Championships in 2012
[One of the passengers from the bus asks] Who is
better: Kasparov or Carlsen?
BJ: What sort of question is this? Kasparov was the best
player in his age, and Carlsen is the best right now. This is not a diplomatic
answer, it’s the truth. It’s impossible to compare. I tell people
that it’s a pointless question. All World Champions were great players
at their time. It’s like asking who is better – Maradona or
Pelé. Both were geniuses in their own way. Why do you ask only about
Carlsen or Kasparov? Why not Capablanca, who used to crush his opponents
in blitz taking one minute against five? It was impossible to play blitz
against Capablanca. My opinion is that he was the best blitz player ever.
This was said by Lasker about the young Capablanca.
SS: What do computer evaluations
mean to you?
BJ: The computer is a very good assistant. And very good
as a helper, but you just should not be addicted to it. I know many players
who are obsessed with engine evaluations and do not use their own brains
to calculate. I do not like these new age commentators. They do not want
to put in work or their energy. They just watch the engines, take a note
of the variations and write them down. This is not what people want. I think
the spectators want to know how grandmasters think and not how computers
are thinking. It doesn’t matter if you are wrong, you must try to
give your own opinion and analysis. Just imagine going to a university and
a computer is reading out from the book. This is not what they need. A professor
who gives his own sense and opinions will help them improve.
SS: And what if the commentators
go wrong?
BJ: So what? They are human. Of course they can go wrong.
Do you mean to say that the old masters of the past were not great players?
If you would see Botvinnik’s best games you might find 100 mistakes
with the help of the engine, but it does not diminish his work in any respect.
SS: What happens when you face these
world class grandmasters who are preparing all the time using engines? How
can you compete with them?
SS: I dislike the approach of many of these new generation
top grandmasters. They study 30-35 moves of theory and cannot use their
own brains. For example if you play a move like 1.b3 then you can outplay
many of these players. But the problem is that even 1.b3 is turning into
mainstream theory! So that’s the sad part. They just switch on the
computer and try to find the best way to play against it.
SS: So how can a player like you
with a creative bent of mind break into the top ten?
BJ: As I told you I am trying to find a median between
creative play and computer analysis. For example there was a tournament
on PlayChess
which is called something like “Centaur chess”. Here you can
use a computer at any time during the game. So, many players would connect
to a very strong engine and let them play for themselves. But do you know
who were the ones winning the games? The ones who were using their own mind
along with computer engines – half man half computer = centaur style.
Strong computer + strong human always beats very strong computer.
SS: With the Candidates coming up
in March 2016, who do you think would be the next challenger to Carlsen?
BJ: I don’t really know and I am in no position
to answer who deserves to be the challenger.
SS: Alright. Tell us about your
chess idol? Do you have one?
BJ: It’s without doubt Alexander Alekhine.
The great Alexander Alekhine is Jobava’s
favourite chess player
What do you think about the Re3 game played by Alekhine against Reti? Don’t
you think it was the best calculation ever?
Richard Reti – Alexander Alekhine, Baden-Baden
1925
In the above position, Alekhine played a brilliant combination starting
with 26…Re3!! For all those who would like to see this game with enlightening
commentary by Garry Kasparov click on the link below:
Garry Kasparov’s analysis of Reti-Alekkhine -1925
[Event "Baden-Baden"] [Site "Baden-Baden"] [Date "1925.04.25"] [Round
"?"] [White "Reti, Richard"] [Black "Alekhine, Alexander"] [Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"] [Annotator "Kasparov"] [PlyCount "84"] [EventDate "1925.04.16"]
[EventType "tourn"] [EventRounds "20"] [EventCountry "GER"] [Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "1999.07.01"] 1. g3 e5 2. Nf3 e4 3. Nd4 d5 4. d3 exd3 5. Qxd3
Nf6 6. Bg2 Bb4+ 7. Bd2 Bxd2+ 8. Nxd2 O-O 9. c4 Na6 10. cxd5 Nb4 11. Qc4
Nbxd5 12. N2b3 c6 13. O-O Re8 14. Rfd1 Bg4 15. Rd2 Qc8 16. Nc5 Bh3 17.
Bf3 Bg4 18. Bg2 Bh3 19. Bf3 Bg4 20. Bh1 h5 21. b4 a6 22. Rc1 h4 23. a4
hxg3 24. hxg3 Qc7 25. b5 axb5 26. axb5 {[%cal Ge8e3] White's strategy
seems to be working very nicely. The isolated black pawn is doomed to
fall within a few moves. But Alekhine wasn't going to passively wait for
destruction. He finds a way to completely change the unwanted course of
the game.} Re3 $1 {All of a sudden the white king feels insecure. The
audacious rook cannot be taken:} 27. Nf3 $2 {From now on Alekhine makes
a series of moves that sweep White off the board.} ({The impudent rook
cannot be taken:} 27. fxe3 $4 Qxg3+ {with mate; and even after}) (27.
Bg2 Rxg3 $1 28. fxg3 $2 (28. e3 $1 {is much stronger, but Black still
has sufficient compensation for the sacrificed material:} Nxe3 29. fxe3
Nd5) 28... Ne3 29. Qd3 Qxg3 {wins. In the last variation 28.e3! was much
stronger... (see above). Alas Alekhine's original attempt to complicate
the position could have been met by simply}) (27. Bf3 Bxf3 28. exf3 {ending
Black's activity; or even by the cold-blooded}) (27. Kh2 {Black will continue
to apply pressure on g3:} Raa3 $1 {and the rook still cannot be touched}
28. fxe3 Nxe3 29. Qb4 Nf1+ $1 30. Kg1 Qxg3+ 31. Bg2 (31. Kxf1 Bh3+) 31...
Ne3 {and mate. But the quiet 28.Ncb3 would have given White the upper
hand. However, confronted with Alekhine's dramatic assault Reti panicked
- unfortunate for him, lucky for the world of chess!}) 27... cxb5 $1 28.
Qxb5 Nc3 {Now the black pieces are swarming} 29. Qxb7 (29. Qc4 {doesn't
help: hilft wenig:} b5 $1) 29... Qxb7 30. Nxb7 Nxe2+ 31. Kh2 {[#]} (31.
Kf1 {is hopeless too:} Nxg3+ 32. fxg3 Bxf3 33. Bxf3 Rxf3+ 34. Kg2 Raa3
{ etc. White's position has lost its attraction, but how can Black make
something serious out of that? Both 31...Nxc1... (see below)}) 31... Ne4
$3 { What a move! This new member of the cavalry regiment will turn White's
defence lines into dust. Now White's best chance was 32.Nd8... (see below)}
(31... Nxc1 {and}) (31... Rxf3 32. Rxe2 Rf5 33. Rb2 {lead to an obvious
draw.}) 32. Rc4 { Reti, using nice tactical attempts, desperately hopes
he will be able to exchange the terrifying black pieces. 32...Bxf3...
(see below)} (32. Rd8+ Rxd8 33. fxe3 {although after} Rd5 $1 {Black wins
the pawn while his pieces still dominate the board.}) (32. fxe3 $2 Nxd2
{loses right away.}) 32... Nxf2 {The simple refutation - Black takes the
key pawn on f2 and keeps all threats alive. } (32... Bxf3 {is met by}
33. Rxe4 $3 Bxe4 34. fxe3 Bxh1 35. Kxh1 Nxg3+ 36. Kg2 Ne4 37. Rd8+ Rxd8
38. Nxd8 {with good drawing chances.}) (32... Nxd2 {also doesn't work}
33. Nxd2 Rd3 34. Nc5 $1) 33. Bg2 {Black is clearly winning, but Alekhine's
final combination makes this game a true masterpiece.} Be6 $1 34. Rcc2
Ng4+ 35. Kh3 Ne5+ 36. Kh2 Rxf3 $1 37. Rxe2 Ng4+ 38. Kh3 {Neither now nor
before could the white king move to the first rank because of the deadly
check on a1} Ne3+ 39. Kh2 Nxc2 40. Bxf3 Nd4 41. Rf2 Nxf3+ 42. Rxf3 Bd5
{and the abandoned knight on b7 is lost. The endgame with a piece less
is hopeless, so Reti resigned. I think there is reason to nominate this
game the most beautiful ever played in the history of chess.} 0-1
I think more than calculation it was the intuition which should be praised
here. Alekhine believed that there would exist something like Re3 in this
position. Similar intuition in modern times is possessed by Vishy Anand.
When he was young it was absolutely impossible to beat him in rapid or blitz
because the first move that came to his mind was usually the best one. Of
course without calculation intuition is not so useful. Intuition helps you
to find the best move in the position on the first feel. In big time pressure
then you switch to intuition mode. You no longer calculate all the variations
– your hand does the playing. But this intuition is developed by a
lot of hard work. For example when I worked with Topalov, once in 2006,
I understood his talent. He has an amazing understanding of positions. He
could get to know the critical point of the position in a few seconds. I
really enjoyed working with him. By understanding I mean that he would realize
the evaluation of the position at first sight and suggest a plan in the
position – which pieces to change, which to keep. By the way Botvinnik
too had this same gift. There was a famous game when Mikhail Tal played
with Botvinnik. Tal wrote in his book that after the game many people including
himself and Botvinnik were analyzing the position. Tal was like a machine
giving one variation after another. And after he was done, Botvinnik simply
said in this position I will change this piece and keep this one on the
board. After Botvinik left Tal and his friends kept analyzing and in the
end they were all shocked that all their variations were leading to the
same conclusion – Botvinnik was right. This is what I mean by understanding.
You must study a lot of games to improve your intuition and increase your
knowledge of the game. And coming to the topic of Alekhine, the first book
that I read was Alekhine’s Best Games, and you would be surprised
to know that it was also the first book studied by my wife Aleksandra Dimitrijevic!
SS: What a co-incidence! Now that
we are on the topic of Aleksandra, can you tell us how the two of you met?
Baadur divorced his first wife and married
Aleksandra Dimitrijevic,
who is a WGM and a FIDE trainer from Bosnia and Herzegovina, in 2015
BJ: I met Aleksandra about a year ago in Italy. I was
playing the ACP golden Classic in Bergamo in 2014. It was Emil Sutovsky’s
idea – he got the sponsors and organized the event. The point was
to have adjournment sessions like the good old days. It was an interesting
tournament. Aleksandra came to play an open tournament over there. One of
the days I was in the Chinese restaurant with Emil and Aleksandra messaged
Emil to ask where he was. Sutovsky told her and that she could come over.
She did, and that was the first time we met. Things clicked and we slowly
fell into a relationship. Next time we saw each other was at the Tromsø
Olympiad 2014. Things were going very well, and in 2015 we decided to get
married. Now we are together and expecting the birth of our son. Do you
know what we are going to name him? Maximus – because of the movie
Gladiator in which I really love the role of the main character named Maximus!
[ed - A healthy Maximus was born in the Jobava family on the 21st of
September]
SS: Your brother, Belgar, is also
a chess player. In your encounters do you always fight it out or agree to
a draw?
BJ: No, usually we made pre-arranged draws. Once I won
the game in Georgian Championships because it helped me qualify for the
next event. When he was 12 years old he became the Ukrainian Champion. He
stopped playing chess after he achieved the IM title. But I think it is
fine because we already have one GM, one IM, one WGM – and one dog
and eight cats – in the family [laughs].
SS: Who are your best friends in
chess?
BJ: I have many great friends in chess, like for example
Alexander Grischuk, Vladimir Malakhov, etc. Malakhov is a great guy, very
polite, down to earth. I do not know why he did not become stronger than
he currently is. Maybe he did not realize how strong he was at chess. His
opening theory is very good and also his understanding. Practically he is
a very good player. Grischuk is a great guy and also one of the top players
of the world. There are so many guys like Wojtaszek, Nevednichy (who was
just sitting behind him in the bus). He is also a great person, slightly
older generation, but whenever we meet we have a great time. I do not want
to answer this question further because I am sure I am forgetting many people
and I do not want to offend anyone.
SS: Suppose you were given an option
to stop normal chess and start playing chess 960, what would be your reaction?
BJ: This idea of chess 960 is completely illogical. People
call it very original, but I don’t like it.
SS: That’s surprising! I thought
a creative player like you might love chess 960.
BJ: Ok, some of the starting positions are interesting,
but not all. It’s just too random and that’s the reason why
I don’t like it.
SS: What do you think about women
chess?
BJ: I don’t like women chess – it’s
not normal chess. Maybe women will be angry with me when they read this,
but I say what I think. Basically you cannot compare men and women chess.
I absolutely agree with Nigel Short’s comments. Hou Yifan is good,
but objectively speaking she is much weaker than the top men players.
An interviewer’s delight: Baadur always
speaks what he feels
SS: What’s a normal day like
in the life of Baadur Jobava?
BJ: It depends. Sometimes I cannot even look at chess.
Before a strong tournament I try to work hard for five to six hours a day.
I persevere before the tournament and try to conserve my energy during the
event. Many years ago I was working very seriously on my physical fitness,
but not anymore. I would like to restart it.
SS: What are your favourite sports?
BJ: I really like Ping-Pong, football and ice hockey.
I like to watch ice hockey, but I have never played it.
SS: How do you finance your play?
Do you have a sponsor?
BJ: I do not have a sponsor. If I am invited for a tournament
all my expenses are taken care of. But if I am not then I have to make my
own arrangements. It’s some sort of gambling. You work hard for an
entire year and say during the tournament you fall sick, all your hard work
is lost. I do coach sometimes, but not on a regular basis. Above all I am
a professional chess player.
SS: So what are your future plans?
BJ: I will be a father soon. I hope my son is healthy.
As for chess, I will play the Euro Cup and Russian Team Championship. Then
the Swedish League, the Malmo Cup and the European Team Championship in
Iceland. My aim is to go back to 2700 so that I receive more invitations
for closed events. The organizers do not like players who are losing rating
points, so getting back to 2700 is my priority.
SS: Do you think that your happy-go-lucky
character affects your chess?
BJ: Usually off the board characteristics determine one’s
over the board play. For example Georg Meier from Germany is very calm and
cool guy and that is reflected in his game. My own approach towards life
is also shown in my play. Generally, partying and enjoying affects my play,
but sometimes positively too.
SS: What is your ultimate aim in
chess?
BJ: To become the World Champion was of course the childhood
dream. But now I am objective, I know that it’s difficult. I am not
really thinking about it. I am trying to find my best style of play and
whatever is in my control I will try to do it to the best of my abilities.
SS: What is your message to all
the youngsters and chess lovers out there?
BJ: Chess wise I would say don’t use computers,
use your brain! On a general note my advice would be that in the race to
be more successful we tend to forget what is more important in life –
human relations. That’s why life has become so fast. It’s like
a race, some sort of global hypnotization. We should slow down and understand
that loving each other is the right way to live life.
Huge thanks to my wife, Amruta Mokal, for helping me
to transcribe this entire interview
Sagar ShahSagar is an International Master from India with two GM norms. He is also a chartered accountant. He loves to cover chess tournaments, as that helps him understand and improve at the game he loves so much. He is the co-founder and CEO of ChessBase India website, the biggest chess news outlet in the country.
Most players prefer to attack rather than defend. But what is the correct way to do it? GM Dr Karsten Müller has compiled many rules and motifs to guide you, along with sharpening your intuition for the exceptions.
Videos: Caro-Kann with 2.Nf3 d5 3,d3 by Christian Bauer and Saemisch Benoni by David Navara. "Lucky bag" with 45 annotated games - analyses by Anish Giri, Alexander Motylev, Romain Edouard et al. Update service with 43,000 new games.
Looking for some action against the Ruy Lopez? The Delayed Jaenisch, arising from the moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 f5, will be your choice from now on!
2nd Move Anti-Sicilian Powerbase 2023 is a database and contains a total of 10131 games from Mega 2023 or the Correspondence Database 2022, of which 847 are annotated.
In a total of 6 chapters, we look at the following aspects: the right decision based on tactical factors, decisions in exchanges and moves, complex and psychological decisions in longer games and in defence.
Start of the Bundesliga season 22/23 with analyses by Eljanov, Van Wely, McShane, l'Ami and many others. "Special" on Mikhail Tal, opening videos by Ponomariov, King and Marin. 10 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and much more.
€19.95
Fritztrainer in App Store
for iPads and iPhones
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.
Pop-up for detailed settings
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Technically required cookies
Technically required cookies: so that you can navigate and use the basic functions and store preferences.
Analysis Cookies
To help us determine how visitors interact with our website to improve the user experience.
Marketing-Cookies
To help us offer and evaluate relevant content and interesting and appropriate advertisement.