Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.
Before the tournament began, a few players and noteworthy pundits were consulted on their opinion of the respective chances of both MVL and Radjabov to qualify for the Candidates. In spite of MVL requiring a larger number of Grand Prix points, 126 to Radjabov’s 94 (rounded up for simplicity), most favored MVL’s chances for a variety of reasons. Whether at that time this spoke highly of MVL’s prestige, or poorly of Radjabov’s, is open to speculation, but that was the popular feeling.
The tournament did little to dispel this opinion, and while MVL started strong with a win straight out of the opening in the first round followed by some draws, the Azeri player’s equally positive start with a win in round two, was then marred almost catastrophically by two losses, one in round four against Nakamura, and the next against Tomashevsky in round six. With a minus one score and only three rounds left, it seemed all but over for Radjabov.
Radjabov may not have shown the same unequivocal desire to fight for each and every game with the same verve, but when push came to shove he was ready | Photo: Valerij Belobeev
Perhaps the sign that things were not so clear came from Radjabov himself in a Tweet he posted. It showed a defiant player who was unapologetic for trying to fight on even if this eventually cost him the point. This was not a weepy apologetic participant, lamenting the way things had gone wrong, or with some ‘philosophical’ outlook claiming things would be better next time. Radjabov is experienced enough to be above such banalities (remember this is a player who was taking down Garry Kasparov when he was just 15!). He was there to fight, and the Tweet was his banner.
At least I tried! #chess
— Teymur Rajabov (@rajachess) November 22, 2017
In round seven he steadily outplayed Li Chao in a complex endgame to return to parity, which could still have been a last hurrah, but round eight changed everything. With Black, he faced Gelfand, a veteran opponent who has also seen it all, and then some, and there was no King’s Indian either, to the surprise of many, and yes it was an option. Enjoy the in-depth look at this critical game by GM Tiger Hillarp Persson.
Boris Gelfand tries to gauge his opponent. Is he going to fight tooth and nail, or will he take an easy draw? He found out soon enough... | Photo: Valerij Belobeev
With plus one, this changes everything, and Radjabov’s chances are now very much alive. Plus one might not be much, but in view of only one other player having more: Levon Aronian, and eight others at plus one, he is right there in the mix. While it is conceivable he could qualify with that plus one, it would need a very good draw in the lottery of results in the last round. A win would pretty much guarantee his spot.
Maxime Vachier Lagrave may not have suffered the two losses that threatened to capsize USS Radjabov, but the near endless slew of seven straight draws has done him no favors, especially with a few barely warranting the label ‘game’. He too is on plus one, but the chance that it might suffice to win a berth to Berlin is next to nil. He is in a win-at-all-costs situation, and will have to defeat Dmitry Jakovenko in the final round. His saving grace is that he is white.
Li Chao showed great creativity as he shocked Anish Giri with a pawn sacrifice in a queenless middlegame that left the Dutch player gasping | Photo: Valerij Belobeev
While these two tales might represent the drama in the larger picture of the tournament, they do not summarize the individual battles that took place. Li Chao also showed his resilience and desire to play them all, as he came back from his loss to Radjabov to defeat Anish Giri.
Both players have followed 16 moves of theory, and three moves later it is barely a wilt different from Gajewski-Fressinet (May 2017). Whether this was merely his objective choice of best move, or a desire to exploit Giri's tendency to avoid danger, the Chinese player came up with the strong and creative continuation 20. e4! and after 20... dxe4 21. d5!, Black chose not to face the rook invasion that would arise after 21...cxd5 22. Rc7+ and instead played 21...c5? and after 22. Bb5+ Kd8 23. Bd6 Rc8 24. Bc6 (NB: Remember you can move the pieces on the diagrams)
White's compensation and advantage were quite clear. Li Chao conducted the rest of the game with precision and technique and converted his point.
Jon Hammer, on the other hand, will be kicking himself for his missed opportunity against Alexander Riazantsev. He built up a winning advantage only to squander it. He then pressed on for dozens of moves in the endgame to finally be rewarded with a chance to win it once more.
| Bo. | No. | Name | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | No. |
| 1 | 1 | Aronian Levon | 4½ | ½ - ½ | 4 | Tomashevsky Evgeny | 14 |
| 2 | 3 | Nakamura Hikaru | 4 | ½ - ½ | 4 | Harikrishna P. | 9 |
| 3 | 5 | Svidler Peter | 4 | ½ - ½ | 4 | Ding Liren | 4 |
| 4 | 15 | Rapport Richard | 4 | ½ - ½ | 4 | Jakovenko Dmitry | 10 |
| 5 | 16 | Inarkiev Ernesto | 3½ | ½ - ½ | 4 | Vachier-Lagrave Maxime | 2 |
| 6 | 13 | Vallejo Pons Francisco | 3 | ½ - ½ | 3½ | Eljanov Pavel | 12 |
| 7 | 7 | Li Chao B | 2½ | 1 - 0 | 3½ | Giri Anish | 6 |
| 8 | 11 | Gelfand Boris | 2½ | 0 - 1 | 3½ | Radjabov Teimour | 8 |
| 9 | 18 | Hammer Jon Ludvig | 2 | ½ - ½ | 2½ | Riazantsev Alexander | 17 |
| Rk. | Name | Rtg | Pts. | ||
| 1 |
|
GM | Aronian Levon | 2801 | 5,0 |
| 2 |
|
GM | Vachier-Lagrave Maxime | 2796 | 4,5 |
|
|
GM | Nakamura Hikaru | 2780 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Ding Liren | 2774 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Svidler Peter | 2763 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Radjabov Teimour | 2741 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Harikrishna P. | 2738 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Jakovenko Dmitry | 2721 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Tomashevsky Evgeny | 2702 | 4,5 | |
|
|
GM | Rapport Richard | 2692 | 4,5 | |
| 11 |
|
GM | Eljanov Pavel | 2707 | 4,0 |
|
|
GM | Inarkiev Ernesto | 2683 | 4,0 | |
| 13 |
|
GM | Giri Anish | 2762 | 3,5 |
|
|
GM | Li Chao B | 2741 | 3,5 | |
|
|
GM | Vallejo Pons Francisco | 2705 | 3,5 | |
| 16 |
|
GM | Riazantsev Alexander | 2651 | 3,0 |
| 17 |
|
GM | Gelfand Boris | 2719 | 2,5 |
|
|
GM | Hammer Jon Ludvig | 2629 | 2,5 |
