Garry Kasparov still has the magic!
4/29/2016 – It was exciting nine rounds of blitz chess. Day one ended with Hikaru Nakamura and Wesley So taking the lead with 5.0/9. While the duo played well, the player of the day was surely Garry Kasparov. The 13th World Champion showed that he still is a force to reckon with as he played some scintillating games. We have loads of analysis, interesting moments and a touch move incident which was handled very maturely by Hikaru Nakamura.
Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2020 with 8 million games and more than 80,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!
Photos by Lennart Ootes
The entire world was looking forward to this ultimate blitz event where Garry Kasparov was going to lock horns against three of the best players in the world. This is what the event was all about:
- It is a four player sextuple Round Robin. Each player will play against the other six times. 18 rounds of chess divided equally over two days.
- The time control is 5 mins + 3 seconds delay (not increment)
The criteria for selection was the top three
finishers of the US Chess Championships 2016 -
Fabiano Caruana, Hikaru Nakamura and Wesley So. It couldn't have
got better.
Garry Kasparov is not going to keep his winnings for himself!
On the first day we witnessed nine rounds of action packed blitz chess! And this is how the standings looked like at the end of the day:
While many expect Nakamura to win this tournament hands down, Wesley So's performance was quite unexpected. Wesley and Hikaru lead the tournament and are followed by Kasparov just half a point behind. Caruana is currently on the last spot, but that is only because he lost all of his last three games. Instead of going through the key moments round by round, let's have a look at the players individually and how they performed. It is of course natural to start with the star attraction of the event, Garry Kimovich Kasparov!
Garry Kasparov
.jpg)
That will to win, the fire in his eyes, the
intent in his moves!
Garry Kasparov was back doing the thing he does best - play chess!
The last time we saw Garry at the chess board was exactly a year ago against Nigel Short. Prior to that he had played some exhibition matches against Anatoly Karpov. But Short and Karpov are nowhere close to the level of Nakamura, Caruana and So. It was surely alien territory for all the viewers as well as Kasparov himself. How was he going to fare? He silenced all his critics when in the first round he began with a win over Wesley So.
Kasparov - So
Wesley played the move f6 which turned out to be a critical mistake. Garry jumped on his opportunity and played the strong 21.Bd5+! with the neat point being that 21...Kh8 lost to 22.exf6! and the queen is not hanging on e2 as 23.fxg7 is a mate! Wesley had to sacrifice an exchange with 21...Rxd5 and after 22.cxd5 it was quite easy for Kasparov to score his first win!
While the first round win was surely a confidence booster for Garry, a bigger test awaited him in the second round in the form of Hikaru Nakamura. It was really interesting to see Kasparov essaying the King's Indian Defence with the black pieces. It was a battle between one of the greatest exponents of the KID that our game as ever seen (Kasparov) against the present day King's Indian expert (Nakamura). Garry played the opening confidently, gained a comfortable position, but Hikaru fought back and the players reached the following position.
Nakamura - Kasparov
In the above position Kasparov played his knight from d5 to b4, let go of it, then suddenly noticed that 27.Bc5! would lose the game. So he picked his knight again and moved it to f4. "I was not sure whether I had left the knight. In blitz it is difficult to tell," said Garry in his interview with Maurice Ashley at the end of the day. "I looked at Hikaru and the arbiter. If they would have claimed I would have resigned the game."
That moment when Kasparov picked up his
knight on b4 after having let go of it.
You can see Hikaru's face that says that he has seen it!
.jpg)
Kasparov's reaction when this topic of leaving the piece was brought up
This is what Hikaru had to say about the incident: "It's Garry after all. Maybe I am not treating this event as seriously as he is. I gave him the benefit of the doubt. You hate seeing games decided on blunders like that. So that's the reason why I let it pass." It was truly a great gesture by Nakamura.
Garry came to the event with a very smart decision of avoiding the Berlin by playing the Scotch and the Vienna. In the four games with white when he opened with 1.e4 and his opponent's replied with 1...e5, he scored 3.5/4.
.jpg)
When was the last time you saw the Vienna in top level chess?!
It wouldn't be incorrect to say that Garry was the best player of the day. He made the best moves in most of his games and had dominating positions in all of them. But making the best moves come at a cost - time! And he made huge mistakes in three completely winning positions.
So - Kasparov, Round four
Kasparov, who is Black, is a complete pawn up and has a great position. Over here he blundered big time with the move 25...Nc3?? Wesley just moved his rook to 26.Rc1 and it was all over. Kasparov had to resign.
.jpg)
Wesley played Rc1 and Garry had to stretch out his hand in resignation
Kasparov - So, Round seven
Kasparov has completely outplayed So and is clearly winning here. But in this position he blundered with 41.b7?? The knight on d6 was hanging and Wesley was once again lucky. After 41...Qxd6 Kasparov had to resign.
Nakamura - Kasparov, Round eight
It was Kasparov's (Black's) turn to play. The game had been topsy turvy until this point. Nakamura was winning, then Kasparov was and in the above position after 43...Kxd8, the game would end in a draw. But Garry played 43...Rd5?? and after 44.Nxf7 he couldn't captured the d3 knight due to Ne5+ fork.
The best part about having Garry back on the board is that he brings the human element with him!
Three whole knights! That's what I blundered today! Yet I am just half a point behind the leaders!
Of course not all of Kasparov's games were filled with mistakes. He also played some sublime chess and here we present two of his finest games of day one. The first one against Nakmura is special because of the simplicity with which Garry finishes off the game and doesn't give his opponent any chances.
This next game will definitely remind you of a 23-year-old Garry Kasparov trying to stamp his authority on his opponents:
Look at how hard Garry is trying to figure out the best way to win. He knows that this is the critical position.
Wesley So
After Wesley lost his first two games at the event it seemed as if he would be the one who would have to fight really hard in order to avoid finishing at the bottom of the table. But as it so happened, at the end of day one he finished on the top! He was given two lucky points by Kasparov, but he did play some excellent games as well, like this one against Hikaru Nakamura:
.jpg)
Wesley played his first game with his jacket
on against Garry Kasparov, but he soon realized
hat in blitz it is just a big liability! Jacket came off and the points
started pouring in!
Have a look at this amazing defensive effort by Wesley So:
[Event "Ultimate Blitz Challenge"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2016.04.28"] [Round "5.1"] [White "So, Wesley"] [Black "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A05"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "154"] [EventDate "2016.04.28"] [EventType "blitz"] 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 c6 5. d4 d5 6. cxd5 cxd5 7. Bg2 O-O 8. Ne5 e6 9. O-O Nfd7 10. Nf3 Nf6 11. Bf4 Nc6 12. Rc1 Bd7 13. Ne5 Rc8 14. Qd2 Nxe5 15. Bxe5 Bc6 16. Rc2 Ne8 17. Rfc1 Nd6 18. Qf4 g5 19. Qf3 Bxe5 20. dxe5 Nc4 21. Qg4 Nxe5 22. Qd4 Qf6 23. Qxa7 Ra8 24. Qc5 Rfc8 25. Qb4 h5 26. a4 Rd8 27. Nb5 Ng4 28. Rf1 e5 29. Nc7 Rxa4 30. Qb3 e4 31. h3 Ne5 32. Rd1 Rc4 33. Rcd2 Ba4 34. Qxb7 Bxd1 35. Nxd5 Rxd5 36. Rxd5 Rc1 37. Qb8+ Kg7 38. Kh2 Ng6 39. Qa7 Bxe2 40. Qe3 Rc2 41. Bxe4 Rxb2 42. Rf5 Qb6 43. Qxg5 Bc4 44. Kg2 Qd4 45. Rf4 Qe5 46. Qxe5+ Nxe5 47. Rf5 Nd3 48. Bxd3 Bxd3 49. Rxh5 Be4+ 50. Kf1 Bf3 51. Re5 Rb1+ 52. Re1 Bg2+ 53. Ke2 Rxe1+ 54. Kxe1 Bxh3 {Diagram [#] Caruana has played an excellent game until this point and is completely winning. But in blitz it is not always so easy.} 55. Ke2 Kf6 56. Kf3 Kf5 57. Ke3 Bg2 58. f3 Bh1 59. Kf2 Ke5 60. Ke3 f5 $2 {A crucial error. Can you guess the reason why? Well the f5 pawn just shut the route for the bishop to get back into the game. Now the best it can go to is h3 but from there, there is no way out of this cage!} (60... Bg2 61. Kf2 Bh3 62. Ke3 Bd7 63. Kd3 f5 64. Ke3 Bb5 {and now that the bishop is on the right side, this is just winning.} 65. Kf2 Kd4 66. Kg2 Ke3 $19) 61. Kf2 Kd4 62. Ke2 Kd5 63. Ke3 Ke5 64. Kf2 Kd4 65. Ke2 Bg2 66. Kf2 Bh3 67. Ke2 Kd5 (67... Ke5 68. Ke1 $1 {keeping the f1 square controlled is the key.}) 68. Ke3 {Threatening Kf4.} Ke5 69. Kf2 Kd4 70. Ke2 Kd5 71. Ke3 Ke5 72. Kf2 Kf6 73. Ke3 Kg5 74. Kf2 Kh5 75. Ke3 Kg5 76. Kf2 Kf6 77. Ke3 Ke5 1/2-1/2
No way through! That was a weird fortess!
If you see the broadcast you will realize that one thing that separated Wesley from the rest was his sheer calmness on the board. The minimum fuss with which he made his moves was exemplary. This was perhaps one of the reasons why he performed so well.
Hikaru Nakamura
Nakamura was definitely the favourite going into this event. He is the number two ranked blitz player in the world behind Magnus Carlsen and sports a massive blitz Elo of 2883. But today was not his day as he wasn't able to convert better positions and very often slid into completely losing situations. It was only his resourcefulness that helped him score points from absolutely impossible situations. Have a look at this one:
Here's another endgame where Nakamura began with a pawn less but ended up winning the game:
.jpg)
Many of the players would have agreed to a draw but Nakamura kept trying
.jpg)
Such endings can only be lost in blitz!
Fabiano Caruana
.jpg)
Fabiano showed some excellent chess at the start of the day. However, towards the end he ran out of steam and finished the first day on the last spot with 3.5/9. But just to show what he was capable of, here's his nice win against Hikaru Nakamura:
One of the reasons why we are able to enjoy
this event is thanks to
the excellent commentary by Jennifer Shahade, Yasser Seirawan and...
...and Maurice Ashley
Watch all the action from day one
Day two action begins at 1 p.m. local time in Saint Louis on 29th of April. This would be 7 p.m. CET or 6 p.m. GMT. The games can be watched live on the official website.
LinksThe games are being broadcast live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use ChessBase 13 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs. |
 |
Discussion and Feedback
Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors
Kasparov,E 'stato,ed è ancora oggi,veramente un Grande!!!.
"Gary,sarà capace,nel prossimo futuro,di stupire tutti noi,ritornando nuovamente,al vertice sia come rating, che per il suo stile unico!.
To take just one comment from many.. " Kasparov did not cheat it is up to his opponent or the arbiter to call the touch move". So you seem to be saying, it would have been cheating if someone complained, but they didn't, so it's not.
Say for example, a marathon runner gets in a car and drives most of the distance. Does it make a difference if they are caught doing this or not? It seems to me, its status as cheating isn't at all affected by whether anyone knows about it. Fairly obviously. Or if someone saw them do it, and chose not to report it, wouldn't it be ridiculous to say "It's not cheating because they didn't tell anyone"?
The behaviour of these people making excuses for Garry, explaining away his cheating, isn't impressive either. Seduced by the glamour. Which is of course how he gets away with it. Such effrontery and blatant cheating that the chess fan in the street, as well as Kasparov's own mind, are forced to make up excuses for why this piece of cheating is actually fine, ok, understandable, legitimate etc, why he was allowed to get away with it, AGAIN, in full public view.
It's a fascinating but depressing psychological study.
Say for example, a marathon runner gets in a car and drives most of the distance. Does it make a difference if they are caught doing this or not? It seems to me, its status as cheating isn't at all affected by whether anyone knows about it. Fairly obviously. Or if someone saw them do it, and chose not to report it, wouldn't it be ridiculous to say "It's not cheating because they didn't tell anyone"?
The behaviour of these people making excuses for Garry, explaining away his cheating, isn't impressive either. Seduced by the glamour. Which is of course how he gets away with it. Such effrontery and blatant cheating that the chess fan in the street, as well as Kasparov's own mind, are forced to make up excuses for why this piece of cheating is actually fine, ok, understandable, legitimate etc, why he was allowed to get away with it, AGAIN, in full public view.
It's a fascinating but depressing psychological study.
Caruana is #3 in the world at 2795 and 2665 at blitz, not calling him a GM at blitz is just silly and insulting. Yes the others are stronger at blitz but lets not be ridiculous with such a statement.
Nakamura did not call the touch move as he expects to win the tournament any way, Kasparov did not cheat it is up to his opponent or the arbiter to call the touch move. Though it is unsporting, on the other hand most of us were all on the Internet to watch Kasparov. His and Nakamura 's games were the most entertaining it was great to see Kasparov back instead of all the grinders we have now.
Can anyone say Why is Caruana so bad at blitz when he is nearly 2800 at classical ?
Can anyone say Why is Caruana so bad at blitz when he is nearly 2800 at classical ?
@Bellona Tribe 4/29/2016 03:42 "Can someone help me? There must be a German word for the way watching this makes me feel!?" Maybe Kasparovblitzturnierbetrachtungshochgefühle?
Question: the blitz is 5 minutes + 3 seconds "delay" - it is specified that "delay" does not mean "increment". How does this work?
Yes the skill has not rusted yet, but nerves have !. Kasparov blundering in speed chess is not new. He did that in 1996 against Anand who won that tournament by beating him. Although we all understand(not because he is 53) that he is out of chess scene for many years now, and it's not easy.
How generously Hikaru Nakamura acted towards Garri can only be measured, if taking into account what happened to himself when blundering due to the "touch piece" rule in his game with Aronian. Well done!
nice to see gary back with a bang....playing some scintillating games! hope he will continue in similar vein today minus the losses of yesterday!
Being 3rd against 3 opponents, 2 of whom are top blitz players and 1 of whom is under 2500 at blitz, is not "dominating." Dominating requires, first of all, being in first place. And second, it requires to be strongly in first.
What meaning of "dominate" means, "trailing?"
What meaning of "dominate" means, "trailing?"
so basically he cheated by touching the knight and not moving it.
Nakamura was asked about the infraction. The fact that you choose to frame his reaction that way says more about your suspicious mind than it does about the truth of his comments. I wonder if anyone else would have let Nakamura slide on that infraction. Somehow I doubt the chess community would let it go. Interesting how personal biases color our perceptions and analyses.
Taken in by Nakamura's "gesture" is like appreciating Trump's moving left in his politics—it's really about him. Fine, it seemed magnanimous of Nakamura not to make a fuss in a non-rated blitz game against the strongest player ever. But I'm sure they all would have done the same thing. But true to form, Trump...er...Naka just had to make sure you understood that he was being magnanimous about it so you could praise it. "I gave him the benefit of the doubt. ...that's the reason why I let it pass." I do not care for the guy.
Interesting to see a 53 year old retired player dominating three current top 10 players at blitz (which is supposingly more challenging for older people than longer time controls). I wonder if that is an indication that the soll called y-Generation or Millenials are indeed have soften up compared to previous generations (Karpov made once a similar statement). With all the computer help wouldnt you expect that chess has progressed in depth and understanding of the game? What would happen if these young guys have to play a 24-game wc-match? Throw in the towel after 12 games because of exhaustion and tireness?
"This next game will definitely remind you of a 23-year-old Garry Kasparov trying to stamp his authority on his opponents:"
Garry is so young? ;)
Garry is so young? ;)
@MatAlfre72 -- Kasparov's use of would was correct, though not required. It is correct to say it as he did, or to say "had" as you suggest.
Yes, you can find grammar that says otherwise, (conditional perfect vs past perfect), and that is an illustration of why grammars are only approximations of the actual language. The grammar is extracted from language usage,not the other way around.
Unless your goal is to sound stilted, you should listen to how people actually talk and not just to what the grammar says.
Yes, you can find grammar that says otherwise, (conditional perfect vs past perfect), and that is an illustration of why grammars are only approximations of the actual language. The grammar is extracted from language usage,not the other way around.
Unless your goal is to sound stilted, you should listen to how people actually talk and not just to what the grammar says.
MatAlfre72=grammar nazi
Only when one watches Kasparov back in action does one have an objective comparison as to how dry current chess has gone, how dull top chess players have become, and how far human exuberance and emotion is missing over the board. Garry, while playing dynamic and intelligent chess, has turned the tournament into something immensely more spectacular, so much so that even my friend's old granny who basically knows nothing of chess was thrilled by Garry's energetic expressions during the game. I sincerely hope Garry will keep showing up.
If Garry were 20 years younger, he would crush all of them. Nice to watch him again!
I do not know why the author of this article says Wesley So's performance is surprising. He is my favorite to win the event. Why is he So consistently underrated ? Yes, he was lucky to win two games against Garry with blunders, but this is blitz. He should not have lost the game to Nakamura either, so it all comes out in the wash eventually.
I am not surprised Caruana tanked. His speed chess was significantly below that of classical play. 2400 at best. He is obviously better then this today, but still below the other three competitors.
I am not surprised Caruana tanked. His speed chess was significantly below that of classical play. 2400 at best. He is obviously better then this today, but still below the other three competitors.
All players had theirs ups and downs what put out a large part of the drama. And everybody had to get used to the unusual Bronstein-time mode (a very chess-like one!), particularly as the average game does no longer take 2 x 5 minutes, but 2 x 8 minutes, some kind of "slow blitz". Even speedy Nakamura sometimes took up to one minute for a move what increases the tension extremely and also permits to the spectator a completely different insight in contrast to faster games. The straight expiration of the clock of from 5.00 to 0.00 without constant adding of a time bonus also has something - it is more aethetic. Conclusion: This could be the birth of a new format for blitz chess matches. The tension before the showdown tonight (in St. Louis at noon) is hardly to be outbid.
It wasn't a "sporting" gesture; the "sporting" gesture is to maintain the rules.
It was a non-sporting gesture, because as he said, for him it is not a serious event, maybe Kasparov really cares more about winning.
One of them is a top level chess professional. The other is retired. It is also blitz, and neither of them cares about the small cash prize. The entertainment of Kasparov grasping at straws in that way is surely worth more than the game! And he's ahead of Kasparov anyways.
It think it is funny that 3rd place out of 4 players, ahead of only the player who is not a GM at blitz, means to many that he "still has the magic." I guess that is why he retired before these guys could surpass him; so he wouldn't lose any worshipers! Hilarious.
I agree with @Villa; if Fischer was playing his worshipers would certainly have him at 10/9, even if he was in 3rd.
It was a non-sporting gesture, because as he said, for him it is not a serious event, maybe Kasparov really cares more about winning.
One of them is a top level chess professional. The other is retired. It is also blitz, and neither of them cares about the small cash prize. The entertainment of Kasparov grasping at straws in that way is surely worth more than the game! And he's ahead of Kasparov anyways.
It think it is funny that 3rd place out of 4 players, ahead of only the player who is not a GM at blitz, means to many that he "still has the magic." I guess that is why he retired before these guys could surpass him; so he wouldn't lose any worshipers! Hilarious.
I agree with @Villa; if Fischer was playing his worshipers would certainly have him at 10/9, even if he was in 3rd.
To use an apt expression, Kasparov made these top ten players look like tourists:-)
Oh duh, I realised whilst watching the blitz that of course, Magnus is playing in Norway, just forgot whilst carried away with the enthusiasm this event inspires. I guess holding it immediately after the USA championships was the best way to get everyone together, and keep it current, despite the clash with the Altibox in Norway.
Nakamura's response to Kasparov putting the piece down, going to press his clock, then moving it elsewhere, was perfect- his professionalism is very impressive. Kasparov is still the ebullient, at times implusive, individual, who wears his heart on his sleeve. As the commentators said when he realised he had blundered pieces- look at this response. Just great entertainment and the stuff that helps make chess a spectator sport to more than just afficiandos.
Nakamura didn't take it up because he would rather play chess against the move Garry wanted to play, than claim a game- as he said, its a blitz game and wanted to act in the spirit of the event. Clearly, he'd rather it be remembered for the great celebration of chess it is, than a possible incident. Being able to rise above the situation and act magnanimously like this- very mature and professional.
Come on, Kasparov is superb entertainment, a lively and talkative interviewee, and he happens to play pretty good chess too :-)
I guess I'm thinking what a lot of other people are thinking too- what a shame Magnus wasn't invited (or couldn't play- perhaps he was). Whilst a blitz match between Magnus and Garry would be great, with Garry having enough time to prepare and shake off the rust- its tragic to see great games spoilt by blunders at any rate of play- an all play all like this would be an even better event in my opinion. A 6 player/4 game minimatch would only be an extra round each day, wouldn't it?
Also, how about playing in the world blitz tournament, Garry? Win it or not, the audience that would draw would be insane.
Congrats to St. Louis for coming up with this event and their organisation of it. Superb.
Nakamura didn't take it up because he would rather play chess against the move Garry wanted to play, than claim a game- as he said, its a blitz game and wanted to act in the spirit of the event. Clearly, he'd rather it be remembered for the great celebration of chess it is, than a possible incident. Being able to rise above the situation and act magnanimously like this- very mature and professional.
Come on, Kasparov is superb entertainment, a lively and talkative interviewee, and he happens to play pretty good chess too :-)
I guess I'm thinking what a lot of other people are thinking too- what a shame Magnus wasn't invited (or couldn't play- perhaps he was). Whilst a blitz match between Magnus and Garry would be great, with Garry having enough time to prepare and shake off the rust- its tragic to see great games spoilt by blunders at any rate of play- an all play all like this would be an even better event in my opinion. A 6 player/4 game minimatch would only be an extra round each day, wouldn't it?
Also, how about playing in the world blitz tournament, Garry? Win it or not, the audience that would draw would be insane.
Congrats to St. Louis for coming up with this event and their organisation of it. Superb.
I think 21 moves is the shortest losing game of Nakamura when he joined the elite top 10. Nice to see Garry Kasparov being back in the board. The monster with 21 eyes from Baku as his compatriots calls him.
People still go on about the Judit touch move incident. This was a mile more blatant, and .. no-one cares? I think in both cases it wasn't so much 'sporting' of his opponents not to protest, as K stunning them with his colossal effrontery. It's like Maradona's hand of God goal, or a corporation 'too big to fail', or trying to tell the Emperor he has no clothes - the actual rules that apply to everyone else don't seem to apply. The sporting thing would have been for him to resign in both games. But no.. Ah anyway. I just wanted to register my amazement that no-one seems to mind K's blatant moving of a piece after he moved it. i.e. cheating, if anyone else tried to get away with it! And then lying about it! I really can't believe that he wasn't aware he moved it and let go. Even if he almost convinced himself.. Is this his style in politics also?
"Delay" is much worse than "increment".
" If they would have claimed I would have resigned the game." Correct your grammar! The right way to write is "if they HAD claimed I would have resigned"
nice
The old lion can still roar! Well done, Garry, you have defied age!
@Denix, no. $20k is the prize for 1st. Kasparov had agreed to donate whatever his winnings will be to the US team. The $20k is assuming if he wins the blitz.
Did G Kasparov donated $ 20,000 to the US Olympic Team? I think I heard it during the live commentary by Y Seirawan and the beautiful J Shahade in the middle of the tournament. G Kasparov was leading with F Caruana at that time.
Wesley the underdog and the former Asian Blitz King at the age of 16 is doing good in round 1, he will do much better in round 2
I was smiling like I just smoked a fat joint with an old friend seeing Kasparov get in there and mix it up. Tomorrow promises even higher drama. Kasparov and Nakamura make great television. Wesley is a surprising fighter and Caruana is the consummate pro. No excuses from him, just acknowledgement and a promise to fight harder.
well......if kasparov gets back to preparation business he will beat your carlsen
Kaspy vs Carlsen? It would be a no contest. However, if you could deduct 20-30 yrs from Kaspy's age, it would also be a no contest, but the other way around!
It was 2am my time ... and I managed to watch for 2 hours until I got too tired ... but it was worth every second!
I especially like the game vs Caruana when he unleashed f4-f3-Be2-e3 ... man we lost such attacking display for more than 10 years! Credits to Caruana who didn't crack and defended calmly. Only weakness by Kasparov was his outdated opening theories, making him thought more during the opening phase. If Kasparov was not out of the game for so long, it would have been a massacre considering he was top in most of the games by middle games with dynamic positions and attacking possibilities.
This is turning out to be a fantastic promotion to chess. The top 3 finishers of US championships becomes the qualifier to the BOSS stage like arcade game!
Kasparov is the GOAT, with or without the machine/engine generations.
I especially like the game vs Caruana when he unleashed f4-f3-Be2-e3 ... man we lost such attacking display for more than 10 years! Credits to Caruana who didn't crack and defended calmly. Only weakness by Kasparov was his outdated opening theories, making him thought more during the opening phase. If Kasparov was not out of the game for so long, it would have been a massacre considering he was top in most of the games by middle games with dynamic positions and attacking possibilities.
This is turning out to be a fantastic promotion to chess. The top 3 finishers of US championships becomes the qualifier to the BOSS stage like arcade game!
Kasparov is the GOAT, with or without the machine/engine generations.
Surely there is a sponsor willing to fund a Kasparov-Carlsen match at any time limit.
