Ian Nepomniachtchi wins Jerusalem Grand Prix, qualifies to Candidates

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
12/23/2019 – A draw in the second game of the Jerusalem Grand Prix Final gave Ian Nepomniachtchi tournament victory and secured him a spot in next year's Candidates Tournament. Wei Yi managed to mix things up with the black pieces, only to get an inferior position which came to a close when a draw by repetition was agreed. The one remaining spot in the Candidates still up for grabs is the organizer's wildcard, and the Russian Chess Federation will more than likely grant it to Kirill Alekseenko. | Photos: Niki Riga

Chess News


ChessBase 15 - Mega package ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2020 with 8 million games and more than 80,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!

More...

Good news for Alekseenko


The fourth leg of the FIDE Grand Prix is being played in Jerusalem, Israel. The 16-player knockout has a €130,000 prize fund, with the series as a whole having an additional prize fund of €280,000 plus two qualifying spots for the 2020 Candidates Tournament. The tournament takes place in the Notre Dame of Jerusalem Centre from December 11th to 23rd.


Chess as a competitive endeavour differs from other sports in many ways. Regarding the system to crown its champions, it circles around this one huge accomplishment — becoming the (undisputed) World Champion. In order to get the honour, one needs to defeat the previous titleholder, and in order to get the chance to do it one needs to win the all-important Candidates Tournament.

Qualifying to the Candidates is no easy task either, with six different paths to get there and just one of them being relatively simple to obtain — namely, having lost the previous match for the crown. In the current 2019/20 cycle, Ian Nepomniachtchi, by winning the final leg of the Grand Prix in Jerusalem, just became the seventh 'candidate'.

Who is the eighth candidate then? According to a frequently questioned regulation, the organizer of the single round robin event gets to nominate a wildcard. The International Chess Federation grants this privilege as a negotiation tool in the interest of attracting organizers. Unlike previous editions, however, FIDE has now implemented stricter rules regarding who can be nominated — only the best non-qualified player from four of the qualifying paths (Grand Prix series, Grand Swiss, World Cup and rating average). 

Here is when the story gets interesting, as the eligible player in three out of the four aforementioned categories is the same person: Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. Furthermore, the Frenchman also missed out on the previous edition of the Candidates by the smallest of margins...and most likely he will be missing out again.

The 2020 eight-player tournament will take place in Yekaterinburg and will be organized by the Russian Chess Federation. Andrey Filatov, the president of the federation, stated: "The decision to host this event in Russia guarantees that there will be a Russian player participating". Coincidentally, the one other eligible player to get the wildcard — besides Vachier-Lagrave — is Kirill Alekseenko, a 22-year-old grandmaster from Saint Petersburg, Russia.

The RCF still needs to confirm who will be the nominee, but only an unexpected turn of events would result in the the last spot being given to 'MVL'. Or, perhaps, the Russians will surprise the chess world by announcing a match between the Frenchman and Alekseenko?

Credit must be given to Martin Bennedik, who kept the race to the Candidates updated throughout the year.

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

World number four Maxime Vachier-Lagrave | Photo: Niki Riga

The final game

Returning to Jerusalem, let us recap how Nepomniachtchi obtained match victory over Wei Yi.

After losing a game he could have chosen to draw by repetition, the Chinese prodigy was in an unenviable position — in a must-win situation with Black against a top-10 player. Not surprisingly, he played the Pirc Defence.

As it usually happens with this system, White got a comfortable position from the get go. Nepomniachtchi played natural moves and got a big space advantage, with total control of the centre. Things went from bad to worse for Wei Yi as early as move 12:

 

Black went for 12...e5, putting his hopes on the strength of his outpost on f5. But getting that square is not compensation enough, as both contenders explained afterwards. Wei Yi mentioned he should have castled instead, while Nepomniachtchi considered that the Chinese would have got some chances after 13.h2 0-0, securing his king one move later (Black played 13...g6 instead).

Ian Nepomniachtchi, Wei Yi

Wei Yi did all he could to try to stop Ian Nepomniachtchi | Photo: Niki Riga

In the game, White's advantage only increased. On move 21, Wei Yi, already in a clearly inferior position, correctly sacrificed a knight, to which Nepomniachtchi responded pragmatically:

 

With 23.e3, the Russian invited his rival to get a draw by repetition. Wei Yi could only accept the offer, and the game finished after 23...g3 24.xh6 f3+ 25.h2 g3+. Of course, White did not need to give up his knight and settle for a half point, but given the circumstances there was no reason for Nepomniachtchi not to do precisely that.

 

Ian NepomniachtchiThe eventual champion in Jerusalem faced strong opposition before getting the title (Boris Gelfand, Wesley So, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Wei Yi). Nepomniachtchi confessed that the first match-up was the toughest for him though, as he came from having got sick in Kolkata, where his strategy not to qualify to the Grand Chess Tour finals borne fruit. The Russian quipped:

[I have] very mixed feelings, because it was a very busy tough year. Actually, my strategy was not to qualify for London in the Grand Chess Tour, because I knew that London almost clashes with the last leg in Jerusalem (smiles).

Indeed, it was a very busy year for the elite players, so much so that Nepomniachtchi would have been fine with getting eliminated by Gelfand as, "at least the torture would end for me". However, the fatigue did not prevent him from registering to play the World Rapid and Blitz Tournament starting Thursday, while his debut in a Candidates Tournament is less than three months away. Nepomniachtchi:

It's a big moment in my career. [...] It will be difficult because I'm very tired after this year, [but] probably there'll be no rest because I have to prepare for the Candidates right now.

Regarding his chances in Yekaterimburg, he explained that having played the Grand Chess Tour this year should be of great help, as he faced a "similar field" — he specifically named world numbers two and three, Ding Liren and Fabiano Caruana. The player from Bryansk concluded:

I should play better than here, if I want to have even a few chances.


Full interview with Ian Nepomniachtchi


Pending confirmation by the Russian Chess Federation regarding the wildcard, the field for the coming Candidates Tournament is now set:

  Player Federation Rating Qualification means
1 Fabiano Caruana USA 2822 Lost the previous WCh match
2 Ding Liren China 2801 World Cup (runner-up)
3 Alexander Grischuk Russia 2777 Grand Prix (winner)
4 Anish Giri Netherlands 2769 Best rating average of 2019
5 Ian Nepomniachtchi Russia 2767 Grand Prix (runner-up)
6 Teimour Radjabov Azerbaijan 2765 World Cup (winner)
7 Wang Hao China 2756 Grand Swiss (winner)
8 Kirill Alekseenko Russia 2704 Wildcard (*)

(*) Pending confirmation

Nevertheless, given how competitive the chess elite has become, it is easy to picture a whole different eight-player group competing to get the right to face the World Champion...


Commentary webcast

Official broadcast with GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko via worldchess.com


Match results

 

All games

 

Links

Previous reports:




Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

heyjoe12 heyjoe12 12/25/2019 07:43
I wish that RCF had in fact more freedom on their wild card. Then they could have nominated Karjakin or Svidler who are in my opinion better candidates than Kiril.

But of course the good thing with Svidler not playing is that he may do some commentary?!
Ravindranath Ravindranath 12/23/2019 06:01
Alekseenko being the runner up in world swiss surely deserves wild card. In fact runner up in this event just like world cup or Grand prix should be given automatically a place in candidates in future.
mamago92 mamago92 12/23/2019 11:21
Alekseenko - and nobody else! We are not kids in a playground.
Rackham Rackham 12/23/2019 10:55
I fully agree with initiative comment below.
Stupido Stupido 12/23/2019 10:43
The wild card is not there to give a second chance to the player who missed direct qualification. MVL failed to qualify, the candidates event will not miss him more than Anand or Aronian or So. Alekseenko has hardly any chance to qualify but would MVL actually have more? He has been quite critic about his play this year.
jrf1831 jrf1831 12/23/2019 09:55
Well, if MVL doesn't get the wildcard, then it wouldn't feel right at all. Who cares he's unlucky. Why is someone, who gets the final once in long time, better than someone who is consitently in the semis, high rated, TOP10? Not having MVL in Candidatets would be a big damage for chess as well. If they don't pick him righaway and want a Russian instead, regardless the fact that anyone knows MVL is best suited for the wildcard, then there should be at least a match between whoever they choose and MVL.
chessgod0 chessgod0 12/23/2019 08:18
@tkbrownscombe

MVL is by far the most worthy non-Russian qualifier and Alekseenko is the only possible remaining Russian option. Hence the focus on them.

I hope FIDE does away with the Grand Swiss as qualifier for the next cycle. A spot in the Candidates is too precious to be decided by victory in one single tournament. They should add another rating qualifier to the criterion.
tkbrownscombe tkbrownscombe 12/23/2019 06:29
The regulation for the wildcard is:The Organizer of the FIDE Candidates Tournament 2020 has the right to nominate a player who meets at least one of the following criteria (provided that he participates in at least two events listed below in b., c. and d.): a. The player from the top-10 players by average FIDE rating as per Clause E; b. The player placed third in the FIDE World Cup 2019 (if the third player is qualified - then the player placed fourth, but not any further); c. The best non-qualifying player from the FIDE Grand Swiss 2019; d. The best non-qualifying player from the FIDE Grand Prix Series 2019. This means that any player among the top ten by average rating who has not yet qualified could be the wildcard. MVL and Alekseenko are not the only possible wildcards.
initiative initiative 12/23/2019 04:55
Alekseenko didn't come in second. He came in a tie for third-eighth, getting third on tiebreak. Wang Hao and Caruana tied for first, with Wang Hao winning on tiebreak. Caruana didn't count for qualification purposes, because he had already qualified for the Candidates by being a World Championship finalist last time around. Objectively, it makes no sense to have Alekseenko play rather than MVL, but it's the cynic's version of the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules. Russia is paying for the event, and in return they get to pick the wildcard. Given how many great Russian players there are, this would normally be a sensible procedure, but in this case the disparity is pretty extreme.

On the other hand, it's not as if MVL hasn't had chance after chance in this cycle and the one before it (and was also a hair's breadth from qualifying in 2012 or 2013). He has definitively taken the baton from Leonid Stein as the player with the consistently worst luck and/or worst nerves in the history of qualifying for the Candidates.
Masquer Masquer 12/23/2019 03:38
@chessgodo
A sporting travesty indeed.
amarpan amarpan 12/23/2019 01:56
Who could be an alternate 8
Karjakin, So, VLM, Mamedyarov, Anand, Nakamura, Aronian, Yangyi?
chessgod0 chessgod0 12/23/2019 01:35
It would a be sporting travesty for Alekseenko to be granted the final spot--coming second in one lone tournament is not enough to justify an appearance in the second biggest show of the chess world. There should be a six-game MVL-Alekseenko match---to be decided by Armageddon, if necessary.
1